No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.0
Projected
26–41
✓ GTWN won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.5
Projected
26–46
✓ TENN won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.8
Projected
34–38
✓ MRSH won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.0
Projected
35–35
✓ LONG won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.9
Projected
29–38
✓ SC won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.4
Projected
32–37
✓ ETSU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.1
Projected
38–37
✓ PFW won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.0
Projected
29–45
✓ USF won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.8
Projected
28–41
✓ VCU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.2
Projected
32–46
✓ IU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.8
Projected
32–35
✓ BU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.5
Projected
35–39
✓ VT won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.3
Projected
31–35
✓ SBU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.3
Projected
31–40
✓ GW won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.5
Projected
34–31
✗ MERC lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.6
Projected
26–42
✓ HOU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.9
Projected
31–47
✓ VAN won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.6
Projected
39–33
✗ TLSA lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.2
Projected
36–37
✓ MIZ won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.6
Projected
35–36
✓ TXST won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.7
Projected
29–42
✓ MARQ won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.8
Projected
34–34
✓ MTSU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.0
Projected
34–35
✓ VAL won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.0
Projected
30–43
✓ NCSU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.6
Projected
27–48
✓ OKST won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.3
Projected
27–46
✓ TEX won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.4
Projected
35–40
✓ SDAK won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.9
Projected
30–39
✓ BRAD won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.0
Projected
38–35
✓ SAM won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.8
Projected
35–36
✗ BRY lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.9
Projected
31–42
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.7
Projected
36–33
✓ UCSD won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.5
Projected
32–43
✓ CSU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.5
Projected
35–37
✓ USD won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.8
Projected
37–38
✓ UTU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.4
Projected
30–39
✓ ORE won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.8
Projected
32–32
✗ ORST lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.4
Projected
32–38
✗ NEV lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.4
Projected
31–39
✓ SF won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.0
Projected
34–37
✓ SEA won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.3
Projected
31–38
✗ PAC lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.2
Projected
31–40
✓ STAN won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.5
Projected
24–45
✓ HAW won
| Status | Matchup | Spread | Total | Model line | Spread edge | Model total | Total edge | Win prob | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Half final | 0-2 · #272 2-0 · #64 |
— | — | GTWN -15.7 | — | 67.0 | — | 96% GTWN | › | |
| Half final | 0-1 · #333 2-0 · #7 |
— | — | TENN -19.9 | — | 72.5 | — | 99% TENN | › | |
| Half final | 1-0 · #232 2-0 · #231 |
— | — | MRSH -4.1 | — | 71.8 | — | 67% MRSH | › | |
| Half final | 1-1 · #158 0-1 · #218 |
— | — | LONG -0.6 | — | 70.0 | — | 53% LONG | › | |
| Half final | 2-1 · #183 2-0 · #79 |
— | — | SC -9.4 | — | 66.9 | — | 85% SC | › | |
| Half final | 0-1 · #230 0-1 · #173 |
— | — | ETSU -4.8 | — | 68.4 | — | 70% ETSU | › | |
| Half final | 0-2 · #249 1-1 · #187 |
— | — | PFW -1.0 | — | 74.1 | — | 54% PFW | › | |
| Half final | 0-3 · #352 1-1 · #84 |
— | — | USF -16.1 | — | 74.0 | — | 96% USF | › | |
| Half final | 1-1 · #269 1-1 · #61 |
— | — | VCU -12.1 | — | 68.8 | — | 91% VCU | › | |
| Half final | 2-1 · #235 2-0 · #38 |
— | — | IU -13.8 | — | 77.2 | — | 93% IU | › | |
| Half final | 0-2 · #156 1-1 · #261 |
— | — | BU -3.6 | — | 66.8 | — | 65% BU | › | |
| Half final | 2-0 · #114 2-0 · #68 |
— | — | VT -4.5 | — | 73.5 | — | 69% VT | › | |
| Half final | 2-0 · #260 2-0 · #142 |
— | — | SBU -4.0 | — | 66.3 | — | 67% SBU | › | |
| Half final | 1-1 · #153 2-0 · #101 |
— | — | GW -9.3 | — | 71.3 | — | 84% GW | › | |
| Half final | 1-1 · #331 0-2 · #359 |
— | — | MERC -3.3 | — | 65.5 | — | 64% MERC | › | |
| Half final | 0-2 · #204 2-0 · #2 |
— | — | HOU -16.1 | — | 67.6 | — | 96% HOU | › | |
| Half final | 0-1 · #294 2-0 · #22 |
— | — | VAN -16.2 | — | 77.9 | — | 96% VAN | › | |
| Half final | 1-0 · #108 0-1 · #305 |
— | — | TLSA -6.1 | — | 72.6 | — | 75% TLSA | › | |
| Half final | 2-0 · #70 3-0 · #54 |
— | — | MIZ -1.6 | — | 73.2 | — | 57% MIZ | › | |
| Half final | 0-1 · #192 0-2 · #103 |
— | — | TXST -1.5 | — | 70.6 | — | 56% TXST | › | |
| Half final | 0-1 · #222 2-1 · #42 |
— | — | MARQ -13.3 | — | 70.7 | — | 93% MARQ | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #154 0-1 · #255 |
— | — | MTSU -0.4 | — | 67.8 | — | 52% MTSU | › | |
| Half final | 0-2 · #285 1-1 · #176 |
— | — | VAL -1.1 | — | 68.0 | — | 55% VAL | › | |
| Half final | 0-2 · #284 2-0 · #48 |
— | — | NCSU -13.0 | — | 73.0 | — | 92% NCSU | › | |
| Half final | 0-1 · #343 2-0 · #45 |
— | — | OKST -21.2 | — | 75.6 | — | 99% OKST | › | |
| Half final | 0-2 · #356 1-1 · #11 |
— | — | TEX -19.0 | — | 72.3 | — | 98% TEX | › | |
| Half final | 0-2 · #304 0-2 · #291 |
— | — | SDAK -5.5 | — | 75.4 | — | 72% SDAK | › | |
| Half final | 1-0 · #341 1-1 · #167 |
— | — | BRAD -8.8 | — | 68.9 | — | 83% BRAD | › | |
| Half final | 1-1 · #184 0-2 · #322 |
— | — | SAM -2.2 | — | 73.0 | — | 60% SAM | › | |
| Half final | 0-1 · #251 0-2 · #290 |
— | — | BRY -0.8 | — | 70.8 | — | 54% BRY | › | |
| Half final | 0-1 · #313 1-0 · #58 |
— | — | USU -11.5 | — | 72.9 | — | 90% USU | › | |
| Half final | 1-0 · #123 1-1 · #174 |
— | — | UCSD -3.1 | — | 68.7 | — | 63% UCSD | › | |
| Half final | 1-1 · #164 2-0 · #87 |
— | — | CSU -11.0 | — | 74.5 | — | 89% CSU | › | |
| Half final | 1-0 · #247 0-1 · #146 |
— | — | USD -2.0 | — | 72.5 | — | 59% USD | › | |
| Half final | 0-1 · #330 1-2 · #268 |
— | — | UTU -1.0 | — | 74.8 | — | 54% UTU | › | |
| Half final | 1-1 · #201 2-0 · #57 |
— | — | ORE -9.2 | — | 68.4 | — | 84% ORE | › | |
| Half final | 2-0 · #112 2-0 · #99 |
— | — | ORST -0.3 | — | 63.8 | — | 51% ORST | › | |
| Half final | 1-0 · #195 2-0 · #96 |
— | — | NEV -5.9 | — | 69.4 | — | 74% NEV | › | |
| Half final | 0-1 · #274 0-1 · #161 |
— | — | SF -7.9 | — | 70.4 | — | 81% SF | › | |
| Half final | 0-3 · #254 1-1 · #119 |
— | — | SEA -3.0 | — | 70.0 | — | 63% SEA | › | |
| Half final | 0-2 · #297 0-1 · #163 |
— | — | PAC -7.2 | — | 68.3 | — | 78% PAC | › | |
| Half final | 0-2 · #162 2-0 · #85 |
— | — | STAN -8.9 | — | 70.2 | — | 83% STAN | › | |
| Half final | 0-2 · #366 1-1 · #140 |
— | — | HAW -21.4 | — | 69.5 | — | 99% HAW | › |
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record