No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.8
Projected
29–37
✓ HAW won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.7
Projected
32–36
✓ UML won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.6
Projected
27–44
✓ CONN won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.2
Projected
27–39
✓ RUTG won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.5
Projected
32–35
✓ NIA won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.0
Projected
37–36
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.9
Projected
35–36
✓ NCAT won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.3
Projected
33–34
✓ GAST won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.4
Projected
37–37
✓ WKU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.0
Projected
28–37
✓ HALL won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.1
Projected
37–38
✓ KENT won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.6
Projected
34–35
✓ CIT won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.1
Projected
29–38
✓ PITT won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.4
Projected
29–46
✓ MIA won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.6
Projected
35–38
✓ ISU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.9
Projected
35–38
✓ MILW won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.1
Projected
31–43
✓ SLU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.6
Projected
28–39
✓ TCU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.0
Projected
30–45
✓ LSU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.1
Projected
28–40
✓ NU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.7
Projected
35–37
✗ XAV lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.1
Projected
33–43
✓ GCU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.5
Projected
31–43
✓ UTAH won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.7
Projected
28–36
✗ GT lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.4
Projected
36–39
✓ WSU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.7
Projected
26–44
✓ UCLA won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.3
Projected
29–43
✓ CAL won
| Status | Matchup | Spread | Total | Model line | Spread edge | Model total | Total edge | Win prob | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Half final | 0-1 · #342 0-1 · #140 |
— | — | HAW -8.6 | — | 65.8 | — | 83% HAW | › | |
| Half final | 0-3 · #355 0-1 · #307 |
— | — | UML -4.1 | — | 67.7 | — | 67% UML | › | |
| Half final | 1-0 · #170 2-0 · #6 |
— | — | CONN -16.9 | — | 71.6 | — | 97% CONN | › | |
| Half final | 0-2 · #323 1-0 · #62 |
— | — | RUTG -12.0 | — | 66.2 | — | 91% RUTG | › | |
| Half final | 0-2 · #351 1-1 · #346 |
— | — | NIA -3.0 | — | 66.5 | — | 63% NIA | › | |
| Half final | 0-1 · #207 1-0 · #256 |
— | — | INST -0.9 | — | 73.0 | — | 54% INST | › | |
| Half final | 0-2 · #353 0-1 · #275 |
— | — | NCAT -0.5 | — | 70.9 | — | 52% NCAT | › | |
| Half final | 1-1 · #183 0-2 · #208 |
— | — | GAST -1.0 | — | 67.3 | — | 54% GAST | › | |
| Half final | 1-0 · #129 0-0 · #294 |
— | — | WKU -0.1 | — | 73.4 | — | 50% EKU | › | |
| Half final | 1-1 · #239 2-0 · #67 |
— | — | HALL -8.4 | — | 65.0 | — | 82% HALL | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #120 1-1 · #151 |
— | — | KENT -0.6 | — | 75.1 | — | 53% KENT | › | |
| Half final | 0-1 · #326 0-1 · #339 |
— | — | CIT -1.5 | — | 68.6 | — | 56% CIT | › | |
| Half final | 1-0 · #188 2-0 · #74 |
— | — | PITT -9.4 | — | 67.1 | — | 85% PITT | › | |
| Half final | 0-1 · #303 2-0 · #25 |
— | — | MIA -17.1 | — | 74.4 | — | 97% MIA | › | |
| Half final | 1-0 · #53 2-0 · #13 |
— | — | ISU -2.5 | — | 72.6 | — | 61% ISU | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #222 1-1 · #235 |
— | — | MILW -3.4 | — | 72.9 | — | 65% MILW | › | |
| Half final | 0-1 · #258 2-0 · #69 |
— | — | SLU -12.3 | — | 74.1 | — | 91% SLU | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #293 1-1 · #40 |
— | — | TCU -11.2 | — | 67.6 | — | 89% TCU | › | |
| Half final | 1-0 · #276 1-0 · #51 |
— | — | LSU -15.2 | — | 75.0 | — | 95% LSU | › | |
| Half final | 0-1 · #315 2-0 · #59 |
— | — | NU -11.8 | — | 68.1 | — | 90% NU | › | |
| Half final | 1-0 · #106 2-0 · #49 |
— | — | XAV -2.5 | — | 71.7 | — | 61% XAV | › | |
| Half final | 1-1 · #334 1-1 · #80 |
— | — | GCU -10.2 | — | 76.1 | — | 87% GCU | › | |
| Half final | 0-2 · #317 2-0 · #73 |
— | — | UTAH -12.2 | — | 74.5 | — | 91% UTAH | › | |
| Half final | 0-2 · #252 2-0 · #94 |
— | — | GT -8.2 | — | 63.7 | — | 81% GT | › | |
| Half final | 1-1 · #212 0-2 · #139 |
— | — | WSU -3.1 | — | 74.4 | — | 63% WSU | › | |
| Half final | 0-1 · #298 2-0 · #26 |
— | — | UCLA -17.3 | — | 69.7 | — | 97% UCLA | › | |
| Half final | 0-1 · #312 2-0 · #92 |
— | — | CAL -14.5 | — | 72.3 | — | 94% CAL | › |
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record