No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 79.8
Projected
38–42
✗ SJU lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.1
Projected
27–43
✓ MINN won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.0
Projected
33–39
✓ AKR won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.7
Projected
39–32
✓ KENN won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.4
Projected
38–30
✓ PSU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
30–41
✓ NEB won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.4
Projected
30–38
✗ JOES lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.9
Projected
28–43
✓ SYR won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.4
Projected
24–45
✓ DUKE won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.1
Projected
35–36
✓ GW won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.8
Projected
31–38
✗ TULN lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.7
Projected
36–36
✗ MRSH lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.8
Projected
33–33
✗ NJIT lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.6
Projected
35–35
✗ MILW lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.5
Projected
30–42
✓ DAY won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.5
Projected
33–34
✓ BING won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.8
Projected
31–34
✓ SPU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.8
Projected
23–40
✓ HOU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.2
Projected
26–41
✓ TENN won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.0
Projected
37–37
✗ GASO lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.9
Projected
27–42
✓ TEX won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.4
Projected
34–37
✓ MEM won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.8
Projected
33–37
✓ LAS won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.2
Projected
35–34
✗ SJSU lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.8
Projected
33–35
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.6
Projected
35–37
✓ NORF won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.1
Projected
40–37
✓ VAN won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.6
Projected
31–40
✓ UNM won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.9
Projected
30–38
✓ BOIS won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.6
Projected
29–38
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.4
Projected
33–34
✗ AF lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.9
Projected
31–40
✓ COLO won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
32–39
✓ STAN won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.9
Projected
25–40
✓ SBU won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.8
Projected
37–35
✓ PROV won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.6
Projected
31–36
✓ FRES won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.5
Projected
32–47
✓ BTLR won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.6
Projected
32–33
✓ STBK won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.7
Projected
33–38
✓ MASS won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.1
Projected
38–37
✓ FAU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.5
Projected
35–32
✓ ETSU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
34–37
✓ RICH won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.4
Projected
37–36
✓ ARK won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.0
Projected
28–42
✓ WICH won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
29–42
✓ VILL won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.2
Projected
33–33
✗ AMCC lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.6
Projected
29–42
✗ UTAH lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.2
Projected
32–39
✓ STMN won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.6
Projected
32–37
✓ BRAD won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.5
Projected
28–45
✓ KSU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.9
Projected
33–40
✓ BEL won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.0
Projected
35–36
✗ SUU lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.1
Projected
26–46
✓ BYU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.4
Projected
28–41
✓ LMU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.7
Projected
35–38
✓ UNLV won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.0
Projected
29–38
✓ UCSD won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.8
Projected
33–39
✗ SEA lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.6
Projected
30–38
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.4
Projected
35–41
✓ GONZ won
| Status | Matchup | Spread | Total | Model line | Spread edge | Model total | Total edge | Win prob | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Half final | 1-0 · #15 1-0 · #9 |
— | — | SJU -4.2 | — | 79.8 | — | 68% SJU | › | |
| Half final | 0-2 · #360 1-0 · #70 |
— | — | MINN -15.9 | — | 69.1 | — | 96% MINN | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #135 1-0 · #118 |
— | — | AKR -5.5 | — | 72.0 | — | 73% AKR | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #148 0-1 · #327 |
— | — | KENN -7.2 | — | 71.7 | — | 78% KENN | › | |
| Half final | 1-0 · #78 0-2 · #355 |
— | — | PSU -8.2 | — | 67.4 | — | 81% PSU | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #178 1-0 · #27 |
— | — | NEB -11.6 | — | 70.5 | — | 90% NEB | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #262 1-0 · #114 |
— | — | JOES -7.7 | — | 67.4 | — | 80% JOES | › | |
| Half final | 0-1 · #351 1-0 · #63 |
— | — | SYR -14.4 | — | 70.9 | — | 94% SYR | › | |
| Half final | 0-1 · #215 1-0 · #3 |
— | — | DUKE -20.8 | — | 69.4 | — | 99% DUKE | › | |
| Half final | 1-0 · #84 1-0 · #101 |
— | — | GW -0.2 | — | 71.1 | — | 51% GW | › | |
| Half final | 0-1 · #103 1-0 · #130 |
— | — | TULN -7.0 | — | 68.8 | — | 78% TULN | › | |
| Half final | 1-0 · #231 0-1 · #157 |
— | — | MRSH -0.1 | — | 72.7 | — | 50% TOL | › | |
| Half final | 0-1 · #239 1-0 · #316 |
— | — | NJIT -0.7 | — | 65.8 | — | 53% NJIT | › | |
| Half final | 1-0 · #235 0-1 · #248 |
— | — | PK | — | 70.6 | — | 50% WOF | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #264 1-0 · #91 |
— | — | DAY -12.4 | — | 72.5 | — | 91% DAY | › | |
| Half final | 0-1 · #346 0-1 · #272 |
— | — | BING -0.8 | — | 66.5 | — | 54% BING | › | |
| Half final | 0-1 · #356 0-1 · #269 |
— | — | SPU -3.9 | — | 64.8 | — | 67% SPU | › | |
| Half final | 1-0 · #165 1-0 · #2 |
— | — | HOU -16.6 | — | 62.8 | — | 97% HOU | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #230 1-0 · #7 |
— | — | TENN -15.4 | — | 67.2 | — | 95% TENN | › | |
| Half final | 0-1 · #271 0-1 · #296 |
— | — | GASO -0.3 | — | 74.0 | — | 51% GASO | › | |
| Half final | 0-1 · #310 0-1 · #11 |
— | — | TEX -14.3 | — | 68.9 | — | 94% TEX | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #161 0-0 · #76 |
— | — | MEM -2.6 | — | 71.4 | — | 61% MEM | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #155 1-0 · #124 |
— | — | LAS -3.5 | — | 69.8 | — | 65% LAS | › | |
| Half final | 0-1 · #143 0-0 · #134 |
— | — | SJSU -0.4 | — | 69.2 | — | 52% SJSU | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #232 0-1 · #284 |
— | — | UNCG -2.8 | — | 67.8 | — | 62% UNCG | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #217 0-0 · #319 |
— | — | NORF -1.4 | — | 71.6 | — | 56% NORF | › | |
| Half final | 1-0 · #22 1-0 · #39 |
— | — | VAN -3.7 | — | 77.1 | — | 66% VAN | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #257 1-0 · #82 |
— | — | UNM -8.4 | — | 70.6 | — | 82% UNM | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #150 0-0 · #86 |
— | — | BOIS -7.7 | — | 67.9 | — | 80% BOIS | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #312 0-0 · #122 |
— | — | WYO -9.0 | — | 66.6 | — | 84% WYO | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #210 0-1 · #220 |
— | — | AF -1.3 | — | 66.4 | — | 56% AF | › | |
| Half final | 0-2 · #254 1-0 · #65 |
— | — | COLO -8.9 | — | 70.9 | — | 83% COLO | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #273 1-0 · #85 |
— | — | STAN -7.3 | — | 70.5 | — | 79% STAN | › | |
| Half final | 0-1 · #359 1-0 · #142 |
— | — | SBU -14.1 | — | 64.9 | — | 94% SBU | › | |
| Half final | 1-0 · #52 1-0 · #68 |
— | — | PROV -1.2 | — | 71.8 | — | 55% PROV | › | |
| Half final | 0-1 · #297 0-1 · #174 |
— | — | FRES -4.3 | — | 66.6 | — | 68% FRES | › | |
| Half final | 0-2 · #340 1-0 · #72 |
— | — | BTLR -14.5 | — | 78.5 | — | 94% BTLR | › | |
| Half final | 0-1 · #323 0-0 · #191 |
— | — | STBK -1.5 | — | 64.6 | — | 56% STBK | › | |
| Half final | 0-1 · #301 0-1 · #209 |
— | — | MASS -5.0 | — | 71.7 | — | 71% MASS | › | |
| Half final | 1-0 · #109 0-1 · #117 |
— | — | FAU -1.1 | — | 74.1 | — | 55% FAU | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #173 0-1 · #183 |
— | — | ETSU -2.7 | — | 66.5 | — | 62% ETSU | › | |
| Half final | 1-0 · #145 0-0 · #104 |
— | — | RICH -3.0 | — | 70.3 | — | 63% RICH | › | |
| Half final | 1-0 · #18 1-0 · #10 |
— | — | ARK -0.7 | — | 73.4 | — | 53% ARK | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #343 1-0 · #77 |
— | — | WICH -13.3 | — | 70.0 | — | 93% WICH | › | |
| Half final | 0-1 · #175 0-1 · #32 |
— | — | VILL -12.8 | — | 70.3 | — | 92% VILL | › | |
| Half final | 0-1 · #238 0-2 · #185 |
— | — | TAR -0.1 | — | 66.2 | — | 50% TAR | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #313 1-0 · #73 |
— | — | UTAH -12.6 | — | 70.6 | — | 92% UTAH | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #288 0-1 · #212 |
— | — | STMN -6.4 | — | 71.2 | — | 76% STMN | › | |
| Half final | 1-0 · #270 0-1 · #167 |
— | — | BRAD -5.6 | — | 68.6 | — | 73% BRAD | › | |
| Half final | 0-1 · #295 1-0 · #83 |
— | — | KSU -17.2 | — | 73.5 | — | 97% KSU | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #245 1-0 · #138 |
— | — | BEL -7.1 | — | 72.9 | — | 78% BEL | › | |
| Half final | 0-1 · #287 0-1 · #267 |
— | — | SUU -0.9 | — | 71.0 | — | 54% SUU | › | |
| Half final | 0-1 · #317 1-0 · #24 |
— | — | BYU -19.8 | — | 72.1 | — | 98% BYU | › | |
| Half final | 0-2 · #363 1-0 · #121 |
— | — | LMU -12.9 | — | 69.4 | — | 92% LMU | › | |
| Half final | 0-1 · #227 0-1 · #98 |
— | — | UNLV -2.5 | — | 72.7 | — | 61% UNLV | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #300 0-0 · #123 |
— | — | UCSD -8.5 | — | 67.0 | — | 82% UCSD | › | |
| Half final | 0-1 · #164 1-0 · #119 |
— | — | SEA -5.9 | — | 71.8 | — | 74% SEA | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #163 1-0 · #96 |
— | — | NEV -7.9 | — | 67.6 | — | 81% NEV | › | |
| Half final | 1-0 · #31 1-0 · #17 |
— | — | GONZ -5.8 | — | 76.4 | — | 74% GONZ | › |
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record