Sort by

Sort

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Half finalNon-conference
Iona
1-0 · #233
52
0-1 · #335
47
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
36–35
✓ IONA won
Half finalNon-conference
1-1 · #324
32
0-2 · #220
33
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.0
Projected
33–33
✗ LIU lost
Half finalNon-conference
UMBC
0-1 · #264
45
0-1 · #345
34
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.4
Projected
39–37
✓ UMBC won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
2-0 · #89
34
1-0 · #8 AP #6
47
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.6
Projected
33–43
✓ MICH won
Half finalNon-conference
1-1 · #259
25
2-0 · #33
30
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.3
Projected
30–43
✓ OSU won
Half finalNon-conference
0-2 · #214
25
0-2 · #271
29
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.7
Projected
36–38
✓ UNCA won
Half finalNon-conference
Navy
1-1 · #199
32
2-0 · #78
38
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.0
Projected
31–39
✓ PSU won
Half finalNon-conference
Duke
2-0 · #3 AP #4
49
Army
0-1 · #288
30
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.6
Projected
45–25
✓ DUKE won
Half finalNon-conference
2-0 · #81
40
1-1 · #1 AP #10
37
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.5
Projected
33–45
✗ FLA lost
Half finalNon-conference
1-0 · #246
31
2-0 · #44 AP #18
44
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.5
Projected
29–43
✓ UNC won
Half finalNon-conference
0-1 · #319
28
0-1 · #234
32
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.8
Projected
34–37
✓ ODU won
Half finalNon-conference
Drexel
0-1 · #262
30
0-2 · #211
49
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.2
Projected
32–34
✓ COLG won
Half finalNon-conference
0-3 · #360
27
1-1 · #50
33
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.6
Projected
26–43
✓ MD won
Half finalNon-conference
1-1 · #205
30
0-1 · #283
37
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.7
Projected
39–35
✗ WIN lost
Half finalNon-conference
0-2 · #327
20
UCF
1-1 · #39
48
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.5
Projected
31–46
✓ UCF won
Half finalNon-conference
0-1 · #311
26
1-1 · #32
52
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.2
Projected
30–43
✓ VILL won
Half finalNon-conference
0-2 · #318
33
0-1 · #292
36
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.6
Projected
32–37
✓ UNA won
Half finalNon-conference
Toledo
0-2 · #157
34
0-1 · #180
39
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.0
Projected
35–39
✓ WRST won
Half finalNon-conference
0-1 · #223
37
1-0 · #90
44
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.1
Projected
31–41
✓ HPU won
Half finalNon-conference
1-1 · #296
42
FGCU
0-1 · #266
42
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.1
Projected
36–39
 
Half finalNon-conference
2-0 · #124
29
Temple
1-0 · #111
42
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.5
Projected
35–37
✓ TEM won
Half finalNon-conference
Wagner
0-2 · #354
31
0-1 · #100
26
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.6
Projected
30–38
✗ FOR lost
Half finalNon-conference
0-2 · #362
30
Butler
2-0 · #72
57
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.2
Projected
30–47
✓ BTLR won
Half finalNon-conference
1-0 · #115
29
2-0 · #141
19
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.2
Projected
34–34
✓ DAV won
Half finalNon-conference
NJIT
1-1 · #316
29
0-1 · #314
27
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.9
Projected
30–34
✗ L-MD lost
Half finalNon-conference
1-0 · #217
43
1-0 · #104
44
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.3
Projected
33–39
✓ RICH won
Half finalNon-conference
0-1 · #349
21
1-1 · #105
39
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.0
Projected
30–38
✓ URI won
Half finalNon-conference
Dayton
2-0 · #91
26
2-0 · #30
33
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.3
Projected
31–36
✓ CIN won
Half finalNon-conference
0-2 · #350
20
2-0 · #35
39
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.1
Projected
27–44
✓ CLEM won
Half finalNon-conference
0-1 · #337
26
1-1 · #95
30
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.8
Projected
27–38
✓ BC won
Half finalNon-conference
1-1 · #229
34
1-0 · #136
27
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.3
Projected
33–36
✗ HARV lost
Half finalNon-conference
Penn
0-1 · #137
36
1-1 · #52
48
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.2
Projected
33–44
✓ PROV won
Half finalNon-conference
0-2 · #278
43
34
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.7
Projected
36–32
✓ MSM won
Half finalNon-conference
2-0 · #299
36
0-1 · #135
41
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.6
Projected
34–35
✓ PRIN won
Half finalNon-conference
0-1 · #302
36
UAB
1-1 · #102
35
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.1
Projected
32–43
✗ UAB lost
Half finalNon-conference
Yale
1-0 · #126
52
1-1 · #241
28
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.0
Projected
39–34
✓ YALE won
Half finalNon-conference
1-1 · #361
28
2-0 · #71
31
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.9
Projected
27–40
✓ ND won
Half finalNon-conference
2-0 · #19 AP #9
46
2-0 · #14 AP #12
53
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.3
Projected
37–39
✓ LOU won
Half finalNon-conference
0-1 · #240
34
1-1 · #18 AP #21
43
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.7
Projected
25–47
✓ ARK won
Half finalNon-conference
1-1 · #248
22
Auburn
2-0 · #21 AP #22
40
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.0
Projected
29–44
✓ AUB won
Half finalNon-conference
0-2 · #238
18
Kansas
1-1 · #16 AP #25
38
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.0
Projected
27–42
✓ KU won
Half finalNon-conference
0-2 · #225
31
1-2 · #185
34
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.0
Projected
32–35
✓ TAR won
Half finalNon-conference
Tulane
2-0 · #130
29
1-1 · #221
30
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.8
Projected
36–31
✗ TULN lost
Half finalNon-conference
1-0 · #193
36
Rice
0-1 · #177
31
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.7
Projected
32–36
✗ RICE lost
Half finalNon-conference
0-3 · #363
31
1-1 · #31
42
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.1
Projected
28–48
✓ OU won
Half finalNon-conference
2-0 · #237
36
DePaul
2-0 · #66
18
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.2
Projected
30–42
✗ DEP lost
Half finalNon-conference
1-1 · #171
33
0-0 · #250
46
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.0
Projected
36–35
✗ ARST lost
Half finalNon-conference
1-1 · #194
33
0-2 · #213
30
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.4
Projected
36–38
✗ NDSU lost
Half finalNon-conference
0-2 · #364
19
2-0 · #27
32
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.3
Projected
24–44
✓ NEB won
Half finalNon-conference
2-0 · #132
42
SMU
2-0 · #55
49
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.3
Projected
33–40
✓ SMU won
Half finalNon-conference
32
2-0 · #107
41
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.9
Projected
33–41
✓ DUQ won
Half finalNon-conference
2-0 · #12 AP #11
32
2-0 · #4 AP #14
45
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.6
Projected
38–40
✓ ILL won
Half finalNon-conference
1-0 · #181
26
2-0 · #41 AP #24
39
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.3
Projected
28–44
✓ WIS won
Half finalNon-conference
1-0 · #210
35
1-0 · #122
37
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.1
Projected
33–36
✓ WYO won
Half finalNon-conference
0-1 · #321
17
2-0 · #5 AP #5
46
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.4
Projected
27–47
✓ ARIZ won
Half finalNon-conference
0-1 · #206
37
BYU
2-0 · #24 AP #7
34
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.5
Projected
27–46
✗ BYU lost
Half finalNon-conference
1-0 · #76
33
2-0 · #46
42
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.3
Projected
34–38
✓ MISS won
Half finalNon-conference
1-0 · #281
32
2-0 · #82
36
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.5
Projected
30–39
✓ UNM won
Half finalNon-conference
LMU
2-0 · #121
34
UTEP
0-0 · #190
38
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.1
Projected
34–35
✓ UTEP won
Half finalNon-conference
1-1 · #287
36
1-0 · #86
48
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.0
Projected
32–42
✓ BOIS won
Half finalNon-conference
0-1 · #159
19
2-0 · #20
47
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.1
Projected
29–39
✓ UVA won
Half finalNon-conference
0-2 · #365
32
0-1 · #329
38
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.2
Projected
32–36
✓ CSUB won
Half finalNon-conference
1-0 · #37 AP #23
38
2-0 · #17 AP #19
44
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.7
Projected
35–40
✓ GONZ won
Half finalNon-conference
Ohio
1-1 · #128
27
2-0 · #97
45
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.3
Projected
31–39
✓ SMC won
Half finalNon-conference
1-0 · #134
45
0-0 · #196
43
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.4
Projected
36–33
✓ UCSB won
Half finalNon-conference
0-1 · #273
47
UNLV
1-1 · #98
45
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.1
Projected
33–41
✗ UNLV lost
StatusMatchupSpreadTotalModel lineSpread edgeModel totalTotal edgeWin probModel
Half final
1-0 · #233
52
0-1 · #335
47
— — IONA -1.1 — 70.5 — 55% IONA ›
Half final
1-1 · #324
32
0-2 · #220
33
— — LIU -0.0 — 66.0 — 50% AF ›
Half final
0-1 · #264
45
0-1 · #345
34
— — UMBC -2.1 — 76.4 — 59% UMBC ›
Half final
2-0 · #89
34
1-0 · #8
47
— — MICH -9.8 — 75.6 — 86% MICH ›
Half final
1-1 · #259
25
2-0 · #33
30
— — OSU -13.2 — 72.3 — 92% OSU ›
Half final
0-2 · #214
25
0-2 · #271
29
— — UNCA -2.2 — 73.7 — 59% UNCA ›
Half final
1-1 · #199
32
2-0 · #78
38
— — PSU -8.6 — 70.0 — 82% PSU ›
Half final
2-0 · #3
49
0-1 · #288
30
— — DUKE -19.9 — 69.6 — 99% DUKE ›
Half final
2-0 · #81
40
1-1 · #1
37
— — FLA -11.8 — 78.5 — 90% FLA ›
Half final
1-0 · #246
31
2-0 · #44
44
— — UNC -13.9 — 72.5 — 94% UNC ›
Half final
0-1 · #319
28
0-1 · #234
32
— — ODU -2.4 — 70.8 — 61% ODU ›
Half final
0-1 · #262
30
0-2 · #211
49
— — COLG -2.0 — 66.2 — 58% COLG ›
Half final
0-3 · #360
27
1-1 · #50
33
— — MD -16.6 — 68.6 — 97% MD ›
Half final
1-1 · #205
30
0-1 · #283
37
— — WIN -3.2 — 73.7 — 64% WIN ›
Half final
0-2 · #327
20
1-1 · #39
48
— — UCF -15.2 — 76.5 — 95% UCF ›
Half final
0-1 · #311
26
1-1 · #32
52
— — VILL -13.4 — 73.2 — 93% VILL ›
Half final
0-2 · #318
33
0-1 · #292
36
— — UNA -5.1 — 68.6 — 71% UNA ›
Half final
0-2 · #157
34
0-1 · #180
39
— — WRST -3.7 — 74.0 — 66% WRST ›
Half final
0-1 · #223
37
1-0 · #90
44
— — HPU -9.5 — 72.1 — 85% HPU ›
Half final
1-1 · #296
42
0-1 · #266
42
— — FGCU -2.4 — 75.1 — 60% FGCU ›
Half final
2-0 · #124
29
1-0 · #111
42
— — TEM -2.3 — 71.5 — 60% TEM ›
Half final
0-2 · #354
31
0-1 · #100
26
— — FOR -8.3 — 67.6 — 82% FOR ›
Half final
0-2 · #362
30
2-0 · #72
57
— — BTLR -17.0 — 76.2 — 97% BTLR ›
Half final
1-0 · #115
29
2-0 · #141
19
— — DAV -0.4 — 68.2 — 52% DAV ›
Half final
1-1 · #316
29
0-1 · #314
27
— — L-MD -4.0 — 63.9 — 67% L-MD ›
Half final
1-0 · #217
43
1-0 · #104
44
— — RICH -5.8 — 72.3 — 74% RICH ›
Half final
0-1 · #349
21
1-1 · #105
39
— — URI -8.7 — 68.0 — 83% URI ›
Half final
2-0 · #91
26
2-0 · #30
33
— — CIN -5.0 — 67.3 — 71% CIN ›
Half final
0-2 · #350
20
2-0 · #35
39
— — CLEM -16.9 — 70.1 — 97% CLEM ›
Half final
0-1 · #337
26
1-1 · #95
30
— — BC -11.0 — 65.8 — 88% BC ›
Half final
1-1 · #229
34
1-0 · #136
27
— — HARV -2.4 — 69.3 — 60% HARV ›
Half final
0-1 · #137
36
1-1 · #52
48
— — PROV -11.0 — 76.2 — 88% PROV ›
Half final
0-2 · #278
43
— — MSM -3.9 — 68.7 — 66% MSM ›
Half final
2-0 · #299
36
0-1 · #135
41
— — PRIN -1.1 — 69.6 — 55% PRIN ›
Half final
0-1 · #302
36
1-1 · #102
35
— — UAB -10.7 — 75.1 — 88% UAB ›
Half final
1-0 · #126
52
1-1 · #241
28
— — YALE -4.5 — 73.0 — 69% YALE ›
Half final
1-1 · #361
28
2-0 · #71
31
— — ND -13.3 — 66.9 — 93% ND ›
Half final
2-0 · #19
46
2-0 · #14
53
— — LOU -1.5 — 76.3 — 57% LOU ›
Half final
0-1 · #240
34
1-1 · #18
43
— — ARK -21.9 — 72.7 — 99% ARK ›
Half final
1-1 · #248
22
2-0 · #21
40
— — AUB -15.8 — 73.0 — 96% AUB ›
Half final
0-2 · #238
18
1-1 · #16
38
— — KU -14.4 — 69.0 — 94% KU ›
Half final
0-2 · #225
31
1-2 · #185
34
— — TAR -2.7 — 67.0 — 62% TAR ›
Half final
2-0 · #130
29
1-1 · #221
30
— — TULN -4.8 — 66.8 — 70% TULN ›
Half final
1-0 · #193
36
0-1 · #177
31
— — RICE -3.9 — 67.7 — 66% RICE ›
Half final
0-3 · #363
31
1-1 · #31
42
— — OU -19.4 — 76.1 — 98% OU ›
Half final
2-0 · #237
36
2-0 · #66
18
— — DEP -12.2 — 72.2 — 91% DEP ›
Half final
1-1 · #171
33
0-0 · #250
46
— — ARST -1.2 — 71.0 — 55% ARST ›
Half final
1-1 · #194
33
0-2 · #213
30
— — NDSU -1.9 — 73.4 — 58% NDSU ›
Half final
0-2 · #364
19
2-0 · #27
32
— — NEB -19.7 — 67.3 — 98% NEB ›
Half final
2-0 · #132
42
2-0 · #55
49
— — SMU -7.4 — 73.3 — 79% SMU ›
Half final
2-0 · #107
41
— — DUQ -8.1 — 73.9 — 81% DUQ ›
Half final
2-0 · #12
32
2-0 · #4
45
— — ILL -2.3 — 78.6 — 60% ILL ›
Half final
1-0 · #181
26
2-0 · #41
39
— — WIS -15.6 — 72.3 — 96% WIS ›
Half final
1-0 · #210
35
1-0 · #122
37
— — WYO -2.3 — 69.1 — 60% WYO ›
Half final
0-1 · #321
17
2-0 · #5
46
— — ARIZ -19.5 — 74.4 — 98% ARIZ ›
Half final
0-1 · #206
37
2-0 · #24
34
— — BYU -18.8 — 73.5 — 98% BYU ›
Half final
1-0 · #76
33
2-0 · #46
42
— — MISS -4.3 — 72.3 — 68% MISS ›
Half final
1-0 · #281
32
2-0 · #82
36
— — UNM -8.7 — 69.5 — 83% UNM ›
Half final
2-0 · #121
34
0-0 · #190
38
— — UTEP -0.9 — 69.1 — 54% UTEP ›
Half final
1-1 · #287
36
1-0 · #86
48
— — BOIS -10.4 — 74.0 — 87% BOIS ›
Half final
0-1 · #159
19
2-0 · #20
47
— — UVA -10.2 — 68.1 — 87% UVA ›
Half final
0-2 · #365
32
0-1 · #329
38
— — CSUB -4.1 — 67.2 — 67% CSUB ›
Half final
1-0 · #37
38
2-0 · #17
44
— — GONZ -4.7 — 74.7 — 69% GONZ ›
Half final
1-1 · #128
27
2-0 · #97
45
— — SMC -8.4 — 69.3 — 82% SMC ›
Half final
1-0 · #134
45
0-0 · #196
43
— — UCSB -2.9 — 68.4 — 63% UCSB ›
Half final
0-1 · #273
47
1-1 · #98
45
— — UNLV -7.9 — 73.1 — 81% UNLV ›
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record