No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.5
Projected
35–38
✗ UK lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.0
Projected
31–41
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.3
Projected
35–34
✓ UVM won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.3
Projected
30–43
✓ UNC won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.3
Projected
33–36
✓ DEL won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.3
Projected
31–35
✓ DREX won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.4
Projected
34–31
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 60.8
Projected
24–37
✓ HALL won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.5
Projected
29–45
✓ PROV won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.9
Projected
31–43
✓ FSU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.0
Projected
32–40
✓ SC won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.8
Projected
35–37
✓ IONA won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.2
Projected
31–39
✓ XAV won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.8
Projected
37–36
✗ EMU lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.7
Projected
28–37
✓ GMU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.5
Projected
29–38
✗ LONG lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.5
Projected
37–42
✓ KENT won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 80.6
Projected
40–41
✓ CHSO won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.8
Projected
34–37
✓ UNCW won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
33–37
✓ COLU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.9
Projected
30–37
✓ BC won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.9
Projected
34–35
✓ BRWN won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.4
Projected
31–39
✓ LEH won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.5
Projected
33–41
✗ GT lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.4
Projected
38–36
✓ NCAT won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.8
Projected
33–44
✓ ARK won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.3
Projected
27–47
✓ LSU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.9
Projected
29–40
✓ MISS won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.3
Projected
33–44
✓ TA&M won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.8
Projected
30–42
✓ DEP won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.2
Projected
31–40
✓ MUR won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.7
Projected
32–33
✗ EVAN lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.5
Projected
33–34
✓ TXST won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.4
Projected
27–43
✓ MINN won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.9
Projected
28–40
✓ UNI won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.1
Projected
30–48
✓ SMU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.5
Projected
33–39
✓ YALE won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.5
Projected
34–43
✓ COR won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.2
Projected
30–44
✓ IOWA won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.5
Projected
32–37
✓ DUKE won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.3
Projected
34–34
✓ SFA won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.7
Projected
32–36
✓ USD won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
34–37
✓ BOIS won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.3
Projected
34–42
✓ UTAH won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.4
Projected
28–40
✓ SYR won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.0
Projected
26–42
✓ TEX won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.4
Projected
36–38
✓ PEPP won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.3
Projected
31–43
✗ WASH lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.9
Projected
30–39
✓ SF won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.6
Projected
31–38
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.3
Projected
29–37
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.2
Projected
31–41
✓ SCU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.4
Projected
32–37
✓ CBU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.8
Projected
28–39
✓ STAN won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.7
Projected
29–41
✓ CAL won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.8
Projected
26–42
✓ UCLA won
| Status | Matchup | Spread | Total | Model line | Spread edge | Model total | Total edge | Win prob | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Half final | 3-0 · #10 3-1 · #19 |
— | — | UK -3.3 | — | 73.5 | — | 64% UK | › | |
| Half final | 1-2 · #153 3-0 · #62 |
— | — | RUTG -9.9 | — | 71.0 | — | 86% RUTG | › | |
| Half final | 2-0 · #186 3-0 · #237 |
— | — | UVM -1.5 | — | 69.3 | — | 57% UVM | › | |
| Half final | 1-2 · #199 4-0 · #44 |
— | — | UNC -12.7 | — | 72.3 | — | 92% UNC | › | |
| Half final | 1-2 · #269 0-2 · #206 |
— | — | DEL -3.2 | — | 68.3 | — | 64% DEL | › | |
| Half final | 3-1 · #316 0-3 · #262 |
— | — | DREX -3.8 | — | 65.3 | — | 66% DREX | › | |
| Half final | 2-1 · #165 1-3 · #158 |
— | — | TOW -2.5 | — | 65.4 | — | 61% TOW | › | |
| Half final | 2-3 · #355 4-0 · #67 |
— | — | HALL -12.9 | — | 60.8 | — | 92% HALL | › | |
| Half final | 0-3 · #286 2-2 · #52 |
— | — | PROV -16.3 | — | 74.5 | — | 96% PROV | › | |
| Half final | 2-0 · #341 2-1 · #81 |
— | — | FSU -12.3 | — | 73.9 | — | 91% FSU | › | |
| Half final | 1-3 · #246 3-0 · #79 |
— | — | SC -8.4 | — | 72.0 | — | 82% SC | › | |
| Half final | 1-2 · #135 3-0 · #233 |
— | — | IONA -1.1 | — | 71.8 | — | 55% IONA | › | |
| Half final | 1-2 · #234 2-2 · #49 |
— | — | XAV -7.3 | — | 70.2 | — | 79% XAV | › | |
| Half final | 1-2 · #188 0-3 · #277 |
— | — | EMU -1.1 | — | 72.8 | — | 55% EMU | › | |
| Half final | 1-2 · #223 3-0 · #93 |
— | — | GMU -9.4 | — | 64.7 | — | 85% GMU | › | |
| Half final | 0-4 · #364 2-1 · #218 |
— | — | LONG -9.2 | — | 66.5 | — | 84% LONG | › | |
| Half final | 0-2 · #294 4-1 · #151 |
— | — | KENT -5.5 | — | 78.5 | — | 73% KENT | › | |
| Half final | 1-3 · #340 1-3 · #326 |
— | — | CHSO -0.4 | — | 80.6 | — | 52% CHSO | › | |
| Half final | 1-1 · #145 1-1 · #120 |
— | — | UNCW -3.0 | — | 70.8 | — | 63% UNCW | › | |
| Half final | 2-2 · #261 2-1 · #170 |
— | — | COLU -4.0 | — | 70.5 | — | 67% COLU | › | |
| Half final | 1-3 · #159 2-2 · #95 |
— | — | BC -7.3 | — | 66.9 | — | 79% BC | › | |
| Half final | 1-3 · #317 0-4 · #156 |
— | — | BRWN -1.1 | — | 68.9 | — | 55% BRWN | › | |
| Half final | 0-3 · #88 0-3 · #216 |
— | — | LEH -8.3 | — | 69.4 | — | 82% LEH | › | |
| Half final | 2-1 · #296 3-1 · #94 |
— | — | GT -7.9 | — | 74.5 | — | 81% GT | › | |
| Half final | 1-1 · #275 0-3 · #345 |
— | — | NCAT -2.1 | — | 74.4 | — | 59% NCAT | › | |
| Half final | 2-2 · #205 3-1 · #18 |
— | — | ARK -10.6 | — | 76.8 | — | 88% ARK | › | |
| Half final | 0-5 · #360 3-0 · #51 |
— | — | LSU -20.0 | — | 73.3 | — | 99% LSU | › | |
| Half final | 2-1 · #210 4-0 · #46 |
— | — | MISS -11.2 | — | 68.9 | — | 89% MISS | › | |
| Half final | 2-1 · #273 2-2 · #28 |
— | — | TA&M -10.9 | — | 76.3 | — | 88% TA&M | › | |
| Half final | 0-3 · #348 2-2 · #66 |
— | — | DEP -11.4 | — | 71.8 | — | 89% DEP | › | |
| Half final | 1-2 · #222 3-1 · #132 |
— | — | MUR -9.0 | — | 71.2 | — | 84% MUR | › | |
| Half final | 1-1 · #257 0-2 · #255 |
— | — | EVAN -1.0 | — | 65.7 | — | 54% EVAN | › | |
| Half final | 1-1 · #253 2-2 · #103 |
— | — | TXST -1.0 | — | 66.5 | — | 54% TXST | › | |
| Half final | 0-4 · #362 3-1 · #70 |
— | — | MINN -15.6 | — | 69.4 | — | 96% MINN | › | |
| Half final | 1-2 · #334 3-0 · #131 |
— | — | UNI -11.3 | — | 67.9 | — | 89% UNI | › | |
| Half final | 0-5 · #363 4-0 · #55 |
— | — | SMU -18.0 | — | 77.1 | — | 98% SMU | › | |
| Half final | 3-1 · #105 3-0 · #126 |
— | — | YALE -5.7 | — | 72.5 | — | 73% YALE | › | |
| Half final | 0-3 · #288 1-2 · #179 |
— | — | COR -9.1 | — | 77.5 | — | 84% COR | › | |
| Half final | 0-3 · #306 3-0 · #43 |
— | — | IOWA -14.0 | — | 73.2 | — | 94% IOWA | › | |
| Half final | 3-1 · #16 4-0 · #3 |
— | — | DUKE -5.3 | — | 69.5 | — | 72% DUKE | › | |
| Half final | 3-0 · #193 2-2 · #174 |
— | — | SFA -0.4 | — | 68.3 | — | 52% SFA | › | |
| Half final | 2-1 · #338 1-1 · #146 |
— | — | USD -4.8 | — | 67.7 | — | 70% USD | › | |
| Half final | 3-0 · #77 3-0 · #86 |
— | — | BOIS -3.0 | — | 70.3 | — | 63% BOIS | › | |
| Half final | 0-3 · #249 4-0 · #73 |
— | — | UTAH -8.4 | — | 76.3 | — | 82% UTAH | › | |
| Half final | 0-2 · #155 3-0 · #63 |
— | — | SYR -11.7 | — | 67.4 | — | 90% SYR | › | |
| Half final | 0-2 · #347 3-1 · #11 |
— | — | TEX -16.8 | — | 68.0 | — | 97% TEX | › | |
| Half final | 2-1 · #276 0-2 · #172 |
— | — | PEPP -1.8 | — | 73.4 | — | 58% PEPP | › | |
| Half final | 0-2 · #309 3-1 · #56 |
— | — | WASH -12.4 | — | 73.3 | — | 91% WASH | › | |
| Half final | 0-3 · #318 2-1 · #161 |
— | — | SF -9.9 | — | 68.9 | — | 86% SF | › | |
| Half final | 2-1 · #182 3-1 · #96 |
— | — | NEV -7.6 | — | 68.6 | — | 80% NEV | › | |
| Half final | 2-2 · #147 2-0 · #75 |
— | — | SDSU -7.7 | — | 66.3 | — | 80% SDSU | › | |
| Half final | 1-2 · #344 3-0 · #106 |
— | — | SCU -9.8 | — | 71.2 | — | 86% SCU | › | |
| Half final | 1-2 · #281 3-0 · #203 |
— | — | CBU -5.2 | — | 68.4 | — | 72% CBU | › | |
| Half final | 1-3 · #221 3-0 · #85 |
— | — | STAN -10.9 | — | 66.8 | — | 88% STAN | › | |
| Half final | 2-3 · #183 3-1 · #92 |
— | — | CAL -11.2 | — | 69.7 | — | 89% CAL | › | |
| Half final | 1-2 · #196 3-1 · #26 |
— | — | UCLA -16.6 | — | 67.8 | — | 97% UCLA | › |
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record