No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.9
Projected
31–37
✓ UIW won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.8
Projected
39–35
✓ HPU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.3
Projected
33–43
✗ MRSH lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.2
Projected
31–43
✓ PUR won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.9
Projected
27–46
✓ IU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.5
Projected
33–39
✓ SBU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.0
Projected
33–35
✓ STBK won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.5
Projected
26–47
✓ SJU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.0
Projected
28–45
✓ TENN won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.8
Projected
37–39
✗ COR lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.3
Projected
38–34
✓ NEB won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.8
Projected
29–48
✓ VAN won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.5
Projected
35–34
✗ NE lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.4
Projected
35–39
✓ FAU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.3
Projected
35–39
✓ QUC won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.2
Projected
34–36
✗ CMU lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.9
Projected
27–46
✓ IOWA won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.5
Projected
30–36
✓ M-OH won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.0
Projected
36–36
✓ UCF won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.7
Projected
33–37
✓ FOR won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.9
Projected
33–44
✓ MIA won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.0
Projected
31–44
✓ OSU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.2
Projected
34–36
✓ RICE won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.8
Projected
32–46
✓ OU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.0
Projected
27–38
✓ UNT won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 80.5
Projected
34–47
✓ MIZ won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.2
Projected
34–40
✓ TTU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.3
Projected
20–43
✓ HOU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.8
Projected
35–43
✗ UTAH lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.4
Projected
39–38
✗ MSST lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.3
Projected
34–44
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.0
Projected
35–40
✓ UNLV won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.3
Projected
34–34
✗ ASU lost
| Status | Matchup | Spread | Total | Model line | Spread edge | Model total | Total edge | Win prob | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Half final | 0-3 · #304 0-2 · #289 |
— | — | UIW -5.7 | — | 67.9 | — | 73% UIW | › | |
| Half final | 3-1 · #90 2-1 · #110 |
— | — | HPU -4.8 | — | 73.8 | — | 70% HPU | › | |
| Half final | 0-6 · #363 3-1 · #231 |
— | — | MRSH -10.1 | — | 76.3 | — | 86% MRSH | › | |
| Half final | 1-2 · #76 4-0 · #23 |
— | — | PUR -11.6 | — | 74.2 | — | 90% PUR | › | |
| Half final | 1-3 · #258 4-0 · #38 |
— | — | IU -18.5 | — | 72.9 | — | 98% IU | › | |
| Half final | 1-1 · #168 4-0 · #142 |
— | — | SBU -5.6 | — | 71.5 | — | 73% SBU | › | |
| Half final | 1-4 · #156 1-1 · #191 |
— | — | STBK -2.7 | — | 68.0 | — | 61% STBK | › | |
| Half final | 2-3 · #299 2-1 · #9 |
— | — | SJU -21.1 | — | 73.5 | — | 99% SJU | › | |
| Half final | 0-2 · #245 4-0 · #7 |
— | — | TENN -17.6 | — | 73.0 | — | 97% TENN | › | |
| Half final | 2-3 · #211 2-2 · #179 |
— | — | COR -2.4 | — | 75.8 | — | 61% COR | › | |
| Half final | 4-0 · #27 3-1 · #82 |
— | — | NEB -3.9 | — | 71.3 | — | 66% NEB | › | |
| Half final | 0-4 · #322 4-0 · #22 |
— | — | VAN -18.1 | — | 76.8 | — | 98% VAN | › | |
| Half final | 2-2 · #229 1-3 · #135 |
— | — | NE -0.7 | — | 68.5 | — | 53% NE | › | |
| Half final | 2-1 · #163 2-1 · #109 |
— | — | FAU -4.3 | — | 73.4 | — | 68% FAU | › | |
| Half final | 0-4 · #284 1-3 · #175 |
— | — | QUC -3.6 | — | 73.3 | — | 65% QUC | › | |
| Half final | 0-2 · #230 2-2 · #270 |
— | — | CMU -2.0 | — | 69.2 | — | 59% CMU | › | |
| Half final | 0-5 · #362 4-0 · #43 |
— | — | IOWA -18.2 | — | 72.9 | — | 98% IOWA | › | |
| Half final | 2-2 · #331 2-0 · #125 |
— | — | M-OH -6.2 | — | 66.5 | — | 75% M-OH | › | |
| Half final | 4-1 · #74 4-1 · #39 |
— | — | UCF -0.7 | — | 72.0 | — | 53% UCF | › | |
| Half final | 3-1 · #324 1-2 · #100 |
— | — | FOR -3.7 | — | 69.7 | — | 66% FOR | › | |
| Half final | 2-1 · #232 3-1 · #25 |
— | — | MIA -11.3 | — | 76.9 | — | 89% MIA | › | |
| Half final | 2-2 · #187 4-0 · #33 |
— | — | OSU -13.3 | — | 75.0 | — | 93% OSU | › | |
| Half final | 2-3 · #185 1-3 · #177 |
— | — | RICE -2.3 | — | 69.2 | — | 60% RICE | › | |
| Half final | 0-3 · #305 2-2 · #31 |
— | — | OU -14.7 | — | 77.8 | — | 95% OU | › | |
| Half final | 0-3 · #240 2-2 · #112 |
— | — | UNT -11.2 | — | 65.0 | — | 89% UNT | › | |
| Half final | 2-2 · #291 5-0 · #54 |
— | — | MIZ -12.5 | — | 80.5 | — | 91% MIZ | › | |
| Half final | 3-1 · #89 3-1 · #12 |
— | — | TTU -5.6 | — | 74.2 | — | 73% TTU | › | |
| Half final | 0-3 · #347 4-0 · #2 |
— | — | HOU -23.6 | — | 63.3 | — | 100% HOU | › | |
| Half final | 1-3 · #164 5-0 · #73 |
— | — | UTAH -8.3 | — | 77.8 | — | 82% UTAH | › | |
| Half final | 2-1 · #53 4-0 · #83 |
— | — | MSST -1.1 | — | 77.4 | — | 55% MSST | › | |
| Half final | 3-2 · #147 3-0 · #36 |
— | — | USC -9.5 | — | 78.3 | — | 85% USC | › | |
| Half final | 2-2 · #114 2-2 · #98 |
— | — | UNLV -4.8 | — | 75.0 | — | 70% UNLV | › | |
| Half final | 3-1 · #60 4-1 · #140 |
— | — | ASU -0.1 | — | 68.3 | — | 51% ASU | › |
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record