No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.7
Projected
26–40
✓ GTWN won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.8
Projected
29–37
✓ NAVY won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.6
Projected
36–35
✓ FAIR won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.5
Projected
34–32
✓ HARV won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.3
Projected
28–46
✓ ILL won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.9
Projected
34–37
✓ SPU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.0
Projected
30–42
✓ MARQ won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 81.1
Projected
37–45
✓ KENT won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.1
Projected
28–42
✓ DAY won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.4
Projected
29–43
✓ OKST won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.9
Projected
34–38
✗ MASS lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.5
Projected
32–33
✗ BING lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.0
Projected
36–38
✗ EKU lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.4
Projected
40–39
✓ PROV won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.7
Projected
28–41
✓ CSUB won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.4
Projected
34–38
✗ DUQ lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.3
Projected
33–32
✓ NIA won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.7
Projected
36–38
✓ UTC won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.7
Projected
32–39
✓ UIC won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.4
Projected
39–33
✗ UTM lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.7
Projected
34–39
✓ NEV won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
34–36
✓ LIP won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.7
Projected
35–35
✗ MOST lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.0
Projected
35–38
✓ ORST won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.9
Projected
32–34
✗ MINN lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.7
Projected
41–33
✓ STMN won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.3
Projected
34–41
✓ HPU won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.2
Projected
37–34
✗ MORE lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.4
Projected
35–34
✓ CCU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.7
Projected
35–35
✗ VMI lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
33–38
✗ INST lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.2
Projected
34–41
✗ WICH lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.3
Projected
31–43
✓ RICH won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.2
Projected
25–44
✓ VCU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.2
Projected
38–36
✓ UNCO won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.4
Projected
37–40
✗ USM lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.5
Projected
36–36
✗ WEB lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.0
Projected
32–31
✓ UNI won
| Status | Matchup | Spread | Total | Model line | Spread edge | Model total | Total edge | Win prob | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Half final | 0-4 · #354 4-0 · #64 |
— | — | GTWN -14.0 | — | 65.7 | — | 94% GTWN | › | |
| Half final | 3-2 · #316 1-3 · #199 |
— | — | NAVY -8.6 | — | 65.8 | — | 83% NAVY | › | |
| Half final | 3-2 · #239 1-3 · #332 |
— | — | FAIR -0.7 | — | 70.6 | — | 53% FAIR | › | |
| Half final | 3-2 · #136 2-3 · #261 |
— | — | HARV -1.5 | — | 65.5 | — | 57% HARV | › | |
| Half final | 3-2 · #324 4-1 · #4 |
— | — | ILL -18.5 | — | 74.3 | — | 98% ILL | › | |
| Half final | 0-5 · #307 1-3 · #269 |
— | — | SPU -3.0 | — | 70.9 | — | 63% SPU | › | |
| Half final | 2-3 · #270 3-3 · #42 |
— | — | MARQ -12.6 | — | 72.0 | — | 92% MARQ | › | |
| Half final | 1-4 · #315 5-1 · #151 |
— | — | KENT -7.8 | — | 81.1 | — | 80% KENT | › | |
| Half final | 0-4 · #357 4-1 · #91 |
— | — | DAY -14.1 | — | 70.1 | — | 94% DAY | › | |
| Half final | 0-4 · #285 5-0 · #45 |
— | — | OKST -14.0 | — | 72.4 | — | 94% OKST | › | |
| Half final | 0-5 · #226 3-2 · #209 |
— | — | MASS -3.9 | — | 71.9 | — | 66% MASS | › | |
| Half final | 1-5 · #364 0-4 · #272 |
— | — | BING -1.1 | — | 64.5 | — | 55% BING | › | |
| Half final | 1-2 · #242 0-3 · #294 |
— | — | EKU -1.5 | — | 74.0 | — | 56% EKU | › | |
| Half final | 3-2 · #52 5-0 · #78 |
— | — | PROV -1.1 | — | 78.4 | — | 55% PROV | › | |
| Half final | 0-5 · #366 1-3 · #329 |
— | — | CSUB -12.5 | — | 68.7 | — | 91% CSUB | › | |
| Half final | 2-3 · #229 4-1 · #107 |
— | — | DUQ -4.0 | — | 71.4 | — | 67% DUQ | › | |
| Half final | 2-3 · #346 1-3 · #197 |
— | — | NIA -0.6 | — | 64.3 | — | 53% NIA | › | |
| Half final | 1-3 · #292 1-3 · #227 |
— | — | UTC -1.5 | — | 73.7 | — | 57% UTC | › | |
| Half final | 0-4 · #304 2-2 · #110 |
— | — | UIC -6.9 | — | 71.7 | — | 78% UIC | › | |
| Half final | 2-1 · #341 0-3 · #343 |
— | — | UTM -5.9 | — | 72.4 | — | 74% UTM | › | |
| Half final | 2-1 · #134 3-2 · #96 |
— | — | NEV -4.7 | — | 72.7 | — | 70% NEV | › | |
| Half final | 2-2 · #215 0-4 · #214 |
— | — | LIP -2.2 | — | 70.5 | — | 59% LIP | › | |
| Half final | 1-2 · #287 0-2 · #250 |
— | — | MOST -0.4 | — | 69.7 | — | 52% MOST | › | |
| Half final | 4-1 · #233 3-2 · #99 |
— | — | ORST -3.8 | — | 73.0 | — | 66% ORST | › | |
| Half final | 3-1 · #161 4-1 · #70 |
— | — | MINN -1.5 | — | 65.9 | — | 56% MINN | › | |
| Half final | 4-2 · #212 0-4 · #312 |
— | — | STMN -7.3 | — | 73.7 | — | 79% STMN | › | |
| Half final | 1-2 · #289 4-1 · #90 |
— | — | HPU -6.7 | — | 74.3 | — | 77% HPU | › | |
| Half final | 0-4 · #350 0-4 · #358 |
— | — | MORE -3.3 | — | 71.2 | — | 64% MORE | › | |
| Half final | 2-2 · #283 1-4 · #336 |
— | — | CCU -1.2 | — | 69.4 | — | 55% CCU | › | |
| Half final | 1-3 · #320 1-3 · #303 |
— | — | VMI -0.7 | — | 69.7 | — | 53% VMI | › | |
| Half final | 1-2 · #181 2-2 · #207 |
— | — | INST -5.0 | — | 70.5 | — | 71% INST | › | |
| Half final | 2-3 · #235 3-1 · #77 |
— | — | WICH -6.8 | — | 74.2 | — | 77% WICH | › | |
| Half final | 0-4 · #348 3-0 · #104 |
— | — | RICH -11.7 | — | 73.3 | — | 90% RICH | › | |
| Half final | 0-6 · #352 2-2 · #61 |
— | — | VCU -18.4 | — | 69.2 | — | 98% VCU | › | |
| Half final | 1-1 · #219 3-1 · #169 |
— | — | UNCO -2.0 | — | 74.2 | — | 59% UNCO | › | |
| Half final | 0-3 · #333 0-3 · #224 |
— | — | USM -3.0 | — | 77.4 | — | 63% USM | › | |
| Half final | 2-2 · #257 1-3 · #313 |
— | — | WEB -0.5 | — | 71.5 | — | 52% WEB | › | |
| Half final | 4-0 · #131 1-2 · #149 |
— | — | UNI -1.5 | — | 63.0 | — | 56% UNI | › |
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record