Sort by

Sort

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
2-2 · #191
19
1-4 · #202
30
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.4
Projected
35–37
✓ BCU won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
Towson
3-2 · #165
36
3-0 · #160
37
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.0
Projected
31–33
✓ LIB won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-0 · #10 AP #11
47
1-3 · #145
24
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.1
Projected
41–28
✓ MSU won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
4-2 · #62
24
4-2 · #71
36
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.6
Projected
33–36
✓ ND won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
3-2 · #163
28
2-3 · #223
20
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.6
Projected
34–32
✓ PAC won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1-5 · #284
29
1-3 · #206
27
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.2
Projected
36–36
✗ DEL lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
Tulsa
3-1 · #108
43
1-3 · #143
33
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.7
Projected
37–35
✓ TLSA won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
3-2 · #37
26
5-0 · #13 AP #15
40
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.1
Projected
33–39
✓ ISU won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1-3 · #342
46
Army
0-5 · #288
36
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.0
Projected
35–34
✓ ETAM won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
4-1 · #48 AP #23
34
4-1 · #86
28
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.8
Projected
36–34
✓ NCSU won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
4-2 · #105
35
2-2 · #186
30
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.1
Projected
37–34
✓ URI won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
3-4 · #184
37
0-5 · #208
32
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.0
Projected
38–33
✓ SAM won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
4-1 · #63
25
Kansas
4-2 · #16
34
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.2
Projected
33–36
✓ KU won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
UTEP
0-3 · #190
34
UAB
4-2 · #102
37
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.2
Projected
33–38
✓ UAB won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-0 · #131
45
1-5 · #113
26
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.2
Projected
35–30
✓ UNI won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
3-2 · #9 AP #14
43
Baylor
4-0 · #29
34
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.4
Projected
42–36
✓ SJU won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
2-1 · #148
34
0-5 · #305
37
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.9
Projected
42–36
✗ KENN lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
LMU
5-1 · #121
31
Ohio
1-5 · #128
32
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.7
Projected
36–34
✗ LMU lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
4-0 · #123
44
3-3 · #167
33
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.3
Projected
35–34
✓ UCSD won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
MTSU
2-2 · #154
34
3-1 · #127
28
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.7
Projected
34–38
✗ MCN lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
6-0 · #67
42
USC
5-0 · #36
38
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.5
Projected
35–37
✗ USC lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
6-0 · #7 AP #17
35
6-0 · #2 AP #3
39
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.4
Projected
30–33
✓ HOU won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-0 · #142
33
5-0 · #44 AP #16
35
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.8
Projected
32–39
✓ UNC won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1-2 · #150
29
2-2 · #201
24
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.0
Projected
36–37
✗ SDST lost
Half finalNon-conference
Drexel
2-4 · #262
34
0-5 · #345
28
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.3
Projected
37–33
✓ DREX won
Half finalNon-conference
0-3 · #245
34
1-3 · #271
40
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.3
Projected
37–39
✓ UNCA won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
3-2 · #217
39
2-2 · #253
32
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.4
Projected
35–33
✓ W&M won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
2-2 · #146
39
5-0 · #203
40
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.9
Projected
33–36
✓ CBU won
Half finalNon-conference
1-5 · #278
26
5-0 · #33
52
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.0
Projected
28–43
✓ OSU won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
Omaha
1-4 · #279
32
3-3 · #158
48
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.6
Projected
37–38
✓ JMU won
Half finalNon-conference
0-5 · #357
24
1-4 · #325
39
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.4
Projected
34–38
✓ UPST won
Half finalNon-conference
3-3 · #261
35
5-1 · #78
51
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.3
Projected
30–38
✓ PSU won
Half finalNon-conference
2-3 · #329
24
4-1 · #81
35
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.5
Projected
30–44
✓ FSU won
Half finalNon-conference
2-4 · #234
36
4-1 · #32
40
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.3
Projected
28–41
✓ VILL won
Half finalNon-conference
1-3 · #180
42
2-3 · #303
23
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
38–32
✓ WRST won
Half finalNon-conference
Rice
1-5 · #177
24
FGCU
3-2 · #266
17
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.0
Projected
35–38
✗ FGCU lost
Half finalNon-conference
1-1 · #300
38
1-4 · #295
35
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.1
Projected
34–35
✗ BELL lost
Half finalNon-conference
1-5 · #159
39
2-5 · #364
28
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 60.8
Projected
32–29
✓ HAMP won
Half finalNon-conference
0-6 · #362
35
0-5 · #249
37
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.6
Projected
32–39
✓ PFW won
Half finalNon-conference
3-2 · #241
52
UCF
5-1 · #39
47
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.0
Projected
34–42
✗ UCF lost
Half finalNon-conference
2-3 · #243
23
4-2 · #89
50
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.9
Projected
32–42
✓ WAKE won
Half finalNon-conference
Lehigh
1-4 · #216
21
Marist
2-2 · #236
38
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.2
Projected
29–33
✓ MRST won
Half finalNon-conference
0-7 · #352
24
Rider
0-4 · #347
37
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.8
Projected
31–37
✓ RID won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-0 · #93
40
FAU
4-1 · #109
25
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.7
Projected
36–34
✓ GMU won
Half finalNon-conference
1-3 · #361
26
1-4 · #240
43
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.3
Projected
32–34
✓ CARK won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
4-3 · #132
45
6-1 · #101
43
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.6
Projected
37–41
✗ GW lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
Temple
3-2 · #111
32
2-4 · #135
36
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.8
Projected
38–34
✗ TEM lost
Half finalNon-conference
5-1 · #83
27
5-0 · #38 AP #25
39
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.5
Projected
36–39
✓ IU won
Half finalNon-conference
0-6 · #366
35
4-2 · #28
52
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.4
Projected
24–49
✓ TA&M won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
0-4 · #306
29
2-4 · #164
31
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.6
Projected
38–39
✓ CP won
Half finalNon-conference
0-6 · #353
30
6-0 · #54
55
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.2
Projected
28–46
✓ MIZ won
Half finalNon-conference
0-5 · #254
30
3-2 · #112
33
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.5
Projected
30–37
✓ UNT won
Half finalNon-conference
2-3 · #334
38
2-3 · #210
41
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.4
Projected
32–37
✓ APSU won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
2-3 · #139
48
5-1 · #60
42
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.8
Projected
35–39
✗ ASU lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
Auburn
5-1 · #21 AP #21
31
5-0 · #8 AP #7
59
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.5
Projected
38–40
✓ MICH won
Half finalNon-conference
3-3 · #205
36
6-0 · #27
32
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.8
Projected
34–42
✗ NEB lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
2-0 · #133
26
1-3 · #149
20
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.8
Projected
35–33
✓ NMSU won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
UTSA
1-3 · #192
29
2-4 · #296
33
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.5
Projected
37–37
✗ UTSA lost
Half finalNon-conference
1-5 · #204
46
2-3 · #273
43
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.9
Projected
39–38
✓ OAK won
Half finalNon-conference
1-2 · #274
24
2-4 · #268
26
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.8
Projected
37–35
✗ PRST lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-1 · #50
32
6-0 · #17 AP #12
47
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.0
Projected
32–41
✓ GONZ won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-0 · #46
31
Iowa
5-0 · #43
31
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.7
Projected
35–38
 
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
UCLA
5-1 · #26 AP #18
41
5-1 · #92
36
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.0
Projected
37–32
✓ UCLA won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
2-2 · #75
51
Oregon
4-1 · #57
41
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.6
Projected
33–35
✗ ORE lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
UNLV
3-3 · #98
36
3-2 · #15 AP #8
51
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 83.9
Projected
37–47
✓ ALA won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
Utah
5-1 · #73
28
3-2 · #80
33
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.6
Projected
38–38
✗ UTAH lost
StatusMatchupSpreadTotalModel lineSpread edgeModel totalTotal edgeWin probModel
Half final
2-2 · #191
19
1-4 · #202
30
— — BCU -2.3 — 71.4 — 60% BCU ›
Half final
3-2 · #165
36
3-0 · #160
37
— — LIB -1.7 — 64.0 — 57% LIB ›
Half final
5-0 · #10
47
1-3 · #145
24
— — MSU -13.4 — 69.1 — 93% MSU ›
Half final
4-2 · #62
24
4-2 · #71
36
— — ND -3.1 — 68.6 — 63% ND ›
Half final
3-2 · #163
28
2-3 · #223
20
— — PAC -2.7 — 65.6 — 62% PAC ›
Half final
1-5 · #284
29
1-3 · #206
27
— — DEL -0.1 — 71.2 — 51% DEL ›
Half final
3-1 · #108
43
1-3 · #143
33
— — TLSA -2.0 — 71.7 — 59% TLSA ›
Half final
3-2 · #37
26
5-0 · #13
40
— — ISU -6.3 — 72.1 — 75% ISU ›
Half final
1-3 · #342
46
0-5 · #288
36
— — ETAM -1.1 — 69.0 — 55% ETAM ›
Half final
4-1 · #48
34
4-1 · #86
28
— — NCSU -2.0 — 70.8 — 59% NCSU ›
Half final
4-2 · #105
35
2-2 · #186
30
— — URI -3.3 — 71.1 — 64% URI ›
Half final
3-4 · #184
37
0-5 · #208
32
— — SAM -5.2 — 71.0 — 72% SAM ›
Half final
4-1 · #63
25
4-2 · #16
34
— — KU -2.5 — 69.2 — 61% KU ›
Half final
0-3 · #190
34
4-2 · #102
37
— — UAB -5.2 — 71.2 — 71% UAB ›
Half final
5-0 · #131
45
1-5 · #113
26
— — UNI -5.3 — 64.2 — 72% UNI ›
Half final
3-2 · #9
43
4-0 · #29
34
— — SJU -6.3 — 77.4 — 75% SJU ›
Half final
2-1 · #148
34
0-5 · #305
37
— — KENN -6.0 — 78.9 — 74% KENN ›
Half final
5-1 · #121
31
1-5 · #128
32
— — LMU -1.7 — 69.7 — 57% LMU ›
Half final
4-0 · #123
44
3-3 · #167
33
— — UCSD -1.4 — 68.3 — 56% UCSD ›
Half final
2-2 · #154
34
3-1 · #127
28
— — MCN -3.5 — 71.7 — 65% MCN ›
Half final
6-0 · #67
42
5-0 · #36
38
— — USC -2.1 — 71.5 — 59% USC ›
Half final
6-0 · #7
35
6-0 · #2
39
— — HOU -2.7 — 63.4 — 62% HOU ›
Half final
5-0 · #142
33
5-0 · #44
35
— — UNC -7.4 — 70.8 — 79% UNC ›
Half final
1-2 · #150
29
2-2 · #201
24
— — SDST -1.1 — 73.0 — 55% SDST ›
Half final
2-4 · #262
34
0-5 · #345
28
— — DREX -4.0 — 69.3 — 67% DREX ›
Half final
0-3 · #245
34
1-3 · #271
40
— — UNCA -2.3 — 75.3 — 60% UNCA ›
Half final
3-2 · #217
39
2-2 · #253
32
— — W&M -1.8 — 68.4 — 58% W&M ›
Half final
2-2 · #146
39
5-0 · #203
40
— — CBU -3.8 — 68.9 — 66% CBU ›
Half final
1-5 · #278
26
5-0 · #33
52
— — OSU -15.5 — 71.0 — 95% OSU ›
Half final
1-4 · #279
32
3-3 · #158
48
— — JMU -1.3 — 74.6 — 56% JMU ›
Half final
0-5 · #357
24
1-4 · #325
39
— — UPST -4.1 — 71.4 — 67% UPST ›
Half final
3-3 · #261
35
5-1 · #78
51
— — PSU -8.1 — 68.3 — 81% PSU ›
Half final
2-3 · #329
24
4-1 · #81
35
— — FSU -13.7 — 73.5 — 93% FSU ›
Half final
2-4 · #234
36
4-1 · #32
40
— — VILL -13.1 — 68.3 — 92% VILL ›
Half final
1-3 · #180
42
2-3 · #303
23
— — WRST -6.1 — 70.5 — 75% WRST ›
Half final
1-5 · #177
24
3-2 · #266
17
— — FGCU -2.5 — 73.0 — 61% FGCU ›
Half final
1-1 · #300
38
1-4 · #295
35
— — BELL -1.4 — 69.1 — 56% BELL ›
Half final
1-5 · #159
39
2-5 · #364
28
— — HAMP -3.6 — 60.8 — 65% HAMP ›
Half final
0-6 · #362
35
0-5 · #249
37
— — PFW -7.0 — 71.6 — 78% PFW ›
Half final
3-2 · #241
52
5-1 · #39
47
— — UCF -8.7 — 76.0 — 83% UCF ›
Half final
2-3 · #243
23
4-2 · #89
50
— — WAKE -9.6 — 73.9 — 85% WAKE ›
Half final
1-4 · #216
21
2-2 · #236
38
— — MRST -4.2 — 62.2 — 68% MRST ›
Half final
0-7 · #352
24
0-4 · #347
37
— — RID -5.9 — 67.8 — 74% RID ›
Half final
5-0 · #93
40
4-1 · #109
25
— — GMU -2.4 — 69.7 — 60% GMU ›
Half final
1-3 · #361
26
1-4 · #240
43
— — CARK -1.5 — 66.3 — 57% CARK ›
Half final
4-3 · #132
45
6-1 · #101
43
— — GW -4.7 — 77.6 — 70% GW ›
Half final
3-2 · #111
32
2-4 · #135
36
— — TEM -4.6 — 71.8 — 69% TEM ›
Half final
5-1 · #83
27
5-0 · #38
39
— — IU -3.4 — 75.5 — 64% IU ›
Half final
0-6 · #366
35
4-2 · #28
52
— — TA&M -24.8 — 72.4 — 100% TA&M ›
Half final
0-4 · #306
29
2-4 · #164
31
— — CP -1.1 — 76.6 — 55% CP ›
Half final
0-6 · #353
30
6-0 · #54
55
— — MIZ -17.9 — 73.2 — 97% MIZ ›
Half final
0-5 · #254
30
3-2 · #112
33
— — UNT -7.3 — 66.5 — 79% UNT ›
Half final
2-3 · #334
38
2-3 · #210
41
— — APSU -5.2 — 68.4 — 72% APSU ›
Half final
2-3 · #139
48
5-1 · #60
42
— — ASU -3.7 — 73.8 — 66% ASU ›
Half final
5-1 · #21
31
5-0 · #8
59
— — MICH -2.1 — 78.5 — 59% MICH ›
Half final
3-3 · #205
36
6-0 · #27
32
— — NEB -8.0 — 75.8 — 81% NEB ›
Half final
2-0 · #133
26
1-3 · #149
20
— — NMSU -1.6 — 67.8 — 57% NMSU ›
Half final
1-3 · #192
29
2-4 · #296
33
— — UTSA -0.2 — 74.5 — 51% UTSA ›
Half final
1-5 · #204
46
2-3 · #273
43
— — OAK -0.2 — 76.9 — 51% OAK ›
Half final
1-2 · #274
24
2-4 · #268
26
— — PRST -1.2 — 71.8 — 55% PRST ›
Half final
5-1 · #50
32
6-0 · #17
47
— — GONZ -8.6 — 73.0 — 82% GONZ ›
Half final
5-0 · #46
31
5-0 · #43
31
— — IOWA -2.7 — 72.7 — 62% IOWA ›
Half final
5-1 · #26
41
5-1 · #92
36
— — UCLA -5.3 — 69.0 — 72% UCLA ›
Half final
2-2 · #75
51
4-1 · #57
41
— — ORE -2.3 — 68.6 — 60% ORE ›
Half final
3-3 · #98
36
3-2 · #15
51
— — ALA -10.0 — 83.9 — 86% ALA ›
Half final
5-1 · #73
28
3-2 · #80
33
— — UTAH -0.1 — 75.6 — 51% UTAH ›
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record