No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.3
Projected
36–37
✓ VCU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.0
Projected
21–46
✓ PUR won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.3
Projected
37–31
✗ SELA lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.7
Projected
31–41
✓ WAKE won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.8
Projected
37–37
✓ CONN won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.0
Projected
37–33
✓ RICH won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.0
Projected
35–37
✓ VAN won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.3
Projected
35–37
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.6
Projected
35–34
✗ SF lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.0
Projected
39–32
✗ INST lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.8
Projected
32–47
✓ MIZ won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.0
Projected
31–34
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.6
Projected
34–40
✓ RMU won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.1
Projected
39–38
✗ OU lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.4
Projected
35–31
✓ MONM won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.7
Projected
34–33
✓ HOF won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.2
Projected
31–41
✗ BTLR lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 80.5
Projected
36–45
✓ FLA won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.7
Projected
32–36
✗ ILST lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.2
Projected
37–38
✓ ARST won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
33–38
✓ TULN won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.4
Projected
32–39
✓ YSU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.9
Projected
32–35
✓ UNCW won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.3
Projected
30–34
✓ AMER won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.4
Projected
29–37
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.3
Projected
31–38
✓ DAV won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.2
Projected
30–42
✓ SC won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.2
Projected
32–44
✓ UVA won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.7
Projected
38–39
✗ USF lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.9
Projected
39–37
✗ WASH lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.2
Projected
37–33
✗ UCSB lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.2
Projected
34–37
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.7
Projected
34–36
✓ PENN won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.0
Projected
39–39
✓ TA&M won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.6
Projected
38–35
✗ WIS lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.9
Projected
30–38
✓ XAV won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.3
Projected
35–36
✓ IDST won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.7
Projected
38–35
✓ MIA won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.6
Projected
38–35
✗ WICH lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.3
Projected
36–38
✓ SLU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.8
Projected
26–43
✓ CLEM won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.8
Projected
33–34
✗ DEP lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.7
Projected
39–39
✗ SMU lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.7
Projected
37–33
✗ OSU lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.6
Projected
38–33
✗ COLG lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.8
Projected
33–35
✗ UL lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.5
Projected
37–36
✗ SHSU lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.5
Projected
40–31
✗ BYU lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.0
Projected
32–35
✓ SCU won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.2
Projected
41–32
✓ LSU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.1
Projected
29–35
✗ LMU lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.8
Projected
30–39
✓ HAW won
| Status | Matchup | Spread | Total | Model line | Spread edge | Model total | Total edge | Win prob | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Half final | 6-1 · #68 4-3 · #61 |
— | — | VCU -1.2 | — | 72.3 | — | 55% VCU | › | |
| Half final | 1-4 · #361 6-0 · #23 |
— | — | PUR -24.6 | — | 67.0 | — | 100% PUR | › | |
| Half final | 0-5 · #252 0-6 · #348 |
— | — | SELA -6.4 | — | 68.3 | — | 76% SELA | › | |
| Half final | 3-3 · #229 5-2 · #89 |
— | — | WAKE -10.8 | — | 71.7 | — | 88% WAKE | › | |
| Half final | 6-1 · #4 5-1 · #6 |
— | — | CONN -0.1 | — | 73.8 | — | 50% CONN | › | |
| Half final | 4-1 · #104 2-4 · #141 |
— | — | RICH -4.1 | — | 69.0 | — | 67% RICH | › | |
| Half final | 7-0 · #97 7-0 · #22 |
— | — | VAN -2.1 | — | 72.0 | — | 59% VAN | › | |
| Half final | 2-3 · #218 4-2 · #260 |
— | — | SIE -2.2 | — | 71.3 | — | 60% SIE | › | |
| Half final | 4-2 · #161 4-3 · #96 |
— | — | SF -1.4 | — | 68.6 | — | 56% SF | › | |
| Half final | 3-3 · #207 0-7 · #360 |
— | — | INST -7.8 | — | 71.0 | — | 80% INST | › | |
| Half final | 1-5 · #315 7-0 · #54 |
— | — | MIZ -15.5 | — | 78.8 | — | 95% MIZ | › | |
| Half final | 4-2 · #103 4-1 · #119 |
— | — | SEA -3.5 | — | 65.0 | — | 65% SEA | › | |
| Half final | 0-5 · #267 2-3 · #168 |
— | — | RMU -6.1 | — | 73.6 | — | 75% RMU | › | |
| Half final | 4-2 · #31 4-3 · #42 |
— | — | OU -1.0 | — | 76.1 | — | 54% OU | › | |
| Half final | 1-3 · #155 1-3 · #181 |
— | — | MONM -3.5 | — | 65.4 | — | 65% MONM | › | |
| Half final | 1-3 · #166 2-3 · #124 |
— | — | HOF -1.2 | — | 66.7 | — | 55% HOF | › | |
| Half final | 2-3 · #180 5-1 · #72 |
— | — | BTLR -9.6 | — | 72.2 | — | 85% BTLR | › | |
| Half final | 4-3 · #52 4-2 · #1 |
— | — | FLA -8.5 | — | 80.5 | — | 82% FLA | › | |
| Half final | 2-3 · #152 4-2 · #116 |
— | — | ILST -3.3 | — | 67.7 | — | 64% ILST | › | |
| Half final | 3-2 · #213 3-3 · #171 |
— | — | ARST -1.2 | — | 74.2 | — | 55% ARST | › | |
| Half final | 0-5 · #285 4-2 · #130 |
— | — | TULN -4.7 | — | 70.5 | — | 70% TULN | › | |
| Half final | 0-7 · #362 2-4 · #265 |
— | — | YSU -7.3 | — | 70.4 | — | 79% YSU | › | |
| Half final | 3-3 · #199 4-1 · #120 |
— | — | UNCW -3.5 | — | 66.9 | — | 65% UNCW | › | |
| Half final | 0-6 · #323 1-3 · #153 |
— | — | AMER -3.6 | — | 64.3 | — | 65% AMER | › | |
| Half final | 3-5 · #316 4-3 · #188 |
— | — | EMU -7.7 | — | 66.4 | — | 80% EMU | › | |
| Half final | 2-1 · #275 4-1 · #115 |
— | — | DAV -6.7 | — | 68.3 | — | 77% DAV | › | |
| Half final | 3-3 · #326 4-2 · #79 |
— | — | SC -12.7 | — | 72.2 | — | 92% SC | › | |
| Half final | 2-4 · #175 5-1 · #20 |
— | — | UVA -11.9 | — | 75.2 | — | 90% UVA | › | |
| Half final | 5-2 · #87 4-3 · #84 |
— | — | USF -0.9 | — | 76.7 | — | 54% USF | › | |
| Half final | 5-1 · #56 6-0 · #65 |
— | — | WASH -1.5 | — | 75.9 | — | 57% WASH | › | |
| Half final | 2-2 · #134 1-5 · #216 |
— | — | UCSB -3.7 | — | 70.2 | — | 66% UCSB | › | |
| Half final | 1-4 · #332 0-5 · #310 |
— | — | LAF -2.7 | — | 71.2 | — | 61% LAF | › | |
| Half final | 2-4 · #225 2-2 · #137 |
— | — | PENN -2.5 | — | 69.7 | — | 61% PENN | › | |
| Half final | 5-2 · #28 5-1 · #81 |
— | — | TA&M -0.1 | — | 77.0 | — | 50% FSU | › | |
| Half final | 5-1 · #41 4-2 · #40 |
— | — | WIS -2.4 | — | 72.6 | — | 61% WIS | › | |
| Half final | 0-4 · #238 4-3 · #49 |
— | — | XAV -8.1 | — | 67.9 | — | 81% XAV | › | |
| Half final | 2-3 · #194 1-4 · #344 |
— | — | IDST -0.6 | — | 71.3 | — | 52% IDST | › | |
| Half final | 5-2 · #25 5-1 · #64 |
— | — | MIA -3.7 | — | 72.7 | — | 66% MIA | › | |
| Half final | 4-3 · #77 3-2 · #129 |
— | — | WICH -3.1 | — | 72.6 | — | 63% WICH | › | |
| Half final | 5-1 · #85 6-0 · #69 |
— | — | SLU -2.4 | — | 74.3 | — | 60% SLU | › | |
| Half final | 2-1 · #328 6-1 · #35 |
— | — | CLEM -16.6 | — | 68.8 | — | 97% CLEM | › | |
| Half final | 5-1 · #94 4-2 · #66 |
— | — | DEP -0.9 | — | 67.8 | — | 54% DEP | › | |
| Half final | 7-0 · #55 3-3 · #53 |
— | — | SMU -0.5 | — | 77.7 | — | 52% SMU | › | |
| Half final | 6-0 · #33 4-3 · #74 |
— | — | OSU -4.2 | — | 70.7 | — | 68% OSU | › | |
| Half final | 2-4 · #211 0-4 · #301 |
— | — | COLG -5.2 | — | 70.6 | — | 71% COLG | › | |
| Half final | 0-6 · #280 1-6 · #221 |
— | — | UL -1.6 | — | 67.8 | — | 57% UL | › | |
| Half final | 2-2 · #189 2-2 · #247 |
— | — | SHSU -0.7 | — | 73.5 | — | 53% SHSU | › | |
| Half final | 5-1 · #24 6-1 · #91 |
— | — | BYU -8.9 | — | 71.5 | — | 83% BYU | › | |
| Half final | 4-3 · #70 5-1 · #106 |
— | — | SCU -2.4 | — | 67.0 | — | 60% SCU | › | |
| Half final | 5-0 · #51 2-2 · #144 |
— | — | LSU -9.2 | — | 72.2 | — | 84% LSU | › | |
| Half final | 3-2 · #191 6-1 · #121 |
— | — | LMU -6.3 | — | 64.1 | — | 76% LMU | › | |
| Half final | 2-5 · #336 4-2 · #140 |
— | — | HAW -8.3 | — | 68.8 | — | 82% HAW | › |
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record