Sort by

Sort

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
33
Troy
3-4 · #147
28
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.0
Projected
32–44
✗ TROY lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
3-2 · #200
45
VMI
1-5 · #320
20
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.2
Projected
39–32
✓ BGSU won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-0 · #22 AP #24
40
3-0 · #129
35
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.5
Projected
45–34
✓ VAN won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
Towson
4-2 · #165
31
5-0 · #123
50
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.0
Projected
32–33
✓ UCSD won
Half finalNon-conference
0-6 · #307
34
1-5 · #349
23
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
35–35
✗ STO lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
4-2 · #63
34
6-0 · #13 AP #15
35
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.7
Projected
32–39
✓ ISU won
Half finalNon-conference
2-4 · #276
34
4-2 · #12 AP #20
41
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.4
Projected
29–45
✓ TTU won
Half finalNon-conference
Brown
2-5 · #156
33
0-4 · #286
29
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.9
Projected
34–32
✓ BRWN won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-0 · #138
36
Toledo
4-2 · #157
33
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.3
Projected
39–36
✓ BEL won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-0 · #237
45
2-5 · #299
32
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.3
Projected
36–34
✓ BUF won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1-4 · #143
29
1-6 · #113
31
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.5
Projected
35–33
✗ SJSU lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
4-0 · #125
34
1-6 · #284
42
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.5
Projected
38–34
✗ M-OH lost
Half finalNon-conference
Omaha
1-5 · #279
31
FIU
0-3 · #178
38
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.0
Projected
36–39
✓ FIU won
Half finalNon-conference
3-3 · #259
29
Mercer
2-2 · #242
26
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.6
Projected
32–35
✗ MER lost
Half finalNon-conference
UIC
3-2 · #110
29
1-3 · #168
50
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.7
Projected
36–36
✓ RMU won
Half finalNon-conference
3-2 · #248
43
2-2 · #230
45
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.7
Projected
34–36
✓ NKU won
Half finalNon-conference
Army
0-6 · #288
33
FDU
0-5 · #356
27
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.4
Projected
37–37
✗ FDU lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
USC
6-0 · #36
43
6-1 · #60
43
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.6
Projected
41–38
 
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
3-1 · #160
33
3-4 · #167
43
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.2
Projected
36–34
✗ LIB lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
3-2 · #84
33
VCU
3-2 · #61
36
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.6
Projected
39–39
✓ VCU won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
2-2 · #213
35
1-2 · #198
21
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.5
Projected
35–34
✓ NDSU won
Half finalNon-conference
36
4-1 · #176
30
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.8
Projected
32–38
✗ VAL lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
0-6 · #208
28
3-0 · #133
37
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.8
Projected
29–37
✓ NMSU won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-2 · #71
25
6-1 · #2 AP #3
39
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.7
Projected
28–36
✓ HOU won
Half finalNon-conference
1-4 · #214
43
5-1 · #231
27
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.6
Projected
34–38
✗ MRSH lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
Navy
2-3 · #199
41
0-5 · #348
29
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.0
Projected
40–32
✓ NAVY won
Half finalNon-conference
3-3 · #136
30
3-4 · #95
38
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.9
Projected
31–35
✓ BC won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
6-0 · #131
27
Tulsa
4-1 · #108
34
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.2
Projected
33–32
✗ UNI lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1-5 · #305
32
Rice
1-6 · #177
44
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.2
Projected
36–38
✓ RICE won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
2-3 · #186
43
2-5 · #135
26
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.6
Projected
36–34
✓ UVM won
Half finalNon-conference
Wagner
0-5 · #354
43
2-3 · #330
56
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.1
Projected
35–36
✓ MAN won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-0 · #68
33
4-1 · #87
26
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.1
Projected
38–36
✓ VT won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
6-1 · #67
37
2-4 · #139
27
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.6
Projected
38–32
✓ HALL won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
4-4 · #184
14
2-2 · #150
42
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.8
Projected
36–37
✓ UVU won
Half finalNon-conference
3-1 · #219
28
3-4 · #220
24
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.3
Projected
37–35
✓ UNCO won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1-2 · #189
38
1-3 · #344
34
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.3
Projected
35–34
✓ SHSU won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
Kansas
5-2 · #16
34
7-0 · #7 AP #17
41
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.9
Projected
33–35
✓ TENN won
Half finalNon-conference
1-3 · #282
28
4-2 · #19 AP #19
43
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.3
Projected
26–46
✓ UK won
Half finalNon-conference
1-2 · #300
35
0-4 · #339
32
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.0
Projected
35–33
✓ HCU won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1-3 · #172
35
4-2 · #174
27
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.6
Projected
36–36
✗ FRES lost
Half finalNon-conference
0-4 · #252
33
3-1 · #120
27
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.8
Projected
29–36
✗ UNCW lost
Half finalNon-conference
2-2 · #148
45
FGCU
4-2 · #266
44
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.7
Projected
38–39
✗ FGCU lost
Half finalNon-conference
3-3 · #188
36
5-1 · #30
23
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.0
Projected
28–39
✗ CIN lost
Half finalNon-conference
5-1 · #170
46
4-2 · #239
29
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.1
Projected
36–34
✓ COLU won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-2 · #105
41
Temple
4-2 · #111
39
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.7
Projected
38–35
✓ URI won
Half finalNon-conference
3-2 · #207
26
1-2 · #244
37
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.6
Projected
33–33
✓ LT won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
4-2 · #9 AP #14
39
Auburn
5-2 · #21 AP #21
30
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 80.0
Projected
42–38
✓ SJU won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-0 · #97
33
4-1 · #77
31
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.2
Projected
35–31
✓ SMC won
Half finalNon-conference
2-3 · #195
29
1-4 · #76
42
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.8
Projected
34–40
✓ MEM won
Half finalNon-conference
1-4 · #306
29
1-2 · #321
39
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.1
Projected
36–36
✓ NAU won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
2-3 · #201
22
1-4 · #149
29
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.7
Projected
34–34
✗ SDST lost
Half finalNon-conference
Denver
2-4 · #263
27
4-1 · #122
37
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.9
Projected
33–39
✓ WYO won
Half finalNon-conference
NJIT
3-4 · #316
20
6-0 · #14 AP #6
52
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.0
Projected
25–47
✓ LOU won
Half finalNon-conference
2-4 · #302
51
4-2 · #82
38
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.0
Projected
30–40
✗ UNM lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
Idaho
1-2 · #247
37
2-2 · #194
37
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.5
Projected
38–37
 
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
7-0 · #17 AP #12
29
6-0 · #8 AP #7
53
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.8
Projected
37–39
✓ MICH won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-1 · #48 AP #23
37
Texas
4-2 · #11
47
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.3
Projected
38–38
✓ TEX won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
Iowa
6-0 · #43
30
4-2 · #80
23
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.9
Projected
39–33
✓ IOWA won
Half finalNon-conference
0-5 · #297
35
3-3 · #169
42
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.8
Projected
34–36
✓ PORT won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
Baylor
4-1 · #29
40
3-2 · #75
36
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.8
Projected
39–35
✓ BAY won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-2 · #50
29
4-2 · #15 AP #8
49
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 79.3
Projected
35–45
✓ ALA won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
Utah
5-2 · #73
42
5-1 · #46
34
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.0
Projected
34–39
✗ MISS lost
StatusMatchupSpreadTotalModel lineSpread edgeModel totalTotal edgeWin probModel
Half final
3-4 · #147
28
— — TROY -12.0 — 75.0 — 91% TROY ›
Half final
3-2 · #200
45
1-5 · #320
20
— — BGSU -7.0 — 71.2 — 78% BGSU ›
Half final
5-0 · #22
40
3-0 · #129
35
— — VAN -10.8 — 78.5 — 88% VAN ›
Half final
4-2 · #165
31
5-0 · #123
50
— — UCSD -1.4 — 65.0 — 56% UCSD ›
Half final
0-6 · #307
34
1-5 · #349
23
— — STO -0.4 — 70.3 — 52% STO ›
Half final
4-2 · #63
34
6-0 · #13
35
— — ISU -7.6 — 70.7 — 80% ISU ›
Half final
2-4 · #276
34
4-2 · #12
41
— — TTU -15.7 — 73.4 — 96% TTU ›
Half final
2-5 · #156
33
0-4 · #286
29
— — BRWN -2.9 — 65.9 — 63% BRWN ›
Half final
5-0 · #138
36
4-2 · #157
33
— — BEL -2.6 — 74.3 — 61% BEL ›
Half final
5-0 · #237
45
2-5 · #299
32
— — BUF -1.7 — 69.3 — 57% BUF ›
Half final
1-4 · #143
29
1-6 · #113
31
— — SJSU -1.5 — 67.5 — 57% SJSU ›
Half final
4-0 · #125
34
1-6 · #284
42
— — M-OH -3.8 — 72.5 — 66% M-OH ›
Half final
1-5 · #279
31
0-3 · #178
38
— — FIU -2.3 — 75.0 — 60% FIU ›
Half final
3-3 · #259
29
2-2 · #242
26
— — MER -3.0 — 67.6 — 63% MER ›
Half final
3-2 · #110
29
1-3 · #168
50
— — RMU -0.2 — 72.7 — 51% RMU ›
Half final
3-2 · #248
43
2-2 · #230
45
— — NKU -1.6 — 69.7 — 57% NKU ›
Half final
0-6 · #288
33
0-5 · #356
27
— — FDU -0.5 — 73.4 — 52% FDU ›
Half final
6-0 · #36
43
6-1 · #60
43
— — USC -3.0 — 78.6 — 63% USC ›
Half final
3-1 · #160
33
3-4 · #167
43
— — LIB -1.9 — 69.2 — 58% LIB ›
Half final
3-2 · #84
33
3-2 · #61
36
— — VCU -0.3 — 78.6 — 51% VCU ›
Half final
2-2 · #213
35
1-2 · #198
21
— — NDSU -1.2 — 69.5 — 55% NDSU ›
Half final
4-1 · #176
30
— — VAL -6.2 — 69.8 — 75% VAL ›
Half final
0-6 · #208
28
3-0 · #133
37
— — NMSU -8.8 — 65.8 — 83% NMSU ›
Half final
5-2 · #71
25
6-1 · #2
39
— — HOU -8.5 — 63.7 — 82% HOU ›
Half final
1-4 · #214
43
5-1 · #231
27
— — MRSH -3.3 — 71.6 — 64% MRSH ›
Half final
2-3 · #199
41
0-5 · #348
29
— — NAVY -8.0 — 72.0 — 81% NAVY ›
Half final
3-3 · #136
30
3-4 · #95
38
— — BC -4.5 — 65.9 — 69% BC ›
Half final
6-0 · #131
27
4-1 · #108
34
— — UNI -0.3 — 65.2 — 52% UNI ›
Half final
1-5 · #305
32
1-6 · #177
44
— — RICE -2.2 — 73.2 — 60% RICE ›
Half final
2-3 · #186
43
2-5 · #135
26
— — UVM -2.4 — 69.6 — 60% UVM ›
Half final
0-5 · #354
43
2-3 · #330
56
— — MAN -1.1 — 70.1 — 55% MAN ›
Half final
5-0 · #68
33
4-1 · #87
26
— — VT -1.4 — 74.1 — 56% VT ›
Half final
6-1 · #67
37
2-4 · #139
27
— — HALL -5.3 — 69.6 — 72% HALL ›
Half final
4-4 · #184
14
2-2 · #150
42
— — UVU -1.8 — 72.8 — 58% UVU ›
Half final
3-1 · #219
28
3-4 · #220
24
— — UNCO -2.4 — 71.3 — 60% UNCO ›
Half final
1-2 · #189
38
1-3 · #344
34
— — SHSU -1.5 — 69.3 — 56% SHSU ›
Half final
5-2 · #16
34
7-0 · #7
41
— — TENN -1.6 — 67.9 — 57% TENN ›
Half final
1-3 · #282
28
4-2 · #19
43
— — UK -20.3 — 72.3 — 99% UK ›
Half final
1-2 · #300
35
0-4 · #339
32
— — HCU -2.1 — 67.0 — 59% HCU ›
Half final
1-3 · #172
35
4-2 · #174
27
— — FRES -0.3 — 71.6 — 51% FRES ›
Half final
0-4 · #252
33
3-1 · #120
27
— — UNCW -6.5 — 64.8 — 76% UNCW ›
Half final
2-2 · #148
45
4-2 · #266
44
— — FGCU -1.1 — 77.7 — 55% FGCU ›
Half final
3-3 · #188
36
5-1 · #30
23
— — CIN -11.7 — 67.0 — 90% CIN ›
Half final
5-1 · #170
46
4-2 · #239
29
— — COLU -2.5 — 70.1 — 61% COLU ›
Half final
5-2 · #105
41
4-2 · #111
39
— — URI -2.5 — 72.7 — 61% URI ›
Half final
3-2 · #207
26
1-2 · #244
37
— — LT -0.6 — 65.6 — 52% LT ›
Half final
4-2 · #9
39
5-2 · #21
30
— — SJU -4.3 — 80.0 — 68% SJU ›
Half final
5-0 · #97
33
4-1 · #77
31
— — SMC -3.8 — 66.2 — 66% SMC ›
Half final
2-3 · #195
29
1-4 · #76
42
— — MEM -5.2 — 73.8 — 71% MEM ›
Half final
1-4 · #306
29
1-2 · #321
39
— — NAU -0.1 — 71.1 — 50% NAU ›
Half final
2-3 · #201
22
1-4 · #149
29
— — SDST -0.1 — 67.7 — 50% UCI ›
Half final
2-4 · #263
27
4-1 · #122
37
— — WYO -5.5 — 71.9 — 73% WYO ›
Half final
3-4 · #316
20
6-0 · #14
52
— — LOU -22.5 — 72.0 — 99% LOU ›
Half final
2-4 · #302
51
4-2 · #82
38
— — UNM -10.5 — 70.0 — 87% UNM ›
Half final
1-2 · #247
37
2-2 · #194
37
— — IDHO -0.6 — 74.5 — 53% IDHO ›
Half final
7-0 · #17
29
6-0 · #8
53
— — MICH -1.4 — 75.8 — 56% MICH ›
Half final
5-1 · #48
37
4-2 · #11
47
— — TEX -0.2 — 75.3 — 51% TEX ›
Half final
6-0 · #43
30
4-2 · #80
23
— — IOWA -6.0 — 71.9 — 74% IOWA ›
Half final
0-5 · #297
35
3-3 · #169
42
— — PORT -2.1 — 69.8 — 59% PORT ›
Half final
4-1 · #29
40
3-2 · #75
36
— — BAY -4.3 — 73.8 — 68% BAY ›
Half final
5-2 · #50
29
4-2 · #15
49
— — ALA -10.1 — 79.3 — 86% ALA ›
Half final
5-2 · #73
42
5-1 · #46
34
— — MISS -4.2 — 73.0 — 67% MISS ›
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record