No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.6
Projected
31–42
✓ YALE won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
39–32
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 79.3
Projected
39–40
✓ ALST won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.8
Projected
38–36
✓ BTLR won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.6
Projected
38–38
✓ COFC won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.1
Projected
36–35
✗ CAM lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.8
Projected
33–34
✗ BC lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.3
Projected
36–40
✓ BYU won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.3
Projected
35–34
✗ NU lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.3
Projected
36–42
✓ AKR won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.2
Projected
33–45
✓ FSU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.8
Projected
33–34
✓ STO won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.3
Projected
32–30
✗ SIUE lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.5
Projected
34–34
✓ COLU won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.3
Projected
40–34
✗ LOU lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.6
Projected
26–44
✓ MSU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.1
Projected
36–35
✗ OAK lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.3
Projected
32–32
✓ CLT won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.4
Projected
28–38
✗ RUTG lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.6
Projected
31–32
✗ CLEM lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.5
Projected
21–45
✓ DUKE won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.6
Projected
26–47
✓ FLA won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.7
Projected
27–47
✓ UK won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.6
Projected
38–35
✗ MSST lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.8
Projected
34–31
✓ CCU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.4
Projected
36–37
✓ WGA won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.2
Projected
31–38
✓ ETSU won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.3
Projected
39–36
✗ WAKE lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.5
Projected
37–32
✓ UNCW won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.2
Projected
30–37
✓ SIE won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.5
Projected
34–41
✗ ECU lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.5
Projected
31–31
✗ UMES lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.1
Projected
29–36
✓ MRST won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.5
Projected
34–40
✓ ODU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.2
Projected
33–36
✓ SHU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.9
Projected
33–36
✗ DREX lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.5
Projected
37–37
✗ STMN lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.2
Projected
33–39
✓ UAB won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.6
Projected
29–45
✓ ARK won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.7
Projected
31–38
✓ SDST won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.2
Projected
32–46
✓ LSU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.5
Projected
32–37
✗ TLSA lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.7
Projected
31–32
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.9
Projected
29–35
✓ TXST won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.9
Projected
32–36
✗ ORST lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.9
Projected
30–45
✓ TA&M won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.6
Projected
34–43
✓ SLU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.7
Projected
32–40
✗ LUC lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.8
Projected
34–37
✗ USD lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.4
Projected
36–36
✓ PEPP won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.0
Projected
30–42
✗ CSU lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
30–40
✓ GCU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.6
Projected
33–38
✓ NMSU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.3
Projected
32–40
✓ COLO won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.6
Projected
35–44
✓ SMU won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.1
Projected
42–34
✓ UGA won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.5
Projected
35–38
✓ FRES won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.2
Projected
35–38
✓ PUR won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.1
Projected
38–38
✓ NEB won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.6
Projected
35–39
✓ SJSU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.0
Projected
28–41
✓ SCU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.0
Projected
29–37
✓ CBU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.4
Projected
35–32
✗ MTST lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.5
Projected
35–38
✓ PORT won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.0
Projected
32–38
✓ STAN won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.8
Projected
30–42
✓ CAL won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.7
Projected
24–39
✓ UCLA won
| Status | Matchup | Spread | Total | Model line | Spread edge | Model total | Total edge | Win prob | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Half final | 0-4 · #226 3-1 · #126 |
— | — | YALE -10.9 | — | 72.6 | — | 88% YALE | › | |
| Half final | 3-0 · #58 3-1 · #130 |
— | — | USU -7.2 | — | 70.5 | — | 78% USU | › | |
| Half final | 1-4 · #340 1-3 · #302 |
— | — | ALST -1.1 | — | 79.3 | — | 55% ALST | › | |
| Half final | 3-1 · #72 4-0 · #79 |
— | — | BTLR -2.4 | — | 73.8 | — | 60% BTLR | › | |
| Half final | 3-1 · #209 1-3 · #117 |
— | — | COFC -0.6 | — | 75.6 | — | 52% COFC | › | |
| Half final | 1-3 · #243 2-1 · #257 |
— | — | CAM -0.4 | — | 71.1 | — | 52% CAM | › | |
| Half final | 3-0 · #115 3-2 · #95 |
— | — | BC -1.5 | — | 66.8 | — | 56% BC | › | |
| Half final | 4-0 · #41 3-1 · #24 |
— | — | BYU -3.7 | — | 75.3 | — | 66% BYU | › | |
| Half final | 4-0 · #59 4-0 · #20 |
— | — | NU -1.1 | — | 68.3 | — | 55% NU | › | |
| Half final | 4-0 · #233 2-1 · #118 |
— | — | AKR -6.0 | — | 78.3 | — | 74% AKR | › | |
| Half final | 2-2 · #296 3-1 · #81 |
— | — | FSU -12.3 | — | 78.2 | — | 91% FSU | › | |
| Half final | 0-4 · #310 0-5 · #349 |
— | — | STO -0.4 | — | 66.8 | — | 52% STO | › | |
| Half final | 2-2 · #256 1-4 · #220 |
— | — | SIUE -1.7 | — | 62.3 | — | 57% SIUE | › | |
| Half final | 3-1 · #170 1-3 · #216 |
— | — | COLU -0.5 | — | 67.5 | — | 52% COLU | › | |
| Half final | 4-0 · #14 4-0 · #30 |
— | — | LOU -5.7 | — | 73.3 | — | 73% LOU | › | |
| Half final | 0-4 · #277 4-0 · #10 |
— | — | MSU -18.1 | — | 70.6 | — | 98% MSU | › | |
| Half final | 0-4 · #204 2-2 · #188 |
— | — | OAK -1.5 | — | 71.1 | — | 56% OAK | › | |
| Half final | 2-2 · #141 2-2 · #259 |
— | — | CLT -0.1 | — | 64.3 | — | 50% APP | › | |
| Half final | 1-2 · #337 4-0 · #62 |
— | — | RUTG -10.1 | — | 66.4 | — | 86% RUTG | › | |
| Half final | 5-0 · #47 4-1 · #35 |
— | — | CLEM -0.9 | — | 63.6 | — | 54% CLEM | › | |
| Half final | 2-2 · #346 5-0 · #3 |
— | — | DUKE -23.8 | — | 66.5 | — | 100% DUKE | › | |
| Half final | 2-3 · #225 3-1 · #1 |
— | — | FLA -20.7 | — | 72.6 | — | 99% FLA | › | |
| Half final | 1-4 · #314 3-2 · #19 |
— | — | UK -19.3 | — | 73.7 | — | 98% UK | › | |
| Half final | 2-2 · #53 3-2 · #82 |
— | — | MSST -2.9 | — | 73.6 | — | 62% MSST | › | |
| Half final | 1-2 · #283 0-4 · #365 |
— | — | CCU -2.1 | — | 64.8 | — | 59% CCU | › | |
| Half final | 1-3 · #325 2-2 · #298 |
— | — | WGA -1.4 | — | 73.4 | — | 56% WGA | › | |
| Half final | 0-3 · #350 2-1 · #173 |
— | — | ETSU -6.9 | — | 68.2 | — | 78% ETSU | › | |
| Half final | 3-2 · #89 1-3 · #76 |
— | — | WAKE -2.4 | — | 75.3 | — | 60% WAKE | › | |
| Half final | 2-1 · #120 1-4 · #246 |
— | — | UNCW -4.7 | — | 69.5 | — | 70% UNCW | › | |
| Half final | 0-3 · #301 2-2 · #260 |
— | — | SIE -6.7 | — | 67.2 | — | 77% SIE | › | |
| Half final | 2-3 · #326 1-2 · #145 |
— | — | ECU -7.2 | — | 74.5 | — | 78% ECU | › | |
| Half final | 1-4 · #364 1-3 · #359 |
— | — | UMES -0.3 | — | 62.5 | — | 51% UMES | › | |
| Half final | 0-4 · #288 1-2 · #236 |
— | — | MRST -7.0 | — | 64.1 | — | 78% MRST | › | |
| Half final | 0-4 · #345 1-3 · #234 |
— | — | ODU -6.0 | — | 74.5 | — | 74% ODU | › | |
| Half final | 1-4 · #317 0-3 · #311 |
— | — | SHU -2.9 | — | 69.2 | — | 62% SHU | › | |
| Half final | 1-2 · #137 1-3 · #262 |
— | — | DREX -2.1 | — | 68.9 | — | 59% DREX | › | |
| Half final | 1-0 · #219 3-2 · #212 |
— | — | STMN -0.1 | — | 73.5 | — | 51% STMN | › | |
| Half final | 5-0 · #228 2-2 · #102 |
— | — | UAB -6.1 | — | 71.2 | — | 75% UAB | › | |
| Half final | 0-4 · #280 4-1 · #18 |
— | — | ARK -16.1 | — | 73.6 | — | 96% ARK | › | |
| Half final | 0-4 · #208 1-2 · #201 |
— | — | SDST -6.2 | — | 68.7 | — | 75% SDST | › | |
| Half final | 1-3 · #279 4-0 · #51 |
— | — | LSU -14.4 | — | 78.2 | — | 94% LSU | › | |
| Half final | 2-2 · #210 2-1 · #108 |
— | — | TLSA -4.9 | — | 69.5 | — | 70% TLSA | › | |
| Half final | 1-4 · #159 0-3 · #319 |
— | — | NORF -0.9 | — | 63.7 | — | 54% NORF | › | |
| Half final | 1-3 · #222 3-2 · #103 |
— | — | TXST -5.1 | — | 63.9 | — | 71% TXST | › | |
| Half final | 0-3 · #255 3-1 · #99 |
— | — | ORST -4.7 | — | 67.9 | — | 70% ORST | › | |
| Half final | 2-2 · #330 3-2 · #28 |
— | — | TA&M -15.5 | — | 74.9 | — | 95% TA&M | › | |
| Half final | 0-4 · #249 4-0 · #69 |
— | — | SLU -9.5 | — | 76.6 | — | 85% SLU | › | |
| Half final | 1-3 · #334 1-4 · #113 |
— | — | LUC -7.3 | — | 71.7 | — | 79% LUC | › | |
| Half final | 1-3 · #281 2-1 · #146 |
— | — | USD -3.5 | — | 70.8 | — | 65% USD | › | |
| Half final | 3-1 · #193 1-2 · #172 |
— | — | PEPP -0.1 | — | 71.4 | — | 50% PEPP | › | |
| Half final | 1-3 · #263 4-0 · #87 |
— | — | CSU -12.8 | — | 72.0 | — | 92% CSU | › | |
| Half final | 0-4 · #318 2-2 · #80 |
— | — | GCU -9.9 | — | 70.5 | — | 86% GCU | › | |
| Half final | 3-3 · #184 1-0 · #133 |
— | — | NMSU -5.2 | — | 71.6 | — | 71% NMSU | › | |
| Half final | 3-1 · #182 4-0 · #65 |
— | — | COLO -8.3 | — | 72.3 | — | 82% COLO | › | |
| Half final | 2-2 · #171 5-0 · #55 |
— | — | SMU -8.4 | — | 78.6 | — | 82% SMU | › | |
| Half final | 5-0 · #34 3-2 · #49 |
— | — | UGA -7.9 | — | 75.1 | — | 81% UGA | › | |
| Half final | 2-2 · #276 3-2 · #174 |
— | — | FRES -2.9 | — | 72.5 | — | 63% FRES | › | |
| Half final | 4-1 · #12 5-0 · #23 |
— | — | PUR -2.6 | — | 73.2 | — | 61% PUR | › | |
| Half final | 5-0 · #83 5-0 · #27 |
— | — | NEB -0.1 | — | 76.1 | — | 50% NEB | › | |
| Half final | 0-3 · #309 0-3 · #143 |
— | — | SJSU -4.3 | — | 74.6 | — | 68% SJSU | › | |
| Half final | 1-4 · #221 4-0 · #106 |
— | — | SCU -12.6 | — | 69.0 | — | 91% SCU | › | |
| Half final | 2-2 · #338 4-0 · #203 |
— | — | CBU -8.2 | — | 66.0 | — | 81% CBU | › | |
| Half final | 0-4 · #162 0-4 · #297 |
— | — | MTST -2.6 | — | 66.4 | — | 61% MTST | › | |
| Half final | 0-3 · #312 2-1 · #169 |
— | — | PORT -3.3 | — | 72.5 | — | 64% PORT | › | |
| Half final | 3-1 · #119 4-0 · #85 |
— | — | STAN -5.3 | — | 70.0 | — | 72% STAN | › | |
| Half final | 1-3 · #196 4-1 · #92 |
— | — | CAL -11.4 | — | 71.8 | — | 89% CAL | › | |
| Half final | 2-4 · #183 4-1 · #26 |
— | — | UCLA -15.0 | — | 62.7 | — | 95% UCLA | › |
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record