No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.3
Projected
35–37
✓ WIN won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.3
Projected
33–33
✓ SBU won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.4
Projected
33–35
✓ MUR won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.1
Projected
29–35
✗ DRKE lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.9
Projected
26–45
✓ SJU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
34–36
✓ EMU won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.2
Projected
33–37
✓ HPU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.2
Projected
34–35
✗ BUF lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.0
Projected
26–47
✓ OSU won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.3
Projected
23–42
✓ MD won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.4
Projected
27–42
✓ GTWN won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.3
Projected
40–35
✗ FLA lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.9
Projected
21–46
✓ CONN won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.8
Projected
26–42
✓ ARK won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.4
Projected
23–42
✓ TENN won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.3
Projected
26–42
✓ MSU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.2
Projected
26–44
✓ UNC won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.4
Projected
34–34
✗ M-OH lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.4
Projected
43–29
✓ MIZ won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.2
Projected
33–36
✗ WMU lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.5
Projected
36–36
✓ OHIO won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
34–37
✗ MASS lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.6
Projected
29–37
✓ GMU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.4
Projected
28–38
✓ RAD won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.0
Projected
34–35
✗ TOL lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.3
Projected
32–32
✗ APP lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.0
Projected
34–34
✗ TXST lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.9
Projected
28–40
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.6
Projected
32–33
✗ KENT lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 61.2
Projected
23–39
✓ VCU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.0
Projected
27–37
✓ JOES won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.7
Projected
32–35
✗ BALL lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.1
Projected
34–36
✓ SIE won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.7
Projected
34–37
✗ AKR lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.8
Projected
27–40
✓ CIN won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.3
Projected
27–40
✓ VT won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.8
Projected
28–41
✓ SYR won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.8
Projected
29–38
✓ PITT won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.1
Projected
27–41
✓ NCSU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.7
Projected
36–35
✗ BC lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.1
Projected
29–41
✓ URI won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.8
Projected
26–39
✓ DUQ won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.8
Projected
26–40
✓ DAY won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.8
Projected
24–43
✓ CLEM won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.5
Projected
27–39
✓ UVA won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.0
Projected
27–38
✓ ND won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.3
Projected
34–35
✓ BUCK won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.3
Projected
27–39
✓ XAV won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.2
Projected
26–41
✓ PROV won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 61.6
Projected
26–36
✓ HALL won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.8
Projected
24–45
✓ UAB won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.6
Projected
31–33
✗ NE lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.2
Projected
30–38
✓ WKU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.4
Projected
27–43
✓ UGA won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.9
Projected
26–41
✓ GT won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.0
Projected
33–33
✓ NAVY won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.0
Projected
31–37
✓ BEL won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.1
Projected
20–44
✓ HOU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.2
Projected
28–49
✓ ALA won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.8
Projected
22–46
✓ ISU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.2
Projected
25–44
✓ KU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.7
Projected
26–44
✓ AUB won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.4
Projected
27–41
✓ WIS won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.2
Projected
25–41
✓ TA&M won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.0
Projected
27–41
✓ MINN won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.0
Projected
28–42
✓ NEB won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.8
Projected
28–42
✓ VAN won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.0
Projected
33–35
✓ NIU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.7
Projected
31–37
✓ UIC won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.5
Projected
27–42
✓ MARQ won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.0
Projected
26–42
✓ DEP won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.1
Projected
33–36
✓ MILW won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.3
Projected
35–37
✓ CLT won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.7
Projected
24–41
✓ NU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.1
Projected
27–44
✓ BAY won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.9
Projected
26–39
✓ WAKE won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.7
Projected
27–40
✓ SMU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.4
Projected
29–39
✓ SLU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.8
Projected
29–37
✗ LUC lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.6
Projected
28–38
✓ GW won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.8
Projected
29–39
✓ MIA won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.3
Projected
27–41
✓ MISS won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.6
Projected
27–42
✗ TCU lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.1
Projected
27–44
✓ MICH won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.8
Projected
27–45
✓ ILL won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.2
Projected
34–38
✓ TULN won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.0
Projected
26–44
✓ OU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.8
Projected
36–38
✗ SDAK lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.4
Projected
27–40
✓ USF won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.5
Projected
29–39
✓ UCF won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.8
Projected
25–45
✓ LOU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.5
Projected
27–44
✓ GONZ won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.3
Projected
35–32
✓ SDST won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.2
Projected
29–37
✓ CSU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.9
Projected
32–39
✓ GCU won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.5
Projected
35–29
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.7
Projected
31–39
✓ UTAH won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.7
Projected
28–39
✗ COLO lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.0
Projected
32–38
✓ BYU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.1
Projected
30–44
✓ USC won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.7
Projected
30–39
✗ ORST lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.1
Projected
32–38
✗ WSU lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.1
Projected
29–38
✓ SMC won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.0
Projected
28–38
✓ SEA won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.7
Projected
29–39
✓ CAL won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.5
Projected
23–44
✓ UCLA won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.9
Projected
31–39
✓ CBU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.8
Projected
27–46
✓ WASH won
| Status | Matchup | Spread | Total | Model line | Spread edge | Model total | Total edge | Win prob | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Half final | 0-0 · #175 0-0 · #205 |
— | — | WIN -2.0 | — | 72.3 | — | 59% WIN | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #167 0-0 · #142 |
— | — | SBU -0.3 | — | 65.3 | — | 51% SBU | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #279 0-0 · #132 |
— | — | MUR -1.5 | — | 68.4 | — | 56% MUR | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #321 0-0 · #144 |
— | — | DRKE -5.6 | — | 64.1 | — | 73% DRKE | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #241 0-0 · #9 |
— | — | SJU -19.7 | — | 70.9 | — | 98% SJU | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #208 0-0 · #188 |
— | — | EMU -2.5 | — | 70.3 | — | 61% EMU | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #152 0-0 · #90 |
— | — | HPU -4.1 | — | 70.2 | — | 67% HPU | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #224 0-0 · #237 |
— | — | BUF -0.6 | — | 69.2 | — | 53% BUF | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #340 0-0 · #33 |
— | — | OSU -21.0 | — | 72.0 | — | 99% OSU | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #352 0-0 · #50 |
— | — | MD -19.1 | — | 65.3 | — | 98% MD | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #345 0-0 · #64 |
— | — | GTWN -14.6 | — | 69.4 | — | 94% GTWN | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #1 0-0 · #5 |
— | — | FLA -4.6 | — | 74.3 | — | 69% FLA | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #355 0-0 · #6 |
— | — | CONN -24.1 | — | 66.9 | — | 100% CONN | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #309 0-0 · #18 |
— | — | ARK -15.9 | — | 67.8 | — | 96% ARK | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #242 0-0 · #7 |
— | — | TENN -18.7 | — | 65.4 | — | 98% TENN | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #211 0-0 · #10 |
— | — | MSU -16.0 | — | 67.3 | — | 96% MSU | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #240 0-0 · #44 |
— | — | UNC -18.2 | — | 70.2 | — | 98% UNC | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #234 0-0 · #125 |
— | — | M-OH -0.1 | — | 68.4 | — | 50% M-OH | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #54 0-0 · #197 |
— | — | MIZ -14.3 | — | 72.4 | — | 94% MIZ | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #283 0-0 · #187 |
— | — | WMU -2.9 | — | 68.2 | — | 62% WMU | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #171 0-0 · #128 |
— | — | OHIO -0.3 | — | 71.5 | — | 51% OHIO | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #231 0-0 · #209 |
— | — | MASS -2.8 | — | 70.3 | — | 62% MASS | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #248 0-0 · #93 |
— | — | GMU -8.4 | — | 65.6 | — | 82% GMU | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #365 0-0 · #246 |
— | — | RAD -9.6 | — | 65.4 | — | 85% RAD | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #228 0-0 · #157 |
— | — | TOL -1.2 | — | 69.0 | — | 55% TOL | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #259 0-0 · #270 |
— | — | APP -0.1 | — | 64.3 | — | 50% CMU | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #103 0-0 · #200 |
— | — | TXST -0.6 | — | 68.0 | — | 52% TXST | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #239 0-0 · #78 |
— | — | PSU -12.9 | — | 67.9 | — | 92% PSU | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #147 0-0 · #151 |
— | — | KENT -1.1 | — | 65.6 | — | 55% KENT | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #354 0-0 · #61 |
— | — | VCU -16.2 | — | 61.2 | — | 96% VCU | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #310 0-0 · #114 |
— | — | JOES -9.4 | — | 64.0 | — | 85% JOES | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #221 0-0 · #181 |
— | — | BALL -3.2 | — | 66.7 | — | 64% BALL | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #290 0-0 · #260 |
— | — | SIE -1.6 | — | 70.1 | — | 57% SIE | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #158 0-0 · #118 |
— | — | AKR -3.3 | — | 70.7 | — | 64% AKR | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #215 0-0 · #30 |
— | — | CIN -13.8 | — | 66.8 | — | 93% CIN | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #326 0-0 · #68 |
— | — | VT -12.4 | — | 67.3 | — | 91% VT | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #272 0-0 · #63 |
— | — | SYR -12.8 | — | 68.8 | — | 92% SYR | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #265 0-0 · #74 |
— | — | PITT -9.0 | — | 67.8 | — | 84% PITT | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #357 0-0 · #48 |
— | — | NCSU -14.7 | — | 68.1 | — | 95% NCSU | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #95 0-0 · #109 |
— | — | BC -0.2 | — | 70.7 | — | 51% BC | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #303 0-0 · #105 |
— | — | URI -11.4 | — | 70.1 | — | 89% URI | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #346 0-0 · #107 |
— | — | DUQ -12.6 | — | 64.8 | — | 92% DUQ | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #359 0-0 · #91 |
— | — | DAY -14.2 | — | 65.8 | — | 94% DAY | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #286 0-0 · #35 |
— | — | CLEM -18.9 | — | 66.8 | — | 98% CLEM | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #347 0-0 · #20 |
— | — | UVA -12.5 | — | 65.5 | — | 91% UVA | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #324 0-0 · #71 |
— | — | ND -11.7 | — | 65.0 | — | 90% ND | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #206 0-0 · #299 |
— | — | BUCK -1.1 | — | 69.3 | — | 55% BUCK | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #236 0-0 · #49 |
— | — | XAV -11.9 | — | 65.3 | — | 90% XAV | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #317 0-0 · #52 |
— | — | PROV -14.8 | — | 67.2 | — | 95% PROV | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #269 0-0 · #67 |
— | — | HALL -10.3 | — | 61.6 | — | 87% HALL | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #366 0-0 · #102 |
— | — | UAB -21.1 | — | 68.8 | — | 99% UAB | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #261 0-0 · #229 |
— | — | NE -2.2 | — | 63.6 | — | 59% NE | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #282 0-0 · #129 |
— | — | WKU -8.4 | — | 68.2 | — | 82% WKU | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #295 0-0 · #34 |
— | — | UGA -16.2 | — | 69.4 | — | 96% UGA | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #364 0-0 · #94 |
— | — | GT -15.7 | — | 66.9 | — | 96% GT | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #199 0-0 · #183 |
— | — | NAVY -0.0 | — | 66.0 | — | 50% PRES | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #220 0-0 · #138 |
— | — | BEL -5.8 | — | 68.0 | — | 74% BEL | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #216 0-0 · #2 |
— | — | HOU -24.2 | — | 63.1 | — | 100% HOU | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #336 0-0 · #15 |
— | — | ALA -21.6 | — | 77.2 | — | 99% ALA | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #356 0-0 · #13 |
— | — | ISU -24.3 | — | 67.8 | — | 100% ISU | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #226 0-0 · #16 |
— | — | KU -19.3 | — | 69.2 | — | 98% KU | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #202 0-0 · #21 |
— | — | AUB -17.8 | — | 70.7 | — | 97% AUB | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #243 0-0 · #41 |
— | — | WIS -13.6 | — | 67.4 | — | 93% WIS | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #318 0-0 · #28 |
— | — | TA&M -15.9 | — | 66.2 | — | 96% TA&M | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #348 0-0 · #70 |
— | — | MINN -14.7 | — | 68.0 | — | 95% MINN | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #298 0-0 · #27 |
— | — | NEB -14.2 | — | 70.0 | — | 94% NEB | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #214 0-0 · #22 |
— | — | VAN -13.8 | — | 69.8 | — | 93% VAN | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #358 0-0 · #334 |
— | — | NIU -2.6 | — | 68.0 | — | 61% NIU | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #277 0-0 · #110 |
— | — | UIC -6.0 | — | 67.7 | — | 74% UIC | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #301 0-0 · #42 |
— | — | MARQ -14.8 | — | 68.5 | — | 95% MARQ | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #362 0-0 · #66 |
— | — | DEP -15.4 | — | 68.0 | — | 95% DEP | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #159 0-0 · #235 |
— | — | MILW -2.9 | — | 68.1 | — | 62% MILW | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #207 0-0 · #141 |
— | — | CLT -1.9 | — | 71.3 | — | 58% CLT | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #331 0-0 · #59 |
— | — | NU -17.7 | — | 64.7 | — | 97% NU | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #287 0-0 · #29 |
— | — | BAY -17.1 | — | 70.1 | — | 97% BAY | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #153 0-0 · #89 |
— | — | WAKE -13.1 | — | 64.9 | — | 92% WAKE | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #185 0-0 · #55 |
— | — | SMU -12.3 | — | 66.7 | — | 91% SMU | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #306 0-0 · #69 |
— | — | SLU -10.3 | — | 68.4 | — | 87% SLU | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #315 0-0 · #113 |
— | — | LUC -7.7 | — | 65.8 | — | 80% LUC | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #323 0-0 · #101 |
— | — | GW -10.3 | — | 65.6 | — | 87% GW | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #223 0-0 · #25 |
— | — | MIA -9.3 | — | 67.8 | — | 84% MIA | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #252 0-0 · #46 |
— | — | MISS -13.9 | — | 67.3 | — | 94% MISS | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #276 0-0 · #40 |
— | — | TCU -15.0 | — | 68.6 | — | 95% TCU | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #204 0-0 · #8 |
— | — | MICH -17.1 | — | 70.1 | — | 97% MICH | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #280 0-0 · #4 |
— | — | ILL -17.6 | — | 71.8 | — | 97% ILL | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #184 0-0 · #130 |
— | — | TULN -4.0 | — | 71.2 | — | 67% TULN | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #88 0-0 · #31 |
— | — | OU -18.0 | — | 70.0 | — | 98% OU | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #268 0-0 · #291 |
— | — | SDAK -2.8 | — | 73.8 | — | 62% SDAK | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #327 0-0 · #84 |
— | — | USF -12.7 | — | 67.4 | — | 92% USF | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #166 0-0 · #39 |
— | — | UCF -10.1 | — | 67.5 | — | 87% UCF | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #353 0-0 · #14 |
— | — | LOU -19.1 | — | 69.8 | — | 98% LOU | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #322 0-0 · #17 |
— | — | GONZ -16.7 | — | 71.5 | — | 97% GONZ | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #201 0-0 · #225 |
— | — | SDST -2.7 | — | 66.3 | — | 62% SDST | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #289 0-0 · #87 |
— | — | CSU -8.7 | — | 66.2 | — | 83% CSU | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #249 0-0 · #80 |
— | — | GCU -7.2 | — | 70.9 | — | 78% GCU | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #165 0-0 · #314 |
— | — | TOW -6.1 | — | 64.5 | — | 75% TOW | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #143 0-0 · #73 |
— | — | UTAH -8.6 | — | 69.7 | — | 83% UTAH | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #162 0-0 · #65 |
— | — | COLO -11.0 | — | 67.7 | — | 88% COLO | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #32 0-0 · #24 |
— | — | BYU -6.3 | — | 70.0 | — | 75% BYU | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #164 0-0 · #36 |
— | — | USC -13.6 | — | 74.1 | — | 93% USC | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #213 0-0 · #99 |
— | — | ORST -8.3 | — | 68.7 | — | 82% ORST | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #247 0-0 · #139 |
— | — | WSU -5.7 | — | 70.1 | — | 73% WSU | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #212 0-0 · #97 |
— | — | SMC -9.2 | — | 66.1 | — | 84% SMC | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #263 0-0 · #119 |
— | — | SEA -9.4 | — | 66.0 | — | 85% SEA | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #329 0-0 · #92 |
— | — | CAL -9.9 | — | 68.7 | — | 86% CAL | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #254 0-0 · #26 |
— | — | UCLA -20.7 | — | 67.5 | — | 99% UCLA | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #325 0-0 · #203 |
— | — | CBU -7.3 | — | 69.9 | — | 79% CBU | › | |
| Half final | 0-0 · #363 0-0 · #56 |
— | — | WASH -19.7 | — | 72.8 | — | 98% WASH | › |
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record