Millett Hall · at Miami OH
Closing line
M-OH -16.5✓ ODU covered by 1.5
Closing total153.5Over by 5.5
| This season | M-OH | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: ODU 73–73 M-OH · ✓ M-OH (52%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ODU | 45 | 27 | 72 |
| M-OH | 37 | 50 | 87 |
1st half: ODU 45, M-OH 37 (ODU by 8). The model had M-OH by 0.1 and a total of 68.4 (actual 82).
Team stats
| ODU | M-OH | |
|---|---|---|
| 25-53 47% | Field goals | 29-58 50% |
| 9-21 43% | 3-pointers | 7-24 29% |
| 13-16 81% | Free throws | 22-27 81% |
| 29 5 off | Rebounds | 33 8 off |
| 13 | Assists | 11 |
| 5 | Steals | 9 |
| 3 | Blocks | 4 |
| 19 | Turnovers | 12 |
| 23 | Fouls | 17 |
| 24 | Points in paint | 42 |
| 6 | Fast-break points | 13 |
Players
| ODU | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan Battle G | 38 | 10 | 7 | 5 | 2-7 | 1-4 |
| LJ Thomas G | 37 | 13 | 3 | 6 | 5-8 | 2-3 |
| KC Shaw G | 35 | 11 | 4 | 2 | 5-16 | 0-2 |
| Caelum Swanton-Rodger F | 25 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| Scottie Hubbard G | 14 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 2-3 | 2-3 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Jared Turner F | 25 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 3-9 | 2-6 |
| Zacch Wiggins G | 15 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 3-3 | 2-2 |
| Donovan Raymond F | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| Drew McKenna F | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Rieco Hellams G | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: CJ Parker, Ben Nacey, Robert Davis Jr., Elijah Flowers, Stephaun Walker, Cooper Jones
| M-OH | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eian Elmer G | 31 | 5 | 8 | 1 | 1-7 | 1-5 |
| Brant Byers F | 29 | 18 | 2 | 0 | 6-9 | 2-5 |
| Evan Ipsaro G | 28 | 16 | 2 | 2 | 5-9 | 0-2 |
| Antwone Woolfolk F | 25 | 12 | 5 | 1 | 6-8 | 0-2 |
| Peter Suder G | 20 | 14 | 3 | 2 | 5-8 | 1-2 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Luke Skaljac G | 30 | 10 | 7 | 4 | 2-9 | 1-4 |
| Almar Atlason F | 18 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 2-4 | 2-4 |
| Trey Perry G | 12 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| Tyler Robbins F | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Kyle Waltz F | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Blake Anderson, Jackson Kotecki, Ethan Wright, Eli Yofan, Brady Ganley, Justin Kirby, Leshawn Stowers
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenM-OH -6.5
10 → M-OH
CloseM-OH -16.5
10 pts toward M-OH
Total
Open147.5
▲ 6
Close153.5
Up 6 since the open
Moneyline
—
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened M-OH -6.5 · closed M-OH -16.5 · moved 10 toward M-OHmodel M-OH -0.5
model M-OH -0.5
Opened 147.5 · closed 153.5 · moved 6 upmodel 146
model 146
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | M-OH -16.5 | M-OH -0.5 | ODU +16.1 | W ODU covered |
| Total | 153.5 | 146.0 | Under 7.5 | L Over |
| Projected score | — | ODU 72.8 · M-OH 73.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | M-OH -0.1 | ODU -8.0 |
| 1H total | 68.4 | 82 |
| 1H projected score | ODU 34.1 · M-OH 34.2 | ODU 45 · M-OH 37 |
Showing 2024-25 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2024-25
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | |
| 6-4 60% | 7-3 70% | 2-8 20% |
ATS History · 2024-25
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Old Dominion
33 games played
Straight up
13-20
39% wins
Against the spread
17-16
52% covers · avg −0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-20
39% overs · avg −2.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | L 82-83 | -10.5 | L −11.5 | 146.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 44-102 | +33.5 | L −24.5 | 163.5 | U 146 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 75-87 | +3.5 | L −8.5 | 142.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 73-71 | -11.5 | L −9.5 | 147.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 52-82 | +11.5 | L −18.5 | 143.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 67-73 | +14.5 | W +8.5 | 145.5 | U 140 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 54-67 | +9.5 | L −3.5 | 139.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 88-83 | +7.5 | W +12.5 | 157.5 | O 171 |
| Dec 7 | vs | L 70-78 | +8.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 15 | vs | L 71-75 | +6.5 | W +2.5 | 142.5 | O 146 |
| Dec 21 | @ | W 80-75 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 142.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 2 | vs | L 59-78 | +10.5 | L −8.5 | 153.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 74-71 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 9 | @ | W 71-60 | +3.5 | W +14.5 | 144.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 11 | @ | W 71-63 | +13.5 | W +21.5 | 135.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 16 | vs | L 43-62 | +3.5 | L −15.5 | 134.5 | U 105 |
| Jan 18 | vs | L 63-67 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 147.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 22 | vs | L 60-74 | +6.5 | L −7.5 | 136.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 25 | vs | W 74-52 | -4.5 | W +17.5 | 133.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 29 | @ | W 78-77 | +10.5 | W +11.5 | 127.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 1 | @ | L 54-68 | +10.5 | L −3.5 | 138.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 75-64 | +2.5 | W +13.5 | 140.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 8 | @ | L 70-76 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 142.5 | O 146 |
| Feb 13 | @ | L 75-97 | +2.5 | L −19.5 | 150.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 75-78 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 20 | vs | L 77-81 | +4.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 22 | vs | L 70-76 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 152.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 66-83 | +9.5 | L −7.5 | 147.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 61-59 | +0.5 | W +2.5 | 137.5 | U 120 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 67-49 | -4.5 | W +13.5 | 136.5 | U 116 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 64-61 | +6.5 | W +9.5 | 140.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 61-56 | +8.5 | W +13.5 | 128.5 | U 117 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 59-75 | +11.5 | L −4.5 | 130.5 | O 134 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
BUF
L 82-83
−11.5
9
@
ARIZ
L 44-102
−24.5
12
@
RAD
L 75-87
−8.5
15
vs
UMES
W 73-71
−9.5
24
vs
BC
L 52-82
−18.5
25
vs
HPU
L 67-73
+8.5
26
vs
DUQ
L 54-67
−3.5
2
vs
W&M
W 88-83
+12.5
7
vs
GW
L 70-78
+0.5
15
vs
NE
L 71-75
+2.5
21
@
ULM
W 80-75
+6.5
2
vs
ARST
L 59-78
−8.5
4
vs
USM
W 74-71
+0.5
9
@
UL
W 71-60
+14.5
11
@
USA
W 71-63
+21.5
16
vs
APP
L 43-62
−15.5
18
vs
GASO
L 63-67
−6.5
22
vs
JMU
L 60-74
−7.5
25
vs
CCU
W 74-52
+17.5
29
@
APP
W 78-77
+11.5
1
@
JMU
L 54-68
−3.5
5
vs
TXST
W 75-64
+13.5
8
@
EMU
L 70-76
−4.5
13
@
GAST
L 75-97
−19.5
15
@
GASO
L 75-78
+2.5
20
vs
MRSH
L 77-81
+0.5
22
vs
GAST
L 70-76
−8.5
25
@
MRSH
L 66-83
−7.5
28
@
CCU
W 61-59
+2.5
5
vs
UL
W 67-49
+13.5
6
vs
TXST
W 64-61
+9.5
7
vs
APP
W 61-56
+13.5
8
vs
TROY
L 59-75
−4.5
covered 17didn’t cover 16avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
BUF
L 82-83
+18.5
9
@
ARIZ
L 44-102
−17.5
12
@
RAD
L 75-87
+19.5
15
vs
UMES
W 73-71
−3.5
24
vs
BC
L 52-82
−9.5
25
vs
HPU
L 67-73
−5.5
26
vs
DUQ
L 54-67
−18.5
2
vs
W&M
W 88-83
+13.5
7
vs
GW
L 70-78
+0.5
15
vs
NE
L 71-75
+3.5
21
@
ULM
W 80-75
+12.5
2
vs
ARST
L 59-78
−16.5
4
vs
USM
W 74-71
−0.5
9
@
UL
W 71-60
−13.5
11
@
USA
W 71-63
−1.5
16
vs
APP
L 43-62
−29.5
18
vs
GASO
L 63-67
−17.5
22
vs
JMU
L 60-74
−2.5
25
vs
CCU
W 74-52
−7.5
29
@
APP
W 78-77
+27.5
1
@
JMU
L 54-68
−16.5
5
vs
TXST
W 75-64
−1.5
8
@
EMU
L 70-76
+3.5
13
@
GAST
L 75-97
+21.5
15
@
GASO
L 75-78
+6.5
20
vs
MRSH
L 77-81
+10.5
22
vs
GAST
L 70-76
−6.5
25
@
MRSH
L 66-83
+1.5
28
@
CCU
W 61-59
−17.5
5
vs
UL
W 67-49
−20.5
6
vs
TXST
W 64-61
−15.5
7
vs
APP
W 61-56
−11.5
8
vs
TROY
L 59-75
+3.5
over 13under 20avg −2.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Miami OH
32 games played
Straight up
23-9
72% wins
Against the spread
20-12
63% covers · avg +2.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-15
53% overs · avg +2.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | W 77-63 | +6.5 | W +20.5 | 138.5 | O 140 |
| Nov 9 | vs | L 68-81 | -3.5 | L −16.5 | 154.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 88-70 | -18.5 | L −0.5 | 141.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 67-94 | +23.5 | L −3.5 | 151.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 70-58 | -4.5 | W +7.5 | 136.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 75-72 | -3.5 | L −0.5 | 152.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 73-60 | -6.5 | W +6.5 | 131.5 | O 133 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 57-76 | +18.5 | L −0.5 | 150.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 67-75 | +4.5 | L −3.5 | 129.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 94-76 | -7.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 93-79 | -11.5 | W +2.5 | 149.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 80-72 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 144.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 11 | vs | W 91-71 | -9.5 | W +10.5 | 149.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 84-69 | -10.5 | W +4.5 | 148.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 18 | @ | W 70-61 | +5.5 | W +14.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 84-76 | -9.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 25 | @ | L 75-102 | +7.5 | L −19.5 | 156.5 | O 177 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 89-80 | -8.5 | W +0.5 | 152.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 1 | vs | W 73-69 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 161.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 76-70 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | O 146 |
| Feb 8 | vs | W 69-62 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 140.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 92-80 | -4.5 | W +7.5 | 156.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 70-78 | -6.5 | L −14.5 | 152.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 66-76 | -4.5 | L −14.5 | 152.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 96-92 | -0.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | O 188 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 87-58 | -13.5 | W +15.5 | 151.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 1 | @ | L 66-75 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 159.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 4 | @ | W 84-69 | -8.5 | W +6.5 | 153.5 | U 153 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 79-66 | -9.5 | W +3.5 | 150.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 81-75 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 148.5 | O 156 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 72-64 | +3.5 | W +11.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Mar 15 | vs | L 74-76 | +6.5 | W +4.5 | 159.5 | U 150 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
APP
W 77-63
+20.5
9
vs
WRST
L 68-81
−16.5
12
vs
UMES
W 88-70
−0.5
18
@
MICH
L 67-94
−3.5
25
vs
SIE
W 70-58
+7.5
26
vs
MER
W 75-72
−0.5
2
vs
AF
W 73-60
+6.5
6
@
IU
L 57-76
−0.5
18
@
UVM
L 67-75
−3.5
22
vs
SHU
W 94-76
+10.5
4
vs
BUF
W 93-79
+2.5
7
@
BALL
W 80-72
+6.5
11
vs
WMU
W 91-71
+10.5
14
@
NIU
W 84-69
+4.5
18
@
KENT
W 70-61
+14.5
21
vs
BGSU
W 84-76
−1.5
25
@
AKR
L 75-102
−19.5
28
vs
EMU
W 89-80
+0.5
1
vs
OHIO
W 73-69
−1.5
4
@
CMU
W 76-70
+7.5
8
vs
TROY
W 69-62
+8.5
11
vs
TOL
W 92-80
+7.5
15
@
WMU
L 70-78
−14.5
18
@
EMU
L 66-76
−14.5
21
vs
KENT
W 96-92
+3.5
25
vs
NIU
W 87-58
+15.5
1
@
OHIO
L 66-75
−2.5
4
@
BUF
W 84-69
+6.5
7
vs
BALL
W 79-66
+3.5
13
vs
EMU
W 81-75
+0.5
14
vs
KENT
W 72-64
+11.5
15
vs
AKR
L 74-76
+4.5
covered 20didn’t cover 12avg +2.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
APP
W 77-63
+1.5
9
vs
WRST
L 68-81
−5.5
12
vs
UMES
W 88-70
+16.5
18
@
MICH
L 67-94
+9.5
25
vs
SIE
W 70-58
−8.5
26
vs
MER
W 75-72
−5.5
2
vs
AF
W 73-60
+1.5
6
@
IU
L 57-76
−17.5
18
@
UVM
L 67-75
+12.5
22
vs
SHU
W 94-76
+22.5
4
vs
BUF
W 93-79
+22.5
7
@
BALL
W 80-72
+7.5
11
vs
WMU
W 91-71
+12.5
14
@
NIU
W 84-69
+4.5
18
@
KENT
W 70-61
−10.5
21
vs
BGSU
W 84-76
+10.5
25
@
AKR
L 75-102
+20.5
28
vs
EMU
W 89-80
+16.5
1
vs
OHIO
W 73-69
−19.5
4
@
CMU
W 76-70
+1.5
8
vs
TROY
W 69-62
−9.5
11
vs
TOL
W 92-80
+15.5
15
@
WMU
L 70-78
−4.5
18
@
EMU
L 66-76
−10.5
21
vs
KENT
W 96-92
+41.5
25
vs
NIU
W 87-58
−6.5
1
@
OHIO
L 66-75
−18.5
4
@
BUF
W 84-69
−0.5
7
vs
BALL
W 79-66
−5.5
13
vs
EMU
W 81-75
+7.5
14
vs
KENT
W 72-64
−10.5
15
vs
AKR
L 74-76
−9.5
over 17under 15avg +2.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Old Dominion
0-0 overall · 0-0 in conference · Sun Belt Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- No games yet
A week or more of rest.
Miami OH
0-0 overall · 0-0 in conference · Mid-American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- No games yet
A week or more of rest.