Sanford Coyote Sports Center · at South Dakota
Closing line
SDAK -1.5✓ UTU covered by 3.5
Closing total164.5Under by 4.5
| This season | SDAK | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: UTU 76–81 SDAK · ✗ SDAK (67%) lost
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | OT | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UTU | 30 | 38 | 13 | 81 |
| SDAK | 29 | 39 | 11 | 79 |
1st half: UTU 30, SDAK 29 (UTU by 1). The model had SDAK by 2.8 and a total of 73.8 (actual 59).
Team stats
| UTU | SDAK | |
|---|---|---|
| 33-73 45% | Field goals | 25-66 38% |
| 7-27 26% | 3-pointers | 2-17 12% |
| 8-13 62% | Free throws | 27-35 77% |
| 42 12 off | Rebounds | 45 14 off |
| 17 | Assists | 7 |
| 5 | Steals | 4 |
| 6 | Blocks | 2 |
| 15 | Turnovers | 14 |
| 23 | Fouls | 16 |
| 44 | Points in paint | 42 |
| 12 | Fast-break points | 0 |
Players
| UTU | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chance Trujillo G | 45 | 17 | 12 | 5 | 6-13 | 3-9 |
| Jusaun Holt G | 38 | 11 | 8 | 1 | 4-9 | 2-3 |
| Noah Bolanga G | 34 | 15 | 4 | 2 | 6-16 | 1-7 |
| Ethan Potter F | 30 | 15 | 5 | 3 | 6-11 | 0-0 |
| Britton Berrett G | 23 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1-6 | 0-4 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Tanner Davis G | 31 | 17 | 3 | 1 | 8-12 | 1-3 |
| Samuel Ariyibi F | 15 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| Boston Harker G | 9 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-1 |
Did not play: Marvel Allen, Dario Domingos, Preston Vandermyde, Madiba Owona, Hunter Schenck, Dallin Grant
| SDAK | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isaac Bruns G | 34 | 23 | 3 | 0 | 8-24 | 0-4 |
| Jordan Crawford G | 26 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2-11 | 1-8 |
| Cameron Fens C | 19 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| Jesse McIntosh G | 18 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 1-4 | 0-1 |
| Shey Eberwein G | 18 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 4-7 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Vince Buzelis G | 29 | 8 | 11 | 0 | 1-6 | 0-2 |
| Jake Brack F | 26 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| Uzziah Buntyn G | 26 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 2-5 | 0-1 |
| Evan Anderson G | 25 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 3-3 | 1-1 |
| Ethan Kizer F | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Ashton Smith, Jonah Funk, Caleb Kizer, Luke Bruns, Josiah Dotzler, Porter Ihnen, Jalen Hayes
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenSDAK -2.5
1 → UTU
CloseSDAK -1.5
1 pt toward UTU
Total
Open160.5
▲ 4
Close164.5
Up 4 since the open
Moneyline
UTU +115 · SDAK -135
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened SDAK -2.5 · closed SDAK -1.5 · moved 1 toward UTUmodel SDAK -5
model SDAK -5
Opened 160.5 · closed 164.5 · moved 4 upmodel 157.5
model 157.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | SDAK -1.5 | SDAK -5.0 | SDAK +3.5 | L UTU covered |
| Total | 164.5 | 157.7 | Under 6.8 | W Under |
| Projected score | — | UTU 76.4 · SDAK 81.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | SDAK -2.8 | UTU -1.0 |
| 1H total | 73.8 | 59 |
| 1H projected score | UTU 35.5 · SDAK 38.3 | UTU 30 · SDAK 29 |
Showing 2024-25 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2024-25
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-9 10% | 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | |
| 6-4 60% | 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
UTU 1–0 SDAKUTU leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · UTU 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2024-25 | SDAK 87 @ UTU 92 | UTU +2.5 | UTU W |
ATS History · 2024-25
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Utah Tech
31 games played
Straight up
5-26
16% wins
Against the spread
15-16
48% covers · avg −0.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-16
48% overs · avg −1.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 57-80 | +9.5 | L −13.5 | 142.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 9 | vs | L 63-75 | +3.5 | L −8.5 | 149.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 16 | @ | L 69-86 | +10.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | O 155 |
| Nov 22 | @ | L 53-84 | +25.5 | L −5.5 | 154.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 79-89 | +8.5 | L −1.5 | 154.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 66-69 | +10.5 | W +7.5 | 146.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 68-54 | -2.5 | W +11.5 | 150.5 | U 122 |
| Nov 30 | @ | L 68-71 | +6.5 | W +3.5 | 152.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 64-87 | +23.5 | W +0.5 | 148.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 62-92 | +24.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 71-73 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 143.5 | O 144 |
| Dec 19 | vs | W 92-87 | +2.5 | W +7.5 | 163.5 | O 179 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 66-80 | +5.5 | L −8.5 | 147.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 9 | vs | W 74-62 | +3.5 | W +15.5 | 153.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 11 | vs | W 58-54 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 136.5 | U 112 |
| Jan 16 | @ | L 62-82 | +11.5 | L −8.5 | 141.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 18 | @ | L 80-96 | +13.5 | L −2.5 | 140.5 | O 176 |
| Jan 25 | vs | L 66-79 | +13.5 | W +0.5 | 148.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 30 | @ | L 54-61 | +5.5 | L −1.5 | 133.5 | U 115 |
| Feb 1 | @ | L 71-73 | +9.5 | W +7.5 | 146.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 6 | vs | L 72-86 | -2.5 | L −16.5 | 138.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 13 | @ | L 74-76 | +2.5 | W +0.5 | 144.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 83-86 | +11.5 | W +8.5 | 144.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 20 | vs | L 77-79 | +7.5 | W +5.5 | 146.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 22 | @ | L 72-80 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 27 | vs | L 75-82 | -3.5 | L −10.5 | 146.5 | O 157 |
| Mar 1 | vs | L 57-61 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | U 118 |
| Mar 6 | @ | L 68-90 | +16.5 | L −5.5 | 148.5 | O 158 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 65-70 | +7.5 | W +2.5 | 137.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 72-65 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 143.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 57-74 | +12.5 | L −4.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
ORST
L 57-80
−13.5
9
vs
NMSU
L 63-75
−8.5
16
@
WYO
L 69-86
−6.5
22
@
UTAH
L 53-84
−5.5
24
vs
CSUN
L 79-89
−1.5
25
@
MONT
L 66-69
+7.5
26
vs
DEN
W 68-54
+11.5
30
@
PRST
L 68-71
+3.5
3
@
BOIS
L 64-87
+0.5
7
@
USU
L 62-92
−5.5
13
vs
WEB
L 71-73
+1.5
19
vs
SDAK
W 92-87
+7.5
30
@
FIU
L 66-80
−8.5
9
vs
UTA
W 74-62
+15.5
11
vs
TAR
W 58-54
+2.5
16
@
SEA
L 62-82
−8.5
18
@
UVU
L 80-96
−2.5
25
vs
GCU
L 66-79
+0.5
30
@
TAR
L 54-61
−1.5
1
@
UTA
L 71-73
+7.5
6
vs
ACU
L 72-86
−16.5
13
@
SUU
L 74-76
+0.5
15
@
CBU
L 83-86
+8.5
20
vs
UVU
L 77-79
+5.5
22
@
ACU
L 72-80
−1.5
27
vs
SUU
L 75-82
−10.5
1
vs
CBU
L 57-61
−2.5
6
@
GCU
L 68-90
−5.5
8
vs
SEA
L 65-70
+2.5
11
vs
SUU
W 72-65
+2.5
12
vs
UVU
L 57-74
−4.5
covered 15didn’t cover 16avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
ORST
L 57-80
−5.5
9
vs
NMSU
L 63-75
−11.5
16
@
WYO
L 69-86
+9.5
22
@
UTAH
L 53-84
−17.5
24
vs
CSUN
L 79-89
+13.5
25
@
MONT
L 66-69
−11.5
26
vs
DEN
W 68-54
−28.5
30
@
PRST
L 68-71
−13.5
3
@
BOIS
L 64-87
+2.5
7
@
USU
L 62-92
+3.5
13
vs
WEB
L 71-73
+0.5
19
vs
SDAK
W 92-87
+15.5
30
@
FIU
L 66-80
−1.5
9
vs
UTA
W 74-62
−17.5
11
vs
TAR
W 58-54
−24.5
16
@
SEA
L 62-82
+2.5
18
@
UVU
L 80-96
+35.5
25
vs
GCU
L 66-79
−3.5
30
@
TAR
L 54-61
−18.5
1
@
UTA
L 71-73
−2.5
6
vs
ACU
L 72-86
+19.5
13
@
SUU
L 74-76
+5.5
15
@
CBU
L 83-86
+24.5
20
vs
UVU
L 77-79
+9.5
22
@
ACU
L 72-80
+6.5
27
vs
SUU
L 75-82
+10.5
1
vs
CBU
L 57-61
−26.5
6
@
GCU
L 68-90
+9.5
8
vs
SEA
L 65-70
−2.5
11
vs
SUU
W 72-65
−6.5
12
vs
UVU
L 57-74
−10.5
over 15under 16avg −1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
South Dakota
30 games played
Straight up
16-14
53% wins
Against the spread
17-13
57% covers · avg −0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
21-9
70% overs · avg +6.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 93-79 | -2.5 | W +11.5 | 142.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 6 | vs | W 91-83 | -10.5 | L −2.5 | 149.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 77-96 | +19.5 | W +0.5 | 174.5 | U 173 |
| Nov 20 | @ | W 80-76 | -2.5 | W +1.5 | 157.5 | U 156 |
| Nov 22 | @ | L 83-92 | -2.5 | L −11.5 | 152.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 27 | @ | L 79-96 | +22.5 | W +5.5 | 157.5 | O 175 |
| Dec 4 | vs | W 94-80 | -3.5 | W +10.5 | 151.5 | O 174 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 82-95 | +0.5 | L −12.5 | 157.5 | O 177 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 82-81 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 156.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 89-66 | -9.5 | W +13.5 | 153.5 | O 155 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 87-92 | -2.5 | L −7.5 | 163.5 | O 179 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 81-98 | +18.5 | W +1.5 | 168.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 54-68 | +4.5 | L −9.5 | 154.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 91-84 | -9.5 | L −2.5 | 162.5 | O 175 |
| Jan 11 | @ | L 104-119 | +9.5 | L −5.5 | 167.5 | O 223 |
| Jan 16 | vs | W 92-82 | -7.5 | W +2.5 | 171.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 18 | vs | L 77-103 | +3.5 | L −22.5 | 169.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 23 | @ | W 102-93 | +3.5 | W +12.5 | 175.5 | O 195 |
| Jan 25 | @ | L 71-90 | +12.5 | L −6.5 | 172.5 | U 161 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 91-87 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 169.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 6 | @ | W 86-79 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 164.5 | O 165 |
| Feb 8 | @ | W 75-74 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 171.5 | U 149 |
| Feb 13 | vs | W 79-72 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 157.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 16 | vs | L 91-94 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 174.5 | O 185 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 85-80 | +3.5 | W +8.5 | 174.5 | U 165 |
| Feb 22 | @ | L 85-93 | +4.5 | L −3.5 | 172.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 78-82 | +6.5 | W +2.5 | 170.5 | U 160 |
| Mar 1 | vs | W 92-79 | -4.5 | W +8.5 | 175.5 | U 171 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 85-84 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 164.5 | O 169 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 75-100 | +5.5 | L −19.5 | 166.5 | O 175 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
SOU
W 93-79
+11.5
6
vs
ETAM
W 91-83
−2.5
12
@
IOWA
L 77-96
+0.5
20
@
WMU
W 80-76
+1.5
22
@
USI
L 83-92
−11.5
27
@
NEB
L 79-96
+5.5
4
vs
IDST
W 94-80
+10.5
7
@
NAU
L 82-95
−12.5
10
vs
WYO
W 82-81
−0.5
14
vs
WIU
W 89-66
+13.5
19
@
UTU
L 87-92
−7.5
21
@
SCU
L 81-98
+1.5
2
@
KC
L 54-68
−9.5
4
vs
DEN
W 91-84
−2.5
11
@
STMN
L 104-119
−5.5
16
vs
ORU
W 92-82
+2.5
18
vs
NDSU
L 77-103
−22.5
23
@
UND
W 102-93
+12.5
25
@
SDST
L 71-90
−6.5
29
vs
OMA
W 91-87
+5.5
6
@
DEN
W 86-79
+5.5
8
@
ORU
W 75-74
−0.5
13
vs
KC
W 79-72
+4.5
16
vs
SDST
L 91-94
+2.5
19
vs
STMN
W 85-80
+8.5
22
@
OMA
L 85-93
−3.5
26
@
NDSU
L 78-82
+2.5
1
vs
UND
W 92-79
+8.5
7
vs
NDSU
W 85-84
+2.5
8
vs
OMA
L 75-100
−19.5
covered 17didn’t cover 13avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
SOU
W 93-79
+29.5
6
vs
ETAM
W 91-83
+24.5
12
@
IOWA
L 77-96
−1.5
20
@
WMU
W 80-76
−1.5
22
@
USI
L 83-92
+22.5
27
@
NEB
L 79-96
+17.5
4
vs
IDST
W 94-80
+22.5
7
@
NAU
L 82-95
+19.5
10
vs
WYO
W 82-81
+6.5
14
vs
WIU
W 89-66
+1.5
19
@
UTU
L 87-92
+15.5
21
@
SCU
L 81-98
+10.5
2
@
KC
L 54-68
−32.5
4
vs
DEN
W 91-84
+12.5
11
@
STMN
L 104-119
+55.5
16
vs
ORU
W 92-82
+2.5
18
vs
NDSU
L 77-103
+10.5
23
@
UND
W 102-93
+19.5
25
@
SDST
L 71-90
−11.5
29
vs
OMA
W 91-87
+8.5
6
@
DEN
W 86-79
+0.5
8
@
ORU
W 75-74
−22.5
13
vs
KC
W 79-72
−6.5
16
vs
SDST
L 91-94
+10.5
19
vs
STMN
W 85-80
−9.5
22
@
OMA
L 85-93
+5.5
26
@
NDSU
L 78-82
−10.5
1
vs
UND
W 92-79
−4.5
7
vs
NDSU
W 85-84
+4.5
8
vs
OMA
L 75-100
+8.5
over 21under 9avg +6.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Utah Tech
0-0 overall · 0-0 in conference · Big Sky Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- No games yet
A week or more of rest.
South Dakota
0-0 overall · 0-0 in conference · Summit League
Last five, 2025-26
- No games yet
A week or more of rest.