Wintrust Arena · at DePaul
Closing line
DEP -24.5✓ DEP covered by 5.5
Closing total143.5Over by 10.5
| This season | DEP | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: CHST 60–85 DEP · ✓ DEP (99%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHST | 21 | 41 | 62 |
| DEP | 46 | 46 | 92 |
1st half: CHST 21, DEP 46 (DEP by 25). The model had DEP by 15.4 and a total of 68.0 (actual 67).
Team stats
| CHST | DEP | |
|---|---|---|
| 21-56 38% | Field goals | 30-60 50% |
| 4-16 25% | 3-pointers | 8-25 32% |
| 16-23 70% | Free throws | 24-35 69% |
| 34 11 off | Rebounds | 43 16 off |
| 8 | Assists | 21 |
| 8 | Steals | 12 |
| 3 | Blocks | 7 |
| 16 | Turnovers | 13 |
| 22 | Fouls | 18 |
| 28 | Points in paint | 42 |
| 3 | Fast-break points | 9 |
Players
| CHST | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcus Tankersley G | 33 | 16 | 9 | 0 | 6-11 | 0-1 |
| Lionel Larvadain G | 27 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1-5 | 0-1 |
| Doyel Cockrill III G | 27 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 3-9 | 2-5 |
| CJ Ray F | 26 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 2-7 | 0-2 |
| Daniel Zatsepin F | 20 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Braelon Bush G | 25 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 2-8 | 1-5 |
| Stephen Byard F | 15 | 16 | 1 | 0 | 5-8 | 1-1 |
| Dailliss Cox F | 12 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 2-4 | 0-1 |
| Malek Robinson G | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Corey Sands G | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Joseph Owens F | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Dakari Thomas, Chauncey Gibson, Greg Spate, DaJuan Bates, Deshawn Jean-Charles, CJ Delancy
| DEP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brandon Maclin G | 28 | 7 | 3 | 6 | 2-5 | 1-2 |
| Layden Blocker G | 26 | 16 | 2 | 4 | 5-10 | 1-5 |
| CJ Gunn G | 26 | 12 | 3 | 4 | 5-12 | 1-6 |
| NJ Benson F | 21 | 16 | 10 | 1 | 7-8 | 0-0 |
| Kaleb Banks F | 19 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 1-4 | 0-1 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Jeremy Lorenz F | 14 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Theo Pierre-Justin F | 14 | 12 | 5 | 0 | 5-7 | 2-2 |
| RJ Smith G | 14 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-2 |
| Khaman Maker C | 12 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| Ilija Milijasevic G | 12 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2-3 | 2-3 |
| Kruz McClure G | 12 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1-4 | 1-4 |
| Nate Kasher G | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Amsal Delalic, Isaiah Medina, Jonas Johnson, Fabian Flores
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenDEP -24.5
no move
CloseDEP -24.5
No change since the open
Total
Open143.5
no move
Close143.5
No change since the open
Moneyline
CHST +3500 · DEP -50000
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened DEP -24.5 · unchangedmodel DEP -25.5
model DEP -25.5
Opened 143.5 · unchangedmodel 145.5
model 145.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | DEP -24.5 | DEP -25.5 | DEP +1.0 | W DEP covered |
| Total | 143.5 | 145.3 | Over 1.8 | W Over |
| Projected score | — | CHST 59.9 · DEP 85.4 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | DEP -15.4 | DEP -25.0 |
| 1H total | 68.0 | 67 |
| 1H projected score | CHST 26.3 · DEP 41.7 | CHST 21 · DEP 46 |
Showing 2024-25 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2024-25
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% | |
| 3-7 30% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
CHST 0–1 DEPDEP leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · CHST 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2023-24 | CHST 58 @ DEP 70 | DEP -6.5 | DEP W |
ATS History · 2024-25
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Chicago St
32 games played
Straight up
4-28
13% wins
Against the spread
14-18
44% covers · avg −2.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-15
53% overs · avg −0.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 72-79 | +21.5 | W +14.5 | 137.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 9 | vs | L 60-80 | +5.5 | L −14.5 | 151.5 | U 140 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 58-105 | +30.5 | L −16.5 | 147.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 16 | @ | L 37-82 | +27.5 | L −17.5 | 149.5 | U 119 |
| Nov 19 | vs | L 66-86 | +6.5 | L −13.5 | 148.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 22 | @ | L 61-97 | +17.5 | L −18.5 | 155.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 48-63 | +14.5 | L −0.5 | 143.5 | U 111 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 71-83 | +18.5 | W +6.5 | 134.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 30 | @ | L 53-74 | +34.5 | W +13.5 | 148.5 | U 127 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 76-98 | +19.5 | L −2.5 | 140.5 | O 174 |
| Dec 8 | @ | L 62-85 | +25.5 | W +2.5 | 154.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 15 | @ | L 63-75 | +15.5 | W +3.5 | 151.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 51-74 | +31.5 | W +8.5 | 150.5 | U 125 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 57-81 | +20.5 | L −3.5 | 150.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 64-117 | +39.5 | L −13.5 | 150.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 64-52 | +9.5 | W +21.5 | 126.5 | U 116 |
| Jan 5 | @ | L 39-53 | +7.5 | L −6.5 | 138.5 | U 92 |
| Jan 12 | vs | L 52-68 | +3.5 | L −12.5 | 134.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 18 | vs | W 88-72 | +3.5 | W +19.5 | 140.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 20 | vs | L 48-58 | +3.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | U 106 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 73-75 | +9.5 | W +7.5 | 132.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 26 | @ | L 64-81 | +14.5 | L −2.5 | 129.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 1 | vs | W 73-67 | +3.5 | W +9.5 | 128.5 | O 140 |
| Feb 6 | vs | W 85-78 | -0.5 | W +6.5 | 131.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 8 | vs | L 69-81 | +1.5 | L −10.5 | 140.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 13 | @ | L 49-91 | +8.5 | L −33.5 | 144.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 75-80 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 148.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 20 | vs | L 75-81 | +11.5 | W +5.5 | 136.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 22 | vs | L 52-64 | +3.5 | L −8.5 | 125.5 | U 116 |
| Feb 27 | @ | L 68-90 | +6.5 | L −15.5 | 138.5 | O 158 |
| Mar 1 | @ | L 71-80 | +8.5 | L −0.5 | 142.5 | O 151 |
| Mar 5 | @ | L 57-68 | +12.5 | W +1.5 | 129.5 | U 125 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
LUC
L 72-79
+14.5
9
vs
YSU
L 60-80
−14.5
12
@
TEX
L 58-105
−16.5
16
@
SF
L 37-82
−17.5
19
vs
EKU
L 66-86
−13.5
22
@
INST
L 61-97
−18.5
25
vs
RAD
L 48-63
−0.5
26
vs
DREX
L 71-83
+6.5
30
@
WIS
L 53-74
+13.5
2
@
STMN
L 76-98
−2.5
8
@
SLU
L 62-85
+2.5
15
@
MER
L 63-75
+3.5
19
@
GCU
L 51-74
+8.5
21
@
CSUN
L 57-81
−3.5
29
@
ILL
L 64-117
−13.5
3
@
WAG
W 64-52
+21.5
5
@
LIU
L 39-53
−6.5
12
vs
STO
L 52-68
−12.5
18
vs
LEM
W 88-72
+19.5
20
vs
FDU
L 48-58
−6.5
24
@
STO
L 73-75
+7.5
26
@
CCSU
L 64-81
−2.5
1
vs
LIU
W 73-67
+9.5
6
vs
MERC
W 85-78
+6.5
8
vs
SFPA
L 69-81
−10.5
13
@
FDU
L 49-91
−33.5
15
@
LEM
L 75-80
+0.5
20
vs
CCSU
L 75-81
+5.5
22
vs
WAG
L 52-64
−8.5
27
@
MERC
L 68-90
−15.5
1
@
SFPA
L 71-80
−0.5
5
@
LIU
L 57-68
+1.5
covered 14didn’t cover 18avg −2.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
LUC
L 72-79
+13.5
9
vs
YSU
L 60-80
−11.5
12
@
TEX
L 58-105
+15.5
16
@
SF
L 37-82
−30.5
19
vs
EKU
L 66-86
+3.5
22
@
INST
L 61-97
+2.5
25
vs
RAD
L 48-63
−32.5
26
vs
DREX
L 71-83
+19.5
30
@
WIS
L 53-74
−21.5
2
@
STMN
L 76-98
+33.5
8
@
SLU
L 62-85
−7.5
15
@
MER
L 63-75
−13.5
19
@
GCU
L 51-74
−25.5
21
@
CSUN
L 57-81
−12.5
29
@
ILL
L 64-117
+30.5
3
@
WAG
W 64-52
−10.5
5
@
LIU
L 39-53
−46.5
12
vs
STO
L 52-68
−14.5
18
vs
LEM
W 88-72
+19.5
20
vs
FDU
L 48-58
−39.5
24
@
STO
L 73-75
+15.5
26
@
CCSU
L 64-81
+15.5
1
vs
LIU
W 73-67
+11.5
6
vs
MERC
W 85-78
+31.5
8
vs
SFPA
L 69-81
+9.5
13
@
FDU
L 49-91
−4.5
15
@
LEM
L 75-80
+6.5
20
vs
CCSU
L 75-81
+19.5
22
vs
WAG
L 52-64
−9.5
27
@
MERC
L 68-90
+19.5
1
@
SFPA
L 71-80
+8.5
5
@
LIU
L 57-68
−4.5
over 17under 15avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
DePaul
34 games played
Straight up
14-20
41% wins
Against the spread
17-17
50% covers · avg +0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-15
56% overs · avg +2.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 80-78 | -14.5 | L −12.5 | 146.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 92-59 | -16.5 | W +16.5 | 152.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 95-64 | -8.5 | W +22.5 | 157.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 84-58 | -5.5 | W +20.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 78-69 | -18.5 | L −9.5 | 145.5 | O 147 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 98-52 | -17.5 | W +28.5 | 143.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 89-70 | -14.5 | W +4.5 | 150.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 4 | @ | L 62-76 | +13.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 10 | vs | L 63-70 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 138.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 91-72 | -4.5 | W +14.5 | 151.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 61-89 | +11.5 | L −16.5 | 151.5 | U 150 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 64-84 | +6.5 | L −13.5 | 135.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 28 | vs | W 84-65 | -18.5 | W +0.5 | 144.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 1 | vs | L 68-81 | +12.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 56-100 | +9.5 | L −34.5 | 146.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 80-85 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 133.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 11 | vs | L 63-77 | +4.5 | L −9.5 | 151.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 83-85 | +12.5 | W +10.5 | 146.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 73-68 | +5.5 | W +10.5 | 137.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 21 | vs | L 49-73 | +7.5 | L −16.5 | 143.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 25 | @ | L 69-86 | +6.5 | L −10.5 | 143.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 61-72 | +13.5 | W +2.5 | 140.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 2 | vs | W 74-57 | -4.5 | W +12.5 | 134.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 5 | vs | L 49-59 | +6.5 | L −3.5 | 141.5 | U 108 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 58-68 | +16.5 | W +6.5 | 141.5 | U 126 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 68-85 | +12.5 | L −4.5 | 143.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 58-82 | +11.5 | L −12.5 | 143.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 22 | vs | L 72-84 | +4.5 | L −7.5 | 146.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 65-75 | +15.5 | W +5.5 | 146.5 | U 140 |
| Mar 5 | @ | W 80-77 | +8.5 | W +11.5 | 144.5 | O 157 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 83-77 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 144.5 | O 160 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 71-67 | +4.5 | W +8.5 | 144.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 81-85 | +12.5 | W +8.5 | 142.5 | O 166 |
| Apr 1 | vs | L 61-83 | +9.5 | L −12.5 | 145.5 | U 144 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
USI
W 80-78
−12.5
7
vs
PV
W 92-59
+16.5
11
vs
MER
W 95-64
+22.5
15
vs
DUQ
W 84-58
+20.5
19
vs
EIU
W 78-69
−9.5
23
vs
NIU
W 98-52
+28.5
29
vs
VAL
W 89-70
+4.5
4
@
TTU
L 62-76
−0.5
10
vs
PROV
L 63-70
−8.5
14
vs
WICH
W 91-72
+14.5
17
@
SJU
L 61-89
−16.5
21
@
NU
L 64-84
−13.5
28
vs
L-MD
W 84-65
+0.5
1
vs
CONN
L 68-81
−0.5
4
@
VILL
L 56-100
−34.5
8
@
HALL
L 80-85
−2.5
11
vs
XAV
L 63-77
−9.5
14
vs
MARQ
L 83-85
+10.5
17
@
GTWN
W 73-68
+10.5
21
vs
CREI
L 49-73
−16.5
25
@
BTLR
L 69-86
−10.5
29
@
CONN
L 61-72
+2.5
2
vs
HALL
W 74-57
+12.5
5
vs
VILL
L 49-59
−3.5
11
@
MARQ
L 58-68
+6.5
15
@
XAV
L 68-85
−4.5
19
vs
SJU
L 58-82
−12.5
22
vs
BTLR
L 72-84
−7.5
26
@
CREI
L 65-75
+5.5
5
@
PROV
W 80-77
+11.5
8
vs
GTWN
W 83-77
+4.5
12
vs
GTWN
W 71-67
+8.5
13
vs
CREI
L 81-85
+8.5
1
vs
CIN
L 61-83
−12.5
covered 17didn’t cover 17avg +0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
USI
W 80-78
+11.5
7
vs
PV
W 92-59
−1.5
11
vs
MER
W 95-64
+1.5
15
vs
DUQ
W 84-58
−2.5
19
vs
EIU
W 78-69
+1.5
23
vs
NIU
W 98-52
+6.5
29
vs
VAL
W 89-70
+8.5
4
@
TTU
L 62-76
−9.5
10
vs
PROV
L 63-70
−5.5
14
vs
WICH
W 91-72
+11.5
17
@
SJU
L 61-89
−1.5
21
@
NU
L 64-84
+12.5
28
vs
L-MD
W 84-65
+4.5
1
vs
CONN
L 68-81
+3.5
4
@
VILL
L 56-100
+9.5
8
@
HALL
L 80-85
+31.5
11
vs
XAV
L 63-77
−11.5
14
vs
MARQ
L 83-85
+21.5
17
@
GTWN
W 73-68
+3.5
21
vs
CREI
L 49-73
−21.5
25
@
BTLR
L 69-86
+11.5
29
@
CONN
L 61-72
−7.5
2
vs
HALL
W 74-57
−3.5
5
vs
VILL
L 49-59
−33.5
11
@
MARQ
L 58-68
−15.5
15
@
XAV
L 68-85
+9.5
19
vs
SJU
L 58-82
−3.5
22
vs
BTLR
L 72-84
+9.5
26
@
CREI
L 65-75
−6.5
5
@
PROV
W 80-77
+12.5
8
vs
GTWN
W 83-77
+15.5
12
vs
GTWN
W 71-67
−6.5
13
vs
CREI
L 81-85
+23.5
1
vs
CIN
L 61-83
−1.5
over 19under 15avg +2.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Chicago St
0-0 overall · 0-0 in conference · Northeast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- No games yet
A week or more of rest.
DePaul
0-0 overall · 0-0 in conference · Big East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- No games yet
A week or more of rest.