Crisler Center · at Michigan
Closing line
MICH -24.5✓ MICH covered by 18.5
Closing total156.5Over by 42.5
| This season | MICH | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: OAK 61–89 MICH · ✓ MICH (99%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| OAK | 38 | 40 | 78 |
| MICH | 69 | 52 | 121 |
1st half: OAK 38, MICH 69 (MICH by 31). The model had MICH by 17.1 and a total of 70.1 (actual 107).
Team stats
| OAK | MICH | |
|---|---|---|
| 27-64 42% | Field goals | 45-70 64% |
| 11-26 42% | 3-pointers | 19-35 54% |
| 13-15 87% | Free throws | 12-13 92% |
| 22 5 off | Rebounds | 40 6 off |
| 11 | Assists | 31 |
| 6 | Steals | 3 |
| 0 | Blocks | 7 |
| 11 | Turnovers | 8 |
| 11 | Fouls | 15 |
| 26 | Points in paint | 46 |
| 6 | Fast-break points | 10 |
Players
| OAK | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brody Robinson G | 36 | 11 | 2 | 5 | 3-8 | 3-6 |
| Tuburu Naivalurua F | 34 | 18 | 5 | 0 | 6-16 | 3-7 |
| Isaac Garrett F | 33 | 20 | 1 | 1 | 8-10 | 1-1 |
| Ziare Wells G | 32 | 14 | 6 | 2 | 5-13 | 1-3 |
| Nassim Mashhour G | 22 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 2-6 | 2-5 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Brett White II G | 17 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2-5 | 1-4 |
| Khoi Thurmon G | 15 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1-5 | 0-0 |
| Nate Deer F | 11 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Warren Marshall IV, Hamoudy Mashhour, Donny Yeager, William Kassi, MJ Yeager, Michael Houge
| MICH | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elliot Cadeau G | 25 | 5 | 5 | 14 | 2-7 | 1-4 |
| Roddy Gayle Jr. G | 21 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 5-7 | 1-3 |
| Nimari Burnett G | 20 | 14 | 2 | 2 | 5-9 | 4-7 |
| Morez Johnson Jr. F | 20 | 24 | 3 | 3 | 10-11 | 0-1 |
| Aday Mara C | 20 | 12 | 12 | 2 | 6-9 | 0-1 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Trey McKenney G | 28 | 21 | 2 | 4 | 7-10 | 6-8 |
| Yaxel Lendeborg F | 22 | 12 | 4 | 3 | 4-5 | 2-3 |
| Will Tschetter F | 21 | 16 | 4 | 0 | 4-6 | 4-5 |
| Malick Kordel C | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Oscar Goodman F | 8 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1-4 | 0-2 |
| Charlie May G | 7 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1-2 | 1-1 |
Did not play: Winters Grady, Ricky Liburd, Howard Eisley Jr., L.J. Cason, Harrison Hochberg
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenMICH -24.5
no move
CloseMICH -24.5
No change since the open
Total
Open149.5
▲ 7
Close156.5
Up 7 since the open
Moneyline
OAK +3000 · MICH -50000
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened MICH -24.5 · unchangedmodel MICH -28.5
model MICH -28.5
Opened 149.5 · closed 156.5 · moved 7 upmodel 150
model 150
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | MICH -24.5 | MICH -28.4 | MICH +3.9 | W MICH covered |
| Total | 156.5 | 149.8 | Under 6.7 | L Over |
| Projected score | — | OAK 60.7 · MICH 89.1 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | MICH -17.1 | MICH -31.0 |
| 1H total | 70.1 | 107 |
| 1H projected score | OAK 26.5 · MICH 43.6 | OAK 38 · MICH 69 |
Showing 2024-25 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2024-25
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% | |
| 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% |
ATS History · 2024-25
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Oakland
33 games played
Straight up
15-18
45% wins
Against the spread
16-17
48% covers · avg −0 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-16
52% overs · avg +3.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6 | @ | L 43-87 | +16.5 | L −27.5 | 142.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 13 | @ | L 54-66 | +23.5 | W +11.5 | 150.5 | U 120 |
| Nov 16 | @ | L 57-78 | +27.5 | W +6.5 | 146.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 64-68 | -7.5 | L −11.5 | 134.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 30 | @ | W 85-52 | +8.5 | W +41.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 5 | vs | W 66-64 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 139.5 | U 130 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 50-66 | +2.5 | L −13.5 | 131.5 | U 116 |
| Dec 17 | vs | L 58-77 | +16.5 | L −2.5 | 133.5 | O 135 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 75-92 | +0.5 | L −16.5 | 128.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 72-71 | +6.5 | W +7.5 | 133.5 | O 143 |
| Dec 23 | vs | L 74-80 | +9.5 | W +3.5 | 130.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 25 | @ | L 70-73 | +3.5 | W +0.5 | 132.5 | O 143 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 62-92 | +16.5 | L −13.5 | 138.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 65-49 | -0.5 | W +15.5 | 146.5 | U 114 |
| Jan 4 | vs | L 71-79 | -5.5 | L −13.5 | 135.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 9 | @ | L 62-66 | +2.5 | L −1.5 | 137.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 11 | @ | W 68-53 | +3.5 | W +18.5 | 128.5 | U 121 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 72-59 | -8.5 | W +4.5 | 135.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 18 | @ | W 65-59 | -9.5 | L −3.5 | 133.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 76-72 | -0.5 | W +3.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 25 | @ | L 71-73 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 135.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 68-54 | -14.5 | L −0.5 | 136.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 1 | vs | L 75-84 | -6.5 | L −15.5 | 129.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 6 | vs | L 75-84 | -4.5 | L −13.5 | 138.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 82-67 | -6.5 | W +8.5 | 145.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 16 | vs | W 93-83 | -13.5 | L −3.5 | 139.5 | O 176 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 66-80 | +3.5 | L −10.5 | 154.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 23 | vs | W 91-86 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 138.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 27 | @ | L 66-71 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 148.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 1 | @ | W 87-84 | -9.5 | L −6.5 | 148.5 | O 171 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 96-72 | -10.5 | W +13.5 | 146.5 | O 168 |
| Mar 6 | @ | W 72-64 | +7.5 | W +15.5 | 148.5 | U 136 |
| Mar 10 | vs | L 76-79 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 141.5 | O 155 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
6
@
BOIS
L 43-87
−27.5
13
@
ILL
L 54-66
+11.5
16
@
KU
L 57-78
+6.5
21
vs
EMU
L 64-68
−11.5
30
@
TOL
W 85-52
+41.5
5
vs
WRST
W 66-64
+0.5
7
@
YSU
L 50-66
−13.5
17
vs
MSU
L 58-77
−2.5
19
@
CLE
L 75-92
−16.5
22
vs
LUC
W 72-71
+7.5
23
vs
ORST
L 74-80
+3.5
25
@
HAW
L 70-73
+0.5
30
@
ARK
L 62-92
−13.5
2
vs
MILW
W 65-49
+15.5
4
vs
RMU
L 71-79
−13.5
9
@
WRST
L 62-66
−1.5
11
@
NKU
W 68-53
+18.5
15
vs
IUIN
W 72-59
+4.5
18
@
DETM
W 65-59
−3.5
22
vs
PFW
W 76-72
+3.5
25
@
RMU
L 71-73
−0.5
30
vs
GB
W 68-54
−0.5
1
vs
NKU
L 75-84
−15.5
6
vs
YSU
L 75-84
−13.5
12
@
IUIN
W 82-67
+8.5
16
vs
DETM
W 93-83
−3.5
21
@
PFW
L 66-80
−10.5
23
vs
CLE
W 91-86
+2.5
27
@
MILW
L 66-71
+0.5
1
@
GB
W 87-84
−6.5
4
vs
GB
W 96-72
+13.5
6
@
MILW
W 72-64
+15.5
10
vs
RMU
L 76-79
−0.5
covered 16didn’t cover 17avg −0 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
6
@
BOIS
L 43-87
−12.5
13
@
ILL
L 54-66
−30.5
16
@
KU
L 57-78
−11.5
21
vs
EMU
L 64-68
−2.5
30
@
TOL
W 85-52
−10.5
5
vs
WRST
W 66-64
−9.5
7
@
YSU
L 50-66
−15.5
17
vs
MSU
L 58-77
+1.5
19
@
CLE
L 75-92
+38.5
22
vs
LUC
W 72-71
+9.5
23
vs
ORST
L 74-80
+23.5
25
@
HAW
L 70-73
+10.5
30
@
ARK
L 62-92
+15.5
2
vs
MILW
W 65-49
−32.5
4
vs
RMU
L 71-79
+14.5
9
@
WRST
L 62-66
−9.5
11
@
NKU
W 68-53
−7.5
15
vs
IUIN
W 72-59
−4.5
18
@
DETM
W 65-59
−9.5
22
vs
PFW
W 76-72
+3.5
25
@
RMU
L 71-73
+8.5
30
vs
GB
W 68-54
−14.5
1
vs
NKU
L 75-84
+29.5
6
vs
YSU
L 75-84
+20.5
12
@
IUIN
W 82-67
+3.5
16
vs
DETM
W 93-83
+36.5
21
@
PFW
L 66-80
−8.5
23
vs
CLE
W 91-86
+38.5
27
@
MILW
L 66-71
−11.5
1
@
GB
W 87-84
+22.5
4
vs
GB
W 96-72
+21.5
6
@
MILW
W 72-64
−12.5
10
vs
RMU
L 76-79
+13.5
over 17under 16avg +3.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Michigan
37 games played
Straight up
27-10
73% wins
Against the spread
18-19
49% covers · avg +1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-18
51% overs · avg −2.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 101-53 | -21.5 | W +26.5 | 147.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 10 | vs | L 70-72 | -2.5 | L −4.5 | 156.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 76-64 | -6.5 | W +5.5 | 151.5 | U 140 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 94-67 | -23.5 | W +3.5 | 151.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 72-49 | -31.5 | L −8.5 | 147.5 | U 121 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 75-63 | -10.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 78-53 | -1.5 | W +23.5 | 153.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 3 | @ | W 67-64 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 150.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 85-83 | -9.5 | L −7.5 | 159.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 10 | vs | L 87-89 | -3.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | O 176 |
| Dec 18 | vs | L 86-87 | -4.5 | L −5.5 | 149.5 | O 173 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 89-58 | -20.5 | W +10.5 | 160.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 112-64 | -21.5 | W +26.5 | 159.5 | O 176 |
| Jan 4 | @ | W 85-74 | -5.5 | W +5.5 | 151.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 94-75 | +1.5 | W +20.5 | 143.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 12 | vs | W 91-75 | -14.5 | W +1.5 | 154.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 16 | @ | L 81-84 | -10.5 | L −13.5 | 144.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 80-76 | -9.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 64-91 | +4.5 | L −22.5 | 150.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 76-72 | -9.5 | L −5.5 | 159.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 1 | @ | W 66-63 | -6.5 | L −3.5 | 155.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 80-76 | -7.5 | L −3.5 | 152.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 8 | @ | W 70-67 | -3.5 | L −0.5 | 154.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 75-73 | -2.5 | L −0.5 | 153.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 16 | @ | W 86-83 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 152.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 62-75 | -3.5 | L −16.5 | 150.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 24 | @ | W 49-46 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 151.5 | U 95 |
| Feb 27 | vs | W 84-82 | -9.5 | L −7.5 | 154.5 | O 166 |
| Mar 2 | vs | L 73-93 | -3.5 | L −23.5 | 162.5 | O 166 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 65-71 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 156.5 | U 136 |
| Mar 9 | @ | L 62-79 | +7.5 | L −9.5 | 148.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 86-68 | +2.5 | W +20.5 | 150.5 | O 154 |
| Mar 15 | vs | W 81-80 | +4.5 | W +5.5 | 149.5 | O 161 |
| Mar 16 | vs | W 59-53 | +4.5 | W +10.5 | 152.5 | U 112 |
| Mar 20 | vs | W 68-65 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 22 | vs | W 91-79 | +2.5 | W +14.5 | 143.5 | O 170 |
| Mar 28 | vs | L 65-78 | +9.5 | L −3.5 | 155.5 | U 143 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
CLE
W 101-53
+26.5
10
vs
WAKE
L 70-72
−4.5
15
vs
TCU
W 76-64
+5.5
18
vs
M-OH
W 94-67
+3.5
21
vs
TAR
W 72-49
−8.5
25
vs
VT
W 75-63
+1.5
27
vs
XAV
W 78-53
+23.5
3
@
WIS
W 67-64
+6.5
7
vs
IOWA
W 85-83
−7.5
10
vs
ARK
L 87-89
−5.5
18
vs
OU
L 86-87
−5.5
22
vs
PFW
W 89-58
+10.5
29
vs
WKU
W 112-64
+26.5
4
@
USC
W 85-74
+5.5
7
@
UCLA
W 94-75
+20.5
12
vs
WASH
W 91-75
+1.5
16
@
MINN
L 81-84
−13.5
19
vs
NU
W 80-76
−5.5
24
@
PUR
L 64-91
−22.5
27
vs
PSU
W 76-72
−5.5
1
@
RUTG
W 66-63
−3.5
5
vs
ORE
W 80-76
−3.5
8
@
IU
W 70-67
−0.5
11
vs
PUR
W 75-73
−0.5
16
@
OSU
W 86-83
+4.5
21
vs
MSU
L 62-75
−16.5
24
@
NEB
W 49-46
+1.5
27
vs
RUTG
W 84-82
−7.5
2
vs
ILL
L 73-93
−23.5
5
vs
MD
L 65-71
−7.5
9
@
MSU
L 62-79
−9.5
14
vs
PUR
W 86-68
+20.5
15
vs
MD
W 81-80
+5.5
16
vs
WIS
W 59-53
+10.5
20
vs
UCSD
W 68-65
+1.5
22
vs
TA&M
W 91-79
+14.5
28
vs
AUB
L 65-78
−3.5
covered 18didn’t cover 19avg +1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
CLE
W 101-53
+6.5
10
vs
WAKE
L 70-72
−14.5
15
vs
TCU
W 76-64
−11.5
18
vs
M-OH
W 94-67
+9.5
21
vs
TAR
W 72-49
−26.5
25
vs
VT
W 75-63
−8.5
27
vs
XAV
W 78-53
−22.5
3
@
WIS
W 67-64
−19.5
7
vs
IOWA
W 85-83
+8.5
10
vs
ARK
L 87-89
+28.5
18
vs
OU
L 86-87
+23.5
22
vs
PFW
W 89-58
−13.5
29
vs
WKU
W 112-64
+16.5
4
@
USC
W 85-74
+7.5
7
@
UCLA
W 94-75
+25.5
12
vs
WASH
W 91-75
+11.5
16
@
MINN
L 81-84
+20.5
19
vs
NU
W 80-76
+8.5
24
@
PUR
L 64-91
+4.5
27
vs
PSU
W 76-72
−11.5
1
@
RUTG
W 66-63
−26.5
5
vs
ORE
W 80-76
+3.5
8
@
IU
W 70-67
−17.5
11
vs
PUR
W 75-73
−5.5
16
@
OSU
W 86-83
+16.5
21
vs
MSU
L 62-75
−13.5
24
@
NEB
W 49-46
−56.5
27
vs
RUTG
W 84-82
+11.5
2
vs
ILL
L 73-93
+3.5
5
vs
MD
L 65-71
−20.5
9
@
MSU
L 62-79
−7.5
14
vs
PUR
W 86-68
+3.5
15
vs
MD
W 81-80
+11.5
16
vs
WIS
W 59-53
−40.5
20
vs
UCSD
W 68-65
−11.5
22
vs
TA&M
W 91-79
+26.5
28
vs
AUB
L 65-78
−12.5
over 19under 18avg −2.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Oakland
0-0 overall · 0-0 in conference · Horizon League
Last five, 2025-26
- No games yet
A week or more of rest.
Michigan
0-0 overall · 0-0 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- No games yet
A week or more of rest.