No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.2
Projected
29–36
✗ NAVY lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.5
Projected
35–37
✓ KU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.2
Projected
33–40
✓ INST won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.0
Projected
36–37
✓ STMN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.4
Projected
33–35
✓ MRMK won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.2
Projected
32–35
✓ NE won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 79.2
Projected
30–50
✓ ALA won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.9
Projected
35–35
✓ RGV won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.8
Projected
36–30
✓ SMC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.5
Projected
39–39
✓ IONA won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.2
Projected
39–36
✗ FAU lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.2
Projected
37–31
✓ USU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
31–39
✓ QUIN won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.0
Projected
32–40
✓ YALE won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.3
Projected
30–33
✓ SPU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.3
Projected
25–37
✓ SIE won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.0
Projected
30–37
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.7
Projected
32–40
✓ RAD won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.4
Projected
37–37
✓ TTU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.8
Projected
28–39
✓ SFA won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.3
Projected
33–36
✗ UTM lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.4
Projected
30–43
✓ SLU won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.3
Projected
35–38
✗ MSST lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.6
Projected
32–39
✓ UCF won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.6
Projected
36–40
✓ STAN won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.8
Projected
30–34
✗ PITT lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.3
Projected
36–36
✗ MTSU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.7
Projected
31–35
✓ SELA won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.9
Projected
32–40
✓ UNC won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.6
Projected
31–37
✓ LIP won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.1
Projected
37–35
✗ NEV lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.6
Projected
35–36
✓ NEB won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.3
Projected
32–37
✓ WRST won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.5
Projected
39–38
✗ TA&M lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.4
Projected
36–29
✗ TCU lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.1
Projected
33–34
✗ ETAM lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 79.2
Projected
40–39
✓ COR won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.4
Projected
29–35
✓ SEA won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.8
Projected
26–51
✓ GONZ won
| Status | Matchup | Spread | Total | Model line | Spread edge | Model total | Total edge | Win prob | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Half final | 3-7 · #220 4-5 · #199 |
— | — | NAVY -6.8 | — | 64.2 | — | 77% NAVY | › | |
| Half final | 8-1 · #54 6-3 · #16 |
— | — | KU -1.7 | — | 71.5 | — | 58% KU | › | |
| Half final | 1-6 · #304 3-4 · #207 |
— | — | INST -6.8 | — | 72.2 | — | 77% INST | › | |
| Half final | 3-4 · #313 5-4 · #212 |
— | — | STMN -1.8 | — | 73.0 | — | 58% STMN | › | |
| Half final | 5-4 · #239 4-6 · #225 |
— | — | MRMK -2.0 | — | 67.4 | — | 59% MRMK | › | |
| Half final | 3-3 · #337 3-5 · #229 |
— | — | NE -2.3 | — | 67.2 | — | 60% NE | › | |
| Half final | 2-4 · #192 6-2 · #15 |
— | — | ALA -20.0 | — | 79.2 | — | 99% ALA | › | |
| Half final | 3-4 · #210 1-5 · #287 |
— | — | RGV -0.3 | — | 69.9 | — | 51% RGV | › | |
| Half final | 7-1 · #97 6-1 · #115 |
— | — | SMC -5.6 | — | 65.8 | — | 73% SMC | › | |
| Half final | 6-3 · #233 2-5 · #311 |
— | — | IONA -0.5 | — | 77.5 | — | 52% IONA | › | |
| Half final | 4-3 · #109 4-4 · #266 |
— | — | FAU -2.5 | — | 75.2 | — | 61% FAU | › | |
| Half final | 6-1 · #58 3-5 · #141 |
— | — | USU -6.4 | — | 68.2 | — | 76% USU | › | |
| Half final | 0-6 · #347 5-3 · #241 |
— | — | QUIN -8.4 | — | 70.3 | — | 82% QUIN | › | |
| Half final | 3-4 · #110 7-1 · #126 |
— | — | YALE -7.9 | — | 72.0 | — | 80% YALE | › | |
| Half final | 2-6 · #346 3-4 · #269 |
— | — | SPU -3.4 | — | 63.3 | — | 64% SPU | › | |
| Half final | 3-5 · #359 8-2 · #260 |
— | — | SIE -11.6 | — | 62.3 | — | 90% SIE | › | |
| Half final | 3-5 · #330 4-2 · #236 |
— | — | MRST -7.0 | — | 67.0 | — | 78% MRST | › | |
| Half final | 0-7 · #88 1-7 · #246 |
— | — | RAD -7.2 | — | 71.7 | — | 79% RAD | › | |
| Half final | 8-0 · #51 6-2 · #12 |
— | — | TTU -0.2 | — | 74.4 | — | 51% TTU | › | |
| Half final | 1-6 · #358 5-2 · #193 |
— | — | SFA -11.0 | — | 67.8 | — | 88% SFA | › | |
| Half final | 2-5 · #302 4-2 · #341 |
— | — | UTM -2.5 | — | 69.3 | — | 61% UTM | › | |
| Half final | 2-5 · #270 7-1 · #69 |
— | — | SLU -13.4 | — | 73.4 | — | 93% SLU | › | |
| Half final | 4-4 · #161 4-4 · #53 |
— | — | MSST -3.0 | — | 72.3 | — | 63% MSST | › | |
| Half final | 5-3 · #165 7-1 · #39 |
— | — | UCF -6.3 | — | 70.6 | — | 75% UCF | › | |
| Half final | 3-5 · #98 7-1 · #85 |
— | — | STAN -4.1 | — | 76.6 | — | 67% STAN | › | |
| Half final | 4-4 · #166 5-4 · #74 |
— | — | PITT -4.7 | — | 63.8 | — | 70% PITT | › | |
| Half final | 7-1 · #138 3-3 · #154 |
— | — | MTSU -0.2 | — | 72.3 | — | 51% MTSU | › | |
| Half final | 0-7 · #318 2-5 · #252 |
— | — | SELA -4.3 | — | 65.7 | — | 68% SELA | › | |
| Half final | 6-2 · #64 7-1 · #44 |
— | — | UNC -7.0 | — | 71.9 | — | 78% UNC | › | |
| Half final | 3-3 · #328 4-4 · #214 |
— | — | LIP -6.0 | — | 67.6 | — | 75% LIP | › | |
| Half final | 6-3 · #96 2-6 · #139 |
— | — | NEV -1.5 | — | 72.1 | — | 56% NEV | › | |
| Half final | 5-3 · #37 8-0 · #27 |
— | — | NEB -1.2 | — | 71.6 | — | 55% NEB | › | |
| Half final | 2-6 · #226 2-5 · #180 |
— | — | WRST -4.5 | — | 69.3 | — | 69% WRST | › | |
| Half final | 7-2 · #28 8-1 · #55 |
— | — | TA&M -1.4 | — | 77.5 | — | 56% TA&M | › | |
| Half final | 5-3 · #40 6-2 · #112 |
— | — | TCU -6.6 | — | 64.4 | — | 76% TCU | › | |
| Half final | 3-5 · #240 2-4 · #342 |
— | — | ETAM -1.5 | — | 67.1 | — | 57% ETAM | › | |
| Half final | 4-4 · #179 4-6 · #184 |
— | — | COR -0.5 | — | 79.2 | — | 52% COR | › | |
| Half final | 0-4 · #190 5-2 · #119 |
— | — | SEA -5.9 | — | 63.4 | — | 74% SEA | › | |
| Half final | 0-6 · #333 8-1 · #17 |
— | — | GONZ -24.9 | — | 77.8 | — | 100% GONZ | › |
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record