Day in numbers

Tap a number to filter the games below

Games5252 final · 0 to play
Lines moved311+ pt since the open · 52 with a line
Totals moved411+ pt since the open
Favorites ATS26-2650% covered
Upsets14outright
Over / Under23-2944% over
Model Favorite40-1277% won
GameSpread, open → closeMovedTotalMoved
LONG vs SIELONG -6.5 → SIE -5.512 → SIE149.5 → 145.5▼ 4
MINN vs SCUMINN -6.5 → SCU -5.512 → SCU139.5 → 138.5▼ 1
ILL vs CONNILL -2.5 → CONN -4.57 → CONN154.5 → 150.5▼ 4
MONM vs BALLBALL -4.5 → MONM -2.57 → MONM138.5 → 136.5▼ 2
TA&M vs FSUFSU -1.5 → FSU -1.5no move167.5 → 174.5▲ 7
PROV vs FLAFLA -9.5 → FLA -12.53 → FLA165.5 → 169.5▲ 4
QUC @ UVAUVA -22.5 → UVA -25.53 → UVA160.5 → 160.5no move
SMU @ MSSTSMU -1.5 → MSST -1.53 → MSST165.5 → 162.5▼ 3
RICH vs CLTRICH -6.5 → RICH -6.5no move147.5 → 141.5▼ 6
CSU vs USFUSF -1.5 → USF -2.51 → USF160.5 → 155.5▼ 5
Line movedCoveredCover rate
1+ pts5579-5698-549%
2+ pts2172-2236-249%
3+ pts880-90849%
5+ pts139-14948%
Sort by

Sort

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
6-1 · #68
68
VCU
4-3 · #61
86
Spread
VCU -2.5
✓ VCU W ATS
Total
153.5
▲ Over 154
Projected
76–78
✓ VCU won
Model: VT by 0.2 ✗ Model: Over 0.9 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-4 · #361
62
6-0 · #23 AP #1
109
Spread
PUR -40.5
✓ PUR W ATS
Total
141.5
▲ Over 171
Projected
51–92
✓ PUR won
Model: PUR by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 1.5 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
0-5 · #252
76
0-6 · #348
68
Spread
SELA -6.5
✓ SELA W ATS
Total
141.5 ▲1
▲ Over 144
Projected
78–68
✓ SELA won
Model: SELA by 3.9 ✓ Model: Over 4.2 ✓
FinalNon-conference
3-3 · #229
73
5-2 · #89
86
Spread
WAKE -17.5
✓ NE W ATS
Total
154.5 ▲3
▲ Over 159
Projected
68–86
✓ WAKE won
Model: WAKE by 0.6 ✗ Model: Under 1.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
6-1 · #4 AP #13
61
5-1 · #6 AP #5
74
Spread
CONN -4.5
✓ CONN W ATS
Total
150.5 ▼4
▼ Under 135
Projected
79–79
✓ CONN won
Model: ILL by 4.1 ✗ Model: Over 7.0 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
4-1 · #104
71
2-4 · #141
66
Spread
RICH -6.5
✓ CLT W ATS
Total
141.5 ▼6
▼ Under 137
Projected
77–70
✓ RICH won
Model: Over 5.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
7-0 · #97
71
7-0 · #22 AP #24
96
Spread
VAN -4.5
✓ VAN W ATS
Total
149.5 ▼2
▲ Over 167
Projected
75–79
✓ VAN won
Model: SMC by 0.7 ✗ Model: Over 4.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
2-3 · #218
63
4-2 · #260
70
Spread
SIE -5.5
✓ SIE W ATS
Total
145.5 ▼4
▼ Under 133
Projected
74–78
✓ SIE won
Model: LONG by 1.5 ✗ Model: Over 6.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
4-2 · #161
65
4-3 · #96
81
Spread
SF -5.5
✓ NEV W ATS
Total
142.5 ▼2
▲ Over 146
Projected
74–72
✗ SF lost
Model: NEV by 3.5 ✓ Model: Over 4.0 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
3-3 · #207
74
0-7 · #360
81
Spread
INST -12.5
✓ ALCN W ATS
Total
152.5 ▲3
▲ Over 155
Projected
82–70
✗ INST lost
Model: INST by 0.1 ✗ Model: Under 0.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-5 · #315
59
7-0 · #54
86
Spread
MIZ -31.5
✓ CLE W ATS
Total
170.5
▼ Under 145
Projected
71–97
✓ MIZ won
Model: CLE by 5.6 ✓ Model: Under 2.2 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
4-2 · #103
52
4-1 · #119
66
Spread
SEA -7.5
✓ SEA W ATS
Total
136.5 ▼1
▼ Under 118
Projected
66–72
✓ SEA won
Model: TXST by 1.5 ✗ Model: Over 2.2 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-5 · #267
54
2-3 · #168
61
Spread
RMU -8.5
✓ SUU W ATS
Total
152.5 ▲1
▼ Under 115
Projected
74–84
✓ RMU won
Model: RMU by 1.8 ✗ Model: Over 4.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
4-2 · #31
75
4-3 · #42
74
Spread
OU -1.5
✓ MARQ W ATS
Total
162.5
▼ Under 149
Projected
82–81
✓ OU won
Model: MARQ by 0.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
1-3 · #155
80
1-3 · #181
73
Spread
MONM -2.5
✓ MONM W ATS
Total
136.5 ▼2
▲ Over 153
Projected
73–67
✓ MONM won
Model: MONM by 3.1 ✓ Model: Over 3.0 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
1-3 · #166
63
2-3 · #124
58
Spread
HOF -3.5
✓ HOF W ATS
Total
138.5 ▼4
▼ Under 121
Projected
72–70
✓ HOF won
Model: LAS by 1.8 ✗ Model: Over 3.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-3 · #180
69
5-1 · #72
94
Spread
BTLR -14.5
✓ BTLR W ATS
Total
150.5 ▼1
▲ Over 163
Projected
69–85
✓ BTLR won
Model: BTLR by 1.6 ✓ Model: Over 3.7 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
4-3 · #52
78
4-2 · #1 AP #10
90
Spread
FLA -12.5
✓ PROV W ATS
Total
169.5 ▲4
▼ Under 168
Projected
79–93
✓ FLA won
Model: FLA by 1.8 ✗ Model: Over 2.5 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
2-3 · #152
65
4-2 · #116
72
Spread
ILST -3.5
✓ ILST W ATS
Total
145.5 ▼2
▼ Under 137
Projected
69–75
✓ ILST won
Model: ILST by 2.3 ✓ Model: Under 0.9 ✓
FinalNon-conference
3-2 · #213
80
3-3 · #171
85
Spread
ARST -3.5
✓ ARST W ATS
Total
160.5 ▲4
▲ Over 165
Projected
78–80
✓ ARST won
Model: NDSU by 1.2 ✗ Model: Under 2.0 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-5 · #285
72
4-2 · #130
82
Spread
TULN -8.5
✓ TULN W ATS
Total
148.5 ▼2
▲ Over 154
Projected
71–79
✓ TULN won
Model: NICH by 0.4 ✗ Model: Over 2.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-7 · #362
64
2-4 · #265
87
Spread
YSU -14.5
✓ YSU W ATS
Total
146.5 ▼2
▲ Over 151
Projected
69–81
✓ YSU won
Model: CHST by 2.1 ✗ Model: Over 3.9 ✓
FinalNon-conference
Navy
3-3 · #199
57
4-1 · #120
87
Spread
UNCW -8.5
✓ UNCW W ATS
Total
138.5 ▼5
▲ Over 144
Projected
68–74
✓ UNCW won
Model: NAVY by 2.5 ✗ Model: Over 4.3 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-6 · #323
61
1-3 · #153
74
Spread
AMER -7.5
✓ AMER W ATS
Total
133.5 ▼2
▲ Over 135
Projected
66–72
✓ AMER won
Model: ME by 1.2 ✗ Model: Over 3.8 ✓
FinalNon-conference
NJIT
3-5 · #316
55
4-3 · #188
73
Spread
EMU -14.5
✓ EMU W ATS
Total
141.5 ▼2
▼ Under 128
Projected
64–77
✓ EMU won
Model: NJIT by 1.5 ✗ Model: Over 0.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-1 · #275
74
4-1 · #115
90
Spread
DAV -13.5
✓ DAV W ATS
Total
145.5 ▼3
▲ Over 164
Projected
67–79
✓ DAV won
Model: NCAT by 2.1 ✗ Model: Over 0.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference
3-3 · #326
62
4-2 · #79
74
Spread
SC -17.5
✓ CHSO W ATS
Total
150.5
▼ Under 136
Projected
67–88
✓ SC won
Model: SC by 3.8 ✗ Model: Over 3.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference
69
5-1 · #20
94
Spread
UVA -25.5
✓ QUC W ATS
Total
160.5
▲ Over 163
Projected
70–90
✓ UVA won
Model: QUC by 5.4 ✓ Model: Over 0.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-2 · #87
83
4-3 · #84
68
Spread
USF -2.5
✓ CSU W ATS
Total
155.5 ▼5
▼ Under 151
Projected
81–83
✗ USF lost
Model: CSU by 0.8 ✓ Model: Over 8.4 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-1 · #56
68
6-0 · #65
81
Spread
WASH -2.5
✓ COLO W ATS
Total
151.5 ▼2
▼ Under 149
Projected
82–80
✗ WASH lost
Model: COLO by 0.2 ✓ Model: Over 10.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
2-2 · #134
72
1-5 · #216
70
Spread
UCSB -10.5
✓ LEH W ATS
Total
146.5 ▼2
▼ Under 142
Projected
78–72
✓ UCSB won
Model: LEH by 4.7 ✓ Model: Over 3.5 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-4 · #332
76
0-5 · #310
63
Spread
LAF -4.5
✓ LEM W ATS
Total
151.5 ▼2
▼ Under 139
Projected
74–78
✗ LAF lost
Model: LAF by 0.2 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-4 · #225
65
Penn
2-2 · #137
77
Spread
PENN -2.5
✓ PENN W ATS
Total
152.5 ▼1
▼ Under 142
Projected
72–77
✓ PENN won
Model: PENN by 1.8 ✓ Model: Under 3.7 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-2 · #28
95
5-1 · #81
59
Spread
FSU -1.5
✓ TA&M W ATS
Total
174.5 ▲7
▼ Under 154
Projected
82–82
✓ TA&M won
Model: TA&M by 1.4 ✓ Model: Under 9.9 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-1 · #41
63
TCU
4-2 · #40
74
Spread
WIS -5.5
✓ TCU W ATS
Total
157.5 ▲3
▼ Under 137
Projected
79–76
✗ WIS lost
Model: TCU by 1.7 ✓ Model: Under 2.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-4 · #238
67
4-3 · #49
88
Spread
XAV -13.5
✓ XAV W ATS
Total
146.5 ▼1
▲ Over 155
Projected
66–79
✓ XAV won
Model: XAV by 0.2 ✓ Model: Under 1.5 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
2-3 · #194
50
1-4 · #344
82
Spread
IDST -1.5
✓ IDST W ATS
Total
148.5 ▼1
▼ Under 132
Projected
76–77
✓ IDST won
Model: CSUN by 0.3 ✗ Model: Over 3.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-2 · #25
78
5-1 · #64
65
Spread
MIA -5.5
✓ MIA W ATS
Total
151.5 ▼2
▼ Under 143
Projected
81–75
✓ MIA won
Model: MIA by 0.4 ✓ Model: Over 3.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
4-3 · #77
70
3-2 · #129
75
Spread
WICH -4.5
✓ WKU W ATS
Total
155.5 ▲1
▼ Under 145
Projected
80–75
✗ WICH lost
Model: WICH by 0.3 ✗ Model: Under 0.6 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-1 · #85
78
6-0 · #69
77
Spread
SLU -1.5
✓ STAN W ATS
Total
160.5 ▼1
▼ Under 155
Projected
77–82
✗ SLU lost
Model: SLU by 2.8 ✗ Model: Under 1.8 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-1 · #328
56
6-1 · #35
92
Spread
CLEM -27.5
✓ CLEM W ATS
Total
141.5 ▲1
▲ Over 148
Projected
60–87
✓ CLEM won
Model: CLEM by 0.3 ✓ Model: Over 5.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-1 · #94
61
4-2 · #66
75
Spread
DEP -1.5
✓ DEP W ATS
Total
147.5 ▲2
▼ Under 136
Projected
72–73
✓ DEP won
Model: DEP by 0.3 ✓ Model: Under 2.8 ✓
FinalNon-conference
SMU
7-0 · #55
87
3-3 · #53
81
Spread
MSST -1.5
✓ SMU W ATS
Total
162.5 ▼3
▲ Over 168
Projected
83–83
✓ SMU won
Model: SMU by 2.1 ✓ Model: Over 3.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference
6-0 · #33
66
Pitt
4-3 · #74
67
Spread
OSU -5.5
✓ PITT W ATS
Total
148.5 ▲2
▼ Under 133
Projected
79–72
✗ OSU lost
Model: OSU by 1.1 ✗ Model: Over 2.4 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
2-4 · #211
69
0-4 · #301
67
Spread
COLG -7.5
✓ UALB W ATS
Total
141.5 ▼4
▼ Under 136
Projected
80–71
✓ COLG won
Model: COLG by 0.8 ✗ Model: Over 9.2 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-6 · #280
51
1-6 · #221
45
Spread
UL -5.5
✓ JKST W ATS
Total
136.5
▼ Under 96
Projected
71–74
✗ UL lost
Model: JKST by 2.6 ✓ Model: Over 8.1 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
2-2 · #189
94
2-2 · #247
68
Spread
IDHO -1.5
✓ SHSU W ATS
Total
154.5
▲ Over 162
Projected
79–78
✓ SHSU won
Model: SHSU by 2.4 ✓ Model: Over 2.5 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
BYU
5-1 · #24 AP #9
83
6-1 · #91
79
Spread
BYU -9.5
✓ DAY W ATS
Total
150.5
▲ Over 162
Projected
84–69
✓ BYU won
Model: BYU by 5.0 ✗ Model: Over 2.2 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
4-3 · #70
75
5-1 · #106
86
Spread
SCU -5.5
✓ SCU W ATS
Total
138.5 ▼1
▲ Over 161
Projected
69–74
✓ SCU won
Model: MINN by 1.3 ✗ Model: Over 4.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
LSU
5-0 · #51
71
2-2 · #144
62
Spread
LSU -11.5
✓ DRKE W ATS
Total
151.5
▼ Under 133
Projected
85–70
✓ LSU won
Model: LSU by 3.5 ✗ Model: Over 2.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference
3-2 · #191
71
LMU
6-1 · #121
68
Spread
LMU -10.5
✓ STBK W ATS
Total
138.5
▲ Over 139
Projected
63–74
✗ LMU lost
Model: LMU by 0.3 ✗ Model: Under 1.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-5 · #336
55
4-2 · #140
92
Spread
HAW -18.5
✓ HAW W ATS
Total
149.5 ▲3
▼ Under 147
Projected
66–80
✓ HAW won
Model: UND by 4.5 ✗ Model: Under 2.6 ✓
StatusMatchupSpreadTotalModel lineSpread edgeModel totalTotal edgeWin probModel
Final
6-1 · #68
68
4-3 · #61
86
VCU -2.5 153.5 VCU -2.3 VT +0.2 154.4 Over 0.9 58% VCU L W ›
Final
1-4 · #361
62
6-0 · #23
109
PUR -40.5 141.5 PUR -41.0 PUR +0.5 143.0 Over 1.5 100% PUR W W ›
Final
0-5 · #252
76
0-6 · #348
68
SELA -6.5 141.5 SELA -10.4 SELA +3.9 145.7 Over 4.2 82% SELA W W ›
Final
3-3 · #229
73
5-2 · #89
86
WAKE -17.5 154.5 WAKE -18.1 WAKE +0.6 153.2 Under 1.3 94% WAKE L L ›
Final
6-1 · #4
61
5-1 · #6
74
CONN -4.5 150.5 CONN -0.4 ILL +4.1 157.5 Over 7.0 51% CONN L L ›
Final
4-1 · #104
71
2-4 · #141
66
RICH -6.5 141.5 RICH -6.5 — 147.2 Over 5.7 71% RICH L ›
Final
7-0 · #97
71
7-0 · #22
96
VAN -4.5 149.5 VAN -3.8 SMC +0.7 153.9 Over 4.4 63% VAN L W ›
Final
2-3 · #218
63
4-2 · #260
70
SIE -5.5 145.5 SIE -4.0 LONG +1.5 152.2 Over 6.7 64% SIE L L ›
Final
4-2 · #161
65
4-3 · #96
81
SF -5.5 142.5 SF -2.0 NEV +3.5 146.5 Over 4.0 57% SF W W ›
Final
3-3 · #207
74
0-7 · #360
81
INST -12.5 152.5 INST -12.6 INST +0.1 151.7 Under 0.8 86% INST L L ›
Final
1-5 · #315
59
7-0 · #54
86
MIZ -31.5 170.5 MIZ -25.9 CLE +5.6 168.3 Under 2.2 99% MIZ W W ›
Final
4-2 · #103
52
4-1 · #119
66
SEA -7.5 136.5 SEA -6.0 TXST +1.5 138.7 Over 2.2 70% SEA L L ›
Final
0-5 · #267
54
2-3 · #168
61
RMU -8.5 152.5 RMU -10.3 RMU +1.8 157.2 Over 4.7 82% RMU L L ›
Final
4-2 · #31
75
4-3 · #42
74
OU -1.5 162.5 OU -1.4 MARQ +0.1 162.5 — 55% OU W ›
Final
1-3 · #155
80
1-3 · #181
73
MONM -2.5 136.5 MONM -5.6 MONM +3.1 139.5 Over 3.0 69% MONM W W ›
Final
1-3 · #166
63
2-3 · #124
58
HOF -3.5 138.5 HOF -1.7 LAS +1.8 142.2 Over 3.7 56% HOF L L ›
Final
2-3 · #180
69
5-1 · #72
94
BTLR -14.5 150.5 BTLR -16.1 BTLR +1.6 154.2 Over 3.7 92% BTLR W W ›
Final
4-3 · #52
78
4-2 · #1
90
FLA -12.5 169.5 FLA -14.3 FLA +1.8 172.0 Over 2.5 90% FLA L L ›
Final
2-3 · #152
65
4-2 · #116
72
ILST -3.5 145.5 ILST -5.8 ILST +2.3 144.6 Under 0.9 69% ILST W W ›
Final
3-2 · #213
80
3-3 · #171
85
ARST -3.5 160.5 ARST -2.3 NDSU +1.2 158.5 Under 2.0 58% ARST L L ›
Final
0-5 · #285
72
4-2 · #130
82
TULN -8.5 148.5 TULN -8.1 NICH +0.4 150.6 Over 2.1 76% TULN L W ›
Final
0-7 · #362
64
2-4 · #265
87
YSU -14.5 146.5 YSU -12.4 CHST +2.1 150.4 Over 3.9 86% YSU L W ›
Final
3-3 · #199
57
4-1 · #120
87
UNCW -8.5 138.5 UNCW -6.0 NAVY +2.5 142.8 Over 4.3 70% UNCW L W ›
Final
0-6 · #323
61
1-3 · #153
74
AMER -7.5 133.5 AMER -6.3 ME +1.2 137.3 Over 3.8 71% AMER L W ›
Final
3-5 · #316
55
4-3 · #188
73
EMU -14.5 141.5 EMU -13.0 NJIT +1.5 141.8 Over 0.3 87% EMU L L ›
Final
2-1 · #275
74
4-1 · #115
90
DAV -13.5 145.5 DAV -11.4 NCAT +2.1 145.9 Over 0.4 84% DAV L W ›
Final
3-3 · #326
62
4-2 · #79
74
SC -17.5 150.5 SC -21.3 SC +3.8 154.2 Over 3.7 97% SC L L ›
Final
5-1 · #20
94
UVA -25.5 160.5 UVA -20.1 QUC +5.4 160.6 Over 0.1 96% UVA W W ›
Final
5-2 · #87
83
4-3 · #84
68
USF -2.5 155.5 USF -1.7 CSU +0.8 163.9 Over 8.4 56% USF W L ›
Final
5-1 · #56
68
6-0 · #65
81
WASH -2.5 151.5 WASH -2.3 COLO +0.2 162.2 Over 10.7 58% WASH W L ›
Final
2-2 · #134
72
1-5 · #216
70
UCSB -10.5 146.5 UCSB -5.8 LEH +4.7 150.0 Over 3.5 70% UCSB W L ›
Final
1-4 · #332
76
0-5 · #310
63
LAF -4.5 151.5 LAF -4.7 LAF +0.2 152.0 Over 0.5 66% LAF L L ›
Final
2-4 · #225
65
2-2 · #137
77
PENN -2.5 152.5 PENN -4.3 PENN +1.8 148.8 Under 3.7 65% PENN W W ›
Final
5-2 · #28
95
5-1 · #81
59
FSU -1.5 174.5 FSU -0.1 TA&M +1.4 164.6 Under 9.9 50% FSU W W ›
Final
5-1 · #41
63
4-2 · #40
74
WIS -5.5 157.5 WIS -3.8 TCU +1.7 155.1 Under 2.4 63% WIS W W ›
Final
0-4 · #238
67
4-3 · #49
88
XAV -13.5 146.5 XAV -13.7 XAV +0.2 145.0 Under 1.5 88% XAV W L ›
Final
2-3 · #194
50
1-4 · #344
82
IDST -1.5 148.5 IDST -1.2 CSUN +0.3 152.2 Over 3.7 54% IDST L L ›
Final
5-2 · #25
78
5-1 · #64
65
MIA -5.5 151.5 MIA -5.9 MIA +0.4 155.3 Over 3.8 70% MIA W L ›
Final
4-3 · #77
70
3-2 · #129
75
WICH -4.5 155.5 WICH -4.8 WICH +0.3 154.9 Under 0.6 66% WICH L W ›
Final
5-1 · #85
78
6-0 · #69
77
SLU -1.5 160.5 SLU -4.3 SLU +2.8 158.7 Under 1.8 65% SLU L W ›
Final
2-1 · #328
56
6-1 · #35
92
CLEM -27.5 141.5 CLEM -27.8 CLEM +0.3 146.9 Over 5.4 99% CLEM W W ›
Final
5-1 · #94
61
4-2 · #66
75
DEP -1.5 147.5 DEP -1.8 DEP +0.3 144.7 Under 2.8 56% DEP W W ›
Final
7-0 · #55
87
3-3 · #53
81
MSST -1.5 162.5 SMU -0.6 SMU +2.1 165.9 Over 3.4 52% SMU W W ›
Final
6-0 · #33
66
4-3 · #74
67
OSU -5.5 148.5 OSU -6.6 OSU +1.1 150.9 Over 2.4 72% OSU L L ›
Final
2-4 · #211
69
0-4 · #301
67
COLG -7.5 141.5 COLG -8.3 COLG +0.8 150.7 Over 9.2 76% COLG L L ›
Final
0-6 · #280
51
1-6 · #221
45
UL -5.5 136.5 UL -2.9 JKST +2.6 144.6 Over 8.1 60% UL W L ›
Final
2-2 · #189
94
2-2 · #247
68
IDHO -1.5 154.5 SHSU -0.9 SHSU +2.4 157.0 Over 2.5 53% SHSU W W ›
Final
5-1 · #24
83
6-1 · #91
79
BYU -9.5 150.5 BYU -14.5 BYU +5.0 152.7 Over 2.2 90% BYU L W ›
Final
4-3 · #70
75
5-1 · #106
86
SCU -5.5 138.5 SCU -4.2 MINN +1.3 142.9 Over 4.4 64% SCU L W ›
Final
5-0 · #51
71
2-2 · #144
62
LSU -11.5 151.5 LSU -15.0 LSU +3.5 154.1 Over 2.6 91% LSU L L ›
Final
3-2 · #191
71
6-1 · #121
68
LMU -10.5 138.5 LMU -10.8 LMU +0.3 136.8 Under 1.7 83% LMU L L ›
Final
2-5 · #336
55
4-2 · #140
92
HAW -18.5 149.5 HAW -14.0 UND +4.5 146.9 Under 2.6 89% HAW L W ›
The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record