Day in numbers

Tap a number to filter the games below

Games3636 final · 0 to play
Lines moved281+ pt since the open · 36 with a line
Totals moved321+ pt since the open
Favorites ATS16-2044% covered
Upsets4outright
Over / Under22-1461% over
Model Favorite30-683% won
GameSpread, open → closeMovedTotalMoved
LOU @ TENNLOU -1.5 → TENN -4.56 → TENN157.5 → 156.5▼ 1
LEM @ TEXTEX -26.5 → TEX -29.53 → TEX159.5 → 152.5▼ 7
M-OH @ WRSTWRST -1.5 → M-OH -1.53 → M-OH152.5 → 149.5▼ 3
ETSU @ UNCUNC -14.5 → UNC -17.53 → UNC149.5 → 150.5▲ 1
UNCO @ TTUTTU -22.5 → TTU -25.53 → TTU153.5 → 152.5▼ 1
QUC @ ARKARK -24.5 → ARK -23.51 → QUC175.5 → 169.5▼ 6
FIU @ MIAMIA -22.5 → MIA -22.5no move155.5 → 161.5▲ 6
BEL @ EVANBEL -10.5 → BEL -8.52 → EVAN152.5 → 147.5▼ 5
BTLR @ CONNCONN -16.5 → CONN -15.51 → BTLR149.5 → 144.5▼ 5
MRST @ GTGT -6.5 → GT -6.5no move136.5 → 141.5▲ 5
Line movedCoveredCover rate
1+ pts5579-5698-549%
2+ pts2172-2236-249%
3+ pts880-90849%
5+ pts139-14948%
Sort by

Sort

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
FinalNon-conference
4-5 · #197
74
3-6 · #262
66
Spread
DREX -6.5
✓ HOW W ATS
Total
138.5
▲ Over 140
Projected
68–73
✗ DREX lost
Model: HOW by 0.9 ✓ Model: Over 2.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference
5-4 · #214
73
Duke
10-0 · #3 AP #3
97
Spread
DUKE -32.5
✓ LIP W ATS
Total
151.5
▲ Over 170
Projected
60–88
✓ DUKE won
Model: LIP by 4.3 ✓ Model: Under 2.9 ✗
FinalNon-conference
4-6 · #325
78
0-11 · #353
72
Spread
UPST -10.5
✓ SCST W ATS
Total
147.5
▲ Over 150
Projected
80–71
✓ UPST won
Model: SCST by 1.6 ✓ Model: Over 3.0 ✓
FinalNon-conference
3-6 · #311
82
1-8 · #307
87
Spread
SHU -2.5
✓ UML W ATS
Total
151.5 ▼3
▲ Over 169
Projected
77–79
✓ UML won
Model: UML by 4.4 ✓ Model: Over 5.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference
3-5 · #251
89
3-6 · #317
64
Spread
DART -1.5
✓ DART W ATS
Total
147.5 ▲1
▲ Over 153
Projected
73–74
✗ HC lost
Model: HC by 2.8 ✗ Model: Under 0.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference
4-5 · #157
69
9-1 · #10 AP #9
92
Spread
MSU -23.5
✓ TOL W ATS
Total
150.5 ▼1
▲ Over 161
Projected
63–87
✓ MSU won
Model: TOL by 0.1 ✓ Model: Under 0.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference
9-1 · #14 AP #11
62
7-3 · #7 AP #20
83
Spread
TENN -4.5
✓ TENN W ATS
Total
156.5 ▼1
▼ Under 145
Projected
78–78
✗ LOU lost
Model: LOU by 4.8 ✗ Model: Under 0.1 ✓
FinalConference
8-3 · #66
66
6-3 · #9 AP #22
79
Spread
SJU -19.5
✓ DEP W ATS
Total
147.5 ▼4
▼ Under 145
Projected
65–87
✓ SJU won
Model: SJU by 2.2 ✗ Model: Over 3.9 ✗
FinalConference
9-1 · #138
83
2-7 · #255
78
Spread
BEL -8.5
✓ EVAN W ATS
Total
147.5 ▼5
▲ Over 161
Projected
78–71
✓ BEL won
Model: EVAN by 1.2 ✓ Model: Over 0.9 ✓
FinalNon-conference
4-4 · #275
71
2-8 · #284
65
Spread
UNCG -6.5
✓ NCAT W ATS
Total
147.5 ▼3
▼ Under 136
Projected
74–78
✗ UNCG lost
Model: NCAT by 1.8 ✓ Model: Over 4.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference
3-4 · #185
88
0-9 · #366
64
Spread
TAR -17.5
✓ TAR W ATS
Total
142.5 ▼4
▲ Over 152
Projected
85–65
✓ TAR won
Model: TAR by 2.4 ✓ Model: Over 7.2 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-9 · #335
67
7-3 · #31
89
Spread
OU -30.5
✓ KC W ATS
Total
153.5 ▲3
▲ Over 156
Projected
62–89
✓ OU won
Model: KC by 3.6 ✓ Model: Under 2.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-8 · #347
57
3-6 · #206
65
Spread
DEL -8.5
✓ RID W ATS
Total
129.5 ▼3
▼ Under 122
Projected
64–73
✓ DEL won
Model: DEL by 0.9 ✗ Model: Over 7.5 ✗
FinalNon-conference
8-0 · #125
83
3-6 · #180
76
Spread
M-OH -1.5
✓ M-OH W ATS
Total
149.5 ▼3
▲ Over 159
Projected
76–78
✗ WRST lost
Model: WRST by 2.7 ✗ Model: Over 4.6 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-9 · #362
55
5-3 · #200
76
Spread
BGSU -21.5
✓ CHST W ATS
Total
148.5 ▲2
▼ Under 131
Projected
66–84
✓ BGSU won
Model: CHST by 3.7 ✓ Model: Over 1.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference
5-5 · #81
69
8-3 · #91
97
Spread
DAY -6.5
✓ DAY W ATS
Total
162.5
▲ Over 166
Projected
78–81
✓ DAY won
Model: FSU by 3.2 ✗ Model: Under 3.2 ✗
FinalNon-conference
4-6 · #359
45
7-4 · #105
62
Spread
URI -21.5
✓ CAN W ATS
Total
138.5 ▲3
▼ Under 107
Projected
57–79
✓ URI won
Model: URI by 0.9 ✗ Model: Under 2.3 ✓
FinalNon-conference
7-3 · #79
61
8-3 · #35
68
Spread
CLEM -12.5
✓ SC W ATS
Total
142.5 ▲3
▼ Under 129
Projected
69–78
✓ CLEM won
Model: SC by 2.9 ✓ Model: Over 4.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference
FIU
3-3 · #178
81
9-2 · #25
98
Spread
MIA -22.5
✓ FIU W ATS
Total
161.5 ▲6
▲ Over 179
Projected
69–88
✓ MIA won
Model: FIU by 3.7 ✓ Model: Under 4.9 ✗
FinalConference
2-6 · #287
83
3-4 · #293
72
Spread
LAM -3.5
✓ RGV W ATS
Total
139.5 ▲4
▲ Over 155
Projected
67–69
✗ LAM lost
Model: RGV by 1.5 ✓ Model: Under 2.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference
6-2 · #236
76
6-4 · #94
87
Spread
GT -6.5
✓ GT W ATS
Total
141.5 ▲5
▲ Over 163
Projected
64–70
✓ GT won
Model: MRST by 0.8 ✗ Model: Under 6.9 ✗
FinalNon-conference
6-4 · #324
83
5-5 · #53
87
Spread
MSST -16.5
✓ LIU W ATS
Total
152.5 ▼1
▲ Over 170
Projected
70–88
✓ MSST won
Model: MSST by 1.2 ✗ Model: Over 5.1 ✓
FinalConference
1-8 · #222
64
1-7 · #350
78
Spread
MORE -2.5
✓ MORE W ATS
Total
136.5 ▼4
▲ Over 142
Projected
69–72
✓ MORE won
Model: MORE by 0.9 ✓ Model: Over 4.6 ✓
FinalNon-conference
ETSU
6-3 · #173
58
9-1 · #44 AP #12
77
Spread
UNC -17.5
✓ UNC W ATS
Total
150.5 ▲1
▼ Under 135
Projected
67–82
✓ UNC won
Model: ETSU by 2.4 ✗ Model: Under 2.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference
6-1 · #219
90
7-3 · #12 AP #19
101
Spread
TTU -25.5
✓ UNCO W ATS
Total
152.5 ▼1
▲ Over 191
Projected
66–89
✓ TTU won
Model: UNCO by 2.6 ✓ Model: Over 3.0 ✓
FinalNon-conference
4-5 · #332
53
6-4 · #11
95
Spread
TEX -29.5
✓ TEX W ATS
Total
152.5 ▼7
▼ Under 148
Projected
67–93
✓ TEX won
Model: LEM by 3.1 ✗ Model: Over 7.4 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-7 · #305
62
1-5 · #250
63
Spread
MOST -4.5
✓ ORU W ATS
Total
146.5 ▼2
▼ Under 125
Projected
71–77
✓ MOST won
Model: MOST by 1.1 ✗ Model: Over 1.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference
5-4 · #176
70
6-4 · #59
86
Spread
NU -14.5
✓ NU W ATS
Total
145.5 ▲2
▲ Over 156
Projected
65–82
✓ NU won
Model: NU by 2.6 ✓ Model: Over 1.3 ✓
FinalConference
8-2 · #72
60
10-1 · #6 AP #5
79
Spread
CONN -15.5
✓ CONN W ATS
Total
144.5 ▼5
▼ Under 139
Projected
70–84
✓ CONN won
Model: BTLR by 2.0 ✗ Model: Over 9.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference
4-3 · #253
62
9-0 · #5 AP #1
96
Spread
ARIZ -34.5
✓ ACU W ATS
Total
145.5 ▼1
▲ Over 158
Projected
56–89
✓ ARIZ won
Model: ACU by 1.3 ✓ Model: Over 0.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference
6-3 · #163
57
BYU
9-1 · #24 AP #10
93
Spread
BYU -23.5
✓ BYU W ATS
Total
149.5 ▲2
▲ Over 150
Projected
62–85
✓ BYU won
Model: BYU by 0.2 ✓ Model: Under 2.4 ✗
FinalNon-conference
80
8-2 · #18 AP #14
108
Spread
ARK -23.5
✓ ARK W ATS
Total
169.5 ▼6
▲ Over 188
Projected
73–97
✓ ARK won
Model: ARK by 0.6 ✓ Model: Over 0.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference
5-4 · #165
49
8-3 · #16 AP #17
73
Spread
KU -14.5
✓ KU W ATS
Total
137.5 ▲4
▼ Under 122
Projected
59–78
✓ KU won
Model: KU by 4.3 ✓ Model: Under 0.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-7 · #162
83
3-6 · #164
80
Spread
MTST -2.5
✓ MTST W ATS
Total
159.5 ▲3
▲ Over 163
Projected
80–78
✓ MTST won
Model: CP by 0.5 ✗ Model: Under 0.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-6 · #309
67
8-3 · #203
75
Spread
CBU -12.5
✓ SOU W ATS
Total
155.5 ▲1
▼ Under 142
Projected
72–83
✓ CBU won
Model: SOU by 2.2 ✓ Model: Under 0.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference
8-1 · #123
67
LMU
6-3 · #121
57
Spread
UCSD -1.5
✓ UCSD W ATS
Total
150.5 ▲2
▼ Under 124
Projected
73–71
✓ UCSD won
Model: UCSD by 1.1 ✓ Model: Under 6.9 ✓
StatusMatchupSpreadTotalModel lineSpread edgeModel totalTotal edgeWin probModel
Final
4-5 · #197
74
3-6 · #262
66
DREX -6.5 138.5 DREX -5.6 HOW +0.9 140.9 Over 2.4 69% DREX W W ›
Final
5-4 · #214
73
10-0 · #3
97
DUKE -32.5 151.5 DUKE -28.2 LIP +4.3 148.6 Under 2.9 99% DUKE W L ›
Final
4-6 · #325
78
0-11 · #353
72
UPST -10.5 147.5 UPST -8.9 SCST +1.6 150.5 Over 3.0 78% UPST W W ›
Final
3-6 · #311
82
1-8 · #307
87
SHU -2.5 151.5 UML -1.9 UML +4.4 156.6 Over 5.1 57% UML W W ›
Final
3-5 · #251
89
3-6 · #317
64
DART -1.5 147.5 HC -1.3 HC +2.8 147.2 Under 0.3 54% HC L L ›
Final
4-5 · #157
69
9-1 · #10
92
MSU -23.5 150.5 MSU -23.4 TOL +0.1 149.7 Under 0.8 98% MSU W L ›
Final
9-1 · #14
62
7-3 · #7
83
TENN -4.5 156.5 LOU -0.3 LOU +4.8 156.4 Under 0.1 51% LOU L W ›
Final
8-3 · #66
66
6-3 · #9
79
SJU -19.5 147.5 SJU -21.7 SJU +2.2 151.4 Over 3.9 97% SJU L L ›
Final
9-1 · #138
83
2-7 · #255
78
BEL -8.5 147.5 BEL -7.3 EVAN +1.2 148.4 Over 0.9 74% BEL W W ›
Final
4-4 · #275
71
2-8 · #284
65
UNCG -6.5 147.5 UNCG -4.7 NCAT +1.8 152.1 Over 4.6 66% UNCG W L ›
Final
3-4 · #185
88
0-9 · #366
64
TAR -17.5 142.5 TAR -19.9 TAR +2.4 149.7 Over 7.2 96% TAR W W ›
Final
0-9 · #335
67
7-3 · #31
89
OU -30.5 153.5 OU -26.9 KC +3.6 150.9 Under 2.6 99% OU W L ›
Final
0-8 · #347
57
3-6 · #206
65
DEL -8.5 129.5 DEL -9.4 DEL +0.9 137.0 Over 7.5 79% DEL L L ›
Final
8-0 · #125
83
3-6 · #180
76
M-OH -1.5 149.5 WRST -1.2 WRST +2.7 154.1 Over 4.6 54% WRST L W ›
Final
1-9 · #362
55
5-3 · #200
76
BGSU -21.5 148.5 BGSU -17.8 CHST +3.7 150.2 Over 1.7 94% BGSU W L ›
Final
5-5 · #81
69
8-3 · #91
97
DAY -6.5 162.5 DAY -3.3 FSU +3.2 159.3 Under 3.2 61% DAY L L ›
Final
4-6 · #359
45
7-4 · #105
62
URI -21.5 138.5 URI -22.4 URI +0.9 136.2 Under 2.3 98% URI L W ›
Final
7-3 · #79
61
8-3 · #35
68
CLEM -12.5 142.5 CLEM -9.6 SC +2.9 147.1 Over 4.6 80% CLEM W L ›
Final
3-3 · #178
81
9-2 · #25
98
MIA -22.5 161.5 MIA -18.8 FIU +3.7 156.6 Under 4.9 95% MIA W L ›
Final
2-6 · #287
83
3-4 · #293
72
LAM -3.5 139.5 LAM -2.0 RGV +1.5 136.7 Under 2.8 57% LAM W L ›
Final
6-2 · #236
76
6-4 · #94
87
GT -6.5 141.5 GT -5.7 MRST +0.8 134.6 Under 6.9 69% GT L L ›
Final
6-4 · #324
83
5-5 · #53
87
MSST -16.5 152.5 MSST -17.7 MSST +1.2 157.6 Over 5.1 94% MSST L W ›
Final
1-8 · #222
64
1-7 · #350
78
MORE -2.5 136.5 MORE -3.4 MORE +0.9 141.1 Over 4.6 62% MORE W W ›
Final
6-3 · #173
58
9-1 · #44
77
UNC -17.5 150.5 UNC -15.1 ETSU +2.4 148.4 Under 2.1 91% UNC L W ›
Final
6-1 · #219
90
7-3 · #12
101
TTU -25.5 152.5 TTU -22.9 UNCO +2.6 155.5 Over 3.0 98% TTU W W ›
Final
4-5 · #332
53
6-4 · #11
95
TEX -29.5 152.5 TEX -26.4 LEM +3.1 159.9 Over 7.4 99% TEX L L ›
Final
2-7 · #305
62
1-5 · #250
63
MOST -4.5 146.5 MOST -5.6 MOST +1.1 148.1 Over 1.6 69% MOST L L ›
Final
5-4 · #176
70
6-4 · #59
86
NU -14.5 145.5 NU -17.1 NU +2.6 146.8 Over 1.3 93% NU W W ›
Final
8-2 · #72
60
10-1 · #6
79
CONN -15.5 144.5 CONN -13.5 BTLR +2.0 154.1 Over 9.6 88% CONN L L ›
Final
4-3 · #253
62
9-0 · #5
96
ARIZ -34.5 145.5 ARIZ -33.3 ACU +1.3 145.6 Over 0.1 100% ARIZ W W ›
Final
6-3 · #163
57
9-1 · #24
93
BYU -23.5 149.5 BYU -23.7 BYU +0.2 147.1 Under 2.4 98% BYU W L ›
Final
8-2 · #18
108
ARK -23.5 169.5 ARK -24.1 ARK +0.6 169.9 Over 0.4 98% ARK W W ›
Final
5-4 · #165
49
8-3 · #16
73
KU -14.5 137.5 KU -18.8 KU +4.3 137.1 Under 0.4 95% KU W W ›
Final
2-7 · #162
83
3-6 · #164
80
MTST -2.5 159.5 MTST -2.0 CP +0.5 158.8 Under 0.7 57% MTST L L ›
Final
1-6 · #309
67
8-3 · #203
75
CBU -12.5 155.5 CBU -10.3 SOU +2.2 155.1 Under 0.4 82% CBU W W ›
Final
8-1 · #123
67
6-3 · #121
57
UCSD -1.5 150.5 UCSD -2.6 UCSD +1.1 143.6 Under 6.9 59% UCSD W W ›
The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record