Day in numbers

Tap a number to filter the games below

Games3232 final · 0 to play
Lines moved251+ pt since the open · 32 with a line
Totals moved281+ pt since the open
Favorites ATS15-1747% covered
Upsets9outright
Over / Under18-1456% over
Model Favorite24-875% won
GameSpread, open → closeMovedTotalMoved
HALL @ MARQHALL -3.5 → MARQ -1.55 → MARQ141.5 → 145.5▲ 4
FSU @ UNCUNC -16.5 → UNC -12.54 → FSU159.5 → 166.5▲ 7
DUQ @ DAVDUQ -1.5 → DAV -2.54 → DAV152.5 → 150.5▼ 2
MASS @ EMUEMU -1.5 → MASS -2.54 → MASS148.5 → 148.5no move
TNST @ TNTCTNTC -2.5 → TNST -1.54 → TNST151.5 → 155.5▲ 4
NEV @ CSUCSU -3.5 → CSU -1.52 → NEV146.5 → 139.5▼ 7
WYO @ AFWYO -11.5 → WYO -14.53 → WYO143.5 → 146.5▲ 3
ND @ STANSTAN -3.5 → STAN -6.53 → STAN149.5 → 143.5▼ 6
ETSU @ CITETSU -12.5 → ETSU -12.5no move146.5 → 140.5▼ 6
UVM @ PRINUVM -1.5 → UVM -3.52 → UVM138.5 → 136.5▼ 2
Line movedCoveredCover rate
1+ pts5579-5698-549%
2+ pts2172-2236-249%
3+ pts880-90849%
5+ pts139-14948%
Sort by

Sort

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
FinalNon-conference
6-6 · #186
69
2-11 · #135
75
Spread
UVM -3.5
✓ PRIN W ATS
Total
136.5 ▼2
▲ Over 144
Projected
72–70
✗ UVM lost
Model: PRIN by 1.9 ✓ Model: Over 5.4 ✓
FinalConference
3-8 · #252
70
3-6 · #289
79
Spread
UIW -6.5
✓ UIW W ATS
Total
135.5 ▼3
▲ Over 149
Projected
68–74
✓ UIW won
Model: SELA by 0.5 ✗ Model: Over 6.6 ✓
FinalConference
Ohio
4-7 · #128
80
2-9 · #270
64
Spread
OHIO -6.5
✓ OHIO W ATS
Total
151.5 ▲1
▼ Under 144
Projected
80–74
✓ OHIO won
Model: CMU by 0.6 ✗ Model: Over 2.9 ✗
FinalConference
8-3 · #122
68
3-9 · #220
56
Spread
WYO -14.5
✓ AF W ATS
Total
146.5 ▲3
▼ Under 124
Projected
77–64
✓ WYO won
Model: AF by 1.6 ✓ Model: Under 4.7 ✓
FinalNon-conference
6-5 · #197
60
7-5 · #59
80
Spread
NU -19.5
✓ NU W ATS
Total
148.5 ▲3
▼ Under 140
Projected
62–85
✓ NU won
Model: NU by 2.8 ✓ Model: Under 1.7 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-10 · #301
67
8-4 · #79
96
Spread
SC -19.5
✓ SC W ATS
Total
148.5 ▲2
▲ Over 163
Projected
64–85
✓ SC won
Model: SC by 0.7 ✓ Model: Over 0.3 ✓
FinalConference
ETSU
6-5 · #173
74
0-10 · #339
49
Spread
ETSU -12.5
✓ ETSU W ATS
Total
140.5 ▼6
▼ Under 123
Projected
79–66
✓ ETSU won
Model: ETSU by 0.9 ✓ Model: Over 3.8 ✗
FinalConference
5-6 · #187
79
4-6 · #157
84
Spread
TOL -10.5
✓ WMU W ATS
Total
160.5 ▼2
▲ Over 163
Projected
76–84
✓ TOL won
Model: WMU by 1.8 ✓ Model: Under 0.7 ✗
FinalConference
7-6 · #81
66
12-1 · #44 AP #12
79
Spread
UNC -12.5
✓ UNC W ATS
Total
166.5 ▲7
▼ Under 145
Projected
73–85
✓ UNC won
Model: FSU by 0.4 ✗ Model: Under 8.8 ✓
FinalConference
6-5 · #107
89
7-4 · #115
83
Spread
DAV -2.5
✓ DUQ W ATS
Total
150.5 ▼2
▲ Over 172
Projected
76–77
✗ DAV lost
Model: DUQ by 1.6 ✓ Model: Over 1.8 ✓
FinalConference
7-5 · #111
76
5-7 · #141
73
Spread
CLT -1.5
✓ TEM W ATS
Total
138.5 ▼4
▲ Over 149
Projected
73–74
✗ CLT lost
Model: TEM by 0.8 ✓ Model: Over 8.4 ✓
FinalConference
11-2 · #67
79
5-8 · #42
73
Spread
MARQ -1.5
✓ HALL W ATS
Total
145.5 ▲4
▲ Over 152
Projected
72–71
✓ HALL won
Model: HALL by 2.6 ✓ Model: Under 3.4 ✗
FinalNon-conference
6-6 · #235
60
8-4 · #41
80
Spread
WIS -19.5
✓ WIS W ATS
Total
157.5 ▲2
▼ Under 140
Projected
71–89
✓ WIS won
Model: MILW by 1.1 ✗ Model: Over 1.8 ✗
FinalConference
Pitt
7-6 · #74
69
11-2 · #25
76
Spread
MIA -9.5
✓ PITT W ATS
Total
144.5 ▼4
▲ Over 145
Projected
70–78
✓ MIA won
Model: PITT by 0.6 ✓ Model: Over 3.3 ✓
FinalConference
10-0 · #125
93
7-3 · #200
83
Spread
BGSU -6.5
✓ M-OH W ATS
Total
150.5 ▼2
▲ Over 176
Projected
74–79
✗ BGSU lost
Model: M-OH by 2.0 ✓ Model: Over 2.6 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-13 · #353
54
9-3 · #7 AP #19
105
Spread
TENN -44.5
✓ TENN W ATS
Total
147.5
▲ Over 159
Projected
54–93
✓ TENN won
Model: SCST by 5.6 ✗ Model: Under 0.7 ✗
FinalConference
8-4 · #209
74
5-7 · #188
80
Spread
MASS -2.5
✓ EMU W ATS
Total
148.5
▲ Over 154
Projected
73–74
✓ EMU won
Model: EMU by 2.8 ✓ Model: Under 1.3 ✗
FinalConference
4-5 · #245
88
3-7 · #282
76
Spread
TNST -1.5
✓ TNST W ATS
Total
155.5 ▲4
▲ Over 164
Projected
76–77
✗ TNTC lost
Model: TNTC by 2.5 ✗ Model: Under 2.4 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-8 · #286
55
12-0 · #27 AP #13
86
Spread
NEB -31.5
✓ UNH W ATS
Total
146.5 ▲2
▼ Under 141
Projected
57–87
✓ NEB won
Model: UNH by 1.4 ✓ Model: Under 3.0 ✓
FinalConference
10-2 · #14 AP #16
90
11-1 · #92
70
Spread
LOU -7.5
✓ LOU W ATS
Total
159.5 ▲1
▲ Over 160
Projected
83–73
✓ LOU won
Model: LOU by 2.1 ✓ Model: Under 3.0 ✗
FinalConference
9-3 · #96
75
8-3 · #87
62
Spread
CSU -1.5
✓ NEV W ATS
Total
139.5 ▼7
▼ Under 137
Projected
72–74
✗ CSU lost
Model: CSU by 0.5 ✗ Model: Over 7.2 ✗
FinalConference
11-2 · #97
72
3-9 · #172
45
Spread
SMC -19.5
✓ SMC W ATS
Total
141.5
▼ Under 117
Projected
79–63
✓ SMC won
Model: PEPP by 3.2 ✗ Model: Under 0.3 ✓
FinalConference
9-1 · #58
72
5-6 · #174
63
Spread
USU -14.5
✓ FRES W ATS
Total
154.5 ▲2
▼ Under 135
Projected
83–69
✓ USU won
Model: FRES by 0.4 ✓ Model: Under 2.1 ✓
FinalConference
9-4 · #71
47
11-2 · #85
40
Spread
STAN -6.5
✓ ND W ATS
Total
143.5 ▼6
▼ Under 87
Projected
74–75
✗ STAN lost
Model: ND by 5.8 ✓ Model: Over 4.9 ✗
FinalConference
10-3 · #72
85
8-5 · #37
89
Spread
CREI -5.5
✓ BTLR W ATS
Total
156.5 ▲4
▲ Over 174
Projected
76–80
✓ CREI won
Model: BTLR by 1.3 ✓ Model: Under 1.2 ✗
FinalConference
13-1 · #17 AP #7
99
5-7 · #146
93
Spread
GONZ -29.5
✓ USD W ATS
Total
160.5 ▼1
▲ Over 192
Projected
92–66
✓ GONZ won
Model: USD by 3.5 ✓ Model: Under 3.3 ✗
FinalConference
5-8 · #139
55
9-3 · #119
69
Spread
SEA -6.5
✓ SEA W ATS
Total
144.5 ▲3
▼ Under 124
Projected
70–74
✓ SEA won
Model: WSU by 2.2 ✗ Model: Under 0.9 ✓
FinalConference
9-4 · #106
92
5-7 · #169
85
Spread
SCU -13.5
✓ PORT W ATS
Total
157.5 ▲2
▲ Over 177
Projected
85–72
✓ SCU won
Model: PORT by 1.0 ✓ Model: Under 1.1 ✗
FinalConference
8-5 · #161
62
7-7 · #99
70
Spread
SF -4.5
✓ ORST W ATS
Total
144.5 ▲1
▼ Under 132
Projected
74–70
✗ SF lost
Model: ORST by 0.5 ✓ Model: Under 0.3 ✓
FinalConference
7-5 · #163
71
LMU
8-5 · #121
80
Spread
LMU -3.5
✓ LMU W ATS
Total
139.5 ▲1
▲ Over 151
Projected
66–70
✓ LMU won
Model: LMU by 0.7 ✓ Model: Under 3.3 ✗
FinalConference
6-4 · #75
81
4-7 · #143
68
Spread
SDSU -11.5
✓ SDSU W ATS
Total
141.5 ▼2
▲ Over 149
Projected
77–68
✓ SDSU won
Model: SJSU by 3.0 ✗ Model: Over 3.7 ✓
FinalConference
9-2 · #82
53
7-3 · #86
62
Spread
BOIS -5.5
✓ BOIS W ATS
Total
146.5
▼ Under 115
Projected
71–75
✓ BOIS won
Model: UNM by 1.8 ✗ Model: Under 0.8 ✓
StatusMatchupSpreadTotalModel lineSpread edgeModel totalTotal edgeWin probModel
Final
6-6 · #186
69
2-11 · #135
75
UVM -3.5 136.5 UVM -1.6 PRIN +1.9 141.9 Over 5.4 56% UVM W W ›
Final
3-8 · #252
70
3-6 · #289
79
UIW -6.5 135.5 UIW -6.0 SELA +0.5 142.1 Over 6.6 70% UIW L W ›
Final
4-7 · #128
80
2-9 · #270
64
OHIO -6.5 151.5 OHIO -5.9 CMU +0.6 154.4 Over 2.9 70% OHIO L L ›
Final
8-3 · #122
68
3-9 · #220
56
WYO -14.5 146.5 WYO -12.9 AF +1.6 141.8 Under 4.7 87% WYO W W ›
Final
6-5 · #197
60
7-5 · #59
80
NU -19.5 148.5 NU -22.3 NU +2.8 146.8 Under 1.7 97% NU W W ›
Final
1-10 · #301
67
8-4 · #79
96
SC -19.5 148.5 SC -20.2 SC +0.7 148.8 Over 0.3 96% SC W W ›
Final
6-5 · #173
74
0-10 · #339
49
ETSU -12.5 140.5 ETSU -13.4 ETSU +0.9 144.3 Over 3.8 88% ETSU W L ›
Final
5-6 · #187
79
4-6 · #157
84
TOL -10.5 160.5 TOL -8.7 WMU +1.8 159.8 Under 0.7 78% TOL W L ›
Final
7-6 · #81
66
12-1 · #44
79
UNC -12.5 166.5 UNC -12.1 FSU +0.4 157.7 Under 8.8 85% UNC L W ›
Final
6-5 · #107
89
7-4 · #115
83
DAV -2.5 150.5 DAV -0.9 DUQ +1.6 152.3 Over 1.8 53% DAV W W ›
Final
7-5 · #111
76
5-7 · #141
73
CLT -1.5 138.5 CLT -0.7 TEM +0.8 146.9 Over 8.4 53% CLT W W ›
Final
11-2 · #67
79
5-8 · #42
73
MARQ -1.5 145.5 HALL -1.1 HALL +2.6 142.1 Under 3.4 54% HALL W L ›
Final
6-6 · #235
60
8-4 · #41
80
WIS -19.5 157.5 WIS -18.4 MILW +1.1 159.3 Over 1.8 95% WIS L L ›
Final
7-6 · #74
69
11-2 · #25
76
MIA -9.5 144.5 MIA -8.9 PITT +0.6 147.8 Over 3.3 78% MIA W W ›
Final
10-0 · #125
93
7-3 · #200
83
BGSU -6.5 150.5 BGSU -4.5 M-OH +2.0 153.1 Over 2.6 65% BGSU W W ›
Final
0-13 · #353
54
9-3 · #7
105
TENN -44.5 147.5 TENN -38.9 SCST +5.6 146.8 Under 0.7 100% TENN L L ›
Final
8-4 · #209
74
5-7 · #188
80
MASS -2.5 148.5 EMU -0.3 EMU +2.8 147.2 Under 1.3 51% EMU W L ›
Final
4-5 · #245
88
3-7 · #282
76
TNST -1.5 155.5 TNTC -0.9 TNTC +2.5 153.1 Under 2.4 53% TNTC L L ›
Final
2-8 · #286
55
12-0 · #27
86
NEB -31.5 146.5 NEB -30.1 UNH +1.4 143.5 Under 3.0 100% NEB W W ›
Final
10-2 · #14
90
11-1 · #92
70
LOU -7.5 159.5 LOU -9.6 LOU +2.1 156.5 Under 3.0 80% LOU W L ›
Final
9-3 · #96
75
8-3 · #87
62
CSU -1.5 139.5 CSU -2.0 CSU +0.5 146.7 Over 7.2 57% CSU L L ›
Final
11-2 · #97
72
3-9 · #172
45
SMC -19.5 141.5 SMC -16.3 PEPP +3.2 141.2 Under 0.3 92% SMC L W ›
Final
9-1 · #58
72
5-6 · #174
63
USU -14.5 154.5 USU -14.1 FRES +0.4 152.4 Under 2.1 89% USU W W ›
Final
9-4 · #71
47
11-2 · #85
40
STAN -6.5 143.5 STAN -0.7 ND +5.8 148.4 Over 4.9 53% STAN W L ›
Final
10-3 · #72
85
8-5 · #37
89
CREI -5.5 156.5 CREI -4.2 BTLR +1.3 155.3 Under 1.2 64% CREI W L ›
Final
13-1 · #17
99
5-7 · #146
93
GONZ -29.5 160.5 GONZ -26.0 USD +3.5 157.2 Under 3.3 99% GONZ W L ›
Final
5-8 · #139
55
9-3 · #119
69
SEA -6.5 144.5 SEA -4.3 WSU +2.2 143.6 Under 0.9 65% SEA L W ›
Final
9-4 · #106
92
5-7 · #169
85
SCU -13.5 157.5 SCU -12.5 PORT +1.0 156.4 Under 1.1 86% SCU W L ›
Final
8-5 · #161
62
7-7 · #99
70
SF -4.5 144.5 SF -4.0 ORST +0.5 144.2 Under 0.3 64% SF W W ›
Final
7-5 · #163
71
8-5 · #121
80
LMU -3.5 139.5 LMU -4.2 LMU +0.7 136.2 Under 3.3 64% LMU W L ›
Final
6-4 · #75
81
4-7 · #143
68
SDSU -11.5 141.5 SDSU -8.5 SJSU +3.0 145.2 Over 3.7 77% SDSU L W ›
Final
9-2 · #82
53
7-3 · #86
62
BOIS -5.5 146.5 BOIS -3.7 UNM +1.8 145.8 Under 0.8 63% BOIS L W ›
The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record