Day in numbers

Tap a number to filter the games below

Games6161 final · 0 to play
Lines moved381+ pt since the open · 61 with a line
Totals moved491+ pt since the open
Favorites ATS22-3936% covered
Upsets25outright
Over / Under32-2952% over
Model Favorite40-2166% won
GameSpread, open → closeMovedTotalMoved
HPU @ WINWIN -2.5 → HPU -2.55 → HPU163.5 → 162.5▼ 1
VAN @ TEXVAN -7.5 → VAN -3.54 → TEX166.5 → 163.5▼ 3
DUKE @ CALDUKE -10.5 → DUKE -14.54 → DUKE151.5 → 149.5▼ 2
TCU @ BYUBYU -12.5 → BYU -13.51 → BYU155.5 → 162.5▲ 7
FIU @ KENNKENN -5.5 → KENN -5.5no move168.5 → 175.5▲ 7
LEH @ BUBU -1.5 → BU -4.53 → BU145.5 → 144.5▼ 1
SHSU @ JXSTSHSU -1.5 → JXST -1.53 → JXST150.5 → 150.5no move
FOR @ SLUSLU -19.5 → SLU -17.52 → FOR148.5 → 154.5▲ 6
LMU @ ORSTORST -1.5 → LMU -1.53 → LMU140.5 → 140.5no move
NEV @ USUUSU -11.5 → USU -13.52 → USU152.5 → 147.5▼ 5
Line movedCoveredCover rate
1+ pts5579-5698-549%
2+ pts2172-2236-249%
3+ pts880-90849%
5+ pts139-14948%
Sort by

Sort

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
FinalConference
VCU
11-6 · #61
84
10-7 · #105
75
Spread
VCU -3.5
✓ VCU W ATS
Total
147.5
▲ Over 159
Projected
76–72
✓ VCU won
Model: VCU by 0.6 ✓ Model: Under 0.2 ✗
FinalConference
Army
5-10 · #288
75
5-10 · #317
82
Spread
HC -4.5
✓ HC W ATS
Total
142.5 ▼1
▲ Over 157
Projected
71–76
✓ HC won
Model: HC by 0.4 ✓ Model: Over 5.1 ✓
FinalConference
4-11 · #216
93
6-10 · #261
91
Spread
BU -4.5
✓ LEH W ATS
Total
144.5 ▼1
▲ Over 184
Projected
71–76
✗ BU lost
Model: BU by 0.8 ✗ Model: Over 2.3 ✓
FinalConference
4-10 · #227
76
9-6 · #248
67
Spread
WOF -5.5
✓ UTC W ATS
Total
154.5
▼ Under 143
Projected
74–79
✗ WOF lost
Model: UTC by 0.4 ✓ Model: Under 1.9 ✓
FinalConference
ETSU
10-5 · #173
68
3-10 · #215
72
Spread
ETSU -6.5
✓ WCU W ATS
Total
147.5 ▼1
▼ Under 140
Projected
79–72
✗ ETSU lost
Model: ETSU by 0.7 ✗ Model: Over 3.3 ✗
FinalConference
Iowa
12-4 · #43
72
15-1 · #23 AP #5
79
Spread
PUR -10.5
✓ IOWA W ATS
Total
145.5 ▲3
▲ Over 151
Projected
69–79
✓ PUR won
Model: PUR by 0.3 ✗ Model: Over 2.4 ✓
FinalConference
13-3 · #90
75
8-8 · #205
92
Spread
HPU -2.5
✓ WIN W ATS
Total
162.5 ▼1
▲ Over 167
Projected
85–82
✗ HPU lost
Model: HPU by 0.9 ✗ Model: Over 4.4 ✓
FinalConference
10-6 · #72
75
10-7 · #49
89
Spread
BTLR -1.5
✓ XAV W ATS
Total
161.5 ▲3
▲ Over 164
Projected
82–80
✗ BTLR lost
Model: BTLR by 0.4 ✗ Model: Under 0.4 ✗
FinalConference
9-7 · #46
97
14-2 · #34 AP #21
95
Spread
UGA -10.5
✓ MISS W ATS
Total
158.5
▲ Over 192
Projected
75–87
✗ UGA lost
Model: UGA by 1.1 ✗ Model: Over 3.3 ✓
FinalConference
11-5 · #116
89
6-9 · #207
94
Spread
ILST -6.5
✓ INST W ATS
Total
148.5 ▲4
▲ Over 183
Projected
78–72
✗ ILST lost
Model: Over 1.0 ✓
FinalConference
10-5 · #142
64
8-7 · #114
68
Spread
SBU -1.5
✓ JOES W ATS
Total
147.5 ▼2
▼ Under 132
Projected
75–75
✓ JOES won
Model: JOES by 2.2 ✓ Model: Over 2.6 ✗
FinalConference
4-12 · #124
53
11-5 · #104
74
Spread
RICH -8.5
✓ RICH W ATS
Total
147.5 ▲1
▼ Under 127
Projected
69–76
✓ RICH won
Model: LAS by 1.4 ✗ Model: Under 1.7 ✓
FinalConference
9-6 · #115
84
11-5 · #101
79
Spread
GW -9.5
✓ DAV W ATS
Total
150.5 ▲4
▲ Over 163
Projected
70–81
✗ GW lost
Model: GW by 2.1 ✗ Model: Over 0.7 ✓
FinalConference
4-11 · #145
71
9-6 · #84
82
Spread
USF -18.5
✓ ECU W ATS
Total
158.5 ▲3
▼ Under 153
Projected
72–89
✓ USF won
Model: ECU by 0.8 ✓ Model: Over 2.5 ✗
FinalConference
11-3 · #108
86
8-8 · #141
74
Spread
TLSA -3.5
✓ TLSA W ATS
Total
146.5 ▼4
▲ Over 160
Projected
78–74
✓ TLSA won
Model: TLSA by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 6.3 ✓
FinalConference
12-4 · #65
68
8-8 · #30
77
Spread
CIN -8.5
✓ CIN W ATS
Total
145.5 ▼4
▼ Under 145
Projected
72–77
✓ CIN won
Model: COLO by 3.4 ✗ Model: Over 3.8 ✗
FinalConference
5-10 · #325
86
8-8 · #326
81
Spread
CHSO -6.5
✓ UPST W ATS
Total
155.5
▲ Over 167
Projected
75–80
✗ CHSO lost
Model: UPST by 1.3 ✓ Model: Under 0.9 ✗
FinalConference
5-10 · #271
70
5-10 · #183
71
Spread
UNCA -2.5
✓ PRES W ATS
Total
138.5 ▲3
▲ Over 141
Projected
68–69
✓ PRES won
Model: PRES by 3.1 ✓ Model: Under 1.5 ✗
FinalConference
6-9 · #246
89
0-15 · #348
80
Spread
RAD -13.5
✓ GWEB W ATS
Total
165.5 ▼1
▲ Over 169
Projected
86–76
✓ RAD won
Model: GWEB by 3.9 ✓ Model: Under 3.5 ✗
FinalConference
Iona
12-6 · #233
68
0-14 · #347
72
Spread
IONA -7.5
✓ RID W ATS
Total
141.5 ▼1
▼ Under 140
Projected
75–70
✗ IONA lost
Model: RID by 2.1 ✓ Model: Over 3.2 ✗
FinalConference
Pitt
7-9 · #74
89
10-7 · #94
66
Spread
PITT -1.5
✓ PITT W ATS
Total
145.5 ▼5
▲ Over 155
Projected
74–72
✓ PITT won
Model: PITT by 0.3 ✓ Model: Over 0.2 ✓
FinalConference
7-6 · #269
74
11-5 · #241
70
Spread
QUIN -6.5
✓ SPU W ATS
Total
140.5
▲ Over 144
Projected
68–76
✗ QUIN lost
Model: QUIN by 0.7 ✗ Model: Over 3.4 ✓
FinalConference
7-8 · #211
86
3-12 · #314
80
Spread
COLG -8.5
✓ L-MD W ATS
Total
150.5
▲ Over 166
Projected
79–73
✓ COLG won
Model: L-MD by 2.2 ✓ Model: Over 1.0 ✓
FinalConference
4-13 · #311
86
11-6 · #260
80
Spread
SIE -8.5
✓ SHU W ATS
Total
139.5 ▼4
▲ Over 166
Projected
67–77
✗ SIE lost
Model: SIE by 1.0 ✗ Model: Over 4.8 ✓
FinalConference
3-12 · #346
59
7-9 · #359
54
Spread
CAN -2.5
✓ NIA W ATS
Total
126.5 ▼2
▼ Under 113
Projected
63–65
✗ CAN lost
Model: NIA by 0.6 ✓ Model: Over 2.0 ✗
FinalConference
7-10 · #330
62
9-7 · #239
98
Spread
FAIR -6.5
✓ FAIR W ATS
Total
158.5 ▲2
▲ Over 160
Projected
76–82
✓ FAIR won
Model: MAN by 0.7 ✗ Model: Under 0.1 ✗
FinalConference
9-5 · #152
77
7-8 · #184
73
Spread
FUR -1.5
✓ FUR W ATS
Total
149.5 ▲1
▲ Over 150
Projected
75–75
✓ FUR won
Model: SAM by 0.9 ✗ Model: Over 0.2 ✓
FinalConference
9-7 · #224
65
Troy
9-6 · #147
91
Spread
TROY -8.5
✓ TROY W ATS
Total
145.5
▲ Over 156
Projected
74–81
✓ TROY won
Model: USM by 1.3 ✗ Model: Over 9.8 ✓
FinalConference
8-9 · #283
85
10-6 · #231
83
Spread
MRSH -9.5
✓ CCU W ATS
Total
151.5 ▲3
▲ Over 168
Projected
71–78
✗ MRSH lost
Model: CCU by 1.6 ✓ Model: Under 2.6 ✗
FinalConference
10-6 · #21
74
12-4 · #54
84
Spread
AUB -1.5
✓ MIZ W ATS
Total
153.5 ▼2
▲ Over 158
Projected
83–79
✗ AUB lost
Model: AUB by 2.7 ✗ Model: Over 8.7 ✓
FinalConference
10-6 · #19
75
LSU
12-4 · #51
74
Spread
UK -3.5
✓ LSU W ATS
Total
151.5 ▼2
▼ Under 149
Projected
80–79
✓ UK won
Model: LSU by 2.2 ✓ Model: Over 7.8 ✗
FinalConference
FIU
6-7 · #178
86
7-6 · #148
89
Spread
KENN -5.5
✓ FIU W ATS
Total
175.5 ▲7
▼ Under 175
Projected
83–87
✓ KENN won
Model: FIU by 1.1 ✓ Model: Under 5.0 ✓
FinalConference
6-7 · #189
77
5-8 · #198
62
Spread
JXST -1.5
✓ SHSU W ATS
Total
150.5
▼ Under 139
Projected
74–74
✓ SHSU won
Model: SHSU by 1.8 ✓ Model: Under 1.9 ✓
FinalConference
3-13 · #310
69
5-12 · #299
76
Spread
BUCK -2.5
✓ BUCK W ATS
Total
137.5 ▼1
▲ Over 145
Projected
67–72
✓ BUCK won
Model: BUCK by 1.7 ✓ Model: Over 1.4 ✓
FinalConference
UAB
10-6 · #102
82
11-4 · #130
69
Spread
UAB -1.5
✓ UAB W ATS
Total
153.5 ▲4
▼ Under 151
Projected
79–76
✓ UAB won
Model: UAB by 1.6 ✓ Model: Over 1.7 ✗
FinalConference
7-6 · #250
72
8-6 · #129
87
Spread
WKU -6.5
✓ WKU W ATS
Total
148.5 ▲4
▲ Over 159
Projected
70–77
✓ WKU won
Model: WKU by 0.1 ✓ Model: Under 1.0 ✗
FinalConference
MTSU
7-6 · #154
58
6-7 · #244
59
Spread
MTSU -3.5
✓ LT W ATS
Total
131.5 ▲2
▼ Under 117
Projected
68–64
✗ MTSU lost
Model: MTSU by 0.4 ✗ Model: Over 0.9 ✗
FinalConference
10-4 · #75
74
10-5 · #122
57
Spread
SDSU -1.5
✓ SDSU W ATS
Total
148.5 ▼1
▼ Under 131
Projected
77–76
✓ SDSU won
Model: WYO by 0.8 ✗ Model: Over 3.8 ✗
FinalConference
6-9 · #144
76
7-9 · #195
73
Spread
SIU -5.5
✓ DRKE W ATS
Total
144.5 ▼3
▲ Over 149
Projected
71–76
✗ SIU lost
Model: DRKE by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 2.5 ✓
FinalConference
7-7 · #100
56
14-1 · #69
78
Spread
SLU -17.5
✓ SLU W ATS
Total
154.5 ▲6
▼ Under 134
Projected
68–84
✓ SLU won
Model: FOR by 1.8 ✗ Model: Under 3.0 ✓
FinalConference
Rice
5-10 · #177
89
UTSA
2-12 · #192
73
Spread
RICE -6.5
✓ RICE W ATS
Total
144.5 ▲1
▲ Over 162
Projected
74–70
✓ RICE won
Model: UTSA by 2.8 ✗ Model: Under 0.1 ✗
FinalConference
10-5 · #111
53
7-8 · #76
55
Spread
MEM -7.5
✓ TEM W ATS
Total
143.5 ▼1
▼ Under 108
Projected
71–80
✓ MEM won
Model: MEM by 1.1 ✗ Model: Over 7.4 ✗
FinalConference
UCF
13-2 · #39
82
9-7 · #83
73
Spread
KSU -2.5
✓ UCF W ATS
Total
170.5
▼ Under 155
Projected
84–84
✓ UCF won
Model: UCF by 2.6 ✓ Model: Under 2.1 ✓
FinalConference
6-9 · #201
65
11-5 · #213
76
Spread
NDSU -5.5
✓ NDSU W ATS
Total
151.5 ▲2
▼ Under 141
Projected
75–80
✓ NDSU won
Model: SDST by 0.8 ✗ Model: Over 3.2 ✗
FinalConference
4-14 · #221
54
7-9 · #103
59
Spread
TXST -8.5
✓ UL W ATS
Total
133.5 ▲3
▼ Under 113
Projected
62–71
✓ TXST won
Model: UL by 0.3 ✓ Model: Under 0.7 ✓
FinalConference
13-3 · #4 AP #13
79
8-8 · #59
68
Spread
ILL -9.5
✓ ILL W ATS
Total
151.5
▼ Under 147
Projected
82–73
✓ ILL won
Model: NU by 0.9 ✗ Model: Over 3.2 ✗
FinalConference
UCLA
11-5 · #26
71
9-7 · #78
60
Spread
UCLA -4.5
✓ UCLA W ATS
Total
148.5 ▼4
▼ Under 131
Projected
77–73
✓ UCLA won
Model: UCLA by 0.1 ✓ Model: Over 1.5 ✗
FinalConference
16-0 · #22 AP #10
64
9-6 · #11
80
Spread
VAN -3.5
✓ TEX W ATS
Total
163.5 ▼3
▼ Under 144
Projected
86–83
✗ VAN lost
Model: TEX by 0.3 ✓ Model: Over 5.3 ✗
FinalConference
14-2 · #44 AP #14
90
13-4 · #85
95
Spread
UNC -4.5
✓ STAN W ATS
Total
147.5 ▲2
▲ Over 185
Projected
76–71
✗ UNC lost
Model: UNC by 1.0 ✗ Model: Under 0.7 ✗
FinalConference
Utah
8-8 · #73
74
12-4 · #12 AP #15
88
Spread
TTU -17.5
✓ UTAH W ATS
Total
159.5 ▲1
▲ Over 162
Projected
72–87
✓ TTU won
Model: UTAH by 1.7 ✓ Model: Under 0.8 ✗
FinalConference
10-6 · #79
74
12-4 · #18 AP #17
108
Spread
ARK -12.5
✓ ARK W ATS
Total
155.5 ▼2
▲ Over 182
Projected
74–85
✓ ARK won
Model: SC by 2.3 ✗ Model: Over 3.5 ✓
FinalConference
7-10 · #169
63
3-14 · #172
67
Spread
PORT -1.5
✓ PEPP W ATS
Total
147.5 ▲2
▼ Under 130
Projected
75–74
✗ PORT lost
Model: PEPP by 1.1 ✓ Model: Over 1.6 ✗
FinalConference
13-4 · #68
76
SMU
12-4 · #55
77
Spread
SMU -8.5
✓ VT W ATS
Total
155.5 ▼2
▼ Under 153
Projected
78–87
✓ SMU won
Model: SMU by 0.6 ✗ Model: Over 8.8 ✗
FinalConference
2-13 · #305
87
5-11 · #263
98
Spread
DEN -6.5
✓ DEN W ATS
Total
156.5 ▲1
▲ Over 185
Projected
77–82
✓ DEN won
Model: ORU by 1.6 ✗ Model: Over 2.7 ✓
FinalConference
12-4 · #96
62
13-1 · #58 AP #23
71
Spread
USU -13.5
✓ NEV W ATS
Total
147.5 ▼5
▼ Under 133
Projected
71–82
✓ USU won
Model: NEV by 2.2 ✓ Model: Over 5.1 ✗
FinalConference
10-7 · #163
69
13-5 · #106
85
Spread
SCU -12.5
✓ SCU W ATS
Total
154.5
▼ Under 154
Projected
70–83
✓ SCU won
Model: SCU by 0.2 ✓ Model: Under 1.9 ✓
FinalConference
LMU
10-8 · #121
70
9-10 · #99
76
Spread
LMU -1.5
✓ ORST W ATS
Total
140.5
▲ Over 146
Projected
71–71
✗ LMU lost
Model: ORST by 1.0 ✓ Model: Over 1.0 ✓
FinalConference
10-6 · #60
82
16-0 · #5 AP #1
89
Spread
ARIZ -21.5
✓ ASU W ATS
Total
167.5 ▲4
▲ Over 171
Projected
71–92
✓ ARIZ won
Model: ASU by 1.1 ✓ Model: Under 4.5 ✗
FinalConference
14-1 · #8 AP #4
82
10-6 · #56
72
Spread
MICH -12.5
✓ WASH W ATS
Total
165.5 ▲2
▼ Under 154
Projected
88–74
✓ MICH won
Model: MICH by 1.5 ✗ Model: Under 2.9 ✓
FinalConference
Duke
15-1 · #3 AP #6
71
12-4 · #92
56
Spread
DUKE -14.5
✓ DUKE W ATS
Total
149.5 ▼2
▼ Under 127
Projected
81–68
✓ DUKE won
Model: CAL by 0.9 ✗ Model: Under 0.5 ✓
FinalConference
TCU
11-5 · #40
70
BYU
15-1 · #24 AP #11
76
Spread
BYU -13.5
✓ TCU W ATS
Total
162.5 ▲7
▼ Under 146
Projected
72–83
✓ BYU won
Model: TCU by 2.4 ✓ Model: Under 7.1 ✓
StatusMatchupSpreadTotalModel lineSpread edgeModel totalTotal edgeWin probModel
Final
11-6 · #61
84
10-7 · #105
75
VCU -3.5 147.5 VCU -4.1 VCU +0.6 147.3 Under 0.2 64% VCU W L ›
Final
5-10 · #288
75
5-10 · #317
82
HC -4.5 142.5 HC -4.9 HC +0.4 147.6 Over 5.1 66% HC W W ›
Final
4-11 · #216
93
6-10 · #261
91
BU -4.5 144.5 BU -5.3 BU +0.8 146.8 Over 2.3 68% BU L W ›
Final
4-10 · #227
76
9-6 · #248
67
WOF -5.5 154.5 WOF -5.1 UTC +0.4 152.6 Under 1.9 67% WOF W W ›
Final
10-5 · #173
68
3-10 · #215
72
ETSU -6.5 147.5 ETSU -7.2 ETSU +0.7 150.8 Over 3.3 73% ETSU L L ›
Final
12-4 · #43
72
15-1 · #23
79
PUR -10.5 145.5 PUR -10.8 PUR +0.3 147.9 Over 2.4 83% PUR L W ›
Final
13-3 · #90
75
8-8 · #205
92
HPU -2.5 162.5 HPU -3.4 HPU +0.9 166.9 Over 4.4 62% HPU L W ›
Final
10-6 · #72
75
10-7 · #49
89
BTLR -1.5 161.5 BTLR -1.9 BTLR +0.4 161.1 Under 0.4 57% BTLR L L ›
Final
9-7 · #46
97
14-2 · #34
95
UGA -10.5 158.5 UGA -11.6 UGA +1.1 161.8 Over 3.3 85% UGA L W ›
Final
11-5 · #116
89
6-9 · #207
94
ILST -6.5 148.5 ILST -6.5 — 149.5 Over 1.0 72% ILST W ›
Final
10-5 · #142
64
8-7 · #114
68
SBU -1.5 147.5 JOES -0.7 JOES +2.2 150.1 Over 2.6 52% JOES W L ›
Final
4-12 · #124
53
11-5 · #104
74
RICH -8.5 147.5 RICH -7.1 LAS +1.4 145.8 Under 1.7 73% RICH L W ›
Final
9-6 · #115
84
11-5 · #101
79
GW -9.5 150.5 GW -11.6 GW +2.1 151.2 Over 0.7 85% GW L W ›
Final
4-11 · #145
71
9-6 · #84
82
USF -18.5 158.5 USF -17.7 ECU +0.8 161.0 Over 2.5 94% USF W L ›
Final
11-3 · #108
86
8-8 · #141
74
TLSA -3.5 146.5 TLSA -4.0 TLSA +0.5 152.8 Over 6.3 64% TLSA W W ›
Final
12-4 · #65
68
8-8 · #30
77
CIN -8.5 145.5 CIN -5.1 COLO +3.4 149.3 Over 3.8 67% CIN L L ›
Final
5-10 · #325
86
8-8 · #326
81
CHSO -6.5 155.5 CHSO -5.2 UPST +1.3 154.6 Under 0.9 67% CHSO W L ›
Final
5-10 · #271
70
5-10 · #183
71
UNCA -2.5 138.5 PRES -0.6 PRES +3.1 137.0 Under 1.5 52% PRES W L ›
Final
6-9 · #246
89
0-15 · #348
80
RAD -13.5 165.5 RAD -9.6 GWEB +3.9 162.0 Under 3.5 80% RAD W L ›
Final
12-6 · #233
68
0-14 · #347
72
IONA -7.5 141.5 IONA -5.4 RID +2.1 144.7 Over 3.2 68% IONA W L ›
Final
7-9 · #74
89
10-7 · #94
66
PITT -1.5 145.5 PITT -1.8 PITT +0.3 145.7 Over 0.2 56% PITT W W ›
Final
7-6 · #269
74
11-5 · #241
70
QUIN -6.5 140.5 QUIN -7.2 QUIN +0.7 143.9 Over 3.4 74% QUIN L W ›
Final
7-8 · #211
86
3-12 · #314
80
COLG -8.5 150.5 COLG -6.3 L-MD +2.2 151.5 Over 1.0 71% COLG W W ›
Final
4-13 · #311
86
11-6 · #260
80
SIE -8.5 139.5 SIE -9.5 SIE +1.0 144.3 Over 4.8 80% SIE L W ›
Final
3-12 · #346
59
7-9 · #359
54
CAN -2.5 126.5 CAN -1.9 NIA +0.6 128.5 Over 2.0 57% CAN W L ›
Final
7-10 · #330
62
9-7 · #239
98
FAIR -6.5 158.5 FAIR -5.8 MAN +0.7 158.4 Under 0.1 69% FAIR L L ›
Final
9-5 · #152
77
7-8 · #184
73
FUR -1.5 149.5 FUR -0.6 SAM +0.9 149.7 Over 0.2 52% FUR L W ›
Final
9-7 · #224
65
9-6 · #147
91
TROY -8.5 145.5 TROY -7.2 USM +1.3 155.3 Over 9.8 74% TROY L W ›
Final
8-9 · #283
85
10-6 · #231
83
MRSH -9.5 151.5 MRSH -7.9 CCU +1.6 148.9 Under 2.6 76% MRSH W L ›
Final
10-6 · #21
74
12-4 · #54
84
AUB -1.5 153.5 AUB -4.2 AUB +2.7 162.2 Over 8.7 64% AUB L W ›
Final
10-6 · #19
75
12-4 · #51
74
UK -3.5 151.5 UK -1.3 LSU +2.2 159.3 Over 7.8 55% UK W L ›
Final
6-7 · #178
86
7-6 · #148
89
KENN -5.5 175.5 KENN -4.4 FIU +1.1 170.5 Under 5.0 65% KENN W W ›
Final
6-7 · #189
77
5-8 · #198
62
JXST -1.5 150.5 SHSU -0.3 SHSU +1.8 148.6 Under 1.9 51% SHSU W W ›
Final
3-13 · #310
69
5-12 · #299
76
BUCK -2.5 137.5 BUCK -4.2 BUCK +1.7 138.9 Over 1.4 64% BUCK W W ›
Final
10-6 · #102
82
11-4 · #130
69
UAB -1.5 153.5 UAB -3.1 UAB +1.6 155.2 Over 1.7 61% UAB W L ›
Final
7-6 · #250
72
8-6 · #129
87
WKU -6.5 148.5 WKU -6.6 WKU +0.1 147.5 Under 1.0 72% WKU W L ›
Final
7-6 · #154
58
6-7 · #244
59
MTSU -3.5 131.5 MTSU -3.9 MTSU +0.4 132.4 Over 0.9 63% MTSU L L ›
Final
10-4 · #75
74
10-5 · #122
57
SDSU -1.5 148.5 SDSU -0.7 WYO +0.8 152.3 Over 3.8 52% SDSU L L ›
Final
6-9 · #144
76
7-9 · #195
73
SIU -5.5 144.5 SIU -5.0 DRKE +0.5 147.0 Over 2.5 67% SIU W W ›
Final
7-7 · #100
56
14-1 · #69
78
SLU -17.5 154.5 SLU -15.7 FOR +1.8 151.5 Under 3.0 91% SLU L W ›
Final
5-10 · #177
89
2-12 · #192
73
RICE -6.5 144.5 RICE -3.7 UTSA +2.8 144.4 Under 0.1 63% RICE L L ›
Final
10-5 · #111
53
7-8 · #76
55
MEM -7.5 143.5 MEM -8.6 MEM +1.1 150.9 Over 7.4 77% MEM L L ›
Final
13-2 · #39
82
9-7 · #83
73
KSU -2.5 170.5 UCF -0.1 UCF +2.6 168.4 Under 2.1 50% KSU W W ›
Final
6-9 · #201
65
11-5 · #213
76
NDSU -5.5 151.5 NDSU -4.8 SDST +0.8 154.7 Over 3.2 66% NDSU L L ›
Final
4-14 · #221
54
7-9 · #103
59
TXST -8.5 133.5 TXST -8.2 UL +0.3 132.8 Under 0.7 76% TXST W W ›
Final
13-3 · #4
79
8-8 · #59
68
ILL -9.5 151.5 ILL -8.6 NU +0.9 154.7 Over 3.2 77% ILL L L ›
Final
11-5 · #26
71
9-7 · #78
60
UCLA -4.5 148.5 UCLA -4.6 UCLA +0.1 150.0 Over 1.5 66% UCLA W L ›
Final
16-0 · #22
64
9-6 · #11
80
VAN -3.5 163.5 VAN -3.3 TEX +0.3 168.8 Over 5.3 61% VAN W L ›
Final
14-2 · #44
90
13-4 · #85
95
UNC -4.5 147.5 UNC -5.5 UNC +1.0 146.8 Under 0.7 68% UNC L L ›
Final
8-8 · #73
74
12-4 · #12
88
TTU -17.5 159.5 TTU -15.8 UTAH +1.7 158.7 Under 0.8 92% TTU W L ›
Final
10-6 · #79
74
12-4 · #18
108
ARK -12.5 155.5 ARK -10.2 SC +2.3 159.0 Over 3.5 81% ARK L W ›
Final
7-10 · #169
63
3-14 · #172
67
PORT -1.5 147.5 PORT -0.4 PEPP +1.1 149.1 Over 1.6 51% PORT W L ›
Final
13-4 · #68
76
12-4 · #55
77
SMU -8.5 155.5 SMU -9.1 SMU +0.6 164.3 Over 8.8 79% SMU L L ›
Final
2-13 · #305
87
5-11 · #263
98
DEN -6.5 156.5 DEN -4.9 ORU +1.6 159.2 Over 2.7 67% DEN L W ›
Final
12-4 · #96
62
13-1 · #58
71
USU -13.5 147.5 USU -11.3 NEV +2.2 152.6 Over 5.1 84% USU W L ›
Final
10-7 · #163
69
13-5 · #106
85
SCU -12.5 154.5 SCU -12.7 SCU +0.2 152.6 Under 1.9 87% SCU W W ›
Final
10-8 · #121
70
9-10 · #99
76
LMU -1.5 140.5 LMU -0.5 ORST +1.0 141.5 Over 1.0 52% LMU W W ›
Final
10-6 · #60
82
16-0 · #5
89
ARIZ -21.5 167.5 ARIZ -20.4 ASU +1.1 163.0 Under 4.5 96% ARIZ W L ›
Final
14-1 · #8
82
10-6 · #56
72
MICH -12.5 165.5 MICH -14.0 MICH +1.5 162.6 Under 2.9 89% MICH L W ›
Final
15-1 · #3
71
12-4 · #92
56
DUKE -14.5 149.5 DUKE -13.6 CAL +0.9 149.0 Under 0.5 88% DUKE L W ›
Final
11-5 · #40
70
15-1 · #24
76
BYU -13.5 162.5 BYU -11.1 TCU +2.4 155.4 Under 7.1 83% BYU W W ›
The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record