Sort by

Sort

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Half finalConference
VCU
11-6 · #61
40
10-7 · #105
30
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.0
Projected
36–33
✓ VCU won
Half finalConference
Army
5-10 · #288
39
5-10 · #317
52
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.1
Projected
33–36
✓ HC won
Half finalConference
Lehigh
4-11 · #216
42
6-10 · #261
30
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.8
Projected
33–36
✗ BU lost
Half finalConference
4-10 · #227
30
9-6 · #248
30
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.5
Projected
34–37
 
Half finalConference
ETSU
10-5 · #173
35
3-10 · #215
36
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.6
Projected
38–33
✗ ETSU lost
Half finalConference
Iowa
12-4 · #43
34
Purdue
15-1 · #23 AP #5
31
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.3
Projected
32–38
✗ PUR lost
Half finalConference
13-3 · #90
29
8-8 · #205
53
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.1
Projected
40–38
✗ HPU lost
Half finalConference
Butler
10-6 · #72
36
Xavier
10-7 · #49
44
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.4
Projected
38–37
✗ BTLR lost
Half finalConference
9-7 · #46
35
14-2 · #34 AP #21
40
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.8
Projected
35–41
✓ UGA won
Half finalConference
11-5 · #116
42
6-9 · #207
51
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.0
Projected
37–33
✗ ILST lost
Half finalConference
10-5 · #142
28
8-7 · #114
35
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
35–35
✓ JOES won
Half finalConference
4-12 · #124
32
11-5 · #104
36
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.3
Projected
32–36
✓ RICH won
Half finalConference
9-6 · #115
36
11-5 · #101
28
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.8
Projected
32–39
✗ GW lost
Half finalConference
4-11 · #145
31
9-6 · #84
44
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.4
Projected
33–43
✓ USF won
Half finalConference
Tulsa
11-3 · #108
44
8-8 · #141
37
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.6
Projected
37–35
✓ TLSA won
Half finalConference
12-4 · #65
25
8-8 · #30
43
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.9
Projected
34–36
✓ CIN won
Half finalConference
5-10 · #325
35
8-8 · #326
41
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.4
Projected
35–38
✓ CHSO won
Half finalConference
5-10 · #271
34
5-10 · #183
40
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.2
Projected
32–32
✓ PRES won
Half finalConference
6-9 · #246
45
0-15 · #348
31
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.8
Projected
41–35
✓ RAD won
Half finalConference
Iona
12-6 · #233
26
Rider
0-14 · #347
41
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.8
Projected
36–32
✗ IONA lost
Half finalConference
Pitt
7-9 · #74
45
10-7 · #94
26
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.3
Projected
35–34
✓ PITT won
Half finalConference
7-6 · #269
38
11-5 · #241
33
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.4
Projected
32–36
✗ QUIN lost
Half finalConference
7-8 · #211
33
3-12 · #314
32
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.9
Projected
37–34
✓ COLG won
Half finalConference
4-13 · #311
42
Siena
11-6 · #260
38
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.6
Projected
31–37
✗ SIE lost
Half finalConference
3-12 · #346
34
7-9 · #359
28
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 60.3
Projected
30–31
✗ CAN lost
Half finalConference
7-10 · #330
23
9-7 · #239
47
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.2
Projected
35–39
✓ FAIR won
Half finalConference
Furman
9-5 · #152
40
7-8 · #184
40
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.1
Projected
35–35
 
Half finalConference
9-7 · #224
26
Troy
9-6 · #147
42
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.7
Projected
34–39
✓ TROY won
Half finalConference
8-9 · #283
39
10-6 · #231
32
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.8
Projected
33–37
✗ MRSH lost
Half finalConference
Auburn
10-6 · #21
34
12-4 · #54
38
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.0
Projected
39–37
✗ AUB lost
Half finalConference
10-6 · #19
22
LSU
12-4 · #51
38
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.6
Projected
38–37
✗ UK lost
Half finalConference
FIU
6-7 · #178
51
7-6 · #148
47
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 79.8
Projected
39–41
✗ KENN lost
Half finalConference
6-7 · #189
34
5-8 · #198
22
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.6
Projected
35–35
✓ SHSU won
Half finalConference
3-13 · #310
30
5-12 · #299
36
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.1
Projected
31–34
✓ BUCK won
Half finalConference
UAB
10-6 · #102
38
Tulane
11-4 · #130
29
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.7
Projected
37–35
✓ UAB won
Half finalConference
7-6 · #250
34
8-6 · #129
41
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.1
Projected
33–37
✓ WKU won
Half finalConference
MTSU
7-6 · #154
40
6-7 · #244
21
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.1
Projected
32–30
✓ MTSU won
Half finalConference
10-4 · #75
38
10-5 · #122
25
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.3
Projected
36–35
✓ SDSU won
Half finalConference
Drake
6-9 · #144
26
7-9 · #195
37
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.8
Projected
33–36
✓ SIU won
Half finalConference
7-7 · #100
30
14-1 · #69
44
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.0
Projected
31–40
✓ SLU won
Half finalConference
Rice
5-10 · #177
51
UTSA
2-12 · #192
40
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.7
Projected
35–33
✓ RICE won
Half finalConference
Temple
10-5 · #111
22
7-8 · #76
29
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.7
Projected
33–38
✓ MEM won
Half finalConference
UCF
13-2 · #39
42
9-7 · #83
28
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.8
Projected
40–39
✓ UCF won
Half finalConference
6-9 · #201
23
11-5 · #213
35
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.4
Projected
35–38
✓ NDSU won
Half finalConference
4-14 · #221
22
7-9 · #103
29
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.3
Projected
29–34
✓ TXST won
Half finalConference
13-3 · #4 AP #13
38
8-8 · #59
33
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.4
Projected
39–34
✓ ILL won
Half finalConference
UCLA
11-5 · #26
29
9-7 · #78
23
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
37–34
✓ UCLA won
Half finalConference
16-0 · #22 AP #10
37
Texas
9-6 · #11
42
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 79.0
Projected
41–39
✗ VAN lost
Half finalConference
14-2 · #44 AP #14
47
13-4 · #85
45
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.8
Projected
36–33
✓ UNC won
Half finalConference
Utah
8-8 · #73
38
12-4 · #12 AP #15
50
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.3
Projected
33–42
✓ TTU won
Half finalConference
10-6 · #79
38
12-4 · #18 AP #17
50
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.5
Projected
34–40
✓ ARK won
Half finalConference
7-10 · #169
32
3-14 · #172
32
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.8
Projected
35–35
 
Half finalConference
13-4 · #68
38
SMU
12-4 · #55
39
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.9
Projected
36–41
✓ SMU won
Half finalConference
2-13 · #305
45
Denver
5-11 · #263
56
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.5
Projected
36–39
✓ DEN won
Half finalConference
Nevada
12-4 · #96
23
13-1 · #58 AP #23
29
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.4
Projected
32–39
✓ USU won
Half finalConference
10-7 · #163
42
13-5 · #106
44
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.5
Projected
32–40
✓ SCU won
Half finalConference
LMU
10-8 · #121
37
9-10 · #99
36
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.3
Projected
33–33
✓ LMU won
Half finalConference
10-6 · #60
39
16-0 · #5 AP #1
38
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.3
Projected
32–44
✗ ARIZ lost
Half finalConference
14-1 · #8 AP #4
39
10-6 · #56
30
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.1
Projected
42–34
✓ MICH won
Half finalConference
Duke
15-1 · #3 AP #6
37
12-4 · #92
30
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.8
Projected
39–31
✓ DUKE won
Half finalConference
TCU
11-5 · #40
36
BYU
15-1 · #24 AP #11
30
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.8
Projected
33–40
✗ BYU lost
StatusMatchupSpreadTotalModel lineSpread edgeModel totalTotal edgeWin probModel
Half final
11-6 · #61
40
10-7 · #105
30
— — VCU -2.6 — 69.0 — 61% VCU ›
Half final
5-10 · #288
39
5-10 · #317
52
— — HC -2.8 — 69.1 — 62% HC ›
Half final
4-11 · #216
42
6-10 · #261
30
— — BU -3.1 — 68.8 — 63% BU ›
Half final
4-10 · #227
30
9-6 · #248
30
— — WOF -2.9 — 71.5 — 62% WOF ›
Half final
10-5 · #173
35
3-10 · #215
36
— — ETSU -4.4 — 70.6 — 68% ETSU ›
Half final
12-4 · #43
34
15-1 · #23
31
— — PUR -6.3 — 69.3 — 75% PUR ›
Half final
13-3 · #90
29
8-8 · #205
53
— — HPU -2.1 — 78.1 — 59% HPU ›
Half final
10-6 · #72
36
10-7 · #49
44
— — BTLR -1.3 — 75.4 — 56% BTLR ›
Half final
9-7 · #46
35
14-2 · #34
40
— — UGA -6.8 — 75.8 — 77% UGA ›
Half final
11-5 · #116
42
6-9 · #207
51
— — ILST -4.0 — 70.0 — 67% ILST ›
Half final
10-5 · #142
28
8-7 · #114
35
— — JOES -0.3 — 70.3 — 51% JOES ›
Half final
4-12 · #124
32
11-5 · #104
36
— — RICH -4.1 — 68.3 — 67% RICH ›
Half final
9-6 · #115
36
11-5 · #101
28
— — GW -6.8 — 70.8 — 77% GW ›
Half final
4-11 · #145
31
9-6 · #84
44
— — USF -10.4 — 75.4 — 87% USF ›
Half final
11-3 · #108
44
8-8 · #141
37
— — TLSA -2.5 — 71.6 — 61% TLSA ›
Half final
12-4 · #65
25
8-8 · #30
43
— — CIN -2.9 — 69.9 — 63% CIN ›
Half final
5-10 · #325
35
8-8 · #326
41
— — CHSO -3.0 — 72.4 — 63% CHSO ›
Half final
5-10 · #271
34
5-10 · #183
40
— — PRES -0.2 — 64.2 — 51% PRES ›
Half final
6-9 · #246
45
0-15 · #348
31
— — RAD -5.9 — 75.8 — 74% RAD ›
Half final
12-6 · #233
26
0-14 · #347
41
— — IONA -3.4 — 67.8 — 64% IONA ›
Half final
7-9 · #74
45
10-7 · #94
26
— — PITT -1.2 — 68.3 — 55% PITT ›
Half final
7-6 · #269
38
11-5 · #241
33
— — QUIN -4.2 — 67.4 — 68% QUIN ›
Half final
7-8 · #211
33
3-12 · #314
32
— — COLG -3.9 — 70.9 — 66% COLG ›
Half final
4-13 · #311
42
11-6 · #260
38
— — SIE -5.5 — 67.6 — 73% SIE ›
Half final
3-12 · #346
34
7-9 · #359
28
— — CAN -1.0 — 60.3 — 54% CAN ›
Half final
7-10 · #330
23
9-7 · #239
47
— — FAIR -3.3 — 74.2 — 64% FAIR ›
Half final
9-5 · #152
40
7-8 · #184
40
— — FUR -0.5 — 70.1 — 52% FUR ›
Half final
9-7 · #224
26
9-6 · #147
42
— — TROY -4.2 — 72.7 — 68% TROY ›
Half final
8-9 · #283
39
10-6 · #231
32
— — MRSH -4.6 — 69.8 — 69% MRSH ›
Half final
10-6 · #21
34
12-4 · #54
38
— — AUB -2.6 — 76.0 — 61% AUB ›
Half final
10-6 · #19
22
12-4 · #51
38
— — UK -0.9 — 74.6 — 54% UK ›
Half final
6-7 · #178
51
7-6 · #148
47
— — KENN -2.5 — 79.8 — 61% KENN ›
Half final
6-7 · #189
34
5-8 · #198
22
— — SHSU -0.3 — 69.6 — 51% SHSU ›
Half final
3-13 · #310
30
5-12 · #299
36
— — BUCK -2.4 — 65.1 — 60% BUCK ›
Half final
10-6 · #102
38
11-4 · #130
29
— — UAB -2.0 — 72.7 — 58% UAB ›
Half final
7-6 · #250
34
8-6 · #129
41
— — WKU -3.8 — 69.1 — 66% WKU ›
Half final
7-6 · #154
40
6-7 · #244
21
— — MTSU -2.5 — 62.1 — 61% MTSU ›
Half final
10-4 · #75
38
10-5 · #122
25
— — SDSU -0.5 — 71.3 — 52% SDSU ›
Half final
6-9 · #144
26
7-9 · #195
37
— — SIU -2.9 — 68.8 — 62% SIU ›
Half final
7-7 · #100
30
14-1 · #69
44
— — SLU -9.2 — 71.0 — 84% SLU ›
Half final
5-10 · #177
51
2-12 · #192
40
— — RICE -2.4 — 67.7 — 60% RICE ›
Half final
10-5 · #111
22
7-8 · #76
29
— — MEM -5.0 — 70.7 — 71% MEM ›
Half final
13-2 · #39
42
9-7 · #83
28
— — UCF -0.2 — 78.8 — 51% UCF ›
Half final
6-9 · #201
23
11-5 · #213
35
— — NDSU -2.7 — 72.4 — 62% NDSU ›
Half final
4-14 · #221
22
7-9 · #103
29
— — TXST -4.8 — 62.3 — 70% TXST ›
Half final
13-3 · #4
38
8-8 · #59
33
— — ILL -5.3 — 72.4 — 72% ILL ›
Half final
11-5 · #26
29
9-7 · #78
23
— — UCLA -2.9 — 70.3 — 62% UCLA ›
Half final
16-0 · #22
37
9-6 · #11
42
— — VAN -2.1 — 79.0 — 59% VAN ›
Half final
14-2 · #44
47
13-4 · #85
45
— — UNC -3.4 — 68.8 — 64% UNC ›
Half final
8-8 · #73
38
12-4 · #12
50
— — TTU -9.3 — 74.3 — 85% TTU ›
Half final
10-6 · #79
38
12-4 · #18
50
— — ARK -6.0 — 74.5 — 74% ARK ›
Half final
7-10 · #169
32
3-14 · #172
32
— — PORT -0.3 — 69.8 — 52% PORT ›
Half final
13-4 · #68
38
12-4 · #55
39
— — SMU -5.3 — 76.9 — 72% SMU ›
Half final
2-13 · #305
45
5-11 · #263
56
— — DEN -2.8 — 74.5 — 62% DEN ›
Half final
12-4 · #96
23
13-1 · #58
29
— — USU -6.6 — 71.4 — 76% USU ›
Half final
10-7 · #163
42
13-5 · #106
44
— — SCU -7.5 — 71.5 — 79% SCU ›
Half final
10-8 · #121
37
9-10 · #99
36
— — LMU -0.4 — 66.3 — 52% LMU ›
Half final
10-6 · #60
39
16-0 · #5
38
— — ARIZ -12.0 — 76.3 — 90% ARIZ ›
Half final
14-1 · #8
39
10-6 · #56
30
— — MICH -8.5 — 76.1 — 82% MICH ›
Half final
15-1 · #3
37
12-4 · #92
30
— — DUKE -8.2 — 69.8 — 82% DUKE ›
Half final
11-5 · #40
36
15-1 · #24
30
— — BYU -6.5 — 72.8 — 76% BYU ›
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record