No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.0
Projected
36–33
✓ VCU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.1
Projected
33–36
✓ HC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.8
Projected
33–36
✗ BU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.5
Projected
34–37
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.6
Projected
38–33
✗ ETSU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.3
Projected
32–38
✗ PUR lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.1
Projected
40–38
✗ HPU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.4
Projected
38–37
✗ BTLR lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.8
Projected
35–41
✓ UGA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.0
Projected
37–33
✗ ILST lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
35–35
✓ JOES won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.3
Projected
32–36
✓ RICH won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.8
Projected
32–39
✗ GW lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.4
Projected
33–43
✓ USF won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.6
Projected
37–35
✓ TLSA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.9
Projected
34–36
✓ CIN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.4
Projected
35–38
✓ CHSO won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.2
Projected
32–32
✓ PRES won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.8
Projected
41–35
✓ RAD won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.8
Projected
36–32
✗ IONA lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.3
Projected
35–34
✓ PITT won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.4
Projected
32–36
✗ QUIN lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.9
Projected
37–34
✓ COLG won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.6
Projected
31–37
✗ SIE lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 60.3
Projected
30–31
✗ CAN lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.2
Projected
35–39
✓ FAIR won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.1
Projected
35–35
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.7
Projected
34–39
✓ TROY won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.8
Projected
33–37
✗ MRSH lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.0
Projected
39–37
✗ AUB lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.6
Projected
38–37
✗ UK lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 79.8
Projected
39–41
✗ KENN lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.6
Projected
35–35
✓ SHSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.1
Projected
31–34
✓ BUCK won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.7
Projected
37–35
✓ UAB won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.1
Projected
33–37
✓ WKU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.1
Projected
32–30
✓ MTSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.3
Projected
36–35
✓ SDSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.8
Projected
33–36
✓ SIU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.0
Projected
31–40
✓ SLU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.7
Projected
35–33
✓ RICE won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.7
Projected
33–38
✓ MEM won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.8
Projected
40–39
✓ UCF won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.4
Projected
35–38
✓ NDSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.3
Projected
29–34
✓ TXST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.4
Projected
39–34
✓ ILL won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
37–34
✓ UCLA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 79.0
Projected
41–39
✗ VAN lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.8
Projected
36–33
✓ UNC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.3
Projected
33–42
✓ TTU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.5
Projected
34–40
✓ ARK won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.8
Projected
35–35
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.9
Projected
36–41
✓ SMU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.5
Projected
36–39
✓ DEN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.4
Projected
32–39
✓ USU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.5
Projected
32–40
✓ SCU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.3
Projected
33–33
✓ LMU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.3
Projected
32–44
✗ ARIZ lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.1
Projected
42–34
✓ MICH won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.8
Projected
39–31
✓ DUKE won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.8
Projected
33–40
✗ BYU lost
| Status | Matchup | Spread | Total | Model line | Spread edge | Model total | Total edge | Win prob | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Half final | 11-6 · #61 10-7 · #105 |
— | — | VCU -2.6 | — | 69.0 | — | 61% VCU | › | |
| Half final | 5-10 · #288 5-10 · #317 |
— | — | HC -2.8 | — | 69.1 | — | 62% HC | › | |
| Half final | 4-11 · #216 6-10 · #261 |
— | — | BU -3.1 | — | 68.8 | — | 63% BU | › | |
| Half final | 4-10 · #227 9-6 · #248 |
— | — | WOF -2.9 | — | 71.5 | — | 62% WOF | › | |
| Half final | 10-5 · #173 3-10 · #215 |
— | — | ETSU -4.4 | — | 70.6 | — | 68% ETSU | › | |
| Half final | 12-4 · #43 15-1 · #23 |
— | — | PUR -6.3 | — | 69.3 | — | 75% PUR | › | |
| Half final | 13-3 · #90 8-8 · #205 |
— | — | HPU -2.1 | — | 78.1 | — | 59% HPU | › | |
| Half final | 10-6 · #72 10-7 · #49 |
— | — | BTLR -1.3 | — | 75.4 | — | 56% BTLR | › | |
| Half final | 9-7 · #46 14-2 · #34 |
— | — | UGA -6.8 | — | 75.8 | — | 77% UGA | › | |
| Half final | 11-5 · #116 6-9 · #207 |
— | — | ILST -4.0 | — | 70.0 | — | 67% ILST | › | |
| Half final | 10-5 · #142 8-7 · #114 |
— | — | JOES -0.3 | — | 70.3 | — | 51% JOES | › | |
| Half final | 4-12 · #124 11-5 · #104 |
— | — | RICH -4.1 | — | 68.3 | — | 67% RICH | › | |
| Half final | 9-6 · #115 11-5 · #101 |
— | — | GW -6.8 | — | 70.8 | — | 77% GW | › | |
| Half final | 4-11 · #145 9-6 · #84 |
— | — | USF -10.4 | — | 75.4 | — | 87% USF | › | |
| Half final | 11-3 · #108 8-8 · #141 |
— | — | TLSA -2.5 | — | 71.6 | — | 61% TLSA | › | |
| Half final | 12-4 · #65 8-8 · #30 |
— | — | CIN -2.9 | — | 69.9 | — | 63% CIN | › | |
| Half final | 5-10 · #325 8-8 · #326 |
— | — | CHSO -3.0 | — | 72.4 | — | 63% CHSO | › | |
| Half final | 5-10 · #271 5-10 · #183 |
— | — | PRES -0.2 | — | 64.2 | — | 51% PRES | › | |
| Half final | 6-9 · #246 0-15 · #348 |
— | — | RAD -5.9 | — | 75.8 | — | 74% RAD | › | |
| Half final | 12-6 · #233 0-14 · #347 |
— | — | IONA -3.4 | — | 67.8 | — | 64% IONA | › | |
| Half final | 7-9 · #74 10-7 · #94 |
— | — | PITT -1.2 | — | 68.3 | — | 55% PITT | › | |
| Half final | 7-6 · #269 11-5 · #241 |
— | — | QUIN -4.2 | — | 67.4 | — | 68% QUIN | › | |
| Half final | 7-8 · #211 3-12 · #314 |
— | — | COLG -3.9 | — | 70.9 | — | 66% COLG | › | |
| Half final | 4-13 · #311 11-6 · #260 |
— | — | SIE -5.5 | — | 67.6 | — | 73% SIE | › | |
| Half final | 3-12 · #346 7-9 · #359 |
— | — | CAN -1.0 | — | 60.3 | — | 54% CAN | › | |
| Half final | 7-10 · #330 9-7 · #239 |
— | — | FAIR -3.3 | — | 74.2 | — | 64% FAIR | › | |
| Half final | 9-5 · #152 7-8 · #184 |
— | — | FUR -0.5 | — | 70.1 | — | 52% FUR | › | |
| Half final | 9-7 · #224 9-6 · #147 |
— | — | TROY -4.2 | — | 72.7 | — | 68% TROY | › | |
| Half final | 8-9 · #283 10-6 · #231 |
— | — | MRSH -4.6 | — | 69.8 | — | 69% MRSH | › | |
| Half final | 10-6 · #21 12-4 · #54 |
— | — | AUB -2.6 | — | 76.0 | — | 61% AUB | › | |
| Half final | 10-6 · #19 12-4 · #51 |
— | — | UK -0.9 | — | 74.6 | — | 54% UK | › | |
| Half final | 6-7 · #178 7-6 · #148 |
— | — | KENN -2.5 | — | 79.8 | — | 61% KENN | › | |
| Half final | 6-7 · #189 5-8 · #198 |
— | — | SHSU -0.3 | — | 69.6 | — | 51% SHSU | › | |
| Half final | 3-13 · #310 5-12 · #299 |
— | — | BUCK -2.4 | — | 65.1 | — | 60% BUCK | › | |
| Half final | 10-6 · #102 11-4 · #130 |
— | — | UAB -2.0 | — | 72.7 | — | 58% UAB | › | |
| Half final | 7-6 · #250 8-6 · #129 |
— | — | WKU -3.8 | — | 69.1 | — | 66% WKU | › | |
| Half final | 7-6 · #154 6-7 · #244 |
— | — | MTSU -2.5 | — | 62.1 | — | 61% MTSU | › | |
| Half final | 10-4 · #75 10-5 · #122 |
— | — | SDSU -0.5 | — | 71.3 | — | 52% SDSU | › | |
| Half final | 6-9 · #144 7-9 · #195 |
— | — | SIU -2.9 | — | 68.8 | — | 62% SIU | › | |
| Half final | 7-7 · #100 14-1 · #69 |
— | — | SLU -9.2 | — | 71.0 | — | 84% SLU | › | |
| Half final | 5-10 · #177 2-12 · #192 |
— | — | RICE -2.4 | — | 67.7 | — | 60% RICE | › | |
| Half final | 10-5 · #111 7-8 · #76 |
— | — | MEM -5.0 | — | 70.7 | — | 71% MEM | › | |
| Half final | 13-2 · #39 9-7 · #83 |
— | — | UCF -0.2 | — | 78.8 | — | 51% UCF | › | |
| Half final | 6-9 · #201 11-5 · #213 |
— | — | NDSU -2.7 | — | 72.4 | — | 62% NDSU | › | |
| Half final | 4-14 · #221 7-9 · #103 |
— | — | TXST -4.8 | — | 62.3 | — | 70% TXST | › | |
| Half final | 13-3 · #4 8-8 · #59 |
— | — | ILL -5.3 | — | 72.4 | — | 72% ILL | › | |
| Half final | 11-5 · #26 9-7 · #78 |
— | — | UCLA -2.9 | — | 70.3 | — | 62% UCLA | › | |
| Half final | 16-0 · #22 9-6 · #11 |
— | — | VAN -2.1 | — | 79.0 | — | 59% VAN | › | |
| Half final | 14-2 · #44 13-4 · #85 |
— | — | UNC -3.4 | — | 68.8 | — | 64% UNC | › | |
| Half final | 8-8 · #73 12-4 · #12 |
— | — | TTU -9.3 | — | 74.3 | — | 85% TTU | › | |
| Half final | 10-6 · #79 12-4 · #18 |
— | — | ARK -6.0 | — | 74.5 | — | 74% ARK | › | |
| Half final | 7-10 · #169 3-14 · #172 |
— | — | PORT -0.3 | — | 69.8 | — | 52% PORT | › | |
| Half final | 13-4 · #68 12-4 · #55 |
— | — | SMU -5.3 | — | 76.9 | — | 72% SMU | › | |
| Half final | 2-13 · #305 5-11 · #263 |
— | — | DEN -2.8 | — | 74.5 | — | 62% DEN | › | |
| Half final | 12-4 · #96 13-1 · #58 |
— | — | USU -6.6 | — | 71.4 | — | 76% USU | › | |
| Half final | 10-7 · #163 13-5 · #106 |
— | — | SCU -7.5 | — | 71.5 | — | 79% SCU | › | |
| Half final | 10-8 · #121 9-10 · #99 |
— | — | LMU -0.4 | — | 66.3 | — | 52% LMU | › | |
| Half final | 10-6 · #60 16-0 · #5 |
— | — | ARIZ -12.0 | — | 76.3 | — | 90% ARIZ | › | |
| Half final | 14-1 · #8 10-6 · #56 |
— | — | MICH -8.5 | — | 76.1 | — | 82% MICH | › | |
| Half final | 15-1 · #3 12-4 · #92 |
— | — | DUKE -8.2 | — | 69.8 | — | 82% DUKE | › | |
| Half final | 11-5 · #40 15-1 · #24 |
— | — | BYU -6.5 | — | 72.8 | — | 76% BYU | › |
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record