No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.7
Projected
38–31
✓ CONN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.5
Projected
29–38
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.5
Projected
37–38
✗ SMU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.4
Projected
34–36
✓ TENN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.9
Projected
33–36
✗ HALL lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.5
Projected
34–36
✓ VT won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.4
Projected
32–41
✓ NCSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.4
Projected
33–31
✗ MSM lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.6
Projected
34–38
✗ HOF lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.8
Projected
36–35
✓ DUQ won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 81.9
Projected
44–39
✗ ALA lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.7
Projected
35–37
✓ OSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.9
Projected
33–33
✓ LAF won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.8
Projected
37–35
✓ BU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.0
Projected
31–36
✓ BGSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.3
Projected
35–41
✗ M-OH lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.5
Projected
30–32
✓ NHVN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.4
Projected
35–36
✓ WCU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.4
Projected
31–34
✗ APP lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.3
Projected
36–31
✗ ISU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.1
Projected
40–38
✗ FLA lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.3
Projected
33–36
✓ ILST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.6
Projected
31–36
✓ COLG won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.6
Projected
38–35
✗ TCU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.6
Projected
32–40
✓ WIS won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.7
Projected
35–35
✗ IU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.4
Projected
38–35
✓ WIN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.9
Projected
36–32
✓ PRES won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.1
Projected
29–34
✓ SPU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.4
Projected
35–31
✓ SYR won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.8
Projected
35–32
✓ NAVY won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.5
Projected
35–33
✓ COLU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.2
Projected
36–37
✗ NDSU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.0
Projected
39–39
✓ UND won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 82.5
Projected
38–44
✓ YALE won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.6
Projected
38–34
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 80.8
Projected
41–40
✓ DETM won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.7
Projected
34–44
✓ AKR won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.0
Projected
30–35
✓ MRST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
37–33
✓ SIE won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.0
Projected
30–33
✗ HARV lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 61.1
Projected
29–32
✓ MERC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.3
Projected
36–31
✓ CCSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.8
Projected
36–35
✗ LEM lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.9
Projected
36–34
✓ ETSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.5
Projected
35–40
✗ FGCU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.0
Projected
41–36
✓ QUC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.1
Projected
36–41
✓ CARK won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.3
Projected
38–39
✓ FIU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.7
Projected
34–30
✓ NMSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.9
Projected
34–36
✓ CLEM won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.7
Projected
37–33
✗ USU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.1
Projected
34–33
✗ SBU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.9
Projected
36–39
✓ RAD won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 60.8
Projected
31–29
✗ UNI lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.2
Projected
33–34
✓ UIC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.2
Projected
34–33
✗ QUIN lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.8
Projected
39–34
✗ MASS lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.7
Projected
36–38
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.1
Projected
36–39
✓ GASO won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.8
Projected
32–33
✗ UNA lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.2
Projected
38–40
✗ WKU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.1
Projected
29–36
✓ LIB won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.7
Projected
38–35
✗ GAST lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.4
Projected
36–38
✓ LSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.1
Projected
42–35
✓ ARIZ won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.6
Projected
43–32
✗ MICH lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.4
Projected
36–34
✓ NEB won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.1
Projected
37–33
✗ UNC lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 84.5
Projected
41–43
✓ UGA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.0
Projected
36–42
✓ MUR won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.5
Projected
36–36
✓ TXSO won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.7
Projected
34–41
✓ SLU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.9
Projected
37–38
✓ JKST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.4
Projected
37–27
✓ NEV won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.8
Projected
35–32
✗ COFC lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.3
Projected
38–35
✓ MER won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
38–32
✓ UCSD won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.6
Projected
32–33
✗ NICH lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 61.1
Projected
27–34
✗ USA lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.6
Projected
35–37
✓ MRSH won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.8
Projected
34–35
✗ TNTC lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.8
Projected
29–35
✓ LR won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.8
Projected
31–35
✓ UVU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.7
Projected
34–34
✓ HOW won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.3
Projected
35–32
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.9
Projected
32–35
✗ DSU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.2
Projected
28–36
✗ UMES lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.4
Projected
30–33
✓ AMCC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.0
Projected
32–34
✗ HCU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.9
Projected
39–40
✓ TROY won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.8
Projected
34–34
✗ TXST lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.2
Projected
33–38
✓ TNST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.6
Projected
33–35
✓ UTM won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.2
Projected
32–36
✗ SEMO lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.1
Projected
37–35
✓ UNLV won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.6
Projected
35–36
✗ GRAM lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.1
Projected
33–37
✓ FUR won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.3
Projected
34–33
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.5
Projected
32–36
✗ UIW lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.4
Projected
31–37
✓ PRST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 59.3
Projected
29–30
✓ JXST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
32–39
✓ SDST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.7
Projected
37–31
✗ MCN lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.3
Projected
41–34
✓ PUR won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.4
Projected
39–31
✓ DUKE won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.0
Projected
35–33
✓ MSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.0
Projected
34–33
✓ PAC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.0
Projected
33–36
✓ WVU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.1
Projected
39–38
✗ WAKE lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.0
Projected
37–33
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.2
Projected
35–38
✗ IDST lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 79.9
Projected
39–41
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.3
Projected
33–41
✓ AUB won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.2
Projected
30–35
✓ MTSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.5
Projected
36–37
✓ UAPB won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.3
Projected
39–30
✓ BCU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.0
Projected
37–36
✓ BEL won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.3
Projected
35–36
✓ SCU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.9
Projected
36–33
✓ WYO won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.7
Projected
33–42
✓ HPU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.0
Projected
34–38
✗ NKU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.8
Projected
36–33
✓ LIU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.2
Projected
33–37
✗ UNCW lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.3
Projected
33–36
✗ VMI lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.4
Projected
36–38
✓ EKU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.0
Projected
34–36
✗ LIP lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.2
Projected
37–37
✗ BYU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.2
Projected
38–33
✓ LOU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.4
Projected
35–36
✓ SDSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.8
Projected
36–39
✓ CSUN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.4
Projected
37–37
✗ CSUF lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.9
Projected
36–34
✓ SJU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.7
Projected
36–36
✓ OMA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.4
Projected
35–36
✓ MSST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.6
Projected
35–33
✗ ACU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.6
Projected
33–37
✗ LMU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.8
Projected
36–32
✗ HAW lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
34–37
✓ MTST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.2
Projected
36–37
✗ WEB lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.9
Projected
37–36
✗ TAR lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
41–30
✓ GONZ won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 81.0
Projected
39–42
✓ OKST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.6
Projected
39–37
✓ UNCO won
| Status | Matchup | Spread | Total | Model line | Spread edge | Model total | Total edge | Win prob | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Half final | 17-1 · #6 9-8 · #64 |
— | — | CONN -7.8 | — | 68.7 | — | 80% CONN | › | |
| Half final | 10-7 · #70 14-3 · #4 |
— | — | ILL -9.4 | — | 67.5 | — | 85% ILL | › | |
| Half final | 15-2 · #20 13-4 · #55 |
— | — | SMU -0.6 | — | 74.5 | — | 53% SMU | › | |
| Half final | 11-6 · #19 12-5 · #7 |
— | — | TENN -1.7 | — | 70.4 | — | 57% TENN | › | |
| Half final | 10-7 · #72 14-3 · #67 |
— | — | HALL -2.1 | — | 68.9 | — | 59% HALL | › | |
| Half final | 10-7 · #71 13-5 · #68 |
— | — | VT -2.1 | — | 69.5 | — | 59% VT | › | |
| Half final | 10-8 · #94 12-5 · #48 |
— | — | NCSU -9.4 | — | 72.4 | — | 85% NCSU | › | |
| Half final | 5-12 · #278 7-10 · #359 |
— | — | MSM -2.1 | — | 63.4 | — | 59% MSM | › | |
| Half final | 9-7 · #232 11-5 · #166 |
— | — | HOF -4.0 | — | 71.6 | — | 67% HOF | › | |
| Half final | 7-8 · #107 7-8 · #100 |
— | — | DUQ -0.1 | — | 70.8 | — | 50% FOR | › | |
| Half final | 12-5 · #15 11-6 · #31 |
— | — | ALA -5.0 | — | 81.9 | — | 71% ALA | › | |
| Half final | 12-5 · #26 11-5 · #33 |
— | — | OSU -1.5 | — | 71.7 | — | 56% OSU | › | |
| Half final | 6-10 · #317 3-14 · #310 |
— | — | LAF -0.8 | — | 65.9 | — | 53% LAF | › | |
| Half final | 6-11 · #261 3-13 · #314 |
— | — | BU -1.6 | — | 71.8 | — | 57% BU | › | |
| Half final | 8-9 · #188 8-6 · #200 |
— | — | BGSU -4.5 | — | 67.0 | — | 69% BGSU | › | |
| Half final | 11-4 · #237 15-0 · #125 |
— | — | M-OH -6.0 | — | 75.3 | — | 74% M-OH | › | |
| Half final | 3-9 · #354 4-10 · #355 |
— | — | NHVN -1.9 | — | 62.5 | — | 58% NHVN | › | |
| Half final | 5-10 · #227 4-10 · #215 |
— | — | WCU -0.9 | — | 71.4 | — | 54% WCU | › | |
| Half final | 4-14 · #234 9-8 · #259 |
— | — | APP -2.5 | — | 65.4 | — | 61% APP | › | |
| Half final | 16-1 · #13 9-8 · #30 |
— | — | ISU -4.9 | — | 66.3 | — | 70% ISU | › | |
| Half final | 12-5 · #1 16-1 · #22 |
— | — | FLA -2.1 | — | 77.1 | — | 59% FLA | › | |
| Half final | 12-6 · #167 11-6 · #116 |
— | — | ILST -2.7 | — | 69.3 | — | 62% ILST | › | |
| Half final | 6-12 · #299 8-8 · #211 |
— | — | COLG -5.1 | — | 66.6 | — | 71% COLG | › | |
| Half final | 11-6 · #40 8-9 · #73 |
— | — | TCU -3.3 | — | 72.6 | — | 64% TCU | › | |
| Half final | 9-8 · #62 12-5 · #41 |
— | — | WIS -8.3 | — | 71.6 | — | 82% WIS | › | |
| Half final | 12-5 · #43 12-5 · #38 |
— | — | IU -0.6 | — | 69.7 | — | 53% IU | › | |
| Half final | 9-8 · #205 5-11 · #271 |
— | — | WIN -2.8 | — | 72.4 | — | 62% WIN | › | |
| Half final | 6-10 · #183 0-16 · #348 |
— | — | PRES -4.5 | — | 67.9 | — | 69% PRES | › | |
| Half final | 1-14 · #347 8-6 · #269 |
— | — | SPU -5.8 | — | 63.1 | — | 74% SPU | › | |
| Half final | 12-5 · #63 7-10 · #95 |
— | — | SYR -3.5 | — | 66.4 | — | 65% SYR | › | |
| Half final | 10-6 · #199 5-11 · #216 |
— | — | NAVY -2.3 | — | 66.8 | — | 60% NAVY | › | |
| Half final | 10-4 · #170 4-9 · #156 |
— | — | COLU -2.3 | — | 67.5 | — | 60% COLU | › | |
| Half final | 12-4 · #212 12-5 · #213 |
— | — | NDSU -1.3 | — | 72.2 | — | 56% NDSU | › | |
| Half final | 7-9 · #291 6-12 · #336 |
— | — | UND -0.6 | — | 78.0 | — | 52% UND | › | |
| Half final | 5-8 · #179 10-3 · #126 |
— | — | YALE -6.0 | — | 82.5 | — | 74% YALE | › | |
| Half final | 6-10 · #265 2-14 · #315 |
— | — | YSU -4.0 | — | 72.6 | — | 67% YSU | › | |
| Half final | 5-10 · #277 3-15 · #340 |
— | — | DETM -0.9 | — | 80.8 | — | 54% DETM | › | |
| Half final | 6-9 · #187 11-4 · #118 |
— | — | AKR -10.0 | — | 78.7 | — | 86% AKR | › | |
| Half final | 10-7 · #239 10-5 · #236 |
— | — | MRST -5.9 | — | 65.0 | — | 74% MRST | › | |
| Half final | 11-7 · #260 7-11 · #330 |
— | — | SIE -4.2 | — | 70.3 | — | 68% SIE | › | |
| Half final | 5-11 · #135 7-8 · #136 |
— | — | HARV -3.9 | — | 63.0 | — | 66% HARV | › | |
| Half final | 3-12 · #349 5-10 · #331 |
— | — | MERC -3.6 | — | 61.1 | — | 65% MERC | › | |
| Half final | 7-6 · #337 2-13 · #88 |
— | — | CCSU -4.8 | — | 67.3 | — | 70% CCSU | › | |
| Half final | 6-10 · #332 1-15 · #362 |
— | — | LEM -1.6 | — | 70.8 | — | 57% LEM | › | |
| Half final | 10-6 · #173 7-9 · #184 |
— | — | ETSU -2.3 | — | 69.9 | — | 60% ETSU | › | |
| Half final | 7-8 · #298 5-11 · #266 |
— | — | FGCU -5.2 | — | 74.5 | — | 71% FGCU | › | |
| Half final | 9-8 · #175 5-11 · #303 |
— | — | QUC -5.1 | — | 76.0 | — | 71% QUC | › | |
| Half final | 1-15 · #333 6-10 · #240 |
— | — | CARK -5.6 | — | 77.1 | — | 73% CARK | › | |
| Half final | 7-7 · #189 6-8 · #178 |
— | — | FIU -0.5 | — | 77.3 | — | 52% FIU | › | |
| Half final | 6-7 · #133 5-11 · #206 |
— | — | NMSU -3.9 | — | 64.7 | — | 67% NMSU | › | |
| Half final | 15-2 · #25 15-3 · #35 |
— | — | CLEM -1.6 | — | 69.9 | — | 57% CLEM | › | |
| Half final | 14-1 · #58 10-6 · #80 |
— | — | USU -3.9 | — | 69.7 | — | 66% USU | › | |
| Half final | 10-6 · #142 4-13 · #124 |
— | — | SBU -1.1 | — | 67.1 | — | 55% SBU | › | |
| Half final | 7-9 · #218 7-9 · #246 |
— | — | RAD -2.0 | — | 74.9 | — | 59% RAD | › | |
| Half final | 11-6 · #131 7-10 · #176 |
— | — | UNI -1.9 | — | 60.8 | — | 58% UNI | › | |
| Half final | 7-9 · #144 6-10 · #110 |
— | — | UIC -1.3 | — | 67.2 | — | 56% UIC | › | |
| Half final | 11-6 · #241 10-8 · #225 |
— | — | QUIN -1.2 | — | 66.2 | — | 55% QUIN | › | |
| Half final | 10-7 · #209 3-11 · #334 |
— | — | MASS -4.9 | — | 72.8 | — | 70% MASS | › | |
| Half final | 7-7 · #137 6-7 · #251 |
— | — | DART -1.3 | — | 73.7 | — | 56% DART | › | |
| Half final | 9-9 · #283 11-6 · #296 |
— | — | GASO -2.8 | — | 74.1 | — | 62% GASO | › | |
| Half final | 4-12 · #223 4-10 · #292 |
— | — | UNA -1.7 | — | 64.8 | — | 57% UNA | › | |
| Half final | 8-6 · #148 9-6 · #129 |
— | — | WKU -1.8 | — | 78.2 | — | 58% WKU | › | |
| Half final | 3-11 · #190 11-3 · #160 |
— | — | LIB -7.0 | — | 65.1 | — | 78% LIB | › | |
| Half final | 4-12 · #208 1-15 · #358 |
— | — | GAST -2.8 | — | 72.7 | — | 62% GAST | › | |
| Half final | 13-4 · #54 12-5 · #51 |
— | — | LSU -2.5 | — | 73.4 | — | 61% LSU | › | |
| Half final | 17-0 · #5 14-2 · #39 |
— | — | ARIZ -6.4 | — | 77.1 | — | 76% ARIZ | › | |
| Half final | 15-1 · #8 8-9 · #57 |
— | — | MICH -10.8 | — | 74.6 | — | 88% MICH | › | |
| Half final | 17-0 · #27 8-9 · #59 |
— | — | NEB -2.5 | — | 69.4 | — | 61% NEB | › | |
| Half final | 14-3 · #44 12-5 · #92 |
— | — | UNC -3.4 | — | 70.1 | — | 64% UNC | › | |
| Half final | 13-4 · #18 14-3 · #34 |
— | — | UGA -1.7 | — | 84.5 | — | 57% UGA | › | |
| Half final | 7-9 · #207 15-3 · #132 |
— | — | MUR -6.0 | — | 78.0 | — | 74% MUR | › | |
| Half final | 1-12 · #322 2-13 · #360 |
— | — | TXSO -0.5 | — | 71.5 | — | 52% TXSO | › | |
| Half final | 12-5 · #104 15-1 · #69 |
— | — | SLU -7.5 | — | 74.7 | — | 79% SLU | › | |
| Half final | 4-9 · #343 3-13 · #280 |
— | — | JKST -0.6 | — | 74.9 | — | 52% JKST | › | |
| Half final | 12-5 · #96 3-14 · #220 |
— | — | NEV -9.6 | — | 63.4 | — | 85% NEV | › | |
| Half final | 10-7 · #117 8-9 · #191 |
— | — | COFC -2.4 | — | 66.8 | — | 60% COFC | › | |
| Half final | 8-7 · #242 5-11 · #284 |
— | — | MER -3.5 | — | 73.3 | — | 65% MER | › | |
| Half final | 11-5 · #123 6-11 · #329 |
— | — | UCSD -5.7 | — | 70.3 | — | 73% UCSD | › | |
| Half final | 7-8 · #293 7-9 · #285 |
— | — | NICH -1.2 | — | 65.6 | — | 55% NICH | › | |
| Half final | 4-15 · #221 11-5 · #228 |
— | — | USA -6.2 | — | 61.1 | — | 75% USA | › | |
| Half final | 8-9 · #158 10-7 · #231 |
— | — | MRSH -2.5 | — | 71.6 | — | 61% MRSH | › | |
| Half final | 5-10 · #350 4-11 · #282 |
— | — | TNTC -0.9 | — | 68.8 | — | 54% TNTC | › | |
| Half final | 1-14 · #365 6-10 · #222 |
— | — | LR -5.3 | — | 63.8 | — | 72% LR | › | |
| Half final | 10-5 · #257 11-4 · #150 |
— | — | UVU -4.8 | — | 65.8 | — | 70% UVU | › | |
| Half final | 7-8 · #197 3-11 · #357 |
— | — | HOW -0.7 | — | 67.7 | — | 53% HOW | › | |
| Half final | 4-12 · #319 2-15 · #353 |
— | — | NORF -3.5 | — | 67.3 | — | 65% NORF | › | |
| Half final | 2-13 · #345 2-12 · #351 |
— | — | DSU -2.9 | — | 66.9 | — | 63% DSU | › | |
| Half final | 2-17 · #352 5-13 · #364 |
— | — | UMES -7.6 | — | 64.2 | — | 79% UMES | › | |
| Half final | 4-12 · #252 5-8 · #238 |
— | — | AMCC -3.0 | — | 62.4 | — | 63% AMCC | › | |
| Half final | 5-11 · #342 3-12 · #300 |
— | — | HCU -2.3 | — | 66.0 | — | 60% HCU | › | |
| Half final | 10-6 · #171 10-6 · #147 |
— | — | TROY -1.6 | — | 78.9 | — | 57% TROY | › | |
| Half final | 9-8 · #224 8-9 · #103 |
— | — | TXST -0.4 | — | 67.8 | — | 52% TXST | › | |
| Half final | 2-13 · #304 8-6 · #245 |
— | — | TNST -5.2 | — | 71.2 | — | 71% TNST | › | |
| Half final | 8-7 · #258 11-4 · #341 |
— | — | UTM -1.9 | — | 68.6 | — | 58% UTM | › | |
| Half final | 7-8 · #256 6-9 · #306 |
— | — | SEMO -3.7 | — | 67.2 | — | 66% SEMO | › | |
| Half final | 7-8 · #98 5-11 · #143 |
— | — | UNLV -1.4 | — | 72.1 | — | 56% UNLV | › | |
| Half final | 3-11 · #309 6-9 · #338 |
— | — | GRAM -1.1 | — | 70.6 | — | 55% GRAM | › | |
| Half final | 9-7 · #248 10-5 · #152 |
— | — | FUR -3.6 | — | 70.1 | — | 65% FUR | › | |
| Half final | 10-6 · #149 8-7 · #182 |
— | — | UCI -0.8 | — | 67.3 | — | 54% UCI | › | |
| Half final | 4-11 · #318 5-9 · #289 |
— | — | UIW -4.6 | — | 67.5 | — | 69% UIW | › | |
| Half final | 3-12 · #321 7-5 · #274 |
— | — | PRST -6.3 | — | 67.4 | — | 75% PRST | › | |
| Half final | 7-7 · #244 5-9 · #198 |
— | — | JXST -1.5 | — | 59.3 | — | 56% JXST | › | |
| Half final | 1-15 · #335 6-10 · #201 |
— | — | SDST -7.5 | — | 70.5 | — | 79% SDST | › | |
| Half final | 12-3 · #127 4-11 · #287 |
— | — | MCN -6.1 | — | 68.7 | — | 75% MCN | › | |
| Half final | 16-1 · #23 13-3 · #36 |
— | — | PUR -6.6 | — | 75.3 | — | 76% PUR | › | |
| Half final | 16-1 · #3 14-4 · #85 |
— | — | DUKE -8.2 | — | 69.4 | — | 81% DUKE | › | |
| Half final | 15-2 · #10 10-7 · #56 |
— | — | MSU -2.3 | — | 68.0 | — | 60% MSU | › | |
| Half final | 10-8 · #163 10-10 · #99 |
— | — | PAC -0.1 | — | 67.0 | — | 50% ORST | › | |
| Half final | 12-5 · #65 11-6 · #47 |
— | — | WVU -2.5 | — | 69.0 | — | 61% WVU | › | |
| Half final | 10-7 · #89 7-10 · #81 |
— | — | WAKE -1.1 | — | 77.1 | — | 55% WAKE | › | |
| Half final | 12-3 · #193 6-11 · #276 |
— | — | SFA -3.3 | — | 70.0 | — | 64% SFA | › | |
| Half final | 2-14 · #254 7-8 · #344 |
— | — | IDST -3.2 | — | 73.2 | — | 64% IDST | › | |
| Half final | 13-4 · #28 10-6 · #11 |
— | — | TEX -1.5 | — | 79.9 | — | 57% TEX | › | |
| Half final | 10-7 · #79 10-7 · #21 |
— | — | AUB -7.5 | — | 74.3 | — | 79% AUB | › | |
| Half final | 7-7 · #250 7-7 · #154 |
— | — | MTSU -4.7 | — | 65.2 | — | 69% MTSU | › | |
| Half final | 3-9 · #327 4-11 · #363 |
— | — | UAPB -0.9 | — | 73.5 | — | 54% UAPB | › | |
| Half final | 4-11 · #202 0-17 · #366 |
— | — | BCU -8.6 | — | 69.3 | — | 82% BCU | › | |
| Half final | 15-3 · #138 7-10 · #195 |
— | — | BEL -1.1 | — | 73.0 | — | 55% BEL | › | |
| Half final | 16-2 · #97 14-5 · #106 |
— | — | SCU -0.9 | — | 71.3 | — | 54% SCU | › | |
| Half final | 10-6 · #122 7-9 · #174 |
— | — | WYO -2.2 | — | 68.9 | — | 59% WYO | › | |
| Half final | 6-10 · #325 13-4 · #90 |
— | — | HPU -9.5 | — | 74.7 | — | 85% HPU | › | |
| Half final | 9-8 · #168 11-6 · #230 |
— | — | NKU -3.6 | — | 72.0 | — | 65% NKU | › | |
| Half final | 10-7 · #324 2-12 · #356 |
— | — | LIU -3.4 | — | 68.8 | — | 64% LIU | › | |
| Half final | 7-9 · #243 14-2 · #120 |
— | — | UNCW -3.5 | — | 70.2 | — | 65% UNCW | › | |
| Half final | 1-14 · #339 3-12 · #320 |
— | — | VMI -3.0 | — | 68.3 | — | 63% VMI | › | |
| Half final | 4-11 · #295 4-12 · #294 |
— | — | EKU -1.8 | — | 74.4 | — | 58% EKU | › | |
| Half final | 9-5 · #210 9-7 · #214 |
— | — | LIP -1.9 | — | 70.0 | — | 58% LIP | › | |
| Half final | 16-1 · #24 13-4 · #12 |
— | — | BYU -0.3 | — | 74.2 | — | 51% BYU | › | |
| Half final | 12-5 · #14 8-9 · #74 |
— | — | LOU -5.0 | — | 71.2 | — | 71% LOU | › | |
| Half final | 13-3 · #82 11-4 · #75 |
— | — | SDSU -0.7 | — | 70.4 | — | 53% SDSU | › | |
| Half final | 5-11 · #297 9-8 · #194 |
— | — | CSUN -3.6 | — | 74.8 | — | 65% CSUN | › | |
| Half final | 6-11 · #312 4-12 · #281 |
— | — | CSUF -0.0 | — | 74.4 | — | 50% UCR | › | |
| Half final | 12-5 · #9 14-3 · #32 |
— | — | SJU -2.4 | — | 69.9 | — | 60% SJU | › | |
| Half final | 4-11 · #279 2-14 · #305 |
— | — | OMA -0.1 | — | 71.7 | — | 50% ORU | › | |
| Half final | 10-7 · #46 10-7 · #53 |
— | — | MSST -1.2 | — | 71.4 | — | 55% MSST | › | |
| Half final | 7-8 · #253 2-13 · #267 |
— | — | ACU -1.9 | — | 68.6 | — | 58% ACU | › | |
| Half final | 7-11 · #169 10-9 · #121 |
— | — | LMU -4.3 | — | 69.6 | — | 68% LMU | › | |
| Half final | 11-3 · #140 8-7 · #134 |
— | — | HAW -3.4 | — | 67.8 | — | 65% HAW | › | |
| Half final | 6-7 · #273 6-8 · #162 |
— | — | MTST -2.9 | — | 70.5 | — | 62% MTST | › | |
| Half final | 7-7 · #247 8-8 · #313 |
— | — | WEB -1.1 | — | 73.2 | — | 55% WEB | › | |
| Half final | 7-7 · #185 6-10 · #268 |
— | — | TAR -0.7 | — | 72.9 | — | 53% TAR | › | |
| Half final | 18-1 · #17 11-6 · #119 |
— | — | GONZ -10.8 | — | 70.3 | — | 88% GONZ | › | |
| Half final | 9-8 · #83 13-4 · #45 |
— | — | OKST -2.3 | — | 81.0 | — | 60% OKST | › | |
| Half final | 8-7 · #219 2-11 · #196 |
— | — | UNCO -2.3 | — | 76.6 | — | 60% UNCO | › |
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record