Day in numbers

Tap a number to filter the games below

Games6969 final · 0 to play
Lines moved461+ pt since the open · 69 with a line
Totals moved551+ pt since the open
Favorites ATS40-2958% covered
Upsets12outright
Over / Under37-3254% over
Model Favorite55-1480% won
GameSpread, open → closeMovedTotalMoved
NAVY @ DSUNAVY -12.5 → NAVY -15.53 → NAVY140.5 → 132.5▼ 8
NCCU @ JMUJMU -15.5 → JMU -14.51 → NCCU149.5 → 143.5▼ 6
CLE @ NKUNKU -11.5 → NKU -14.53 → NKU155.5 → 158.5▲ 3
PFW @ OAKOAK -7.5 → OAK -4.53 → PFW161.5 → 162.5▲ 1
SHU @ MSMMSM -1.5 → SHU -1.53 → SHU151.5 → 152.5▲ 1
UMBC @ GTWNGTWN -16.5 → GTWN -19.53 → GTWN148.5 → 149.5▲ 1
EKU @ ILSTILST -15.5 → ILST -12.53 → EKU155.5 → 154.5▼ 1
NOLA @ MEMMEM -17.5 → MEM -14.53 → NOLA154.5 → 149.5▼ 5
RGV @ SFASFA -6.5 → SFA -6.5no move149.5 → 143.5▼ 6
NE @ HCNE -6.5 → NE -8.52 → NE144.5 → 145.5▲ 1
Line movedCoveredCover rate
1+ pts5579-5698-549%
2+ pts2172-2236-249%
3+ pts880-90849%
5+ pts139-14948%
Sort by

Sort

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
FinalNon-conference
0-8 · #363
63
UIC
3-3 · #110
62
Spread
UIC -16.5
✓ UAPB W ATS
Total
163.5 ▲1
▼ Under 125
Projected
73–90
✗ UIC lost
Model: UIC by 0.8 ✗ Model: Under 0.6 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-5 · #282
80
3-4 · #214
83
Spread
LIP -10.5
✓ TNTC W ATS
Total
152.5 ▲1
▲ Over 163
Projected
70–80
✓ LIP won
Model: TNTC by 0.2 ✓ Model: Under 2.0 ✗
FinalNon-conference
3-4 · #229
59
1-6 · #317
76
Spread
NE -8.5
✓ HC W ATS
Total
145.5 ▲1
▼ Under 135
Projected
75–69
✗ NE lost
Model: HC by 2.7 ✓ Model: Under 1.0 ✓
FinalConference
2-4 · #180
68
3-4 · #265
69
Spread
YSU -3.5
✓ WRST W ATS
Total
144.5
▼ Under 137
Projected
73–76
✓ YSU won
Model: WRST by 1.3 ✓ Model: Over 4.3 ✗
FinalConference
7-0 · #38 AP #22
64
4-4 · #70
73
Spread
IU -7.5
✓ MINN W ATS
Total
144.5 ▲1
▼ Under 137
Projected
77–68
✗ IU lost
Model: IU by 1.1 ✗ Model: Over 0.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference
3-4 · #187
88
Spread
WMU -5.5
✓ WMU W ATS
Total
150.5 ▼4
▲ Over 162
Projected
72–79
✓ WMU won
Model: WMU by 0.8 ✓ Model: Over 0.2 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-6 · #357
62
4-4 · #158
67
Spread
JMU -14.5
✓ NCCU W ATS
Total
143.5 ▼6
▼ Under 129
Projected
68–82
✓ JMU won
Model: NCCU by 1.1 ✓ Model: Over 6.5 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-7 · #221
55
2-2 · #293
65
Spread
LAM -10.5
✓ UL W ATS
Total
129.5 ▲1
▼ Under 120
Projected
60–71
✓ LAM won
Model: LAM by 0.4 ✗ Model: Over 1.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference
3-4 · #262
73
3-4 · #153
75
Spread
AMER -4.5
✓ DREX W ATS
Total
137.5 ▼2
▲ Over 148
Projected
68–73
✓ AMER won
Model: AMER by 0.8 ✗ Model: Over 3.2 ✓
FinalNon-conference
4-3 · #179
80
4-3 · #165
93
Spread
TOW -6.5
✓ TOW W ATS
Total
154.5 ▲2
▲ Over 173
Projected
76–81
✓ TOW won
Model: COR by 1.1 ✗ Model: Over 1.8 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-6 · #286
68
1-3 · #251
69
Spread
DART -8.5
✓ UNH W ATS
Total
147.5
▼ Under 137
Projected
68–79
✓ DART won
Model: DART by 2.8 ✗ Model: Under 1.3 ✓
FinalNon-conference
4-3 · #283
78
2-5 · #325
85
Spread
UPST -2.5
✓ UPST W ATS
Total
144.5 ▼1
▲ Over 163
Projected
71–74
✓ UPST won
Model: UPST by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 0.9 ✓
FinalNon-conference
3-4 · #195
86
6-1 · #90
84
Spread
HPU -9.5
✓ SIU W ATS
Total
162.5 ▲1
▲ Over 170
Projected
77–86
✗ HPU lost
Model: SIU by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 1.3 ✓
FinalNon-conference
3-5 · #183
56
4-3 · #248
63
Spread
WOF -4.5
✓ WOF W ATS
Total
138.5 ▲1
▼ Under 119
Projected
67–72
✓ WOF won
Model: WOF by 0.2 ✓ Model: Over 1.1 ✗
FinalNon-conference
3-2 · #244
69
3-5 · #296
77
Spread
GASO -1.5
✓ GASO W ATS
Total
145.5 ▲3
▲ Over 146
Projected
74–72
✗ LT lost
Model: LT by 3.7 ✗ Model: Over 0.3 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-3 · #224
82
1-6 · #246
75
Spread
RAD -3.5
✓ USM W ATS
Total
152.5
▲ Over 157
Projected
77–78
✗ RAD lost
Model: USM by 2.8 ✓ Model: Over 2.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-4 · #152
97
Elon
3-3 · #232
88
Spread
FUR -1.5
✓ FUR W ATS
Total
153.5
▲ Over 185
Projected
77–79
✗ ELON lost
Model: ELON by 3.2 ✗ Model: Over 2.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference
5-2 · #231
69
6-1 · #120
70
Spread
UNCW -8.5
✓ MRSH W ATS
Total
150.5 ▼1
▼ Under 139
Projected
70–81
✓ UNCW won
Model: UNCW by 2.0 ✗ Model: Over 0.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-8 · #348
74
107
Spread
QUC -14.5
✓ QUC W ATS
Total
161.5
▲ Over 181
Projected
75–89
✓ QUC won
Model: GWEB by 1.1 ✗ Model: Over 2.2 ✓
FinalNon-conference
FGCU
4-3 · #266
83
FIU
1-3 · #178
89
Spread
FGCU -1.5
✓ FIU W ATS
Total
154.5 ▲4
▲ Over 172
Projected
78–80
✓ FIU won
Model: FIU by 3.1 ✓ Model: Over 3.9 ✓
FinalNon-conference
3-3 · #210
84
6-1 · #151
96
Spread
KENT -8.5
✓ KENT W ATS
Total
153.5 ▼2
▲ Over 180
Projected
75–82
✓ KENT won
Model: APSU by 1.8 ✗ Model: Over 2.8 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-9 · #323
57
Ohio
1-6 · #128
79
Spread
OHIO -12.5
✓ OHIO W ATS
Total
138.5 ▲1
▼ Under 136
Projected
65–76
✓ OHIO won
Model: ME by 2.3 ✗ Model: Over 2.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-5 · #314
71
2-5 · #159
93
Spread
HAMP -6.5
✓ HAMP W ATS
Total
142.5 ▲2
▲ Over 164
Projected
68–75
✓ HAMP won
Model: HAMP by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 1.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference
Navy
3-5 · #199
66
0-6 · #351
59
Spread
NAVY -15.5
✓ DSU W ATS
Total
132.5 ▼8
▼ Under 125
Projected
75–64
✓ NAVY won
Model: DSU by 4.7 ✓ Model: Over 5.9 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-8 · #352
49
6-2 · #47
91
Spread
WVU -31.5
✓ WVU W ATS
Total
134.5 ▲3
▲ Over 140
Projected
51–84
✓ WVU won
Model: WVU by 0.8 ✓ Model: Over 0.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference
4-3 · #166
70
6-1 · #170
72
Spread
COLU -3.5
✓ HOF W ATS
Total
144.5 ▲1
▼ Under 142
Projected
70–74
✓ COLU won
Model: COLU by 0.2 ✗ Model: Over 0.1 ✗
FinalConference
1-6 · #315
80
4-2 · #230
95
Spread
NKU -14.5
✓ NKU W ATS
Total
158.5 ▲3
▲ Over 175
Projected
74–85
✓ NKU won
Model: CLE by 4.1 ✗ Model: Over 0.3 ✓
FinalConference
1-5 · #249
92
2-5 · #204
101
Spread
OAK -4.5
✓ OAK W ATS
Total
162.5 ▲1
▲ Over 193
Projected
78–87
✓ OAK won
Model: OAK by 4.5 ✓ Model: Over 2.0 ✓
FinalConference
2-6 · #340
78
1-6 · #277
92
Spread
DETM -3.5
✓ DETM W ATS
Total
180.5
▼ Under 170
Projected
85–92
✓ DETM won
Model: DETM by 3.4 ✓ Model: Under 3.1 ✓
FinalConference
1-5 · #311
87
2-6 · #278
80
Spread
SHU -1.5
✓ SHU W ATS
Total
152.5 ▲1
▲ Over 167
Projected
77–78
✗ MSM lost
Model: MSM by 2.8 ✗ Model: Over 2.3 ✓
FinalNon-conference
3-2 · #337
61
7-1 · #67
77
Spread
HALL -18.5
✓ CCSU W ATS
Total
128.5 ▼3
▲ Over 138
Projected
59–76
✓ HALL won
Model: CCSU by 0.8 ✓ Model: Over 6.2 ✓
FinalNon-conference
4-4 · #136
71
4-3 · #209
78
Spread
MASS -5.5
✓ MASS W ATS
Total
143.5 ▼2
▲ Over 149
Projected
71–74
✓ MASS won
Model: HARV by 2.4 ✗ Model: Over 1.8 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-7 · #299
77
5-2 · #118
97
Spread
AKR -23.5
✓ BUCK W ATS
Total
157.5 ▼3
▲ Over 174
Projected
69–90
✓ AKR won
Model: BUCK by 3.4 ✓ Model: Over 1.4 ✓
FinalConference
1-4 · #287
60
4-2 · #193
73
Spread
SFA -6.5
✓ SFA W ATS
Total
143.5 ▼6
▼ Under 133
Projected
72–77
✓ SFA won
Model: RGV by 1.1 ✗ Model: Over 4.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference
7-0 · #14 AP #6
80
5-2 · #18 AP #25
89
Spread
LOU -1.5
✓ ARK W ATS
Total
166.5 ▲2
▲ Over 169
Projected
84–81
✗ LOU lost
Model: LOU by 1.5 ✗ Model: Under 2.2 ✗
FinalNon-conference
7-1 · #35
84
5-2 · #15 AP #12
90
Spread
ALA -8.5
✓ CLEM W ATS
Total
165.5 ▲2
▲ Over 174
Projected
78–92
✓ ALA won
Model: ALA by 5.1 ✗ Model: Over 4.3 ✓
FinalNon-conference
LSU
7-0 · #51
78
4-4 · #95
69
Spread
LSU -7.5
✓ LSU W ATS
Total
149.5 ▲2
▼ Under 147
Projected
83–72
✓ LSU won
Model: LSU by 4.0 ✓ Model: Over 5.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-7 · #366
52
0-6 · #358
66
Spread
ULM -9.5
✓ ULM W ATS
Total
149.5 ▼2
▼ Under 118
Projected
74–84
✓ ULM won
Model: ULM by 0.6 ✓ Model: Over 7.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-5 · #222
47
2-5 · #240
85
Spread
CARK -3.5
✓ CARK W ATS
Total
138.5 ▼2
▼ Under 132
Projected
69–71
✓ CARK won
Model: LR by 1.8 ✗ Model: Over 2.1 ✗
FinalNon-conference
5-1 · #104
84
7-0 · #138
76
Spread
BEL -6.5
✓ RICH W ATS
Total
156.5 ▲1
▲ Over 160
Projected
76–79
✗ BEL lost
Model: RICH by 3.3 ✓ Model: Under 1.2 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-8 · #360
68
7-0 · #13 AP #10
132
Spread
ISU -42.5
✓ ISU W ATS
Total
151.5
▲ Over 200
Projected
55–97
✓ ISU won
Model: ALCN by 1.2 ✗ Model: Over 0.3 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-3 · #245
53
2-3 · #328
80
Spread
TNST -4.5
✓ AAMU W ATS
Total
147.5 ▲4
▼ Under 133
Projected
77–73
✗ TNST lost
Model: AAMU by 0.4 ✓ Model: Over 2.0 ✗
FinalNon-conference
4-1 · #219
75
1-6 · #279
70
Spread
UNCO -3.5
✓ UNCO W ATS
Total
157.5
▼ Under 145
Projected
82–81
✓ UNCO won
Model: OMA by 2.4 ✗ Model: Over 4.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-4 · #201
75
2-2 · #321
62
Spread
SDST -2.5
✓ SDST W ATS
Total
148.5 ▼1
▼ Under 137
Projected
75–72
✓ SDST won
Model: SDST by 0.1 ✓ Model: Under 1.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-7 · #135
58
3-4 · #155
63
Spread
MONM -5.5
✓ PRIN W ATS
Total
139.5 ▼4
▼ Under 121
Projected
70–76
✓ MONM won
Model: Over 6.0 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-4 · #344
68
0-6 · #335
59
Spread
IDST -5.5
✓ IDST W ATS
Total
137.5 ▼3
▼ Under 127
Projected
73–67
✓ IDST won
Model: IDST by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 3.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference
UMBC
3-2 · #264
81
5-2 · #64
90
Spread
GTWN -19.5
✓ UMBC W ATS
Total
149.5 ▲1
▲ Over 171
Projected
66–84
✓ GTWN won
Model: UMBC by 0.8 ✓ Model: Over 0.6 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-5 · #181
52
1-5 · #255
64
Spread
EVAN -6.5
✓ EVAN W ATS
Total
136.5
▼ Under 116
Projected
67–72
✓ EVAN won
Model: BALL by 1.6 ✗ Model: Over 1.9 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-6 · #294
78
5-2 · #116
89
Spread
ILST -12.5
✓ EKU W ATS
Total
154.5 ▼1
▲ Over 167
Projected
70–84
✓ ILST won
Model: ILST by 0.8 ✗ Model: Under 0.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-2 · #274
77
4-3 · #291
71
Spread
PRST -2.5
✓ PRST W ATS
Total
158.5 ▼2
▼ Under 148
Projected
83–82
✓ PRST won
Model: SDAK by 1.5 ✗ Model: Over 6.1 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-5 · #276
70
2-4 · #76
86
Spread
MEM -14.5
✓ MEM W ATS
Total
149.5 ▼5
▲ Over 156
Projected
69–84
✓ MEM won
Model: MEM by 1.0 ✓ Model: Over 3.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference
7-1 · #203
60
BYU
6-1 · #24 AP #9
91
Spread
BYU -18.5
✓ BYU W ATS
Total
153.5 ▲3
▼ Under 151
Projected
64–86
✓ BYU won
Model: BYU by 3.2 ✓ Model: Under 4.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference
3-3 · #213
81
2-4 · #273
72
Spread
MONT -3.5
✓ NDSU W ATS
Total
153.5 ▼1
▼ Under 153
Projected
78–78
✗ MONT lost
Model: NDSU by 3.0 ✓ Model: Over 2.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-6 · #305
66
2-4 · #313
92
Spread
WEB -7.5
✓ WEB W ATS
Total
157.5
▲ Over 158
Projected
76–84
✓ WEB won
Model: WEB by 0.3 ✓ Model: Over 2.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference
4-4 · #103
72
Rice
2-6 · #177
77
Spread
RICE -3.5
✓ RICE W ATS
Total
133.5 ▼2
▲ Over 149
Projected
68–71
✓ RICE won
Model: TXST by 0.3 ✗ Model: Over 6.0 ✓
FinalNon-conference
5-3 · #212
74
1-5 · #162
82
Spread
MTST -2.5
✓ MTST W ATS
Total
147.5
▲ Over 156
Projected
73–76
✓ MTST won
Model: MTST by 0.9 ✓ Model: Over 1.2 ✓
FinalConference
5-2 · #59
73
5-2 · #41
85
Spread
WIS -10.5
✓ WIS W ATS
Total
155.5
▲ Over 158
Projected
74–82
✓ WIS won
Model: NU by 2.7 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-6 · #336
58
2-3 · #247
90
Spread
IDHO -11.5
✓ IDHO W ATS
Total
151.5
▼ Under 148
Projected
71–79
✓ IDHO won
Model: UND by 3.1 ✗ Model: Under 1.2 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-6 · #254
89
2-5 · #263
93
Spread
DEN -1.5
✓ DEN W ATS
Total
155.5 ▲2
▲ Over 182
Projected
80–82
✓ DEN won
Model: DEN by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 5.8 ✓
FinalNon-conference
5-2 · #163
80
3-6 · #220
65
Spread
PAC -5.5
✓ PAC W ATS
Total
134.5
▲ Over 145
Projected
71–63
✓ PAC won
Model: PAC by 2.4 ✓ Model: Over 0.3 ✓
FinalNon-conference
SMU
8-0 · #55
69
8-0 · #22 AP #17
88
Spread
VAN -10.5
✓ VAN W ATS
Total
165.5 ▼3
▼ Under 157
Projected
81–90
✓ VAN won
Model: SMU by 1.7 ✗ Model: Over 4.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference
6-1 · #20
88
5-2 · #11
69
Spread
TEX -3.5
✓ UVA W ATS
Total
154.5 ▲4
▲ Over 157
Projected
76–80
✗ TEX lost
Model: TEX by 1.0 ✗ Model: Over 1.5 ✓
FinalNon-conference
3-4 · #53
85
5-3 · #94
73
Spread
MSST -1.5
✓ MSST W ATS
Total
150.5 ▲1
▲ Over 158
Projected
79–75
✓ MSST won
Model: MSST by 2.2 ✓ Model: Over 3.6 ✓
FinalNon-conference
5-2 · #48
73
6-2 · #21 AP #20
83
Spread
AUB -5.5
✓ AUB W ATS
Total
162.5 ▼3
▼ Under 156
Projected
81–91
✓ AUB won
Model: AUB by 4.3 ✓ Model: Over 9.2 ✗
FinalNon-conference
3-4 · #186
58
3-5 · #99
80
Spread
ORST -3.5
✓ ORST W ATS
Total
143.5 ▼1
▼ Under 138
Projected
74–77
✓ ORST won
Model: UVM by 0.5 ✗ Model: Over 7.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference
3-5 · #268
80
6-1 · #106
90
Spread
SCU -20.5
✓ UTU W ATS
Total
144.5 ▲2
▲ Over 170
Projected
64–85
✓ SCU won
Model: Over 4.5 ✓
FinalNon-conference
3-2 · #150
66
3-3 · #75
77
Spread
SDSU -8.5
✓ SDSU W ATS
Total
144.5 ▼2
▼ Under 143
Projected
72–78
✓ SDSU won
Model: UVU by 2.2 ✗ Model: Over 5.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-4 · #292
65
4-3 · #161
63
Spread
SF -16.5
✓ UNA W ATS
Total
145.5 ▲2
▼ Under 128
Projected
67–79
✗ SF lost
Model: UNA by 4.5 ✓ Model: Over 0.8 ✗
FinalConference
UCLA
5-2 · #26
82
5-2 · #56
80
Spread
UCLA -2.5
✓ WASH W ATS
Total
141.5 ▼1
▲ Over 162
Projected
74–71
✓ UCLA won
Model: UCLA by 0.2 ✗ Model: Over 3.6 ✓
StatusMatchupSpreadTotalModel lineSpread edgeModel totalTotal edgeWin probModel
Final
0-8 · #363
63
3-3 · #110
62
UIC -16.5 163.5 UIC -17.3 UIC +0.8 162.9 Under 0.6 93% UIC L W ›
Final
1-5 · #282
80
3-4 · #214
83
LIP -10.5 152.5 LIP -10.3 TNTC +0.2 150.5 Under 2.0 82% LIP W L ›
Final
3-4 · #229
59
1-6 · #317
76
NE -8.5 145.5 NE -5.8 HC +2.7 144.5 Under 1.0 70% NE W W ›
Final
2-4 · #180
68
3-4 · #265
69
YSU -3.5 144.5 YSU -2.2 WRST +1.3 148.8 Over 4.3 58% YSU W L ›
Final
7-0 · #38
64
4-4 · #70
73
IU -7.5 144.5 IU -8.6 IU +1.1 144.8 Over 0.3 77% IU L L ›
Final
3-4 · #187
88
WMU -5.5 150.5 WMU -6.3 WMU +0.8 150.7 Over 0.2 71% WMU W W ›
Final
0-6 · #357
62
4-4 · #158
67
JMU -14.5 143.5 JMU -13.4 NCCU +1.1 150.0 Over 6.5 88% JMU W L ›
Final
1-7 · #221
55
2-2 · #293
65
LAM -10.5 129.5 LAM -10.9 LAM +0.4 130.8 Over 1.3 83% LAM L L ›
Final
3-4 · #262
73
3-4 · #153
75
AMER -4.5 137.5 AMER -5.3 AMER +0.8 140.7 Over 3.2 68% AMER L W ›
Final
4-3 · #179
80
4-3 · #165
93
TOW -6.5 154.5 TOW -5.4 COR +1.1 156.3 Over 1.8 68% TOW L W ›
Final
0-6 · #286
68
1-3 · #251
69
DART -8.5 147.5 DART -11.3 DART +2.8 146.2 Under 1.3 84% DART L W ›
Final
4-3 · #283
78
2-5 · #325
85
UPST -2.5 144.5 UPST -3.0 UPST +0.5 145.4 Over 0.9 60% UPST W W ›
Final
3-4 · #195
86
6-1 · #90
84
HPU -9.5 162.5 HPU -9.0 SIU +0.5 163.8 Over 1.3 78% HPU W W ›
Final
3-5 · #183
56
4-3 · #248
63
WOF -4.5 138.5 WOF -4.7 WOF +0.2 139.6 Over 1.1 66% WOF W L ›
Final
3-2 · #244
69
3-5 · #296
77
GASO -1.5 145.5 LT -2.2 LT +3.7 145.8 Over 0.3 58% LT L W ›
Final
2-3 · #224
82
1-6 · #246
75
RAD -3.5 152.5 RAD -0.7 USM +2.8 154.9 Over 2.4 53% RAD W W ›
Final
2-4 · #152
97
3-3 · #232
88
FUR -1.5 153.5 ELON -1.7 ELON +3.2 155.9 Over 2.4 56% ELON L W ›
Final
5-2 · #231
69
6-1 · #120
70
UNCW -8.5 150.5 UNCW -10.5 UNCW +2.0 151.1 Over 0.6 82% UNCW L L ›
Final
0-8 · #348
74
QUC -14.5 161.5 QUC -13.4 GWEB +1.1 163.7 Over 2.2 88% QUC L W ›
Final
4-3 · #266
83
1-3 · #178
89
FGCU -1.5 154.5 FIU -1.6 FIU +3.1 158.4 Over 3.9 56% FIU W W ›
Final
3-3 · #210
84
6-1 · #151
96
KENT -8.5 153.5 KENT -6.7 APSU +1.8 156.3 Over 2.8 72% KENT L W ›
Final
0-9 · #323
57
1-6 · #128
79
OHIO -12.5 138.5 OHIO -10.2 ME +2.3 140.8 Over 2.3 81% OHIO L L ›
Final
2-5 · #314
71
2-5 · #159
93
HAMP -6.5 142.5 HAMP -7.0 HAMP +0.5 143.9 Over 1.4 73% HAMP W W ›
Final
3-5 · #199
66
0-6 · #351
59
NAVY -15.5 132.5 NAVY -10.8 DSU +4.7 138.4 Over 5.9 83% NAVY W L ›
Final
1-8 · #352
49
6-2 · #47
91
WVU -31.5 134.5 WVU -32.3 WVU +0.8 134.9 Over 0.4 100% WVU W W ›
Final
4-3 · #166
70
6-1 · #170
72
COLU -3.5 144.5 COLU -3.7 COLU +0.2 144.6 Over 0.1 63% COLU L L ›
Final
1-6 · #315
80
4-2 · #230
95
NKU -14.5 158.5 NKU -10.4 CLE +4.1 158.8 Over 0.3 82% NKU L W ›
Final
1-5 · #249
92
2-5 · #204
101
OAK -4.5 162.5 OAK -9.0 OAK +4.5 164.5 Over 2.0 78% OAK W W ›
Final
2-6 · #340
78
1-6 · #277
92
DETM -3.5 180.5 DETM -6.9 DETM +3.4 177.4 Under 3.1 73% DETM W W ›
Final
1-5 · #311
87
2-6 · #278
80
SHU -1.5 152.5 MSM -1.3 MSM +2.8 154.8 Over 2.3 55% MSM L W ›
Final
3-2 · #337
61
7-1 · #67
77
HALL -18.5 128.5 HALL -17.7 CCSU +0.8 134.7 Over 6.2 94% HALL W W ›
Final
4-4 · #136
71
4-3 · #209
78
MASS -5.5 143.5 MASS -3.1 HARV +2.4 145.3 Over 1.8 61% MASS L W ›
Final
2-7 · #299
77
5-2 · #118
97
AKR -23.5 157.5 AKR -20.1 BUCK +3.4 158.9 Over 1.4 96% AKR W W ›
Final
1-4 · #287
60
4-2 · #193
73
SFA -6.5 143.5 SFA -5.4 RGV +1.1 148.3 Over 4.8 68% SFA L L ›
Final
7-0 · #14
80
5-2 · #18
89
LOU -1.5 166.5 LOU -3.0 LOU +1.5 164.3 Under 2.2 60% LOU L L ›
Final
7-1 · #35
84
5-2 · #15
90
ALA -8.5 165.5 ALA -13.6 ALA +5.1 169.8 Over 4.3 88% ALA L W ›
Final
7-0 · #51
78
4-4 · #95
69
LSU -7.5 149.5 LSU -11.5 LSU +4.0 155.2 Over 5.7 84% LSU W L ›
Final
0-7 · #366
52
0-6 · #358
66
ULM -9.5 149.5 ULM -10.1 ULM +0.6 157.3 Over 7.8 81% ULM W L ›
Final
1-5 · #222
47
2-5 · #240
85
CARK -3.5 138.5 CARK -1.7 LR +1.8 140.6 Over 2.1 56% CARK L L ›
Final
5-1 · #104
84
7-0 · #138
76
BEL -6.5 156.5 BEL -3.2 RICH +3.3 155.3 Under 1.2 61% BEL W L ›
Final
1-8 · #360
68
7-0 · #13
132
ISU -42.5 151.5 ISU -41.3 ALCN +1.2 151.8 Over 0.3 100% ISU L W ›
Final
2-3 · #245
53
2-3 · #328
80
TNST -4.5 147.5 TNST -4.1 AAMU +0.4 149.5 Over 2.0 64% TNST W L ›
Final
4-1 · #219
75
1-6 · #279
70
UNCO -3.5 157.5 UNCO -1.1 OMA +2.4 162.2 Over 4.7 54% UNCO L L ›
Final
2-4 · #201
75
2-2 · #321
62
SDST -2.5 148.5 SDST -2.6 SDST +0.1 147.4 Under 1.1 59% SDST W W ›
Final
2-7 · #135
58
3-4 · #155
63
MONM -5.5 139.5 MONM -5.5 — 145.5 Over 6.0 68% MONM L ›
Final
2-4 · #344
68
0-6 · #335
59
IDST -5.5 137.5 IDST -6.0 IDST +0.5 140.8 Over 3.3 70% IDST W L ›
Final
3-2 · #264
81
5-2 · #64
90
GTWN -19.5 149.5 GTWN -18.7 UMBC +0.8 150.1 Over 0.6 95% GTWN W W ›
Final
2-5 · #181
52
1-5 · #255
64
EVAN -6.5 136.5 EVAN -4.9 BALL +1.6 138.4 Over 1.9 67% EVAN L L ›
Final
0-6 · #294
78
5-2 · #116
89
ILST -12.5 154.5 ILST -13.3 ILST +0.8 153.8 Under 0.7 88% ILST L L ›
Final
2-2 · #274
77
4-3 · #291
71
PRST -2.5 158.5 PRST -1.0 SDAK +1.5 164.6 Over 6.1 54% PRST L L ›
Final
2-5 · #276
70
2-4 · #76
86
MEM -14.5 149.5 MEM -15.5 MEM +1.0 152.9 Over 3.4 91% MEM W W ›
Final
7-1 · #203
60
6-1 · #24
91
BYU -18.5 153.5 BYU -21.7 BYU +3.2 149.4 Under 4.1 97% BYU W W ›
Final
3-3 · #213
81
2-4 · #273
72
MONT -3.5 153.5 MONT -0.5 NDSU +3.0 156.3 Over 2.8 52% MONT W L ›
Final
1-6 · #305
66
2-4 · #313
92
WEB -7.5 157.5 WEB -7.8 WEB +0.3 159.6 Over 2.1 75% WEB W W ›
Final
4-4 · #103
72
2-6 · #177
77
RICE -3.5 133.5 RICE -3.3 TXST +0.3 139.5 Over 6.0 61% RICE L W ›
Final
5-3 · #212
74
1-5 · #162
82
MTST -2.5 147.5 MTST -3.4 MTST +0.9 148.7 Over 1.2 62% MTST W W ›
Final
5-2 · #59
73
5-2 · #41
85
WIS -10.5 155.5 WIS -7.8 NU +2.7 156.0 Over 0.5 75% WIS L W ›
Final
2-6 · #336
58
2-3 · #247
90
IDHO -11.5 151.5 IDHO -8.4 UND +3.1 150.3 Under 1.2 77% IDHO L W ›
Final
0-6 · #254
89
2-5 · #263
93
DEN -1.5 155.5 DEN -2.0 DEN +0.5 161.3 Over 5.8 57% DEN W W ›
Final
5-2 · #163
80
3-6 · #220
65
PAC -5.5 134.5 PAC -7.9 PAC +2.4 134.8 Over 0.3 75% PAC W W ›
Final
8-0 · #55
69
8-0 · #22
88
VAN -10.5 165.5 VAN -8.8 SMU +1.7 170.3 Over 4.8 78% VAN L L ›
Final
6-1 · #20
88
5-2 · #11
69
TEX -3.5 154.5 TEX -4.5 TEX +1.0 156.0 Over 1.5 65% TEX L W ›
Final
3-4 · #53
85
5-3 · #94
73
MSST -1.5 150.5 MSST -3.7 MSST +2.2 154.1 Over 3.6 63% MSST W W ›
Final
5-2 · #48
73
6-2 · #21
83
AUB -5.5 162.5 AUB -9.8 AUB +4.3 171.7 Over 9.2 81% AUB W L ›
Final
3-4 · #186
58
3-5 · #99
80
ORST -3.5 143.5 ORST -3.0 UVM +0.5 150.8 Over 7.3 60% ORST L L ›
Final
3-5 · #268
80
6-1 · #106
90
SCU -20.5 144.5 SCU -20.5 — 149.0 Over 4.5 96% SCU W ›
Final
3-2 · #150
66
3-3 · #75
77
SDSU -8.5 144.5 SDSU -6.3 UVU +2.2 150.2 Over 5.7 71% SDSU L L ›
Final
2-4 · #292
65
4-3 · #161
63
SF -16.5 145.5 SF -12.0 UNA +4.5 146.3 Over 0.8 85% SF W L ›
Final
5-2 · #26
82
5-2 · #56
80
UCLA -2.5 141.5 UCLA -2.7 UCLA +0.2 145.1 Over 3.6 59% UCLA L W ›
The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record