Day in numbers

Tap a number to filter the games below

Games6262 final · 0 to play
Lines moved471+ pt since the open · 62 with a line
Totals moved501+ pt since the open
Favorites ATS38-2461% covered
Upsets15outright
Over / Under23-3937% over
Model Favorite50-1281% won
GameSpread, open → closeMovedTotalMoved
SFPA vs TROYSFPA -21.5 → TROY -21.543 → TROY151.5 → 151.5no move
M-OH vs UNCGUNCG -10.5 → M-OH -10.521 → M-OH149.5 → 150.5▲ 1
SYR vs ISUISU -8.5 → ISU -10.52 → ISU158.5 → 145.5▼ 13
NOLA @ TTUTTU -24.5 → TTU -29.55 → TTU154.5 → 157.5▲ 3
BAY vs SDSUBAY -2.5 → BAY -2.5no move157.5 → 148.5▼ 9
SJSU vs LUCLUC -1.5 → SJSU -1.53 → SJSU138.5 → 136.5▼ 2
UIC @ RMURMU -1.5 → UIC -1.53 → UIC146.5 → 151.5▲ 5
USF vs VCUUSF -1.5 → VCU -1.53 → VCU171.5 → 172.5▲ 1
IDHO vs CSUNCSUN -1.5 → IDHO -1.53 → IDHO161.5 → 159.5▼ 2
OMA @ FIUFIU -5.5 → FIU -4.51 → OMA161.5 → 157.5▼ 4
Line movedCoveredCover rate
1+ pts5579-5698-549%
2+ pts2172-2236-249%
3+ pts880-90849%
5+ pts139-14948%
Sort by

Sort

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
64
Troy
3-4 · #147
74
Spread
TROY -21.5
✓ SFPA W ATS
Total
151.5
▼ Under 138
Projected
70–90
✓ TROY won
Model: SFPA by 1.3 ✓ Model: Over 8.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
3-2 · #200
81
VMI
1-5 · #320
48
Spread
BGSU -11.5
✓ BGSU W ATS
Total
148.5 ▼2
▼ Under 129
Projected
82–70
✓ BGSU won
Model: VMI by 0.1 ✗ Model: Over 3.4 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-0 · #22 AP #24
83
3-0 · #129
78
Spread
VAN -18.5
✓ WKU W ATS
Total
168.5 ▲1
▼ Under 161
Projected
93–75
✓ VAN won
Model: WKU by 0.9 ✓ Model: Under 0.8 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
4-2 · #165
73
5-0 · #123
87
Spread
UCSD -1.5
✓ UCSD W ATS
Total
138.5
▲ Over 160
Projected
68–71
✓ UCSD won
Model: UCSD by 1.1 ✓ Model: Over 0.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-6 · #307
75
1-5 · #349
64
Spread
STO -2.5
✓ UML W ATS
Total
148.5 ▼2
▼ Under 139
Projected
75–76
✗ STO lost
Model: UML by 1.6 ✓ Model: Over 1.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
4-2 · #63
64
6-0 · #13 AP #15
95
Spread
ISU -10.5
✓ ISU W ATS
Total
145.5 ▼13
▲ Over 159
Projected
69–82
✓ ISU won
Model: ISU by 2.4 ✓ Model: Over 5.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-4 · #276
50
4-2 · #12 AP #20
82
Spread
TTU -29.5
✓ TTU W ATS
Total
157.5 ▲3
▼ Under 132
Projected
65–92
✓ TTU won
Model: NOLA by 3.2 ✗ Model: Under 0.8 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-5 · #156
59
0-4 · #286
47
Spread
BRWN -5.5
✓ BRWN W ATS
Total
136.5 ▼3
▼ Under 106
Projected
73–68
✓ BRWN won
Model: UNH by 0.9 ✗ Model: Over 4.1 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-0 · #138
87
4-2 · #157
72
Spread
BEL -4.5
✓ BEL W ATS
Total
163.5 ▲2
▼ Under 159
Projected
81–77
✓ BEL won
Model: TOL by 0.5 ✗ Model: Under 4.7 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-0 · #237
73
2-5 · #299
71
Spread
BUF -4.5
✓ BUCK W ATS
Total
146.5
▼ Under 144
Projected
75–73
✓ BUF won
Model: BUCK by 1.9 ✓ Model: Over 1.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
1-4 · #143
63
1-6 · #113
51
Spread
SJSU -1.5
✓ SJSU W ATS
Total
136.5 ▼2
▼ Under 114
Projected
73–71
✓ SJSU won
Model: SJSU by 0.7 ✓ Model: Over 7.5 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
4-0 · #125
82
1-6 · #284
71
Spread
M-OH -10.5
✓ M-OH W ATS
Total
150.5 ▲1
▲ Over 153
Projected
80–74
✓ M-OH won
Model: UNCG by 4.5 ✗ Model: Over 4.3 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-5 · #279
61
FIU
0-3 · #178
74
Spread
FIU -4.5
✓ FIU W ATS
Total
157.5 ▼4
▼ Under 135
Projected
78–82
✓ FIU won
Model: OMA by 0.4 ✗ Model: Over 2.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference
3-3 · #259
67
2-2 · #242
75
Spread
MER -6.5
✓ MER W ATS
Total
142.5 ▲2
▼ Under 142
Projected
70–75
✓ MER won
Model: APP by 1.2 ✗ Model: Over 1.9 ✗
FinalNon-conference
UIC
3-2 · #110
74
1-3 · #168
88
Spread
UIC -1.5
✓ RMU W ATS
Total
151.5 ▲5
▲ Over 162
Projected
77–78
✓ RMU won
Model: RMU by 2.0 ✓ Model: Over 3.7 ✓
FinalNon-conference
3-2 · #248
83
2-2 · #230
93
Spread
NKU -3.5
✓ NKU W ATS
Total
149.5
▲ Over 176
Projected
73–76
✓ NKU won
Model: WOF by 0.5 ✗ Model: Under 0.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference
Army
0-6 · #288
81
FDU
0-5 · #356
73
Spread
FDU -4.5
✓ ARMY W ATS
Total
152.5 ▲1
▲ Over 154
Projected
78–79
✗ FDU lost
Model: ARMY by 3.4 ✓ Model: Over 4.3 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
USC
6-0 · #36
88
6-1 · #60
75
Spread
USC -4.5
✓ USC W ATS
Total
161.5 ▼2
▲ Over 163
Projected
86–82
✓ USC won
Model: USC by 0.3 ✓ Model: Over 6.5 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
3-1 · #160
64
3-4 · #167
74
Spread
LIB -4.5
✓ BRAD W ATS
Total
144.5 ▼4
▼ Under 138
Projected
75–73
✗ LIB lost
Model: BRAD by 1.7 ✓ Model: Over 3.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
3-2 · #84
66
VCU
3-2 · #61
78
Spread
VCU -1.5
✓ VCU W ATS
Total
172.5 ▲1
▼ Under 144
Projected
84–84
✓ VCU won
Model: USF by 0.8 ✗ Model: Under 4.7 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
2-2 · #213
56
1-2 · #198
43
Spread
NDSU -3.5
✓ NDSU W ATS
Total
142.5
▼ Under 99
Projected
75–73
✓ NDSU won
Model: JXST by 1.8 ✗ Model: Over 5.9 ✗
FinalNon-conference
4-1 · #176
56
Spread
VAL -9.5
✓ USI W ATS
Total
150.5 ▲3
▼ Under 120
Projected
69–80
✗ VAL lost
Model: VAL by 1.0 ✗ Model: Under 1.5 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
0-6 · #208
58
3-0 · #133
77
Spread
NMSU -12.5
✓ NMSU W ATS
Total
136.5 ▲1
▼ Under 135
Projected
63–78
✓ NMSU won
Model: NMSU by 2.3 ✓ Model: Over 3.9 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-2 · #71
56
6-1 · #2 AP #3
66
Spread
HOU -11.5
✓ ND W ATS
Total
132.5 ▼2
▼ Under 122
Projected
61–75
✓ HOU won
Model: HOU by 2.8 ✗ Model: Over 3.5 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-4 · #214
90
5-1 · #231
67
Spread
MRSH -7.5
✓ LIP W ATS
Total
157.5 ▲2
▼ Under 157
Projected
74–79
✗ MRSH lost
Model: LIP by 1.8 ✓ Model: Under 4.6 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
Navy
2-3 · #199
84
0-5 · #348
51
Spread
NAVY -10.5
✓ NAVY W ATS
Total
153.5 ▼3
▼ Under 135
Projected
83–70
✓ NAVY won
Model: NAVY by 2.4 ✓ Model: Over 0.2 ✗
FinalNon-conference
3-3 · #136
60
3-4 · #95
73
Spread
BC -7.5
✓ BC W ATS
Total
138.5
▼ Under 133
Projected
66–74
✓ BC won
Model: BC by 0.3 ✓ Model: Over 2.0 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
6-0 · #131
60
4-1 · #108
63
Spread
UNI -2.5
✓ TLSA W ATS
Total
137.5 ▲1
▼ Under 123
Projected
70–69
✗ UNI lost
Model: TLSA by 2.2 ✓ Model: Over 1.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
1-5 · #305
62
Rice
1-6 · #177
81
Spread
RICE -5.5
✓ RICE W ATS
Total
150.5 ▼2
▼ Under 143
Projected
76–80
✓ RICE won
Model: ORU by 1.5 ✗ Model: Over 5.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
2-3 · #186
79
2-5 · #135
74
Spread
UVM -5.5
✓ PRIN W ATS
Total
140.5 ▼1
▲ Over 153
Projected
76–72
✓ UVM won
Model: PRIN by 1.8 ✓ Model: Over 8.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-5 · #354
103
2-3 · #330
101
Spread
MAN -2.5
✓ WAG W ATS
Total
144.5 ▼3
▲ Over 204
Projected
74–76
✗ MAN lost
Model: WAG by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 5.2 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-0 · #68
66
4-1 · #87
64
Spread
VT -4.5
✓ CSU W ATS
Total
153.5 ▲2
▼ Under 130
Projected
80–78
✓ VT won
Model: CSU by 2.4 ✓ Model: Over 4.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
6-1 · #67
75
2-4 · #139
61
Spread
HALL -8.5
✓ HALL W ATS
Total
147.5 ▼2
▼ Under 136
Projected
79–70
✓ HALL won
Model: Over 1.1 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
4-4 · #184
45
2-2 · #150
89
Spread
UVU -7.5
✓ UVU W ATS
Total
148.5 ▼1
▼ Under 134
Projected
76–79
✓ UVU won
Model: SAM by 4.2 ✗ Model: Over 6.9 ✗
FinalNon-conference
3-1 · #219
71
3-4 · #220
53
Spread
UNCO -4.5
✓ UNCO W ATS
Total
146.5 ▲2
▼ Under 124
Projected
78–74
✓ UNCO won
Model: AF by 0.9 ✗ Model: Over 5.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
1-2 · #189
84
1-3 · #344
81
Spread
SHSU -1.5
✓ SHSU W ATS
Total
142.5 ▼3
▲ Over 165
Projected
75–73
✓ SHSU won
Model: SHSU by 0.7 ✓ Model: Over 5.5 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-2 · #16
81
7-0 · #7 AP #17
76
Spread
TENN -7.5
✓ KU W ATS
Total
140.5 ▲1
▲ Over 157
Projected
71–74
✗ TENN lost
Model: KU by 4.6 ✓ Model: Over 4.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-3 · #282
54
4-2 · #19 AP #19
104
Spread
UK -37.5
✓ UK W ATS
Total
157.5
▲ Over 158
Projected
60–94
✓ UK won
Model: TNTC by 3.8 ✗ Model: Under 3.1 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-2 · #300
72
0-4 · #339
65
Spread
HCU -1.5
✓ HCU W ATS
Total
137.5
▼ Under 137
Projected
73–70
✓ HCU won
Model: HCU by 1.7 ✓ Model: Over 5.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
1-3 · #172
53
4-2 · #174
76
Spread
FRES -2.5
✓ FRES W ATS
Total
150.5 ▲2
▼ Under 129
Projected
76–77
✓ FRES won
Model: PEPP by 1.7 ✗ Model: Over 2.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-4 · #252
57
3-1 · #120
70
Spread
UNCW -11.5
✓ UNCW W ATS
Total
137.5 ▼4
▼ Under 127
Projected
64–75
✓ UNCW won
Model: SELA by 0.4 ✗ Model: Over 0.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-2 · #148
102
FGCU
4-2 · #266
100
Spread
FGCU -1.5
✓ KENN W ATS
Total
160.5 ▲1
▲ Over 202
Projected
82–84
✗ FGCU lost
Model: FGCU by 0.5 ✗ Model: Over 5.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference
3-3 · #188
64
5-1 · #30
56
Spread
CIN -22.5
✓ EMU W ATS
Total
146.5 ▲1
▼ Under 120
Projected
62–81
✗ CIN lost
Model: EMU by 2.9 ✓ Model: Under 3.6 ✓
FinalNon-conference
5-1 · #170
106
4-2 · #239
77
Spread
COLU -3.5
✓ COLU W ATS
Total
150.5 ▲3
▲ Over 183
Projected
77–73
✓ COLU won
Model: COLU by 0.3 ✓ Model: Under 0.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-2 · #105
90
4-2 · #111
75
Spread
URI -3.5
✓ URI W ATS
Total
149.5 ▼3
▲ Over 165
Projected
80–76
✓ URI won
Model: URI by 0.4 ✓ Model: Over 5.7 ✓
FinalNon-conference
3-2 · #207
73
1-2 · #244
75
Spread
LT -2.5
✓ INST W ATS
Total
141.5
▲ Over 148
Projected
69–71
✓ LT won
Model: INST by 1.3 ✓ Model: Under 1.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
4-2 · #9 AP #14
74
5-2 · #21 AP #21
85
Spread
SJU -4.5
✓ AUB W ATS
Total
166.5
▼ Under 159
Projected
89–82
✗ SJU lost
Model: SJU by 2.4 ✗ Model: Over 4.5 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-0 · #97
70
4-1 · #77
65
Spread
SMC -9.5
✓ WICH W ATS
Total
139.5 ▲1
▼ Under 135
Projected
74–68
✓ SMC won
Model: WICH by 3.5 ✓ Model: Over 1.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-3 · #195
58
1-4 · #76
74
Spread
MEM -10.5
✓ MEM W ATS
Total
156.5 ▼2
▼ Under 132
Projected
74–83
✓ MEM won
Model: SIU by 1.7 ✗ Model: Over 1.1 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-4 · #306
72
1-2 · #321
79
Spread
NAU -2.5
✓ NAU W ATS
Total
153.5
▼ Under 151
Projected
76–76
✓ NAU won
Model: SEMO by 2.0 ✗ Model: Under 1.6 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
2-3 · #201
52
1-4 · #149
64
Spread
UCI -2.5
✓ UCI W ATS
Total
144.5 ▲2
▼ Under 116
Projected
72–72
✗ SDST lost
Model: SDST by 2.4 ✗ Model: Under 0.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-4 · #263
59
4-1 · #122
101
Spread
WYO -9.5
✓ WYO W ATS
Total
153.5 ▲1
▲ Over 160
Projected
72–82
✓ WYO won
Model: DEN by 0.1 ✗
FinalNon-conference
NJIT
3-4 · #316
47
6-0 · #14 AP #6
104
Spread
LOU -44.5
✓ LOU W ATS
Total
158.5
▼ Under 151
Projected
58–96
✓ LOU won
Model: NJIT by 7.0 ✗ Model: Under 4.8 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-4 · #302
87
4-2 · #82
93
Spread
UNM -19.5
✓ ALST W ATS
Total
148.5 ▲2
▲ Over 180
Projected
66–84
✓ UNM won
Model: ALST by 1.9 ✓ Model: Over 0.9 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
1-2 · #247
78
2-2 · #194
64
Spread
IDHO -1.5
✓ IDHO W ATS
Total
159.5 ▼2
▼ Under 142
Projected
80–79
✓ IDHO won
Model: CSUN by 0.8 ✗ Model: Under 0.5 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
7-0 · #17 AP #12
61
6-0 · #8 AP #7
101
Spread
GONZ -3.5
✓ MICH W ATS
Total
165.5 ▲2
▼ Under 162
Projected
80–82
✓ MICH won
Model: MICH by 6.2 ✓ Model: Under 3.6 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-1 · #48 AP #23
97
4-2 · #11
102
Spread
NCSU -1.5
✓ TEX W ATS
Total
161.5 ▲4
▲ Over 199
Projected
80–81
✓ TEX won
Model: TEX by 2.1 ✓ Model: Under 0.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
Iowa
6-0 · #43
59
4-2 · #80
46
Spread
IOWA -8.5
✓ IOWA W ATS
Total
143.5 ▼1
▼ Under 105
Projected
82–72
✓ IOWA won
Model: IOWA by 1.1 ✓ Model: Over 10.0 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-5 · #297
73
3-3 · #169
93
Spread
PORT -5.5
✓ PORT W ATS
Total
148.5 ▼1
▲ Over 166
Projected
73–76
✓ PORT won
Model: LBSU by 1.8 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
4-1 · #29
91
3-2 · #75
81
Spread
BAY -2.5
✓ BAY W ATS
Total
148.5 ▼9
▲ Over 172
Projected
82–75
✓ BAY won
Model: BAY by 4.4 ✓ Model: Over 9.2 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-2 · #50
72
4-2 · #15 AP #8
105
Spread
ALA -14.5
✓ ALA W ATS
Total
166.5 ▲3
▲ Over 177
Projected
76–93
✓ ALA won
Model: ALA by 2.4 ✓ Model: Over 2.9 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
Utah
5-2 · #73
75
5-1 · #46
74
Spread
MISS -10.5
✓ UTAH W ATS
Total
144.5 ▼1
▲ Over 149
Projected
74–81
✗ MISS lost
Model: UTAH by 3.4 ✓ Model: Over 11.3 ✓
StatusMatchupSpreadTotalModel lineSpread edgeModel totalTotal edgeWin probModel
Final
3-4 · #147
74
TROY -21.5 151.5 TROY -20.2 SFPA +1.3 160.2 Over 8.7 96% TROY W L ›
Final
3-2 · #200
81
1-5 · #320
48
BGSU -11.5 148.5 BGSU -11.4 VMI +0.1 151.9 Over 3.4 84% BGSU L L ›
Final
5-0 · #22
83
3-0 · #129
78
VAN -18.5 168.5 VAN -17.6 WKU +0.9 167.7 Under 0.8 94% VAN W W ›
Final
4-2 · #165
73
5-0 · #123
87
UCSD -1.5 138.5 UCSD -2.6 UCSD +1.1 138.6 Over 0.1 59% UCSD W W ›
Final
0-6 · #307
75
1-5 · #349
64
STO -2.5 148.5 STO -0.9 UML +1.6 150.1 Over 1.6 53% STO W L ›
Final
4-2 · #63
64
6-0 · #13
95
ISU -10.5 145.5 ISU -12.9 ISU +2.4 150.9 Over 5.4 87% ISU W W ›
Final
2-4 · #276
50
4-2 · #12
82
TTU -29.5 157.5 TTU -26.3 NOLA +3.2 156.7 Under 0.8 99% TTU L W ›
Final
2-5 · #156
59
0-4 · #286
47
BRWN -5.5 136.5 BRWN -4.6 UNH +0.9 140.6 Over 4.1 66% BRWN L L ›
Final
5-0 · #138
87
4-2 · #157
72
BEL -4.5 163.5 BEL -4.0 TOL +0.5 158.8 Under 4.7 64% BEL L W ›
Final
5-0 · #237
73
2-5 · #299
71
BUF -4.5 146.5 BUF -2.6 BUCK +1.9 147.8 Over 1.3 59% BUF W L ›
Final
1-4 · #143
63
1-6 · #113
51
SJSU -1.5 136.5 SJSU -2.2 SJSU +0.7 144.0 Over 7.5 58% SJSU W L ›
Final
4-0 · #125
82
1-6 · #284
71
M-OH -10.5 150.5 M-OH -6.0 UNCG +4.5 154.8 Over 4.3 70% M-OH L W ›
Final
1-5 · #279
61
0-3 · #178
74
FIU -4.5 157.5 FIU -4.1 OMA +0.4 160.3 Over 2.8 64% FIU L L ›
Final
3-3 · #259
67
2-2 · #242
75
MER -6.5 142.5 MER -5.3 APP +1.2 144.4 Over 1.9 68% MER L L ›
Final
3-2 · #110
74
1-3 · #168
88
UIC -1.5 151.5 RMU -0.6 RMU +2.0 155.2 Over 3.7 52% RMU W W ›
Final
3-2 · #248
83
2-2 · #230
93
NKU -3.5 149.5 NKU -3.0 WOF +0.5 148.7 Under 0.8 60% NKU L L ›
Final
0-6 · #288
81
0-5 · #356
73
FDU -4.5 152.5 FDU -1.1 ARMY +3.4 156.8 Over 4.3 54% FDU W W ›
Final
6-0 · #36
88
6-1 · #60
75
USC -4.5 161.5 USC -4.8 USC +0.3 168.0 Over 6.5 66% USC W W ›
Final
3-1 · #160
64
3-4 · #167
74
LIB -4.5 144.5 LIB -2.8 BRAD +1.7 147.8 Over 3.3 60% LIB W L ›
Final
3-2 · #84
66
3-2 · #61
78
VCU -1.5 172.5 VCU -0.7 USF +0.8 167.8 Under 4.7 53% VCU L W ›
Final
2-2 · #213
56
1-2 · #198
43
NDSU -3.5 142.5 NDSU -1.7 JXST +1.8 148.4 Over 5.9 56% NDSU L L ›
Final
4-1 · #176
56
VAL -9.5 150.5 VAL -10.5 VAL +1.0 149.0 Under 1.5 82% VAL L W ›
Final
0-6 · #208
58
3-0 · #133
77
NMSU -12.5 136.5 NMSU -14.8 NMSU +2.3 140.4 Over 3.9 90% NMSU W L ›
Final
5-2 · #71
56
6-1 · #2
66
HOU -11.5 132.5 HOU -14.3 HOU +2.8 136.0 Over 3.5 89% HOU L L ›
Final
1-4 · #214
90
5-1 · #231
67
MRSH -7.5 157.5 MRSH -5.8 LIP +1.8 152.9 Under 4.6 69% MRSH W W ›
Final
2-3 · #199
84
0-5 · #348
51
NAVY -10.5 153.5 NAVY -12.9 NAVY +2.4 153.7 Over 0.2 87% NAVY W L ›
Final
3-3 · #136
60
3-4 · #95
73
BC -7.5 138.5 BC -7.8 BC +0.3 140.5 Over 2.0 75% BC W L ›
Final
6-0 · #131
60
4-1 · #108
63
UNI -2.5 137.5 UNI -0.3 TLSA +2.2 139.2 Over 1.7 51% UNI W L ›
Final
1-5 · #305
62
1-6 · #177
81
RICE -5.5 150.5 RICE -4.0 ORU +1.5 156.3 Over 5.8 64% RICE L L ›
Final
2-3 · #186
79
2-5 · #135
74
UVM -5.5 140.5 UVM -3.7 PRIN +1.8 148.6 Over 8.1 63% UVM W W ›
Final
0-5 · #354
103
2-3 · #330
101
MAN -2.5 144.5 MAN -2.0 WAG +0.5 149.7 Over 5.2 57% MAN W W ›
Final
5-0 · #68
66
4-1 · #87
64
VT -4.5 153.5 VT -2.1 CSU +2.4 158.2 Over 4.7 57% VT W L ›
Final
6-1 · #67
75
2-4 · #139
61
HALL -8.5 147.5 HALL -8.5 — 148.6 Over 1.1 77% HALL L ›
Final
4-4 · #184
45
2-2 · #150
89
UVU -7.5 148.5 UVU -3.3 SAM +4.2 155.4 Over 6.9 61% UVU L L ›
Final
3-1 · #219
71
3-4 · #220
53
UNCO -4.5 146.5 UNCO -3.6 AF +0.9 152.1 Over 5.6 62% UNCO L L ›
Final
1-2 · #189
84
1-3 · #344
81
SHSU -1.5 142.5 SHSU -2.2 SHSU +0.7 148.0 Over 5.5 58% SHSU W W ›
Final
5-2 · #16
81
7-0 · #7
76
TENN -7.5 140.5 TENN -2.9 KU +4.6 144.9 Over 4.4 60% TENN W W ›
Final
1-3 · #282
54
4-2 · #19
104
UK -37.5 157.5 UK -33.8 TNTC +3.8 154.4 Under 3.1 100% UK L L ›
Final
1-2 · #300
72
0-4 · #339
65
HCU -1.5 137.5 HCU -3.2 HCU +1.7 143.1 Over 5.6 61% HCU W L ›
Final
1-3 · #172
53
4-2 · #174
76
FRES -2.5 150.5 FRES -0.8 PEPP +1.7 152.8 Over 2.3 53% FRES L L ›
Final
0-4 · #252
57
3-1 · #120
70
UNCW -11.5 137.5 UNCW -11.1 SELA +0.4 138.3 Over 0.8 83% UNCW L L ›
Final
2-2 · #148
102
4-2 · #266
100
FGCU -1.5 160.5 FGCU -2.0 FGCU +0.5 165.9 Over 5.4 57% FGCU L W ›
Final
3-3 · #188
64
5-1 · #30
56
CIN -22.5 146.5 CIN -19.6 EMU +2.9 142.9 Under 3.6 96% CIN W W ›
Final
5-1 · #170
106
4-2 · #239
77
COLU -3.5 150.5 COLU -3.8 COLU +0.3 149.7 Under 0.8 63% COLU W L ›
Final
5-2 · #105
90
4-2 · #111
75
URI -3.5 149.5 URI -3.9 URI +0.4 155.2 Over 5.7 63% URI W W ›
Final
3-2 · #207
73
1-2 · #244
75
LT -2.5 141.5 LT -1.2 INST +1.3 139.9 Under 1.6 54% LT W L ›
Final
4-2 · #9
74
5-2 · #21
85
SJU -4.5 166.5 SJU -6.9 SJU +2.4 171.0 Over 4.5 73% SJU L L ›
Final
5-0 · #97
70
4-1 · #77
65
SMC -9.5 139.5 SMC -6.0 WICH +3.5 141.2 Over 1.7 70% SMC W L ›
Final
2-3 · #195
58
1-4 · #76
74
MEM -10.5 156.5 MEM -8.8 SIU +1.7 157.6 Over 1.1 78% MEM L L ›
Final
1-4 · #306
72
1-2 · #321
79
NAU -2.5 153.5 NAU -0.5 SEMO +2.0 151.9 Under 1.6 52% NAU L W ›
Final
2-3 · #201
52
1-4 · #149
64
UCI -2.5 144.5 UCI -0.1 SDST +2.4 144.4 Under 0.1 50% UCI L W ›
Final
2-4 · #263
59
4-1 · #122
101
WYO -9.5 153.5 WYO -9.4 DEN +0.1 153.5 — 80% WYO L ›
Final
3-4 · #316
47
6-0 · #14
104
LOU -44.5 158.5 LOU -37.5 NJIT +7.0 153.7 Under 4.8 100% LOU L W ›
Final
2-4 · #302
87
4-2 · #82
93
UNM -19.5 148.5 UNM -17.6 ALST +1.9 149.4 Over 0.9 94% UNM W W ›
Final
1-2 · #247
78
2-2 · #194
64
IDHO -1.5 159.5 IDHO -0.7 CSUN +0.8 159.0 Under 0.5 53% IDHO L W ›
Final
7-0 · #17
61
6-0 · #8
101
GONZ -3.5 165.5 MICH -2.6 MICH +6.2 161.9 Under 3.6 59% MICH W W ›
Final
5-1 · #48
97
4-2 · #11
102
NCSU -1.5 161.5 TEX -0.6 TEX +2.1 160.8 Under 0.7 52% TEX W L ›
Final
6-0 · #43
59
4-2 · #80
46
IOWA -8.5 143.5 IOWA -9.6 IOWA +1.1 153.5 Over 10.0 80% IOWA W L ›
Final
0-5 · #297
73
3-3 · #169
93
PORT -5.5 148.5 PORT -3.7 LBSU +1.8 149.0 Over 0.5 63% PORT L W ›
Final
4-1 · #29
91
3-2 · #75
81
BAY -2.5 148.5 BAY -6.9 BAY +4.4 157.7 Over 9.2 73% BAY W W ›
Final
5-2 · #50
72
4-2 · #15
105
ALA -14.5 166.5 ALA -16.9 ALA +2.4 169.4 Over 2.9 93% ALA W W ›
Final
5-2 · #73
75
5-1 · #46
74
MISS -10.5 144.5 MISS -7.1 UTAH +3.4 155.8 Over 11.3 73% MISS W W ›
The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record