Gentile Arena · at Loyola Chicago
Closing line
LUC -6.5✓ PRIN covered by 1.5
Closing total136.5Over by 4.5
| This season | LUC | |
|---|---|---|
| 2-8 | Record | 2-7 |
| 7-3 | ATS | 1-8 |
| 5-5 | O/U | 3-6 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: PRIN 68–72 LUC · ✓ LUC (63%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PRIN | 28 | 40 | 68 |
| LUC | 30 | 43 | 73 |
1st half: PRIN 28, LUC 30 (LUC by 2). The model had LUC by 2.2 and a total of 65.5 (actual 58).
Team stats
| PRIN | LUC | |
|---|---|---|
| 22-62 35% | Field goals | 25-50 50% |
| 9-34 26% | 3-pointers | 6-22 27% |
| 15-16 94% | Free throws | 17-26 65% |
| 32 11 off | Rebounds | 35 7 off |
| 13 | Assists | 13 |
| 2 | Steals | 2 |
| 0 | Blocks | 5 |
| 5 | Turnovers | 9 |
| 19 | Fouls | 15 |
| 24 | Points in paint | 36 |
| 0 | Fast-break points | 8 |
Players
| PRIN | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jack Stanton G | 39 | 14 | 5 | 2 | 3-12 | 3-10 |
| Sebastian Whitfield G | 33 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 3-12 | 2-7 |
| Landon Clark G | 31 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2-4 | 1-3 |
| Jackson Hicke G | 31 | 13 | 4 | 3 | 6-12 | 1-5 |
| CJ Happy F | 28 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 3-9 | 1-3 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Jacob Hammond F | 13 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2-8 | 0-5 |
| Jacob Huggins F | 12 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| Jake Sussberg G | 7 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Ryan Mandes G | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Cooper Mueller G | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 1-1 |
| Cash McSweeney F | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Zio Kim G | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Will Kutzler F | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Peyton Seals G | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Dalen Davis, Malik Abdullahi
| LUC | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin Moore G | 35 | 21 | 1 | 6 | 7-14 | 1-4 |
| Kayde Dotson G | 33 | 13 | 6 | 2 | 4-8 | 3-7 |
| Miles Rubin C | 33 | 12 | 10 | 1 | 5-6 | 0-0 |
| Kymany Houinsou G | 24 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| Deywilk Tavarez G | 18 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1-7 | 0-4 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Chuck Love III G | 28 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 2-3 | 2-3 |
| Joshua Ola-Joseph F | 22 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 4-9 | 0-4 |
| Alexander Richardson C | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Daniil Glazkov G | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Zachary Royster, Brayden Young, Nic Anderson, Sam Yurasek, Xavier Amos, Caleb Reese, Dominick Harris
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketLUC -6.5
ModelLUC -3.8
Model edgePRIN +2.7
W PRIN covered
Total
Market136.5
Model139.9
Model edgeOver 3.4
W Over
Projected score
PRIN 68 · LUC 71.8
PRIN 68 · LUC 73
Win probability
LUC 63%
1st half
Spread
LUC -2.2
LUC -2.0
Total
65.5
58 points
Projected score
PRIN 31.7 · LUC 33.9
PRIN 28 · LUC 30
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenLUC -5.5
1 → LUC
CloseLUC -6.5
1 pt toward LUC
Total
Open137.5
▼ 1
Close136.5
Down 1 since the open
Moneyline
PRIN +210 · LUC -258
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened LUC -5.5 · closed LUC -6.5 · moved 1 toward LUCmodel LUC -4
model LUC -4
Opened 137.5 · closed 136.5 · moved 1 downmodel 140
model 140
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% | |
| 2-7 22% | 1-8 11% | 3-6 33% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
PRIN 0–1 LUCLUC leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · PRIN 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2024-25 | LUC 73 @ PRIN 68 | PRIN -1.5 | LUC W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Princeton
10 games played
Straight up
2-8
20% wins
Against the spread
7-3
70% covers · avg −2.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
5-5
50% overs · avg −3.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | L 69-104 | +13.5 | L −21.5 | 156.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 73-63 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 57-76 | +22.5 | W +3.5 | 144.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 69-89 | +2.5 | L −17.5 | 154.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 70-57 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 145.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 64-88 | +9.5 | L −14.5 | 141.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 75-79 | +8.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 74-79 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 58-60 | +5.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 118 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 58-63 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 139.5 | U 121 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
AKR
L 69-104
−21.5
11
vs
BUCK
W 73-63
+5.5
15
@
KU
L 57-76
+3.5
18
@
IONA
L 69-89
−17.5
20
vs
NE
W 70-57
+10.5
24
vs
BRAD
L 64-88
−14.5
25
vs
TEM
L 75-79
+4.5
26
vs
UVM
L 74-79
+0.5
30
vs
JOES
L 58-60
+3.5
3
@
MONM
L 58-63
+0.5
covered 7didn’t cover 3avg −2.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
AKR
L 69-104
+16.5
11
vs
BUCK
W 73-63
−10.5
15
@
KU
L 57-76
−11.5
18
@
IONA
L 69-89
+3.5
20
vs
NE
W 70-57
−18.5
24
vs
BRAD
L 64-88
+10.5
25
vs
TEM
L 75-79
+8.5
26
vs
UVM
L 74-79
+12.5
30
vs
JOES
L 58-60
−28.5
3
@
MONM
L 58-63
−18.5
over 5under 5avg −3.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Loyola Chicago
9 games played
Straight up
2-7
22% wins
Against the spread
1-8
11% covers · avg −13.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
3-6
33% overs · avg −1.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 91-88 | -17.5 | L −14.5 | 151.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 6 | vs | L 65-73 | -21.5 | L −29.5 | 144.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 9 | vs | L 62-64 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 138.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 13 | @ | L 74-95 | +5.5 | L −15.5 | 153.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 16 | vs | L 67-80 | +3.5 | L −9.5 | 151.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 59-76 | -13.5 | L −30.5 | 148.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 51-72 | +8.5 | L −12.5 | 134.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 51-63 | +1.5 | L −10.5 | 136.5 | U 114 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 83-72 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 140.5 | O 155 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
CLE
W 91-88
−14.5
6
vs
MERC
L 65-73
−29.5
9
vs
UNT
L 62-64
−3.5
13
@
WICH
L 74-95
−15.5
16
vs
CSU
L 67-80
−9.5
21
vs
NIU
L 59-76
−30.5
25
vs
UNI
L 51-72
−12.5
26
vs
SJSU
L 51-63
−10.5
2
vs
CMU
W 83-72
+4.5
covered 1didn’t cover 8avg −13.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
CLE
W 91-88
+27.5
6
vs
MERC
L 65-73
−6.5
9
vs
UNT
L 62-64
−12.5
13
@
WICH
L 74-95
+15.5
16
vs
CSU
L 67-80
−4.5
21
vs
NIU
L 59-76
−13.5
25
vs
UNI
L 51-72
−11.5
26
vs
SJSU
L 51-63
−22.5
2
vs
CMU
W 83-72
+14.5
over 3under 6avg −1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Princeton
2-8 overall · 0-0 in conference · Ivy League
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Monmouth58–63
- Lvs Saint Joseph's58–60
- Lvs Vermont74–79
- Lvs Temple75–79
- Lvs Bradley64–88
3 days since their last game.
Loyola Chicago
2-7 overall · 0-0 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs C Michigan83–72
- Lvs San José St51–63
- Lvs Northern Iowa51–72
- Lvs N Illinois59–76
- Lvs Colorado St67–80
4 days since their last game.