Loyola Maryland Greyhounds at Georgetown Hoyas: Model Line and Edge

Mon, Nov 2, 6:30 PM ETCapital One Arena · at Georgetown

LineGTWN -23.5moved 1 toward L-MD

Total150.5no move

Season records: Loyola MD and Georgetown
L-MD	This season	GTWN
0-0	Record	0-0
0-0	ATS	0-0
0-0	O/U	0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects GTWN 88–61 · win probability GTWN 99%

Pick this game

Your picksMy picks ›

Spread

Total

Winner

Line

GTWN -23.5

moved 1 toward L-MD

Total

150.5

model 149.3 · Under by 1

Model edge

GTWN by 3

model vs market

Public on the spread

73% L-MD

67% of the money

The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it: GTWN has more of the edges

L-MD 0, GTWN 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games

GTWNBig

L-MD offense vs GTWN defense

Offense 307th of 366 against a defense 46th, on the model’s ratings

Context

Schedule so far

L-MD has played the 299th-hardest schedule, GTWN the 47th. A record against a soft schedule means less

GTWNBig

GTWN offense vs L-MD defense

Offense 75th of 366 against a defense 313th, on the model’s ratings

GTWNSmall

Shooting

Effective FG%: L-MD 50.4 and allows 54.7; GTWN 49.6 and allows 50.0

GTWNSmall

Free throws

Free throw rate: L-MD 29.9, GTWN 37.3. Allowed: L-MD 32.7, GTWN 33.9

GTWNSmall

Home court

GTWN at home. This season: GTWN 0-0 at home, L-MD 0-0 away

Context

Tempo

About 69 possessions: L-MD plays 69.3 a game (165th fastest), GTWN 67.8 (238th). Faster games mean more points

Even

Three-pointers

L-MD hits 32.5% and allows 32.8%; GTWN hits 31.8% and allows 33.3%. Threes are 47.2% and 35.2% of their shots

Even

Rebounding

Offensive rebound rate: L-MD 27.6%, GTWN 32.5%. Defensive: L-MD 71.0%, GTWN 68.5%

Even

Turnovers

Turnover rate: L-MD 15.4%, GTWN 15.8%. Forced: L-MD 15.4%, GTWN 16.2%

Even

Who is back

Minutes back from last season: L-MD 33%, GTWN 38%. Transfers in: L-MD 5, GTWN 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price

Sorted by how lopsided each matchup is, from national ranks. Reasons to look, not picks: the market already knows most of this.

How games like this went

Division I games since 2023-24, closing lines

Situation	Games	Favorite won	Favorite covered	Went over
Home favorites of 20 or more	1165	99%	50%	52%
Non-conference games at this spread	1090	99%	50%	52%
Lines that moved 1+ toward the underdog	4513	74%	51%	50%
Games with a total of 150 to 154.5	2755	75%	51%	50%

A bet at standard prices needs 52.4% to break even, and most situations sit near 50%. Past rates, not a prediction.

Market

Open → current

Spread

OpenGTWN -24.5

1 → L-MD

NowGTWN -23.5

1 pt toward L-MD

Total

Open150.5

no move

Now150.5

No change since the open

Moneyline

L-MD +2500 · GTWN -10000

Line movement

Median of 7 sportsbooks, pre-tip-off · tap a dot

Opened GTWN -24.5 · now GTWN -23.5 · moved 1 toward L-MDmodel GTWN -26.5

model GTWN -26.5

Openline modelNow

Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.

Public betting

Share of bets and of money

L-MD +23.5Spread

GTWN -23.5

Bets

73%27%

Money

67%33%

Over 150.5TotalUnder 150.5

Bets

68%32%

Money

69%31%

L-MDWinner

GTWN

Bets

97%

Money

37%63%

Money is 34 pts ahead of bets on L-MD

Sports Betting Dime, an average of sportsbooks. Read Mon, Nov 2, 4:41 AM ET. ⓘ

Books

7 sportsbooks · current prices

SpreadTotalMoneyline

Book	Spread		Total		Moneyline
Book	L-MD	GTWN	Over	Under	L-MD	GTWN
BetMGMMGM	-23.5-110	+23.5-110	150.5-110	150.5-110	+2200	-10000
BetOnline.agBetOnline.ag	-23.5-110	+23.5-110	150-110	150-110	—	—
BetRiversBetRivers	-24.5-132	+24.5+104	150.5-112	150.5-114	—	—
BovadaBovada	-23.5-110	+23.5-110	150-110	150-110	—	—
DraftKingsDK	-23.5-110	+23.5-110	150.5-110	150.5-110	+2500	-9000
FanDuelFD	-23.5-110	+23.5-110	151.5-115	151.5-105	+2500	-10000
LowVig.agLowVig.ag	-23.5-106	+23.5-106	150-108	150-108	—	—

Prices from The Odds API, updated 2:00 AM ET. Green = best price in the column.

Model vs market

	Market	Model	Model edge
Spread	GTWN -23.5	GTWN -26.5	GTWN +3.0
Total	150.5	149.3	Under 1.2
Projected score	—	L-MD 61.4 · GTWN 87.9

1st-half model

1st-half slate ›

	Model	Actual
1H spread	GTWN -15.7	—
1H total	69.8	—
1H projected score	L-MD 27.1 · GTWN 42.7	—

The 1st-half model is fitted from the full-game model and past halves. ESPN has no 1st-half lines for college games, so there is no market to compare it with.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

ATS

2025-26 season

	Season	Cover	Venue	Role
L-MD LWLWL	16-14	53%	8-8	11-11
GTWN WLWWL	14-20	41%	4-13	3-10

Venue/role: L-MD away, as underdog; GTWN home, as favorite. Squares: last 5 games ATS (W covered, L didn’t), oldest first.

Totals

2025-26 season

	O-U	Over %	SU
L-MD OOUUO	17-13	57%	10-20
GTWN UOUOU	18-16	53%	16-18

Squares: last 5 games (O over, U under), oldest first. Tap for the score and line.

Last 10 games

2025-26

	Straight up	Spread	Over / under
L-MD	4-6 40%	5-5 50%	7-3 70%
GTWN	3-7 30%	5-5 50%	5-5 50%

Wins-losses (pushes last). Spread and over / under skip games without a line.

Next 3 games

With how the last meeting with each opponent went

Loyola MD

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 6	@ MSM	L73–81LO
Nov 12	@ TOW	L56–67LU
Nov 20	@ UVA	No recent meeting

Georgetown

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 7	vs MD	W70–60WU
Nov 10	vs DSU	No recent meeting
Nov 13	@ CLEM	W79–74WO

Last meeting: result, against the spread, over / under. Hover a result for its date.

ATS History · 2025-26

WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total

Loyola MD

30 games played

Straight up

10-20

33% wins

Against the spread

16-14

53% covers · avg −0.4 pts vs the line

Over / Under

17-13

57% overs · avg +4.6 pts vs the total

Straight up

10-2033%

L L W L L L W L L L L L L W L L W L W W L W L W W L L L W L

1 of last 4 wonno streak

Against the spread

16-1453%

L L W W W L W L L L W L L W W W W L W W L W L W W L W L W L

2 of last 4 coveredno streak

Over / Under

17-1357%

U U U O O U O O O O O U U O U O U O U U O O O U O O O U U O

2 of last 4 overno streak

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 3	vsTOW	L 56-67	+8.5	L −2.5	141.5	U 123
Nov 11	vsNJIT	L 64-66	-10.5	L −12.5	139.5	U 130
Nov 15	vsSTO	W 74-63	-6.5	W +4.5	138.5	U 137
Nov 16	@FAIR	L 82-85	+5.5	W +2.5	135.5	O 167
Nov 19	@DUQ	L 78-92	+14.5	W +0.5	150.5	O 170
Nov 21	@UK	L 46-88	+35.5	L −6.5	159.5	U 134
Nov 30	vsCOPP	W 95-84	-9.5	W +1.5	143.5	O 179
Dec 3	@HAMP	L 71-93	+6.5	L −15.5	142.5	O 164
Dec 9	@VMI	L 70-86	-2.5	L −18.5	151.5	O 156
Dec 13	vsMSM	L 73-81	+2.5	L −5.5	151.5	O 154
Dec 21	@GMU	L 79-86	+23.5	W +16.5	146.5	O 165
Dec 31	@AMER	L 69-84	+8.5	L −6.5	154.5	U 153
Jan 3	vsLAF	L 64-79	+1.5	L −13.5	152.5	U 143
Jan 7	@ARMY	W 84-76	+4.5	W +12.5	146.5	O 160
Jan 10	@BUCK	L 67-70	+6.5	W +3.5	143.5	U 137
Jan 14	vsCOLG	L 80-86	+8.5	W +2.5	150.5	O 166
Jan 17	vsBU	W 74-57	+1.5	W +18.5	148.5	U 131
Jan 19	@LEH	L 81-88	+3.5	L −3.5	149.5	O 169
Jan 24	vsBUCK	W 67-62	-2.5	W +2.5	147.5	U 129
Jan 28	vsAMER	W 77-68	+4.5	W +13.5	147.5	U 145
Jan 31	@NAVY	L 71-87	+9.5	L −6.5	143.5	O 158
Feb 4	vsLEH	W 89-84	-2.5	W +2.5	149.5	O 173
Feb 7	@BU	L 69-78	+5.5	L −3.5	145.5	O 147
Feb 11	@LAF	W 68-54	+3.5	W +17.5	147.5	U 122
Feb 15	vsHC	W 83-73	-4.5	W +5.5	146.5	O 156
Feb 18	vsARMY	L 77-87	-4.5	L −14.5	149.5	O 164
Feb 21	@COLG	L 98-101	+8.5	W +5.5	150.5	O 199
Feb 25	vsNAVY	L 51-78	+6.5	L −20.5	147.5	U 129
Feb 28	@HC	W 76-62	+1.5	W +15.5	151.5	U 138
Mar 5	@COLG	L 77-90	+6.5	L −6.5	155.5	O 167

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

TOW

L 56-67

−2.5

NJIT

L 64-66

−12.5

STO

W 74-63

+4.5

FAIR

L 82-85

+2.5

DUQ

L 78-92

+0.5

L 46-88

−6.5

COPP

W 95-84

+1.5

HAMP

L 71-93

−15.5

VMI

L 70-86

−18.5

MSM

L 73-81

−5.5

GMU

L 79-86

+16.5

AMER

L 69-84

−6.5

LAF

L 64-79

−13.5

ARMY

W 84-76

+12.5

BUCK

L 67-70

+3.5

COLG

L 80-86

+2.5

W 74-57

+18.5

LEH

L 81-88

−3.5

BUCK

W 67-62

+2.5

AMER

W 77-68

+13.5

NAVY

L 71-87

−6.5

LEH

W 89-84

+2.5

L 69-78

−3.5

LAF

W 68-54

+17.5

W 83-73

+5.5

ARMY

L 77-87

−14.5

COLG

L 98-101

+5.5

NAVY

L 51-78

−20.5

W 76-62

+15.5

COLG

L 77-90

−6.5

covered 16didn’t cover 14avg −0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

TOW

L 56-67

−18.5

NJIT

L 64-66

−9.5

STO

W 74-63

−1.5

FAIR

L 82-85

+31.5

DUQ

L 78-92

+19.5

L 46-88

−25.5

COPP

W 95-84

+35.5

HAMP

L 71-93

+21.5

VMI

L 70-86

+4.5

MSM

L 73-81

+2.5

GMU

L 79-86

+18.5

AMER

L 69-84

−1.5

LAF

L 64-79

−9.5

ARMY

W 84-76

+13.5

BUCK

L 67-70

−6.5

COLG

L 80-86

+15.5

W 74-57

−17.5

LEH

L 81-88

+19.5

BUCK

W 67-62

−18.5

AMER

W 77-68

−2.5

NAVY

L 71-87

+14.5

LEH

W 89-84

+23.5

L 69-78

+1.5

LAF

W 68-54

−25.5

W 83-73

+9.5

ARMY

L 77-87

+14.5

COLG

L 98-101

+48.5

NAVY

L 51-78

−18.5

W 76-62

−13.5

COLG

L 77-90

+11.5

over 17under 13avg +4.6 ptslonger = bigger margin

Georgetown

34 games played

Straight up

16-18

47% wins

Against the spread

14-20

41% covers · avg −0.1 pts vs the line

Over / Under

18-16

53% overs · avg +0.6 pts vs the total

Straight up

16-1847%

W W W W W L L W L W W L W L L L L L L W W W W L L L L L L L W W W L

3 of last 4 wonno streak

Against the spread

14-2041%

L W L W L L L L L L W L L L L L W W L W W W W L W L W L L W L W W L

2 of last 4 coveredno streak

Over / Under

18-1653%

O U O O O O U O U O U O O O U O O U U U U U U O O O U U O U O U O U

2 of last 4 overno streak

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 3	vsMORG	W 87-70	-27.5	L −10.5	154.5	O 157
Nov 7	@MD	W 70-60	+4.5	W +14.5	144.5	U 130
Nov 12	vsBING	W 83-70	-27.5	L −14.5	141.5	O 153
Nov 15	vsCLEM	W 79-74	+1.5	W +6.5	142.5	O 153
Nov 22	vsWAG	W 92-75	-25.5	L −8.5	140.5	O 167
Nov 27	vsDAY	L 79-84	+1.5	L −3.5	145.5	O 163
Nov 28	vsMIA	L 65-78	+5.5	L −7.5	151.5	U 143
Dec 3	vsUMBC	W 90-81	-19.5	L −10.5	149.5	O 171
Dec 7	@UNC	L 61-81	+10.5	L −9.5	149.5	U 142
Dec 13	vsSPU	W 76-68	-20.5	L −12.5	140.5	O 144
Dec 17	@MARQ	W 78-69	+6.5	W +15.5	149.5	U 147
Dec 20	vsXAV	L 77-80	-4.5	L −7.5	149.5	O 157
Dec 22	vsCOPP	W 97-67	-33.5	L −3.5	150.5	O 164
Dec 31	vsSJU	L 83-95	+8.5	L −3.5	152.5	O 178
Jan 6	@DEP	L 50-56	+2.5	L −3.5	144.5	U 106
Jan 10	vsHALL	L 67-76	+1.5	L −7.5	137.5	O 143
Jan 13	@CREI	L 83-86	+8.5	W +5.5	147.5	O 169
Jan 17	vsCONN	L 62-64	+11.5	W +9.5	141.5	U 126
Jan 21	@VILL	L 51-66	+8.5	L −6.5	142.5	U 117
Jan 24	@PROV	W 81-78	+5.5	W +8.5	159.5	U 159
Jan 28	vsDEP	W 70-61	-3.5	W +5.5	139.5	U 131
Jan 31	@BTLR	W 77-64	+5.5	W +18.5	149.5	U 141
Feb 4	vsCREI	W 76-68	-1.5	W +6.5	146.5	U 144
Feb 7	vsVILL	L 73-80	+2.5	L −4.5	140.5	O 153
Feb 14	@CONN	L 75-79	+16.5	W +12.5	138.5	O 154
Feb 18	vsBTLR	L 89-93	-6.5	L −10.5	147.5	O 182
Feb 21	@HALL	L 47-51	+6.5	W +2.5	136.5	U 98
Feb 24	vsMARQ	L 60-76	-2.5	L −18.5	150.5	U 136
Feb 28	@XAV	L 84-91	+4.5	L −2.5	155.5	O 175
Mar 3	@SJU	L 69-72	+15.5	W +12.5	148.5	U 141
Mar 7	vsPROV	W 80-79	-1.5	L −0.5	158.5	O 159
Mar 11	vsDEP	W 63-56	-1.5	W +5.5	136.5	U 119
Mar 12	vsVILL	W 78-64	+7.5	W +21.5	140.5	O 142
Mar 13	vsCONN	L 51-67	+14.5	L −1.5	138.5	U 118

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

MORG

W 87-70

−10.5

W 70-60

+14.5

BING

W 83-70

−14.5

CLEM

W 79-74

+6.5

WAG

W 92-75

−8.5

DAY

L 79-84

−3.5

MIA

L 65-78

−7.5

UMBC

W 90-81

−10.5

UNC

L 61-81

−9.5

SPU

W 76-68

−12.5

MARQ

W 78-69

+15.5

XAV

L 77-80

−7.5

COPP

W 97-67

−3.5

SJU

L 83-95

−3.5

DEP

L 50-56

−3.5

HALL

L 67-76

−7.5

CREI

L 83-86

+5.5

CONN

L 62-64

+9.5

VILL

L 51-66

−6.5

PROV

W 81-78

+8.5

DEP

W 70-61

+5.5

BTLR

W 77-64

+18.5

CREI

W 76-68

+6.5

VILL

L 73-80

−4.5

CONN

L 75-79

+12.5

BTLR

L 89-93

−10.5

HALL

L 47-51

+2.5

MARQ

L 60-76

−18.5

XAV

L 84-91

−2.5

SJU

L 69-72

+12.5

PROV

W 80-79

−0.5

DEP

W 63-56

+5.5

VILL

W 78-64

+21.5

CONN

L 51-67

−1.5

covered 14didn’t cover 20avg −0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

MORG

W 87-70

+2.5

W 70-60

−14.5

BING

W 83-70

+11.5

CLEM

W 79-74

+10.5

WAG

W 92-75

+26.5

DAY

L 79-84

+17.5

MIA

L 65-78

−8.5

UMBC

W 90-81

+21.5

UNC

L 61-81

−7.5

SPU

W 76-68

+3.5

MARQ

W 78-69

−2.5

XAV

L 77-80

+7.5

COPP

W 97-67

+13.5

SJU

L 83-95

+25.5

DEP

L 50-56

−38.5

HALL

L 67-76

+5.5

CREI

L 83-86

+21.5

CONN

L 62-64

−15.5

VILL

L 51-66

−25.5

PROV

W 81-78

−0.5

DEP

W 70-61

−8.5

BTLR

W 77-64

−8.5

CREI

W 76-68

−2.5

VILL

L 73-80

+12.5

CONN

L 75-79

+15.5

BTLR

L 89-93

+34.5

HALL

L 47-51

−38.5

MARQ

L 60-76

−14.5

XAV

L 84-91

+19.5

SJU

L 69-72

−7.5

PROV

W 80-79

+0.5

DEP

W 63-56

−17.5

VILL

W 78-64

+1.5

CONN

L 51-67

−20.5

over 18under 16avg +0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin

Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.

Georgetown has the better starters

Position by position: Loyola MD 0, Georgetown 4, even 1

Loyola MDBetterGeorgetown

G T. Cicero5.4 pts · 2.2 reb · 0.7 ast Score 53

GTWNSmall

G V. Miller TR10.8 pts · 2.7 reb · 1.8 ast Score 74

G C. Berg-McLean3.5 pts · 2.3 reb · 1.4 ast Score 21

GTWNBig

F C. Williams8.8 pts · 5.1 reb · 1.5 ast Score 57

F S. Springer4.4 pts · 2 reb · 0.6 ast Score 4

GTWNBig

F J. Parker TR9.8 pts · 6.1 reb · 1.1 ast Score 79

F S. Emenalo3.1 pts · 3.1 reb · 0.4 ast Score 11

GTWNBig

C V. Iwuchukwu11.6 pts · 6.1 reb · 0.5 ast Score 89

F D. Harrison TR2.6 pts · 1.8 reb · 0 ast Not ranked

No call

C C. Machot TR8.8 pts · 5.4 reb · 0.2 ast Score 78

Loyola MDBetterGeorgetown

L-MD offense307th of 366 · -9.5

GTWNBig

GTWN defense46th of 366 · +2.3

L-MD defense313th of 366 · -8.1

GTWNBig

GTWN offense75th of 366 · +1.3

Backcourt-1.4 · 2 players

GTWNSmall

Backcourt+0.7 · 1 player

Frontcourt-4.7 · 3 players

GTWNBig

Frontcourt+6.5 · 4 players

Bench-3.1 · 5 players

GTWNBig

Bench+1.4 · 5 players

Score, worst to bestL-MD betterGTWN betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers

Projected starters: college teams publish no depth chart, so these come from minutes played, and a freshman or a new starter can change them. The score is the share of ranked players at the position that player is ahead of. Numbers are this season's once a player has 30 minutes, 2025-26's before that. Bench is the next five by minutes. Tap a player for the full numbers.

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined

Loyola MD

Guards

T. Cicero14 minC. Berg-McLean14 minM. Ortega8 min · TRL. RickettsNewR. LongNewS. BiegNew

Forwards

S. Springer17 minS. Emenalo15 minD. Harrison12 min · TRE. Barnes8 minM. Hagedorn7 min · TRA. Huguet7 min · TR

Georgetown

Guards

V. Miller26 min · TRJ. Lowe19 min · TRE. Jackson18 min · TRK. Mulready17 minM. Moses1 minM. Van Raaphorst1 min

Forwards

C. Williams30 minJ. Parker22 min · TRJ. CaldwellNewP. PastreNew

Centers

V. Iwuchukwu23 minC. Machot20 min · TRS. Diouf4 min

In order of minutes, from rosters as of today. ESPN lists players only as guards, forwards or centers, and no injury report exists for college basketball, so a player who is out may still show here.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams

ChartTable

Scoring

Points per game

L-MD73.7 #212

GTWN73.6 #215

Points per possession

L-MD1.06 #227

GTWN1.09 #165

Pace (possessions)

L-MD69.3 #165

GTWN67.8 #238

Shooting

Effective FG%

L-MD50.4 #219

GTWN49.6 #257

3-point %

L-MD32.5 #251

GTWN31.8 #285

3-point attempt rate

L-MD47.2 #30

GTWN35.2 #271

Free throw rate

L-MD29.9 #312

GTWN37.3 #121

Possessions

Turnover rate

L-MD15.4 #101

GTWN15.8 #120

Offensive rebound rate

L-MD27.6 #279

GTWN32.5 #107

Assists per game

L-MD12.6 #246

GTWN14.8 #101

Defense

Points allowed

L-MD78.5 #280

GTWN72.9 #130

Points allowed per possession

L-MD1.14 #304

GTWN1.08 #147

Opponent effective FG%

L-MD54.7 #321

GTWN50.0 #96

Opponent 3-point %

L-MD32.8 #106

GTWN33.3 #139

Turnovers forced

L-MD15.4 #261

GTWN16.2 #211

Defensive rebound rate

L-MD71.0 #103

GTWN68.5 #228

Steals per game

L-MD6.1 #221

GTWN6.5 #182

Blocks per game

L-MD3.4 #156

GTWN3.6 #130

L-MD		GTWN
Scoring
73.7 #212	Points per game	73.6 #215
1.06 #227	Points per possession	1.09 #165
69.3 #165	Pace (possessions)	67.8 #238
Shooting
50.4 #219	Effective FG%	49.6 #257
32.5 #251	3-point %	31.8 #285
47.2 #30	3-point attempt rate	35.2 #271
29.9 #312	Free throw rate	37.3 #121
Possessions
15.4 #101	Turnover rate	15.8 #120
27.6 #279	Offensive rebound rate	32.5 #107
12.6 #246	Assists per game	14.8 #101
Defense
78.5 #280	Points allowed	72.9 #130
1.14 #304	Points allowed per possession	1.08 #147
54.7 #321	Opponent effective FG%	50.0 #96
32.8 #106	Opponent 3-point %	33.3 #139
15.4 #261	Turnovers forced	16.2 #211
71.0 #103	Defensive rebound rate	68.5 #228
6.1 #221	Steals per game	6.5 #182
3.4 #156	Blocks per game	3.6 #130

From the box scores. A longer bar is a better national rank, on every row; the better team's bar is solid. A green rank is near the top of Division I, a red one near the bottom. Pace and 3-point rate are styles, so they have no better side.

Loyola MD

10-20 in 2025-26 overall · 8-11 in conference · Patriot League

Last five, 2025-26

L@ Colgate77–90
W@ Holy Cross76–62
Lvs Navy51–78
L@ Colgate98–101
Lvs Army77–87

A week or more of rest.

Georgetown

16-18 in 2025-26 overall · 8-15 in conference · Big East Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs UConn51–67
Wvs Villanova78–64
Wvs DePaul63–56
Wvs Providence80–79
L@ St John's69–72

A week or more of rest.