Capital One Arena · at Georgetown
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | GTWN | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects GTWN 75–73 · win probability GTWN 56%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 148.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: GTWN has more of the edges
MD 1, GTWN 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Shooting
Effective FG%: MD 48.1 and allows 54.4; GTWN 49.6 and allows 50.0
Turnovers
Turnover rate: MD 18.6%, GTWN 15.8%. Forced: MD 14.9%, GTWN 16.2%
Three-pointers
MD hits 31.7% and allows 36.3%; GTWN hits 31.8% and allows 33.3%. Threes are 46.9% and 35.2% of their shots
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: MD 33.8%, GTWN 32.5%. Defensive: MD 70.9%, GTWN 68.5%
Home court
GTWN at home. This season: GTWN 0-0 at home, MD 0-0 away
Even
GTWN offense vs MD defense
Offense 75th of 366 against a defense 34th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: MD 36.4, GTWN 37.3. Allowed: MD 35.8, GTWN 33.9
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: MD plays 67.0 a game (281st fastest), GTWN 67.8 (238th). Faster games mean more points
Context
Schedule so far
MD has played the 28th-hardest schedule, GTWN the 47th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
MD offense vs GTWN defense
Offense 63rd of 366 against a defense 46th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: MD 47%, GTWN 38%. Transfers in: MD 5, GTWN 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | GTWN -1.6 | — |
| Total | — | 148.2 | — |
| Projected score | — | MD 73.3 · GTWN 74.9 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | GTWN -0.8 | — |
| 1H total | 69.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | MD 34.2 · GTWN 35.1 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% | |
| 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
MD 0–1 GTWNGTWN leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · MD 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2025-26 | GTWN 70 @ MD 60 | MD -4.5 | GTWN W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Maryland
33 games played
Straight up
12-21
36% wins
Against the spread
16-17
48% covers · avg −2.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-15
55% overs · avg −1.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 83-61 | -28.5 | L −6.5 | 139.5 | O 144 |
| Nov 7 | vs | L 60-70 | -4.5 | L −14.5 | 144.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 84-64 | -29.5 | L −9.5 | 146.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 15 | @ | W 89-82 | +8.5 | W +15.5 | 146.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 95-90 | -17.5 | L −12.5 | 145.5 | O 185 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 74-67 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 164.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 61-100 | +14.5 | L −24.5 | 157.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 72-105 | +14.5 | L −18.5 | 166.5 | O 177 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 89-63 | -22.5 | W +3.5 | 143.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 64-83 | +10.5 | L −8.5 | 137.5 | O 147 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 83-101 | +19.5 | W +1.5 | 163.5 | O 184 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 72-80 | +16.5 | W +8.5 | 153.5 | U 152 |
| Dec 28 | vs | W 73-58 | -14.5 | W +0.5 | 154.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 2 | vs | L 54-64 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 66-84 | +7.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 55-67 | +13.5 | W +1.5 | 147.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 71-88 | +9.5 | L −7.5 | 150.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 18 | vs | W 96-73 | -1.5 | W +21.5 | 148.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 70-89 | +18.5 | L −0.5 | 152.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 48-91 | +18.5 | L −24.5 | 141.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 1 | vs | L 63-93 | +15.5 | L −14.5 | 148.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 5 | vs | L 62-82 | +6.5 | L −13.5 | 150.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 8 | @ | W 67-62 | +10.5 | W +15.5 | 138.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 77-70 | +10.5 | W +17.5 | 138.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 57-68 | +2.5 | L −8.5 | 144.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 74-78 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 142.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 64-60 | +4.5 | W +8.5 | 143.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 61-74 | +16.5 | W +3.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 1 | vs | L 65-69 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 4 | @ | L 45-78 | +14.5 | L −18.5 | 153.5 | U 123 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 72-78 | +14.5 | W +8.5 | 145.5 | O 150 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 70-60 | +4.5 | W +14.5 | 139.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 64-75 | +11.5 | W +0.5 | 133.5 | O 139 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
COPP
W 83-61
−6.5
7
vs
GTWN
L 60-70
−14.5
11
vs
ALCN
W 84-64
−9.5
15
@
MARQ
W 89-82
+15.5
19
vs
MSM
W 95-90
−12.5
24
vs
UNLV
W 74-67
+4.5
25
vs
GONZ
L 61-100
−24.5
26
vs
ALA
L 72-105
−18.5
2
vs
WAG
W 89-63
+3.5
6
@
IOWA
L 64-83
−8.5
13
vs
MICH
L 83-101
+1.5
20
@
UVA
L 72-80
+8.5
28
vs
ODU
W 73-58
+0.5
2
vs
ORE
L 54-64
−8.5
7
vs
IU
L 66-84
−10.5
10
@
UCLA
L 55-67
+1.5
13
@
USC
L 71-88
−7.5
18
vs
PSU
W 96-73
+21.5
21
@
ILL
L 70-89
−0.5
24
@
MSU
L 48-91
−24.5
1
vs
PUR
L 63-93
−14.5
5
vs
OSU
L 62-82
−13.5
8
@
MINN
W 67-62
+15.5
11
vs
IOWA
W 77-70
+17.5
15
@
RUTG
L 57-68
−8.5
18
@
NU
L 74-78
+3.5
21
vs
WASH
W 64-60
+8.5
25
@
NEB
L 61-74
+3.5
1
vs
RUTG
L 65-69
−8.5
4
@
WIS
L 45-78
−18.5
8
vs
ILL
L 72-78
+8.5
10
vs
ORE
W 70-60
+14.5
11
vs
IOWA
L 64-75
+0.5
covered 16didn’t cover 17avg −2.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
COPP
W 83-61
+4.5
7
vs
GTWN
L 60-70
−14.5
11
vs
ALCN
W 84-64
+1.5
15
@
MARQ
W 89-82
+24.5
19
vs
MSM
W 95-90
+39.5
24
vs
UNLV
W 74-67
−23.5
25
vs
GONZ
L 61-100
+3.5
26
vs
ALA
L 72-105
+10.5
2
vs
WAG
W 89-63
+8.5
6
@
IOWA
L 64-83
+9.5
13
vs
MICH
L 83-101
+20.5
20
@
UVA
L 72-80
−1.5
28
vs
ODU
W 73-58
−23.5
2
vs
ORE
L 54-64
−28.5
7
vs
IU
L 66-84
+2.5
10
@
UCLA
L 55-67
−25.5
13
@
USC
L 71-88
+8.5
18
vs
PSU
W 96-73
+20.5
21
@
ILL
L 70-89
+6.5
24
@
MSU
L 48-91
−2.5
1
vs
PUR
L 63-93
+7.5
5
vs
OSU
L 62-82
−6.5
8
@
MINN
W 67-62
−9.5
11
vs
IOWA
W 77-70
+8.5
15
@
RUTG
L 57-68
−19.5
18
@
NU
L 74-78
+9.5
21
vs
WASH
W 64-60
−19.5
25
@
NEB
L 61-74
−7.5
1
vs
RUTG
L 65-69
−9.5
4
@
WIS
L 45-78
−30.5
8
vs
ILL
L 72-78
+4.5
10
vs
ORE
W 70-60
−9.5
11
vs
IOWA
L 64-75
+5.5
over 18under 15avg −1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Georgetown
34 games played
Straight up
16-18
47% wins
Against the spread
14-20
41% covers · avg −0.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-16
53% overs · avg +0.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 87-70 | -27.5 | L −10.5 | 154.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 7 | @ | W 70-60 | +4.5 | W +14.5 | 144.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 83-70 | -27.5 | L −14.5 | 141.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 79-74 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 142.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 92-75 | -25.5 | L −8.5 | 140.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 79-84 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 145.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 65-78 | +5.5 | L −7.5 | 151.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 90-81 | -19.5 | L −10.5 | 149.5 | O 171 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 61-81 | +10.5 | L −9.5 | 149.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 76-68 | -20.5 | L −12.5 | 140.5 | O 144 |
| Dec 17 | @ | W 78-69 | +6.5 | W +15.5 | 149.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 77-80 | -4.5 | L −7.5 | 149.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 97-67 | -33.5 | L −3.5 | 150.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 83-95 | +8.5 | L −3.5 | 152.5 | O 178 |
| Jan 6 | @ | L 50-56 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 144.5 | U 106 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 67-76 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 137.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 83-86 | +8.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 62-64 | +11.5 | W +9.5 | 141.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 51-66 | +8.5 | L −6.5 | 142.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 81-78 | +5.5 | W +8.5 | 159.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 70-61 | -3.5 | W +5.5 | 139.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 77-64 | +5.5 | W +18.5 | 149.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 76-68 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 146.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 73-80 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 140.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 75-79 | +16.5 | W +12.5 | 138.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 89-93 | -6.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | O 182 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 47-51 | +6.5 | W +2.5 | 136.5 | U 98 |
| Feb 24 | vs | L 60-76 | -2.5 | L −18.5 | 150.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 84-91 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 155.5 | O 175 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 69-72 | +15.5 | W +12.5 | 148.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 80-79 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 158.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 63-56 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 136.5 | U 119 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 78-64 | +7.5 | W +21.5 | 140.5 | O 142 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 51-67 | +14.5 | L −1.5 | 138.5 | U 118 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
MORG
W 87-70
−10.5
7
@
MD
W 70-60
+14.5
12
vs
BING
W 83-70
−14.5
15
vs
CLEM
W 79-74
+6.5
22
vs
WAG
W 92-75
−8.5
27
vs
DAY
L 79-84
−3.5
28
vs
MIA
L 65-78
−7.5
3
vs
UMBC
W 90-81
−10.5
7
@
UNC
L 61-81
−9.5
13
vs
SPU
W 76-68
−12.5
17
@
MARQ
W 78-69
+15.5
20
vs
XAV
L 77-80
−7.5
22
vs
COPP
W 97-67
−3.5
31
vs
SJU
L 83-95
−3.5
6
@
DEP
L 50-56
−3.5
10
vs
HALL
L 67-76
−7.5
13
@
CREI
L 83-86
+5.5
17
vs
CONN
L 62-64
+9.5
21
@
VILL
L 51-66
−6.5
24
@
PROV
W 81-78
+8.5
28
vs
DEP
W 70-61
+5.5
31
@
BTLR
W 77-64
+18.5
4
vs
CREI
W 76-68
+6.5
7
vs
VILL
L 73-80
−4.5
14
@
CONN
L 75-79
+12.5
18
vs
BTLR
L 89-93
−10.5
21
@
HALL
L 47-51
+2.5
24
vs
MARQ
L 60-76
−18.5
28
@
XAV
L 84-91
−2.5
3
@
SJU
L 69-72
+12.5
7
vs
PROV
W 80-79
−0.5
11
vs
DEP
W 63-56
+5.5
12
vs
VILL
W 78-64
+21.5
13
vs
CONN
L 51-67
−1.5
covered 14didn’t cover 20avg −0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
MORG
W 87-70
+2.5
7
@
MD
W 70-60
−14.5
12
vs
BING
W 83-70
+11.5
15
vs
CLEM
W 79-74
+10.5
22
vs
WAG
W 92-75
+26.5
27
vs
DAY
L 79-84
+17.5
28
vs
MIA
L 65-78
−8.5
3
vs
UMBC
W 90-81
+21.5
7
@
UNC
L 61-81
−7.5
13
vs
SPU
W 76-68
+3.5
17
@
MARQ
W 78-69
−2.5
20
vs
XAV
L 77-80
+7.5
22
vs
COPP
W 97-67
+13.5
31
vs
SJU
L 83-95
+25.5
6
@
DEP
L 50-56
−38.5
10
vs
HALL
L 67-76
+5.5
13
@
CREI
L 83-86
+21.5
17
vs
CONN
L 62-64
−15.5
21
@
VILL
L 51-66
−25.5
24
@
PROV
W 81-78
−0.5
28
vs
DEP
W 70-61
−8.5
31
@
BTLR
W 77-64
−8.5
4
vs
CREI
W 76-68
−2.5
7
vs
VILL
L 73-80
+12.5
14
@
CONN
L 75-79
+15.5
18
vs
BTLR
L 89-93
+34.5
21
@
HALL
L 47-51
−38.5
24
vs
MARQ
L 60-76
−14.5
28
@
XAV
L 84-91
+19.5
3
@
SJU
L 69-72
−7.5
7
vs
PROV
W 80-79
+0.5
11
vs
DEP
W 63-56
−17.5
12
vs
VILL
W 78-64
+1.5
13
vs
CONN
L 51-67
−20.5
over 18under 16avg +0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Maryland has the better starters
Position by position: Maryland 2, Georgetown 0, even 3
MarylandBetterGeorgetown
G M. McNair TR16.9 pts · 5.2 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 84
=Even
G V. Miller TR10.8 pts · 2.7 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 74
G A. Mills12.2 pts · 4.1 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 89
←MDSmall
F C. Williams8.8 pts · 5.1 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 57
G B. Boswell TR6.2 pts · 4.4 reb · 3.1 ast
Score 70
=Even
F J. Parker TR9.8 pts · 6.1 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 79
F P. Payne17.5 pts · 7.2 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 100
=Even
C V. Iwuchukwu11.6 pts · 6.1 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 89
F T. Buljan TR13.1 pts · 10.3 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 97
←MDSmall
C C. Machot TR8.8 pts · 5.4 reb · 0.2 ast
Score 78
MarylandBetterGeorgetown
MD offense63rd of 366 · +2.4
=Even
GTWN defense46th of 366 · +2.3
MD defense34th of 366 · +3.3
=Even
GTWN offense75th of 366 · +1.3
Backcourt+4.9 · 3 players
←MDBig
Backcourt+0.7 · 1 player
Frontcourt+11.4 · 2 players
←MDBig
Frontcourt+6.5 · 4 players
Bench-2.3 · 5 players
→GTWNBig
Bench+1.4 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestMD betterGTWN betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
M. McNair37 min · TRA. Mills27 minB. Boswell27 min · TRD. Wagner24 min · TRM. Jabriel20 minG. Turkson11 min
Forwards
P. Payne27 minT. Buljan26 min · TRR. Jennings13 min · TRA. BrownNewB. OladotunNewA. TambedouNew
Centers
A. K'MedehoutoNew
Guards
V. Miller26 min · TRJ. Lowe19 min · TRE. Jackson18 min · TRK. Mulready17 minM. Moses1 minM. Van Raaphorst1 min
Forwards
C. Williams30 minJ. Parker22 min · TRJ. CaldwellNewP. PastreNew
Centers
V. Iwuchukwu23 minC. Machot20 min · TRS. Diouf4 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 69.7 #291 | Points per game | 73.6 #215 |
| 1.04 #270 | Points per possession | 1.09 #165 |
| 67.0 #281 | Pace (possessions) | 67.8 #238 |
| Shooting | ||
| 48.1 #311 | Effective FG% | 49.6 #257 |
| 31.7 #293 | 3-point % | 31.8 #285 |
| 46.9 #35 | 3-point attempt rate | 35.2 #271 |
| 36.4 #142 | Free throw rate | 37.3 #121 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.6 #300 | Turnover rate | 15.8 #120 |
| 33.8 #73 | Offensive rebound rate | 32.5 #107 |
| 10.4 #351 | Assists per game | 14.8 #101 |
| Defense | ||
| 76.6 #232 | Points allowed | 72.9 #130 |
| 1.14 #312 | Points allowed per possession | 1.08 #147 |
| 54.4 #312 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.0 #96 |
| 36.3 #317 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.3 #139 |
| 14.9 #294 | Turnovers forced | 16.2 #211 |
| 70.9 #111 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.5 #228 |
| 4.8 #345 | Steals per game | 6.5 #182 |
| 2.9 #237 | Blocks per game | 3.6 #130 |
Maryland
12-21 in 2025-26 overall · 5-17 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Iowa64–75
- Wvs Oregon70–60
- Lvs Illinois72–78
- L@ Wisconsin45–78
- Lvs Rutgers65–69
A week or more of rest.
Georgetown
16-18 in 2025-26 overall · 8-15 in conference · Big East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs UConn51–67
- Wvs Villanova78–64
- Wvs DePaul63–56
- Wvs Providence80–79
- L@ St John's69–72
A week or more of rest.