SRC Arena · at UC Riverside
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UCR | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects UCR 78–77 · win probability UCR 54%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 154.4
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: DEN has more of the edges
DEN 4, UCR 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
DEN offense vs UCR defense
Offense 184th of 366 against a defense 296th, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: DEN 14.2%, UCR 19.0%. Forced: DEN 13.0%, UCR 15.5%
UCR offense vs DEN defense
Offense 265th of 366 against a defense 337th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
DEN has played the 249th-hardest schedule, UCR the 182nd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Shooting
Effective FG%: DEN 53.6 and allows 56.0; UCR 48.9 and allows 52.7
Home court
UCR at home. This season: UCR 0-0 at home, DEN 0-0 away
Three-pointers
DEN hits 36.8% and allows 36.7%; UCR hits 31.6% and allows 33.5%. Threes are 38.6% and 38.3% of their shots
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: DEN plays 69.4 a game (151st fastest), UCR 71.0 (74th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: DEN 29.8%, UCR 27.8%. Defensive: DEN 67.2%, UCR 70.0%
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: DEN 34.1, UCR 35.0. Allowed: DEN 36.8, UCR 40.9
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: DEN 27%, UCR 21%. Transfers in: DEN 6, UCR 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | UCR -1.1 | — |
| Total | — | 154.4 | — |
| Projected score | — | DEN 76.7 · UCR 77.8 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UCR -0.5 | — |
| 1H total | 72.2 | — |
| 1H projected score | DEN 35.8 · UCR 36.4 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% | |
| 2-8 20% | 3-7 30% | 6-4 60% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Denver
29 games played
Straight up
12-17
41% wins
Against the spread
18-11
62% covers · avg +1.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
20-9
69% overs · avg +6.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 73-84 | +13.5 | W +2.5 | 136.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 6 | @ | L 70-84 | +27.5 | W +13.5 | 153.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 9 | @ | W 75-73 | +7.5 | W +9.5 | 146.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 79-84 | -4.5 | L −9.5 | 148.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 21 | @ | W 83-81 | +18.5 | W +20.5 | 149.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 24 | @ | L 73-103 | +32.5 | W +2.5 | 154.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 26 | @ | L 59-101 | +9.5 | L −32.5 | 153.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 93-89 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 155.5 | O 182 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 79-93 | +8.5 | L −5.5 | 142.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 86-105 | -3.5 | L −22.5 | 165.5 | O 191 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 86-79 | +8.5 | W +15.5 | 159.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 85-90 | +16.5 | W +11.5 | 160.5 | O 175 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 87-74 | -9.5 | W +3.5 | 156.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 88-92 | +11.5 | W +7.5 | 163.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 79-87 | +8.5 | W +0.5 | 162.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 72-82 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 169.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 98-87 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 156.5 | O 185 |
| Jan 22 | vs | L 77-82 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 160.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 86-93 | -5.5 | L −12.5 | 162.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 69-61 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 161.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 82-84 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 158.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 78-71 | +12.5 | W +19.5 | 156.5 | U 149 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 98-79 | +3.5 | W +22.5 | 161.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 79-61 | +2.5 | W +20.5 | 160.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 76-83 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 160.5 | U 159 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 90-70 | -5.5 | W +14.5 | 163.5 | U 160 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 82-80 | +3.5 | W +5.5 | 168.5 | U 162 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 80-102 | -2.5 | L −24.5 | 156.5 | O 182 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 67-83 | -2.5 | L −18.5 | 160.5 | U 150 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
SEA
L 73-84
+2.5
6
@
WASH
L 70-84
+13.5
9
@
MTST
W 75-73
+9.5
15
vs
UTSA
L 79-84
−9.5
21
@
CSU
W 83-81
+20.5
24
@
ARIZ
L 73-103
+2.5
26
@
WYO
L 59-101
−32.5
3
vs
EWU
W 93-89
+2.5
6
@
IDST
L 79-93
−5.5
13
vs
CSUF
L 86-105
−22.5
20
@
UNCO
W 86-79
+15.5
22
@
TLSA
L 85-90
+11.5
31
vs
KC
W 87-74
+3.5
4
@
STMN
L 88-92
+7.5
8
@
SDST
L 79-87
+0.5
10
@
SDAK
L 72-82
−11.5
14
vs
ORU
W 98-87
+4.5
22
vs
NDSU
L 77-82
−0.5
24
vs
UND
L 86-93
−12.5
28
@
KC
W 69-61
+4.5
31
vs
OMA
L 82-84
−3.5
5
@
NDSU
W 78-71
+19.5
7
@
UND
W 98-79
+22.5
12
vs
SDST
W 79-61
+20.5
15
@
OMA
L 76-83
−4.5
19
vs
SDAK
W 90-70
+14.5
21
vs
STMN
W 82-80
+5.5
26
@
ORU
L 80-102
−24.5
6
vs
UND
L 67-83
−18.5
covered 18didn’t cover 11avg +1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
SEA
L 73-84
+20.5
6
@
WASH
L 70-84
+0.5
9
@
MTST
W 75-73
+1.5
15
vs
UTSA
L 79-84
+14.5
21
@
CSU
W 83-81
+14.5
24
@
ARIZ
L 73-103
+21.5
26
@
WYO
L 59-101
+6.5
3
vs
EWU
W 93-89
+26.5
6
@
IDST
L 79-93
+29.5
13
vs
CSUF
L 86-105
+25.5
20
@
UNCO
W 86-79
+5.5
22
@
TLSA
L 85-90
+14.5
31
vs
KC
W 87-74
+4.5
4
@
STMN
L 88-92
+16.5
8
@
SDST
L 79-87
+3.5
10
@
SDAK
L 72-82
−15.5
14
vs
ORU
W 98-87
+28.5
22
vs
NDSU
L 77-82
−1.5
24
vs
UND
L 86-93
+16.5
28
@
KC
W 69-61
−31.5
31
vs
OMA
L 82-84
+7.5
5
@
NDSU
W 78-71
−7.5
7
@
UND
W 98-79
+15.5
12
vs
SDST
W 79-61
−20.5
15
@
OMA
L 76-83
−1.5
19
vs
SDAK
W 90-70
−3.5
21
vs
STMN
W 82-80
−6.5
26
@
ORU
L 80-102
+25.5
6
vs
UND
L 67-83
−10.5
over 20under 9avg +6.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
UC Riverside
30 games played
Straight up
8-22
27% wins
Against the spread
15-15
50% covers · avg +0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-14
53% overs · avg +1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6 | @ | W 74-70 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 146.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 68-82 | +19.5 | W +5.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 74-76 | -3.5 | L −5.5 | 148.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 57-80 | +12.5 | L −10.5 | 142.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 21 | @ | W 85-71 | +7.5 | W +21.5 | 152.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 83-74 | -3.5 | W +5.5 | 144.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 69-77 | +5.5 | L −2.5 | 145.5 | O 146 |
| Dec 4 | @ | L 60-73 | +13.5 | W +0.5 | 142.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 88-84 | +5.5 | W +9.5 | 162.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 53-100 | +33.5 | L −13.5 | 155.5 | U 153 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 78-92 | +14.5 | W +0.5 | 152.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 23 | @ | L 65-97 | +24.5 | L −7.5 | 148.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 1 | vs | L 45-88 | +8.5 | L −34.5 | 149.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 66-67 | +3.5 | W +2.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 66-69 | +10.5 | W +7.5 | 149.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 73-88 | +5.5 | L −9.5 | 141.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 81-72 | +3.5 | W +12.5 | 157.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 22 | vs | L 66-80 | +8.5 | L −5.5 | 142.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 66-74 | +9.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 71-61 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 144.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 87-94 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 162.5 | O 181 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 72-78 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 156.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 74-88 | +10.5 | L −3.5 | 160.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 68-76 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 145.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 66-72 | +11.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 93-65 | -6.5 | W +21.5 | 150.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 73-78 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 149.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 59-70 | +10.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 95-84 | +4.5 | W +15.5 | 158.5 | O 179 |
| Mar 5 | @ | L 74-93 | +12.5 | L −6.5 | 150.5 | O 167 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
6
@
UND
W 74-70
+5.5
11
@
UNM
L 68-82
+5.5
15
vs
UND
L 74-76
−5.5
18
@
CBU
L 57-80
−10.5
21
@
USD
W 85-71
+21.5
24
vs
GRAM
W 83-74
+5.5
29
@
UTU
L 69-77
−2.5
4
@
UCI
L 60-73
+0.5
6
@
CP
W 88-84
+9.5
13
@
BYU
L 53-100
−13.5
20
@
STMN
L 78-92
+0.5
23
@
UCLA
L 65-97
−7.5
1
vs
HAW
L 45-88
−34.5
8
@
CSUB
L 66-67
+2.5
10
vs
UCSD
L 66-69
+7.5
15
@
LBSU
L 73-88
−9.5
17
vs
CSUF
W 81-72
+12.5
22
vs
UCI
L 66-80
−5.5
24
@
UCD
L 66-74
+1.5
29
vs
LBSU
W 71-61
+11.5
31
vs
CP
L 87-94
−8.5
5
@
CSUF
L 72-78
−0.5
7
@
CSUN
L 74-88
−3.5
12
vs
UCSB
L 68-76
−1.5
14
@
UCSD
L 66-72
+5.5
19
vs
CSUB
W 93-65
+21.5
21
vs
UCD
L 73-78
−2.5
26
@
UCSB
L 59-70
−0.5
28
vs
CSUN
W 95-84
+15.5
5
@
HAW
L 74-93
−6.5
covered 15didn’t cover 15avg +0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
6
@
UND
W 74-70
−2.5
11
@
UNM
L 68-82
+8.5
15
vs
UND
L 74-76
+1.5
18
@
CBU
L 57-80
−5.5
21
@
USD
W 85-71
+3.5
24
vs
GRAM
W 83-74
+12.5
29
@
UTU
L 69-77
+0.5
4
@
UCI
L 60-73
−9.5
6
@
CP
W 88-84
+9.5
13
@
BYU
L 53-100
−2.5
20
@
STMN
L 78-92
+17.5
23
@
UCLA
L 65-97
+13.5
1
vs
HAW
L 45-88
−16.5
8
@
CSUB
L 66-67
−14.5
10
vs
UCSD
L 66-69
−14.5
15
@
LBSU
L 73-88
+19.5
17
vs
CSUF
W 81-72
−4.5
22
vs
UCI
L 66-80
+3.5
24
@
UCD
L 66-74
−9.5
29
vs
LBSU
W 71-61
−12.5
31
vs
CP
L 87-94
+18.5
5
@
CSUF
L 72-78
−6.5
7
@
CSUN
L 74-88
+1.5
12
vs
UCSB
L 68-76
−1.5
14
@
UCSD
L 66-72
−9.5
19
vs
CSUB
W 93-65
+7.5
21
vs
UCD
L 73-78
+1.5
26
@
UCSB
L 59-70
−16.5
28
vs
CSUN
W 95-84
+20.5
5
@
HAW
L 74-93
+16.5
over 16under 14avg +1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
UC Riverside has the better starters
Position by position: Denver 1, UC Riverside 2, even 2
DenverBetterUC Riverside
G C. Johnson19.9 pts · 1.9 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 73
←DENBig
G D. Perteete6.2 pts · 3.2 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 31
G K. Martin TR5.3 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 24
=Even
G J. Evans TR5.8 pts · 1.7 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 25
G C. Hyland TR5 pts · 1.3 reb · 1 ast
Score 20
→UCRSmall
G B. Waller4.6 pts · 2.5 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 37
F J. Rogers TR5.7 pts · 5.2 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 27
→UCRBig
G D. Malcolm TR5.8 pts · 3.4 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 87
F S. Wysocki5.8 pts · 2.9 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 14
=Even
F D. Washington TR2.7 pts · 1.4 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 0
DenverBetterUC Riverside
DEN offense184th of 366 · -5.7
←DENSmall
UCR defense296th of 366 · -7.4
DEN defense337th of 366 · -8.9
→UCRSmall
UCR offense265th of 366 · -8.1
Backcourt-1.7 · 3 players
=Even
Backcourt-2.7 · 4 players
Frontcourt-3.3 · 2 players
→UCRSmall
Frontcourt-2.0 · 1 player
Bench-2.4 · 3 players
→UCRSmall
Bench+0.3 · 2 players
Score, worst to bestDEN betterUCR betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
C. Johnson36 minK. Martin16 min · TRC. Hyland15 min · TRT. Cady11 min · TRL. ThreattNewJ. NelsonNew
Forwards
J. Rogers27 min · TRS. Wysocki19 minS. Mahoney5 min · TRH. BatesNewC. DimmockNewO. Wickstrom StumerNew
Centers
B. Mbengue9 min · TR
Guards
D. Perteete28 minJ. Evans15 min · TRB. Waller14 minD. Malcolm14 min · TRT. Duckett7 min · TRE. ReaganNew
Forwards
D. Washington11 min · TRT. Parrish-TillmanNewA. McKinneyNewJ. MajokNew
Centers
A. Oyeadier2 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 80.3 #61 | Points per game | 71.6 #258 |
| 1.16 #53 | Points per possession | 1.01 #317 |
| 69.4 #151 | Pace (possessions) | 71.0 #74 |
| Shooting | ||
| 53.6 #79 | Effective FG% | 48.9 #291 |
| 36.8 #32 | 3-point % | 31.6 #301 |
| 38.6 #199 | 3-point attempt rate | 38.3 #203 |
| 34.1 #203 | Free throw rate | 35.0 #177 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.2 #30 | Turnover rate | 19.0 #321 |
| 29.8 #213 | Offensive rebound rate | 27.8 #275 |
| 11.2 #327 | Assists per game | 12.3 #262 |
| Defense | ||
| 84.0 #357 | Points allowed | 79.1 #303 |
| 1.21 #360 | Points allowed per possession | 1.11 #256 |
| 56.0 #344 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.7 #252 |
| 36.7 #338 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.5 #159 |
| 13.0 #355 | Turnovers forced | 15.5 #250 |
| 67.2 #291 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.0 #159 |
| 4.5 #356 | Steals per game | 5.1 #325 |
| 1.9 #348 | Blocks per game | 4.1 #67 |
Denver
12-17 in 2025-26 overall · 8-9 in conference · West Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs North Dakota67–83
- L@ Oral Roberts80–102
- Wvs St Thomas82–80
- Wvs South Dakota90–70
- L@ Omaha76–83
A week or more of rest.
UC Riverside
8-22 in 2025-26 overall · 5-15 in conference · Big West Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Hawai'i74–93
- Wvs CSU Northridge95–84
- L@ Santa Barbara59–70
- Lvs UC Davis73–78
- Wvs Bakersfield93–65
A week or more of rest.