Mohegan Sun Arena · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | NEB | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects NEB 81–75 · win probability NEB 70%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 156.0
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: NEB has more of the edges
PROV 1, NEB 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: PROV 16.7%, NEB 14.5%. Forced: PROV 13.1%, NEB 18.9%
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: PROV plays 74.2 a game (10th fastest), NEB 67.3 (267th). Faster games mean more points
Three-pointers
PROV hits 36.4% and allows 35.3%; NEB hits 35.5% and allows 30.5%. Threes are 40.5% and 51.1% of their shots
Shooting
Effective FG%: PROV 55.0 and allows 51.4; NEB 55.5 and allows 48.1
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: PROV 13%, NEB 48%. Transfers in: PROV 8, NEB 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Free throws
Free throw rate: PROV 36.7, NEB 26.2. Allowed: PROV 32.7, NEB 25.1
Even
NEB offense vs PROV defense
Offense 43rd of 366 against a defense 81st, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
PROV has played the 31st-hardest schedule, NEB the 59th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
PROV offense vs NEB defense
Offense 35th of 366 against a defense 23rd, on the model’s ratings
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: PROV 31.7%, NEB 26.7%. Defensive: PROV 69.2%, NEB 72.6%
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | NEB -6.0 | — |
| Total | — | 156.0 | — |
| Projected score | — | PROV 75 · NEB 81 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | NEB -3.4 | — |
| 1H total | 72.9 | — |
| 1H projected score | PROV 34.7 · NEB 38.2 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | |
| 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Providence
33 games played
Straight up
15-18
45% wins
Against the spread
19-14
58% covers · avg −0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
22-11
67% overs · avg +8.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 89-79 | -23.5 | L −13.5 | 152.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 8 | vs | L 101-107 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 157.5 | O 208 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 106-81 | -19.5 | W +5.5 | 172.5 | O 187 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 88-97 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 163.5 | O 185 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 98-66 | -29.5 | W +2.5 | 161.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 77-65 | -3.5 | W +8.5 | 165.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 83-104 | +6.5 | L −14.5 | 166.5 | O 187 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 78-90 | +12.5 | W +0.5 | 169.5 | U 168 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 94-64 | -26.5 | W +3.5 | 162.5 | U 158 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 90-71 | -7.5 | W +11.5 | 159.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 86-79 | -19.5 | L −12.5 | 145.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 110-113 | +3.5 | W +0.5 | 164.5 | O 223 |
| Dec 19 | vs | L 67-72 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 152.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 77-71 | +14.5 | W +20.5 | 166.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 98-103 | +9.5 | W +4.5 | 152.5 | O 201 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 84-97 | -1.5 | L −14.5 | 165.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 13 | vs | L 82-88 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 156.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 16 | vs | W 93-88 | +2.5 | W +7.5 | 161.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 104-105 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 167.5 | O 209 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 78-81 | -5.5 | L −8.5 | 159.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 81-87 | +15.5 | W +9.5 | 152.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 30 | @ | L 73-87 | +8.5 | L −5.5 | 157.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 97-87 | -2.5 | W +7.5 | 168.5 | O 184 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 90-72 | -4.5 | W +13.5 | 153.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 80-87 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 150.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 69-79 | +6.5 | L −3.5 | 167.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 71-68 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 152.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 94-84 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 170.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 79-76 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 166.5 | U 155 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 56-78 | -3.5 | L −25.5 | 161.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 79-80 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 158.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 91-81 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 162.5 | O 172 |
| Mar 12 | @ | L 72-85 | +11.5 | L −1.5 | 158.5 | U 157 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
HC
W 89-79
−13.5
8
vs
VT
L 101-107
−8.5
11
vs
PENN
W 106-81
+5.5
14
@
COLO
L 88-97
−7.5
18
vs
UNH
W 98-66
+2.5
22
vs
PSU
W 77-65
+8.5
27
vs
WIS
L 83-104
−14.5
28
vs
FLA
L 78-90
+0.5
2
vs
FDU
W 94-64
+3.5
6
vs
URI
W 90-71
+11.5
9
vs
BRWN
W 86-79
−12.5
13
@
BTLR
L 110-113
+0.5
19
vs
HALL
L 67-72
−6.5
3
@
SJU
W 77-71
+20.5
7
vs
CONN
L 98-103
+4.5
10
@
XAV
L 84-97
−14.5
13
vs
VILL
L 82-88
−3.5
16
vs
CREI
W 93-88
+7.5
19
@
MARQ
L 104-105
+1.5
24
vs
GTWN
L 78-81
−8.5
27
@
CONN
L 81-87
+9.5
30
@
VILL
L 73-87
−5.5
4
vs
BTLR
W 97-87
+7.5
7
vs
DEP
W 90-72
+13.5
11
@
HALL
L 80-87
−2.5
14
vs
SJU
L 69-79
−3.5
21
@
DEP
W 71-68
+5.5
25
vs
XAV
W 94-84
+4.5
28
@
CREI
W 79-76
+6.5
4
vs
MARQ
L 56-78
−25.5
7
@
GTWN
L 79-80
+0.5
11
vs
BTLR
W 91-81
+8.5
12
@
SJU
L 72-85
−1.5
covered 19didn’t cover 14avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
HC
W 89-79
+15.5
8
vs
VT
L 101-107
+50.5
11
vs
PENN
W 106-81
+14.5
14
@
COLO
L 88-97
+21.5
18
vs
UNH
W 98-66
+2.5
22
vs
PSU
W 77-65
−23.5
27
vs
WIS
L 83-104
+20.5
28
vs
FLA
L 78-90
−1.5
2
vs
FDU
W 94-64
−4.5
6
vs
URI
W 90-71
+1.5
9
vs
BRWN
W 86-79
+19.5
13
@
BTLR
L 110-113
+58.5
19
vs
HALL
L 67-72
−13.5
3
@
SJU
W 77-71
−18.5
7
vs
CONN
L 98-103
+48.5
10
@
XAV
L 84-97
+15.5
13
vs
VILL
L 82-88
+13.5
16
vs
CREI
W 93-88
+19.5
19
@
MARQ
L 104-105
+41.5
24
vs
GTWN
L 78-81
−0.5
27
@
CONN
L 81-87
+15.5
30
@
VILL
L 73-87
+2.5
4
vs
BTLR
W 97-87
+15.5
7
vs
DEP
W 90-72
+8.5
11
@
HALL
L 80-87
+16.5
14
vs
SJU
L 69-79
−19.5
21
@
DEP
W 71-68
−13.5
25
vs
XAV
W 94-84
+7.5
28
@
CREI
W 79-76
−11.5
4
vs
MARQ
L 56-78
−27.5
7
@
GTWN
L 79-80
+0.5
11
vs
BTLR
W 91-81
+9.5
12
@
SJU
L 72-85
−1.5
over 22under 11avg +8.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Nebraska
35 games played
Straight up
28-7
80% wins
Against the spread
19-16
54% covers · avg +2.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
11-24
31% overs · avg −6.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 86-53 | -24.5 | W +8.5 | 153.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 96-66 | -21.5 | W +8.5 | 156.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 69-50 | -35.5 | L −16.5 | 146.5 | U 119 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 105-99 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 163.5 | O 204 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 84-72 | -8.5 | W +3.5 | 151.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 86-85 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 168.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 80-73 | -14.5 | L −7.5 | 166.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 72-63 | -25.5 | L −16.5 | 157.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 71-50 | -5.5 | W +15.5 | 155.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 90-60 | -1.5 | W +28.5 | 158.5 | U 150 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 83-80 | +9.5 | W +12.5 | 156.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 78-55 | -29.5 | L −6.5 | 151.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 30 | vs | W 86-55 | -31.5 | L −0.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 58-56 | -2.5 | L −0.5 | 146.5 | U 114 |
| Jan 5 | @ | W 72-69 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 155.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 83-77 | +4.5 | W +10.5 | 150.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 90-55 | -10.5 | W +24.5 | 146.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 77-58 | -4.5 | W +14.5 | 149.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 76-66 | -10.5 | L −0.5 | 152.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 76-57 | -4.5 | W +14.5 | 140.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 72-75 | +11.5 | W +8.5 | 157.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 1 | vs | L 69-78 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 154.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 80-68 | -12.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 10 | vs | L 77-80 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 146.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 68-49 | -13.5 | W +5.5 | 146.5 | U 117 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 52-57 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 139.5 | U 109 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 87-64 | -17.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 74-61 | -16.5 | L −3.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 82-67 | -5.5 | W +9.5 | 149.5 | U 149 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 52-72 | +1.5 | L −18.5 | 144.5 | U 124 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 84-75 | -4.5 | W +4.5 | 136.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 58-74 | +4.5 | L −11.5 | 145.5 | U 132 |
| Mar 19 | vs | W 76-47 | -13.5 | W +15.5 | 139.5 | U 123 |
| Mar 21 | vs | W 74-72 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 26 | vs | L 71-77 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 131.5 | O 148 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
WGA
W 86-53
+8.5
8
vs
FIU
W 96-66
+8.5
11
vs
UMES
W 69-50
−16.5
15
vs
OU
W 105-99
+4.5
20
vs
UNM
W 84-72
+3.5
21
vs
KSU
W 86-85
−0.5
25
vs
WIN
W 80-73
−7.5
29
vs
UPST
W 72-63
−16.5
7
vs
CREI
W 71-50
+15.5
10
vs
WIS
W 90-60
+28.5
13
@
ILL
W 83-80
+12.5
21
vs
UND
W 78-55
−6.5
30
vs
UNH
W 86-55
−0.5
2
vs
MSU
W 58-56
−0.5
5
@
OSU
W 72-69
+5.5
10
@
IU
W 83-77
+10.5
13
vs
ORE
W 90-55
+24.5
17
@
NU
W 77-58
+14.5
21
vs
WASH
W 76-66
−0.5
24
@
MINN
W 76-57
+14.5
27
@
MICH
L 72-75
+8.5
1
vs
ILL
L 69-78
−10.5
7
@
RUTG
W 80-68
−0.5
10
vs
PUR
L 77-80
−5.5
14
vs
NU
W 68-49
+5.5
17
@
IOWA
L 52-57
−3.5
21
vs
PSU
W 87-64
+5.5
25
vs
MD
W 74-61
−3.5
28
@
USC
W 82-67
+9.5
3
@
UCLA
L 52-72
−18.5
8
vs
IOWA
W 84-75
+4.5
13
vs
PUR
L 58-74
−11.5
19
vs
TROY
W 76-47
+15.5
21
vs
VAN
W 74-72
+3.5
26
vs
IOWA
L 71-77
−7.5
covered 19didn’t cover 16avg +2.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
WGA
W 86-53
−14.5
8
vs
FIU
W 96-66
+5.5
11
vs
UMES
W 69-50
−27.5
15
vs
OU
W 105-99
+40.5
20
vs
UNM
W 84-72
+4.5
21
vs
KSU
W 86-85
+2.5
25
vs
WIN
W 80-73
−13.5
29
vs
UPST
W 72-63
−22.5
7
vs
CREI
W 71-50
−34.5
10
vs
WIS
W 90-60
−8.5
13
@
ILL
W 83-80
+6.5
21
vs
UND
W 78-55
−18.5
30
vs
UNH
W 86-55
−5.5
2
vs
MSU
W 58-56
−32.5
5
@
OSU
W 72-69
−14.5
10
@
IU
W 83-77
+9.5
13
vs
ORE
W 90-55
−1.5
17
@
NU
W 77-58
−14.5
21
vs
WASH
W 76-66
−10.5
24
@
MINN
W 76-57
−7.5
27
@
MICH
L 72-75
−10.5
1
vs
ILL
L 69-78
−7.5
7
@
RUTG
W 80-68
+2.5
10
vs
PUR
L 77-80
+10.5
14
vs
NU
W 68-49
−29.5
17
@
IOWA
L 52-57
−30.5
21
vs
PSU
W 87-64
+3.5
25
vs
MD
W 74-61
−7.5
28
@
USC
W 82-67
−0.5
3
@
UCLA
L 52-72
−20.5
8
vs
IOWA
W 84-75
+22.5
13
vs
PUR
L 58-74
−13.5
19
vs
TROY
W 76-47
−16.5
21
vs
VAN
W 74-72
−0.5
26
vs
IOWA
L 71-77
+16.5
over 11under 24avg −6.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Nebraska has the better starters
Position by position: Providence 0, Nebraska 2, even 3
ProvidenceBetterNebraska
G R. Sabol TR18.9 pts · 3.3 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 66
→NEBSmall
G T. Leonhardt TR12 pts · 5.4 reb · 5.7 ast
Score 83
G M. Mack TR13.6 pts · 3 reb · 4.1 ast
Score 80
→NEBSmall
F P. Sandfort18.1 pts · 4.9 reb · 2 ast
Score 97
G D. Vanterpool TR15.2 pts · 6 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 89
=Even
F B. Kapke TR10.6 pts · 5.7 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 77
G M. Byrd TR10.6 pts · 4.7 reb · 2.7 ast
Score 90
=Even
F S. Orme TR12.5 pts · 4.9 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 86
G R. Mela9.9 pts · 5.3 reb · 2 ast
Score 81
=Even
F D. Wilkinson TR14.1 pts · 6.3 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 93
ProvidenceBetterNebraska
PROV offense35th of 366 · +5.2
=Even
NEB defense23rd of 366 · +5.1
PROV defense81st of 366 · +0.3
=Even
NEB offense43rd of 366 · +4.6
Backcourt+8.2 · 5 players
←PROVBig
Backcourt+2.0 · 1 player
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
=No call
Frontcourt+13.0 · 4 players
Bench+4.2 · 4 players
←PROVSmall
Bench+1.7 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestPROV betterNEB betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
R. Sabol37 min · TRM. Mack32 min · TRD. Vanterpool32 min · TRM. Byrd28 min · TRR. Mela26 minG. Hightower10 min · TR
Forwards
A. Page23 min · TRJ. Bannarbie16 min · TRJ. BardwellNewC. WaltersNewL. MarangonNew
Centers
S. Aletan26 min · TR
Guards
T. Leonhardt35 min · TRC. Jacobsen20 minT. DeGourville19 min · TRC. Essegian14 minJ. LanierNewC. RiceNew
Forwards
P. Sandfort34 minB. Kapke27 min · TRS. Orme26 min · TRD. Wilkinson25 min · TRB. Frager24 minK. Betts6 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 85.3 #15 | Points per game | 77.0 #116 |
| 1.15 #58 | Points per possession | 1.15 #61 |
| 74.2 #10 | Pace (possessions) | 67.3 #267 |
| Shooting | ||
| 55.0 #37 | Effective FG% | 55.5 #28 |
| 36.4 #45 | 3-point % | 35.5 #91 |
| 40.5 #157 | 3-point attempt rate | 51.1 #9 |
| 36.7 #138 | Free throw rate | 26.2 #356 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.7 #174 | Turnover rate | 14.5 #44 |
| 31.7 #135 | Offensive rebound rate | 26.7 #306 |
| 14.0 #146 | Assists per game | 18.0 #10 |
| Defense | ||
| 84.0 #356 | Points allowed | 66.1 #14 |
| 1.13 #292 | Points allowed per possession | 0.98 #13 |
| 51.4 #179 | Opponent effective FG% | 48.1 #40 |
| 35.3 #265 | Opponent 3-point % | 30.5 #19 |
| 13.1 #352 | Turnovers forced | 18.9 #54 |
| 69.2 #195 | Defensive rebound rate | 72.6 #47 |
| 5.4 #313 | Steals per game | 7.1 #112 |
| 3.9 #86 | Blocks per game | 2.5 #303 |
Providence
15-18 in 2025-26 overall · 8-14 in conference · Big East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ St John's72–85
- Wvs Butler91–81
- L@ Georgetown79–80
- Lvs Marquette56–78
- W@ Creighton79–76
A week or more of rest.
Nebraska
28-7 in 2025-26 overall · 15-6 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Iowa71–77
- Wvs Vanderbilt74–72
- Wvs Troy76–47
- Lvs Purdue58–74
- Wvs Iowa84–75
A week or more of rest.