Amica Mutual Pavilion · at Providence
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | PROV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects PROV 90–63 · win probability PROV 99%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 153.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: PROV has more of the edges
BRY 0, PROV 8 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
BRY has played the 261st-hardest schedule, PROV the 31st. A record against a soft schedule means less
BRY offense vs PROV defense
Offense 306th of 366 against a defense 81st, on the model’s ratings
PROV offense vs BRY defense
Offense 35th of 366 against a defense 254th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: BRY 46.9 and allows 52.7; PROV 55.0 and allows 51.4
Three-pointers
BRY hits 30.0% and allows 36.3%; PROV hits 36.4% and allows 35.3%. Threes are 47.9% and 40.5% of their shots
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: BRY plays 65.2 a game (338th fastest), PROV 74.2 (10th). Faster games mean more points
Free throws
Free throw rate: BRY 29.4, PROV 36.7. Allowed: BRY 33.5, PROV 32.7
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: BRY 27.7%, PROV 31.7%. Defensive: BRY 69.0%, PROV 69.2%
Turnovers
Turnover rate: BRY 20.2%, PROV 16.7%. Forced: BRY 14.6%, PROV 13.1%
Home court
PROV at home. This season: PROV 0-0 at home, BRY 0-0 away
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: BRY 29%, PROV 13%. Transfers in: BRY 3, PROV 8. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | PROV -27.6 | — |
| Total | — | 153.1 | — |
| Projected score | — | BRY 62.7 · PROV 90.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | PROV -16.3 | — |
| 1H total | 71.5 | — |
| 1H projected score | BRY 27.6 · PROV 43.9 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 3-7 30% | 7-3 70% | |
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Bryant
29 games played
Straight up
7-22
24% wins
Against the spread
11-18
38% covers · avg −4.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-16
45% overs · avg −1.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 66-82 | +13.5 | L −2.5 | 148.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 45-74 | +15.5 | L −13.5 | 138.5 | U 119 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 82-75 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 151.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 16 | @ | L 50-68 | +6.5 | L −11.5 | 143.5 | U 118 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 61-78 | +24.5 | W +7.5 | 151.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 49-72 | +36.5 | W +13.5 | 147.5 | U 121 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 53-56 | +7.5 | W +4.5 | 137.5 | U 109 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 77-65 | -6.5 | W +5.5 | 134.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 5 | @ | L 56-75 | +6.5 | L −12.5 | 130.5 | O 131 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 63-69 | +8.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 74-82 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 131.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 47-93 | +19.5 | L −26.5 | 153.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 56-51 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 125.5 | U 107 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 63-77 | -2.5 | L −16.5 | 143.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 46-71 | +3.5 | L −21.5 | 136.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 79-74 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 135.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 55-79 | +1.5 | L −22.5 | 132.5 | O 134 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 52-62 | +8.5 | L −1.5 | 133.5 | U 114 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 60-63 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 130.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 92-84 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 131.5 | O 176 |
| Feb 5 | vs | L 63-65 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 133.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 73-67 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 128.5 | O 140 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 69-88 | +4.5 | L −14.5 | 141.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 63-90 | +13.5 | L −13.5 | 133.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 67-79 | -4.5 | L −16.5 | 134.5 | O 146 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 58-70 | +11.5 | L −0.5 | 138.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 69-52 | +1.5 | W +18.5 | 138.5 | U 121 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 83-88 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 135.5 | O 171 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 57-77 | +11.5 | L −8.5 | 130.5 | O 134 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
SIE
L 66-82
−2.5
7
@
GT
L 45-74
−13.5
12
vs
DART
W 82-75
+5.5
16
@
VAL
L 50-68
−11.5
19
@
VT
L 61-78
+7.5
23
@
CONN
L 49-72
+13.5
29
@
HARV
L 53-56
+4.5
2
vs
STO
W 77-65
+5.5
5
@
BRWN
L 56-75
−12.5
10
@
IONA
L 63-69
+2.5
13
vs
MRST
L 74-82
−6.5
22
@
HPU
L 47-93
−26.5
3
@
ME
W 56-51
+3.5
8
vs
UML
L 63-77
−16.5
10
@
UALB
L 46-71
−21.5
15
vs
UMBC
W 79-74
+6.5
19
@
NJIT
L 55-79
−22.5
24
vs
UVM
L 52-62
−1.5
29
@
BING
L 60-63
−5.5
31
vs
UNH
W 92-84
+6.5
5
vs
UALB
L 63-65
−3.5
7
vs
ME
W 73-67
+3.5
12
@
UML
L 69-88
−14.5
14
@
UVM
L 63-90
−13.5
19
vs
BING
L 67-79
−16.5
26
@
UMBC
L 58-70
−0.5
28
vs
NJIT
W 69-52
+18.5
3
@
UNH
L 83-88
−2.5
7
@
UVM
L 57-77
−8.5
covered 11didn’t cover 18avg −4.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
SIE
L 66-82
−0.5
7
@
GT
L 45-74
−19.5
12
vs
DART
W 82-75
+5.5
16
@
VAL
L 50-68
−25.5
19
@
VT
L 61-78
−12.5
23
@
CONN
L 49-72
−26.5
29
@
HARV
L 53-56
−28.5
2
vs
STO
W 77-65
+7.5
5
@
BRWN
L 56-75
+0.5
10
@
IONA
L 63-69
−14.5
13
vs
MRST
L 74-82
+24.5
22
@
HPU
L 47-93
−13.5
3
@
ME
W 56-51
−18.5
8
vs
UML
L 63-77
−3.5
10
@
UALB
L 46-71
−19.5
15
vs
UMBC
W 79-74
+17.5
19
@
NJIT
L 55-79
+1.5
24
vs
UVM
L 52-62
−19.5
29
@
BING
L 60-63
−7.5
31
vs
UNH
W 92-84
+44.5
5
vs
UALB
L 63-65
−5.5
7
vs
ME
W 73-67
+11.5
12
@
UML
L 69-88
+15.5
14
@
UVM
L 63-90
+19.5
19
vs
BING
L 67-79
+11.5
26
@
UMBC
L 58-70
−10.5
28
vs
NJIT
W 69-52
−17.5
3
@
UNH
L 83-88
+35.5
7
@
UVM
L 57-77
+3.5
over 13under 16avg −1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Providence
33 games played
Straight up
15-18
45% wins
Against the spread
19-14
58% covers · avg −0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
22-11
67% overs · avg +8.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 89-79 | -23.5 | L −13.5 | 152.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 8 | vs | L 101-107 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 157.5 | O 208 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 106-81 | -19.5 | W +5.5 | 172.5 | O 187 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 88-97 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 163.5 | O 185 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 98-66 | -29.5 | W +2.5 | 161.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 77-65 | -3.5 | W +8.5 | 165.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 83-104 | +6.5 | L −14.5 | 166.5 | O 187 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 78-90 | +12.5 | W +0.5 | 169.5 | U 168 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 94-64 | -26.5 | W +3.5 | 162.5 | U 158 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 90-71 | -7.5 | W +11.5 | 159.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 86-79 | -19.5 | L −12.5 | 145.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 110-113 | +3.5 | W +0.5 | 164.5 | O 223 |
| Dec 19 | vs | L 67-72 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 152.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 77-71 | +14.5 | W +20.5 | 166.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 98-103 | +9.5 | W +4.5 | 152.5 | O 201 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 84-97 | -1.5 | L −14.5 | 165.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 13 | vs | L 82-88 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 156.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 16 | vs | W 93-88 | +2.5 | W +7.5 | 161.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 104-105 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 167.5 | O 209 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 78-81 | -5.5 | L −8.5 | 159.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 81-87 | +15.5 | W +9.5 | 152.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 30 | @ | L 73-87 | +8.5 | L −5.5 | 157.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 97-87 | -2.5 | W +7.5 | 168.5 | O 184 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 90-72 | -4.5 | W +13.5 | 153.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 80-87 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 150.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 69-79 | +6.5 | L −3.5 | 167.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 71-68 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 152.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 94-84 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 170.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 79-76 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 166.5 | U 155 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 56-78 | -3.5 | L −25.5 | 161.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 79-80 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 158.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 91-81 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 162.5 | O 172 |
| Mar 12 | @ | L 72-85 | +11.5 | L −1.5 | 158.5 | U 157 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
HC
W 89-79
−13.5
8
vs
VT
L 101-107
−8.5
11
vs
PENN
W 106-81
+5.5
14
@
COLO
L 88-97
−7.5
18
vs
UNH
W 98-66
+2.5
22
vs
PSU
W 77-65
+8.5
27
vs
WIS
L 83-104
−14.5
28
vs
FLA
L 78-90
+0.5
2
vs
FDU
W 94-64
+3.5
6
vs
URI
W 90-71
+11.5
9
vs
BRWN
W 86-79
−12.5
13
@
BTLR
L 110-113
+0.5
19
vs
HALL
L 67-72
−6.5
3
@
SJU
W 77-71
+20.5
7
vs
CONN
L 98-103
+4.5
10
@
XAV
L 84-97
−14.5
13
vs
VILL
L 82-88
−3.5
16
vs
CREI
W 93-88
+7.5
19
@
MARQ
L 104-105
+1.5
24
vs
GTWN
L 78-81
−8.5
27
@
CONN
L 81-87
+9.5
30
@
VILL
L 73-87
−5.5
4
vs
BTLR
W 97-87
+7.5
7
vs
DEP
W 90-72
+13.5
11
@
HALL
L 80-87
−2.5
14
vs
SJU
L 69-79
−3.5
21
@
DEP
W 71-68
+5.5
25
vs
XAV
W 94-84
+4.5
28
@
CREI
W 79-76
+6.5
4
vs
MARQ
L 56-78
−25.5
7
@
GTWN
L 79-80
+0.5
11
vs
BTLR
W 91-81
+8.5
12
@
SJU
L 72-85
−1.5
covered 19didn’t cover 14avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
HC
W 89-79
+15.5
8
vs
VT
L 101-107
+50.5
11
vs
PENN
W 106-81
+14.5
14
@
COLO
L 88-97
+21.5
18
vs
UNH
W 98-66
+2.5
22
vs
PSU
W 77-65
−23.5
27
vs
WIS
L 83-104
+20.5
28
vs
FLA
L 78-90
−1.5
2
vs
FDU
W 94-64
−4.5
6
vs
URI
W 90-71
+1.5
9
vs
BRWN
W 86-79
+19.5
13
@
BTLR
L 110-113
+58.5
19
vs
HALL
L 67-72
−13.5
3
@
SJU
W 77-71
−18.5
7
vs
CONN
L 98-103
+48.5
10
@
XAV
L 84-97
+15.5
13
vs
VILL
L 82-88
+13.5
16
vs
CREI
W 93-88
+19.5
19
@
MARQ
L 104-105
+41.5
24
vs
GTWN
L 78-81
−0.5
27
@
CONN
L 81-87
+15.5
30
@
VILL
L 73-87
+2.5
4
vs
BTLR
W 97-87
+15.5
7
vs
DEP
W 90-72
+8.5
11
@
HALL
L 80-87
+16.5
14
vs
SJU
L 69-79
−19.5
21
@
DEP
W 71-68
−13.5
25
vs
XAV
W 94-84
+7.5
28
@
CREI
W 79-76
−11.5
4
vs
MARQ
L 56-78
−27.5
7
@
GTWN
L 79-80
+0.5
11
vs
BTLR
W 91-81
+9.5
12
@
SJU
L 72-85
−1.5
over 22under 11avg +8.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Providence has the better starters
Position by position: Bryant 0, Providence 3, even 2
BryantBetterProvidence
G T. Tabales9 pts · 2 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 20
→PROVBig
G R. Sabol TR18.9 pts · 3.3 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 66
G F. Vassalluzzo0 pts · 0.2 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G M. Mack TR13.6 pts · 3 reb · 4.1 ast
Score 80
F A. Pasha TR10.8 pts · 5 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 39
→PROVBig
G D. Vanterpool TR15.2 pts · 6 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 89
F K. Harvey10.9 pts · 4.8 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 64
→PROVSmall
G M. Byrd TR10.6 pts · 4.7 reb · 2.7 ast
Score 90
F E. Chatfield TR2.6 pts · 1 reb · 1.4 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G R. Mela9.9 pts · 5.3 reb · 2 ast
Score 81
BryantBetterProvidence
BRY offense306th of 366 · -9.5
→PROVBig
PROV defense81st of 366 · +0.3
BRY defense254th of 366 · -6.6
→PROVBig
PROV offense35th of 366 · +5.2
Backcourt-2.6 · 2 players
→PROVBig
Backcourt+8.2 · 5 players
Frontcourt-1.8 · 3 players
=No call
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
Bench-0.0 · 3 players
→PROVBig
Bench+4.2 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestBRY betterPROV betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Tabales28 minF. Vassalluzzo1 minJ. Sepe1 minM. DeOrsey1 minR. WoernerNew
Forwards
A. Pasha33 min · TRK. Harvey27 minE. Chatfield13 min · TRO. Nnani1 min · TRD. ThompsonNewC. LyonsNew
Guards
R. Sabol37 min · TRM. Mack32 min · TRD. Vanterpool32 min · TRM. Byrd28 min · TRR. Mela26 minG. Hightower10 min · TR
Forwards
A. Page23 min · TRJ. Bannarbie16 min · TRJ. BardwellNewC. WaltersNewL. MarangonNew
Centers
S. Aletan26 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63.0 #358 | Points per game | 85.3 #15 |
| 0.96 #351 | Points per possession | 1.15 #58 |
| 65.2 #338 | Pace (possessions) | 74.2 #10 |
| Shooting | ||
| 46.9 #340 | Effective FG% | 55.0 #37 |
| 30.0 #343 | 3-point % | 36.4 #45 |
| 47.9 #25 | 3-point attempt rate | 40.5 #157 |
| 29.4 #322 | Free throw rate | 36.7 #138 |
| Possessions | ||
| 20.2 #351 | Turnover rate | 16.7 #174 |
| 27.7 #276 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.7 #135 |
| 11.4 #314 | Assists per game | 14.0 #146 |
| Defense | ||
| 73.3 #138 | Points allowed | 84.0 #356 |
| 1.13 #283 | Points allowed per possession | 1.13 #292 |
| 52.7 #257 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.4 #179 |
| 36.3 #320 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.3 #265 |
| 14.6 #313 | Turnovers forced | 13.1 #352 |
| 69.0 #203 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.2 #195 |
| 5.9 #250 | Steals per game | 5.4 #313 |
| 3.9 #88 | Blocks per game | 3.9 #86 |
Bryant
7-22 in 2025-26 overall · 5-12 in conference · America East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Vermont57–77
- L@ New Hampshire83–88
- Wvs NJIT69–52
- L@ UMBC58–70
- Lvs Binghamton67–79
A week or more of rest.
Providence
15-18 in 2025-26 overall · 8-14 in conference · Big East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ St John's72–85
- Wvs Butler91–81
- L@ Georgetown79–80
- Lvs Marquette56–78
- W@ Creighton79–76
A week or more of rest.