McCann Arena · at Marist
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | MRST | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects MRST 73–64 · win probability MRST 77%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 136.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: MRST has more of the edges
BRY 2, MRST 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: BRY 20.2%, MRST 17.0%. Forced: BRY 14.6%, MRST 19.4%
Three-pointers
BRY hits 30.0% and allows 36.3%; MRST hits 32.2% and allows 28.6%. Threes are 47.9% and 34.6% of their shots
BRY offense vs MRST defense
Offense 306th of 366 against a defense 135th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: BRY 46.9 and allows 52.7; MRST 49.3 and allows 45.6
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: BRY 27.7%, MRST 29.1%. Defensive: BRY 69.0%, MRST 71.7%
Context
Schedule so far
BRY has played the 261st-hardest schedule, MRST the 339th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Free throws
Free throw rate: BRY 29.4, MRST 25.7. Allowed: BRY 33.5, MRST 37.6
MRST offense vs BRY defense
Offense 322nd of 366 against a defense 254th, on the model’s ratings
Home court
MRST at home. This season: MRST 0-0 at home, BRY 0-0 away
Context
Tempo
About 66 possessions: BRY plays 65.2 a game (338th fastest), MRST 66.8 (286th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: BRY 29%, MRST 31%. Transfers in: BRY 3, MRST 1. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | MRST -8.6 | — |
| Total | — | 136.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | BRY 64.1 · MRST 72.7 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | MRST -5.0 | — |
| 1H total | 64.1 | — |
| 1H projected score | BRY 29.5 · MRST 34.5 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 3-7 30% | 7-3 70% | |
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
BRY 0–1 MRSTMRST leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · BRY 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2025-26 | MRST 82 @ BRY 74 | BRY +1.5 | MRST W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Bryant
29 games played
Straight up
7-22
24% wins
Against the spread
11-18
38% covers · avg −4.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-16
45% overs · avg −1.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 66-82 | +13.5 | L −2.5 | 148.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 45-74 | +15.5 | L −13.5 | 138.5 | U 119 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 82-75 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 151.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 16 | @ | L 50-68 | +6.5 | L −11.5 | 143.5 | U 118 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 61-78 | +24.5 | W +7.5 | 151.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 49-72 | +36.5 | W +13.5 | 147.5 | U 121 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 53-56 | +7.5 | W +4.5 | 137.5 | U 109 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 77-65 | -6.5 | W +5.5 | 134.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 5 | @ | L 56-75 | +6.5 | L −12.5 | 130.5 | O 131 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 63-69 | +8.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 74-82 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 131.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 47-93 | +19.5 | L −26.5 | 153.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 56-51 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 125.5 | U 107 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 63-77 | -2.5 | L −16.5 | 143.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 46-71 | +3.5 | L −21.5 | 136.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 79-74 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 135.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 55-79 | +1.5 | L −22.5 | 132.5 | O 134 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 52-62 | +8.5 | L −1.5 | 133.5 | U 114 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 60-63 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 130.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 92-84 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 131.5 | O 176 |
| Feb 5 | vs | L 63-65 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 133.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 73-67 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 128.5 | O 140 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 69-88 | +4.5 | L −14.5 | 141.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 63-90 | +13.5 | L −13.5 | 133.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 67-79 | -4.5 | L −16.5 | 134.5 | O 146 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 58-70 | +11.5 | L −0.5 | 138.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 69-52 | +1.5 | W +18.5 | 138.5 | U 121 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 83-88 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 135.5 | O 171 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 57-77 | +11.5 | L −8.5 | 130.5 | O 134 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
SIE
L 66-82
−2.5
7
@
GT
L 45-74
−13.5
12
vs
DART
W 82-75
+5.5
16
@
VAL
L 50-68
−11.5
19
@
VT
L 61-78
+7.5
23
@
CONN
L 49-72
+13.5
29
@
HARV
L 53-56
+4.5
2
vs
STO
W 77-65
+5.5
5
@
BRWN
L 56-75
−12.5
10
@
IONA
L 63-69
+2.5
13
vs
MRST
L 74-82
−6.5
22
@
HPU
L 47-93
−26.5
3
@
ME
W 56-51
+3.5
8
vs
UML
L 63-77
−16.5
10
@
UALB
L 46-71
−21.5
15
vs
UMBC
W 79-74
+6.5
19
@
NJIT
L 55-79
−22.5
24
vs
UVM
L 52-62
−1.5
29
@
BING
L 60-63
−5.5
31
vs
UNH
W 92-84
+6.5
5
vs
UALB
L 63-65
−3.5
7
vs
ME
W 73-67
+3.5
12
@
UML
L 69-88
−14.5
14
@
UVM
L 63-90
−13.5
19
vs
BING
L 67-79
−16.5
26
@
UMBC
L 58-70
−0.5
28
vs
NJIT
W 69-52
+18.5
3
@
UNH
L 83-88
−2.5
7
@
UVM
L 57-77
−8.5
covered 11didn’t cover 18avg −4.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
SIE
L 66-82
−0.5
7
@
GT
L 45-74
−19.5
12
vs
DART
W 82-75
+5.5
16
@
VAL
L 50-68
−25.5
19
@
VT
L 61-78
−12.5
23
@
CONN
L 49-72
−26.5
29
@
HARV
L 53-56
−28.5
2
vs
STO
W 77-65
+7.5
5
@
BRWN
L 56-75
+0.5
10
@
IONA
L 63-69
−14.5
13
vs
MRST
L 74-82
+24.5
22
@
HPU
L 47-93
−13.5
3
@
ME
W 56-51
−18.5
8
vs
UML
L 63-77
−3.5
10
@
UALB
L 46-71
−19.5
15
vs
UMBC
W 79-74
+17.5
19
@
NJIT
L 55-79
+1.5
24
vs
UVM
L 52-62
−19.5
29
@
BING
L 60-63
−7.5
31
vs
UNH
W 92-84
+44.5
5
vs
UALB
L 63-65
−5.5
7
vs
ME
W 73-67
+11.5
12
@
UML
L 69-88
+15.5
14
@
UVM
L 63-90
+19.5
19
vs
BING
L 67-79
+11.5
26
@
UMBC
L 58-70
−10.5
28
vs
NJIT
W 69-52
−17.5
3
@
UNH
L 83-88
+35.5
7
@
UVM
L 57-77
+3.5
over 13under 16avg −1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Marist
30 games played
Straight up
18-12
60% wins
Against the spread
15-15
50% covers · avg +1.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
11-19
37% overs · avg −3.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 62-66 | +12.5 | W +8.5 | 139.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 9 | @ | W 75-56 | +1.5 | W +20.5 | 138.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 16 | vs | L 54-56 | -6.5 | L −8.5 | 130.5 | U 110 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 76-65 | -12.5 | L −1.5 | 132.5 | O 141 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 78-55 | -7.5 | W +15.5 | 132.5 | O 133 |
| Dec 5 | vs | W 64-56 | -8.5 | L −0.5 | 136.5 | U 120 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 80-68 | -7.5 | W +4.5 | 140.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 82-74 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 131.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 76-87 | +6.5 | L −4.5 | 141.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 70-51 | -6.5 | W +12.5 | 137.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 58-64 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 145.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 59-69 | -2.5 | L −12.5 | 133.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 83-38 | -4.5 | W +40.5 | 148.5 | U 121 |
| Jan 9 | @ | W 76-72 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 143.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 11 | @ | W 71-49 | -10.5 | W +11.5 | 131.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 82-67 | -8.5 | W +6.5 | 141.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 19 | vs | L 55-68 | -6.5 | L −19.5 | 133.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 50-69 | +1.5 | L −17.5 | 133.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 71-64 | -3.5 | W +3.5 | 139.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 30 | @ | W 88-86 | -9.5 | L −7.5 | 129.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 1 | @ | W 58-46 | -9.5 | W +2.5 | 128.5 | U 104 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 81-52 | -14.5 | W +14.5 | 135.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 60-63 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 138.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 56-81 | +2.5 | L −22.5 | 128.5 | O 137 |
| Feb 15 | vs | L 63-67 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 133.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 20 | @ | W 84-70 | -5.5 | W +8.5 | 142.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 22 | vs | W 65-63 | -7.5 | L −5.5 | 146.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 1 | vs | L 56-63 | -4.5 | L −11.5 | 132.5 | U 119 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 77-75 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 135.5 | O 152 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 57-58 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 128.5 | U 115 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
XAV
L 62-66
+8.5
9
@
DART
W 75-56
+20.5
16
vs
HARV
L 54-56
−8.5
21
vs
ARMY
W 76-65
−1.5
25
vs
LEH
W 78-55
+15.5
5
vs
MSM
W 64-56
−0.5
7
vs
MAN
W 80-68
+4.5
13
@
BRY
W 82-74
+6.5
16
@
GT
L 76-87
−4.5
21
vs
STBK
W 70-51
+12.5
29
@
QUIN
L 58-64
−3.5
2
@
SPU
L 59-69
−12.5
4
vs
IONA
W 83-38
+40.5
9
@
SHU
W 76-72
−1.5
11
@
RID
W 71-49
+11.5
17
vs
FAIR
W 82-67
+6.5
19
vs
MRMK
L 55-68
−19.5
22
@
SIE
L 50-69
−17.5
24
vs
QUIN
W 71-64
+3.5
30
@
CAN
W 88-86
−7.5
1
@
NIA
W 58-46
+2.5
5
vs
RID
W 81-52
+14.5
7
@
FAIR
L 60-63
−4.5
12
@
MRMK
L 56-81
−22.5
15
vs
SIE
L 63-67
−6.5
20
@
MAN
W 84-70
+8.5
22
vs
SHU
W 65-63
−5.5
1
vs
SPU
L 56-63
−11.5
7
vs
QUIN
W 77-75
+3.5
8
vs
MRMK
L 57-58
+1.5
covered 15didn’t cover 15avg +1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
XAV
L 62-66
−11.5
9
@
DART
W 75-56
−7.5
16
vs
HARV
L 54-56
−20.5
21
vs
ARMY
W 76-65
+8.5
25
vs
LEH
W 78-55
+0.5
5
vs
MSM
W 64-56
−16.5
7
vs
MAN
W 80-68
+7.5
13
@
BRY
W 82-74
+24.5
16
@
GT
L 76-87
+21.5
21
vs
STBK
W 70-51
−16.5
29
@
QUIN
L 58-64
−23.5
2
@
SPU
L 59-69
−5.5
4
vs
IONA
W 83-38
−27.5
9
@
SHU
W 76-72
+4.5
11
@
RID
W 71-49
−11.5
17
vs
FAIR
W 82-67
+7.5
19
vs
MRMK
L 55-68
−10.5
22
@
SIE
L 50-69
−14.5
24
vs
QUIN
W 71-64
−4.5
30
@
CAN
W 88-86
+44.5
1
@
NIA
W 58-46
−24.5
5
vs
RID
W 81-52
−2.5
7
@
FAIR
L 60-63
−15.5
12
@
MRMK
L 56-81
+8.5
15
vs
SIE
L 63-67
−3.5
20
@
MAN
W 84-70
+11.5
22
vs
SHU
W 65-63
−18.5
1
vs
SPU
L 56-63
−13.5
7
vs
QUIN
W 77-75
+16.5
8
vs
MRMK
L 57-58
−13.5
over 11under 19avg −3.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Marist has the better starters
Position by position: Bryant 0, Marist 1, even 4
BryantBetterMarist
G T. Tabales9 pts · 2 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 20
=Even
G J. Collins-Roberts7.3 pts · 4.6 reb · 3.2 ast
Score 27
G F. Vassalluzzo0 pts · 0.2 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G J. Graham TR11.1 pts · 2.9 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 43
F A. Pasha TR10.8 pts · 5 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 39
→MRSTSmall
F M. Parker5 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 59
F K. Harvey10.9 pts · 4.8 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 64
=No call
C T. Watson6.1 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
F E. Chatfield TR2.6 pts · 1 reb · 1.4 ast
Not ranked
=No call
C J. Gabriel2 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
BryantBetterMarist
BRY offense306th of 366 · -9.5
→MRSTBig
MRST defense135th of 366 · -2.6
BRY defense254th of 366 · -6.6
←BRYSmall
MRST offense322nd of 366 · -10.5
Backcourt-2.6 · 2 players
=Even
Backcourt-3.3 · 2 players
Frontcourt-1.8 · 3 players
→MRSTSmall
Frontcourt-0.0 · 3 players
Bench-0.0 · 3 players
=No call
BenchNo numbers yet
Score, worst to bestBRY betterMRST betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Tabales28 minF. Vassalluzzo1 minJ. Sepe1 minM. DeOrsey1 minR. WoernerNew
Forwards
A. Pasha33 min · TRK. Harvey27 minE. Chatfield13 min · TRO. Nnani1 min · TRD. ThompsonNewC. LyonsNew
Guards
J. Collins-Roberts31 minJ. Graham28 min · TRJ. WilliamsNewC. SweeneyNewB. ArnoldNewD. ChessNew
Forwards
M. Parker15 minE. OnyiaNewL. RodriguezNew
Centers
T. Watson11 minJ. Gabriel7 minL. FranzNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63.0 #358 | Points per game | 68.9 #301 |
| 0.96 #351 | Points per possession | 1.04 #276 |
| 65.2 #338 | Pace (possessions) | 66.8 #286 |
| Shooting | ||
| 46.9 #340 | Effective FG% | 49.3 #276 |
| 30.0 #343 | 3-point % | 32.2 #272 |
| 47.9 #25 | 3-point attempt rate | 34.6 #285 |
| 29.4 #322 | Free throw rate | 25.7 #360 |
| Possessions | ||
| 20.2 #351 | Turnover rate | 17.0 #202 |
| 27.7 #276 | Offensive rebound rate | 29.1 #233 |
| 11.4 #314 | Assists per game | 15.0 #89 |
| Defense | ||
| 73.3 #138 | Points allowed | 63.9 #4 |
| 1.13 #283 | Points allowed per possession | 0.95 #3 |
| 52.7 #257 | Opponent effective FG% | 45.6 #5 |
| 36.3 #320 | Opponent 3-point % | 28.6 #2 |
| 14.6 #313 | Turnovers forced | 19.4 #35 |
| 69.0 #203 | Defensive rebound rate | 71.7 #77 |
| 5.9 #250 | Steals per game | 7.1 #116 |
| 3.9 #88 | Blocks per game | 3.1 #200 |
Bryant
7-22 in 2025-26 overall · 5-12 in conference · America East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Vermont57–77
- L@ New Hampshire83–88
- Wvs NJIT69–52
- L@ UMBC58–70
- Lvs Binghamton67–79
A week or more of rest.
Marist
18-12 in 2025-26 overall · 13-9 in conference · Metro Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Merrimack57–58
- Wvs Quinnipiac77–75
- Lvs Saint Peter's56–63
- Wvs Sacred Heart65–63
- W@ Manhattan84–70
A week or more of rest.