Chace Athletic Center · at Bryant
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | BRY | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects BRWN 73–67 · win probability BRWN 69%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 139.6
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: BRWN has more of the edges
BRWN 5, BRY 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
BRY offense vs BRWN defense
Offense 306th of 366 against a defense 124th, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: BRWN 19.4%, BRY 20.2%. Forced: BRWN 18.8%, BRY 14.6%
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: BRWN 100%, BRY 29%. Transfers in: BRWN 0, BRY 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Schedule so far
BRWN has played the 176th-hardest schedule, BRY the 261st. A record against a soft schedule means less
Three-pointers
BRWN hits 30.3% and allows 33.5%; BRY hits 30.0% and allows 36.3%. Threes are 36.3% and 47.9% of their shots
Free throws
Free throw rate: BRWN 28.1, BRY 29.4. Allowed: BRWN 37.6, BRY 33.5
Shooting
Effective FG%: BRWN 48.6 and allows 51.3; BRY 46.9 and allows 52.7
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: BRWN plays 68.0 a game (229th fastest), BRY 65.2 (338th). Faster games mean more points
Home court
BRY at home. This season: BRY 0-0 at home, BRWN 0-0 away
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: BRWN 29.0%, BRY 27.7%. Defensive: BRWN 70.0%, BRY 69.0%
Even
BRWN offense vs BRY defense
Offense 220th of 366 against a defense 254th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | BRWN -5.6 | — |
| Total | — | 139.6 | — |
| Projected score | — | BRWN 72.6 · BRY 67 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | BRWN -3.5 | — |
| 1H total | 65.4 | — |
| 1H projected score | BRWN 34.4 · BRY 31 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | |
| 3-7 30% | 3-7 30% | 7-3 70% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
BRWN 3–2 BRYBRWN leads · 5 games since 2021-22 · BRWN has won the last 2 meetings · BRWN 3-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2025-26 | BRY 56 @ BRWN 75 | BRWN -6.5 | BRWN W |
| Dec 6, 2024-25 | BRWN 76 @ BRY 75 | BRY -5.5 | BRWN W |
| Dec 1, 2023-24 | BRY 69 @ BRWN 66 | BRWN -4.5 | BRY W |
| Dec 2, 2022-23 | BRWN 72 @ BRY 60 | BRY -11.5 | BRWN W |
| Nov 26, 2021-22 | BRY 65 @ BRWN 59 | BRWN -2 | BRY W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Brown
25 games played
Straight up
7-18
28% wins
Against the spread
13-12
52% covers · avg −1.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-12
52% overs · avg +0.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | vs | L 46-62 | +3.5 | L −12.5 | 142.5 | U 108 |
| Nov 9 | vs | L 84-89 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 131.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 77-90 | +3.5 | L −9.5 | 129.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 14 | vs | L 63-72 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 139.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 68-49 | -2.5 | W +16.5 | 141.5 | U 117 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 70-80 | +3.5 | L −6.5 | 136.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 23 | @ | W 58-53 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 127.5 | U 111 |
| Nov 26 | @ | W 59-47 | -5.5 | W +6.5 | 136.5 | U 106 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 56-66 | +13.5 | W +3.5 | 138.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 5 | vs | W 75-56 | -6.5 | W +12.5 | 130.5 | O 131 |
| Dec 9 | @ | L 79-86 | +19.5 | W +12.5 | 145.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 5 | vs | L 53-70 | +8.5 | L −8.5 | 142.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 73-81 | +5.5 | L −2.5 | 145.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 86-80 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 143.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 19 | vs | L 67-89 | +2.5 | L −19.5 | 163.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 53-63 | +4.5 | L −5.5 | 134.5 | U 116 |
| Jan 30 | vs | L 59-69 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 132.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 70-77 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 142.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 6 | @ | L 69-81 | +15.5 | W +3.5 | 140.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 13 | @ | L 53-56 | +7.5 | W +4.5 | 131.5 | U 109 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 79-76 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 139.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 20 | vs | W 80-71 | -2.5 | W +6.5 | 129.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 27 | @ | L 62-80 | +5.5 | L −12.5 | 140.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 80-86 | +9.5 | W +3.5 | 156.5 | O 166 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 61-82 | -1.5 | L −22.5 | 146.5 | U 143 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
vs
SIE
L 46-62
−12.5
9
vs
UVM
L 84-89
+0.5
12
@
BU
L 77-90
−9.5
14
vs
HAMP
L 63-72
−10.5
18
vs
HC
W 68-49
+16.5
20
@
STBK
L 70-80
−6.5
23
@
ME
W 58-53
+3.5
26
@
UNH
W 59-47
+6.5
2
@
URI
L 56-66
+3.5
5
vs
BRY
W 75-56
+12.5
9
@
PROV
L 79-86
+12.5
5
vs
YALE
L 53-70
−8.5
10
@
PENN
L 73-81
−2.5
17
vs
COLU
W 86-80
+8.5
19
vs
COR
L 67-89
−19.5
24
@
PRIN
L 53-63
−5.5
30
vs
HARV
L 59-69
−8.5
31
vs
DART
L 70-77
−8.5
6
@
YALE
L 69-81
+3.5
13
@
HARV
L 53-56
+4.5
14
@
DART
W 79-76
+5.5
20
vs
PRIN
W 80-71
+6.5
27
@
COLU
L 62-80
−12.5
28
@
COR
L 80-86
+3.5
6
vs
PENN
L 61-82
−22.5
covered 13didn’t cover 12avg −1.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
vs
SIE
L 46-62
−34.5
9
vs
UVM
L 84-89
+41.5
12
@
BU
L 77-90
+37.5
14
vs
HAMP
L 63-72
−4.5
18
vs
HC
W 68-49
−24.5
20
@
STBK
L 70-80
+13.5
23
@
ME
W 58-53
−16.5
26
@
UNH
W 59-47
−30.5
2
@
URI
L 56-66
−16.5
5
vs
BRY
W 75-56
+0.5
9
@
PROV
L 79-86
+19.5
5
vs
YALE
L 53-70
−19.5
10
@
PENN
L 73-81
+8.5
17
vs
COLU
W 86-80
+22.5
19
vs
COR
L 67-89
−7.5
24
@
PRIN
L 53-63
−18.5
30
vs
HARV
L 59-69
−4.5
31
vs
DART
L 70-77
+4.5
6
@
YALE
L 69-81
+9.5
13
@
HARV
L 53-56
−22.5
14
@
DART
W 79-76
+15.5
20
vs
PRIN
W 80-71
+21.5
27
@
COLU
L 62-80
+1.5
28
@
COR
L 80-86
+9.5
6
vs
PENN
L 61-82
−3.5
over 13under 12avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Bryant
29 games played
Straight up
7-22
24% wins
Against the spread
11-18
38% covers · avg −4.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-16
45% overs · avg −1.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 66-82 | +13.5 | L −2.5 | 148.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 45-74 | +15.5 | L −13.5 | 138.5 | U 119 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 82-75 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 151.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 16 | @ | L 50-68 | +6.5 | L −11.5 | 143.5 | U 118 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 61-78 | +24.5 | W +7.5 | 151.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 49-72 | +36.5 | W +13.5 | 147.5 | U 121 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 53-56 | +7.5 | W +4.5 | 137.5 | U 109 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 77-65 | -6.5 | W +5.5 | 134.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 5 | @ | L 56-75 | +6.5 | L −12.5 | 130.5 | O 131 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 63-69 | +8.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 74-82 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 131.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 47-93 | +19.5 | L −26.5 | 153.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 56-51 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 125.5 | U 107 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 63-77 | -2.5 | L −16.5 | 143.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 46-71 | +3.5 | L −21.5 | 136.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 79-74 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 135.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 55-79 | +1.5 | L −22.5 | 132.5 | O 134 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 52-62 | +8.5 | L −1.5 | 133.5 | U 114 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 60-63 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 130.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 92-84 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 131.5 | O 176 |
| Feb 5 | vs | L 63-65 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 133.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 73-67 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 128.5 | O 140 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 69-88 | +4.5 | L −14.5 | 141.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 63-90 | +13.5 | L −13.5 | 133.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 67-79 | -4.5 | L −16.5 | 134.5 | O 146 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 58-70 | +11.5 | L −0.5 | 138.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 69-52 | +1.5 | W +18.5 | 138.5 | U 121 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 83-88 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 135.5 | O 171 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 57-77 | +11.5 | L −8.5 | 130.5 | O 134 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
SIE
L 66-82
−2.5
7
@
GT
L 45-74
−13.5
12
vs
DART
W 82-75
+5.5
16
@
VAL
L 50-68
−11.5
19
@
VT
L 61-78
+7.5
23
@
CONN
L 49-72
+13.5
29
@
HARV
L 53-56
+4.5
2
vs
STO
W 77-65
+5.5
5
@
BRWN
L 56-75
−12.5
10
@
IONA
L 63-69
+2.5
13
vs
MRST
L 74-82
−6.5
22
@
HPU
L 47-93
−26.5
3
@
ME
W 56-51
+3.5
8
vs
UML
L 63-77
−16.5
10
@
UALB
L 46-71
−21.5
15
vs
UMBC
W 79-74
+6.5
19
@
NJIT
L 55-79
−22.5
24
vs
UVM
L 52-62
−1.5
29
@
BING
L 60-63
−5.5
31
vs
UNH
W 92-84
+6.5
5
vs
UALB
L 63-65
−3.5
7
vs
ME
W 73-67
+3.5
12
@
UML
L 69-88
−14.5
14
@
UVM
L 63-90
−13.5
19
vs
BING
L 67-79
−16.5
26
@
UMBC
L 58-70
−0.5
28
vs
NJIT
W 69-52
+18.5
3
@
UNH
L 83-88
−2.5
7
@
UVM
L 57-77
−8.5
covered 11didn’t cover 18avg −4.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
SIE
L 66-82
−0.5
7
@
GT
L 45-74
−19.5
12
vs
DART
W 82-75
+5.5
16
@
VAL
L 50-68
−25.5
19
@
VT
L 61-78
−12.5
23
@
CONN
L 49-72
−26.5
29
@
HARV
L 53-56
−28.5
2
vs
STO
W 77-65
+7.5
5
@
BRWN
L 56-75
+0.5
10
@
IONA
L 63-69
−14.5
13
vs
MRST
L 74-82
+24.5
22
@
HPU
L 47-93
−13.5
3
@
ME
W 56-51
−18.5
8
vs
UML
L 63-77
−3.5
10
@
UALB
L 46-71
−19.5
15
vs
UMBC
W 79-74
+17.5
19
@
NJIT
L 55-79
+1.5
24
vs
UVM
L 52-62
−19.5
29
@
BING
L 60-63
−7.5
31
vs
UNH
W 92-84
+44.5
5
vs
UALB
L 63-65
−5.5
7
vs
ME
W 73-67
+11.5
12
@
UML
L 69-88
+15.5
14
@
UVM
L 63-90
+19.5
19
vs
BING
L 67-79
+11.5
26
@
UMBC
L 58-70
−10.5
28
vs
NJIT
W 69-52
−17.5
3
@
UNH
L 83-88
+35.5
7
@
UVM
L 57-77
+3.5
over 13under 16avg −1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Brown 1, Bryant 1, even 3
BrownBetterBryant
G J. Jenkins8.4 pts · 3.8 reb · 5.3 ast
Score 47
←BRWNSmall
G T. Tabales9 pts · 2 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 20
G A. Uchidiuno9.1 pts · 2.8 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 20
=No call
G F. Vassalluzzo0 pts · 0.2 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
G M. Wrisby-Jefferson4.4 pts · 3.6 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 25
=Even
F A. Pasha TR10.8 pts · 5 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 39
G D. Rochester5.6 pts · 3.6 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 27
→BRYBig
F K. Harvey10.9 pts · 4.8 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 64
F N. Dabo7.1 pts · 5.7 reb · 1 ast
Score 72
=No call
F E. Chatfield TR2.6 pts · 1 reb · 1.4 ast
Not ranked
BrownBetterBryant
BRWN offense220th of 366 · -6.7
=Even
BRY defense254th of 366 · -6.6
BRWN defense124th of 366 · -2.2
←BRWNBig
BRY offense306th of 366 · -9.5
Backcourt-6.6 · 4 players
→BRYBig
Backcourt-2.6 · 2 players
Frontcourt+1.0 · 1 player
←BRWNSmall
Frontcourt-1.8 · 3 players
Bench-2.4 · 5 players
→BRYSmall
Bench-0.0 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestBRWN betterBRY betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Jenkins31 minA. Uchidiuno26 minM. Wrisby-Jefferson23 minD. Rochester22 minI. Langham21 minB. Loughlin18 min
Forwards
N. Dabo24 minC. O'Sullivan11 minW. DeGraaf8 minE. JamgbadiNewL. JonesNew
Guards
T. Tabales28 minF. Vassalluzzo1 minJ. Sepe1 minM. DeOrsey1 minR. WoernerNew
Forwards
A. Pasha33 min · TRK. Harvey27 minE. Chatfield13 min · TRO. Nnani1 min · TRD. ThompsonNewC. LyonsNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67.2 #330 | Points per game | 63.0 #358 |
| 0.98 #338 | Points per possession | 0.96 #351 |
| 68.0 #229 | Pace (possessions) | 65.2 #338 |
| Shooting | ||
| 48.6 #299 | Effective FG% | 46.9 #340 |
| 30.3 #338 | 3-point % | 30.0 #343 |
| 36.3 #244 | 3-point attempt rate | 47.9 #25 |
| 28.1 #342 | Free throw rate | 29.4 #322 |
| Possessions | ||
| 19.4 #334 | Turnover rate | 20.2 #351 |
| 29.0 #236 | Offensive rebound rate | 27.7 #276 |
| 14.8 #99 | Assists per game | 11.4 #314 |
| Defense | ||
| 72.4 #115 | Points allowed | 73.3 #138 |
| 1.07 #134 | Points allowed per possession | 1.13 #283 |
| 51.3 #176 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.7 #257 |
| 33.5 #157 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.3 #320 |
| 18.8 #57 | Turnovers forced | 14.6 #313 |
| 70.0 #164 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.0 #203 |
| 7.5 #82 | Steals per game | 5.9 #250 |
| 3.8 #104 | Blocks per game | 3.9 #88 |
Brown
7-18 in 2025-26 overall · 3-11 in conference · Ivy League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Penn61–82
- L@ Cornell80–86
- L@ Columbia62–80
- Wvs Princeton80–71
- W@ Dartmouth79–76
A week or more of rest.
Bryant
7-22 in 2025-26 overall · 5-12 in conference · America East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Vermont57–77
- L@ New Hampshire83–88
- Wvs NJIT69–52
- L@ UMBC58–70
- Lvs Binghamton67–79
A week or more of rest.