Rose Hill Gym · at Fordham
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | FOR | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects FOR 80–60 · win probability FOR 96%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 139.7
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: FOR has more of the edges
BRY 0, FOR 8 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
BRY offense vs FOR defense
Offense 306th of 366 against a defense 71st, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: BRY 27.7%, FOR 34.1%. Defensive: BRY 69.0%, FOR 73.2%
Turnovers
Turnover rate: BRY 20.2%, FOR 17.2%. Forced: BRY 14.6%, FOR 17.2%
FOR offense vs BRY defense
Offense 119th of 366 against a defense 254th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
BRY has played the 261st-hardest schedule, FOR the 136th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Shooting
Effective FG%: BRY 46.9 and allows 52.7; FOR 48.6 and allows 49.9
Three-pointers
BRY hits 30.0% and allows 36.3%; FOR hits 28.9% and allows 33.4%. Threes are 47.9% and 38.3% of their shots
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: BRY 29%, FOR 63%. Transfers in: BRY 3, FOR 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Home court
FOR at home. This season: FOR 0-0 at home, BRY 0-0 away
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: BRY 29.4, FOR 26.4. Allowed: BRY 33.5, FOR 30.3
Context
Tempo
About 65 possessions: BRY plays 65.2 a game (338th fastest), FOR 64.8 (349th). Faster games mean more points
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | FOR -20.1 | — |
| Total | — | 139.7 | — |
| Projected score | — | BRY 59.8 · FOR 79.9 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | FOR -11.8 | — |
| 1H total | 65.4 | — |
| 1H projected score | BRY 26.8 · FOR 38.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 3-7 30% | 7-3 70% | |
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% |
Next 3 games
With how the last meeting with each opponent went
No more games listed yet.
No more games listed yet.
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
BRY 0–1 FORFOR leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · BRY 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2024-25 | FOR 86 vs BRY 84 | BRY -1.5 | FOR W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Bryant
29 games played
Straight up
7-22
24% wins
Against the spread
11-18
38% covers · avg −4.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-16
45% overs · avg −1.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 66-82 | +13.5 | L −2.5 | 148.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 45-74 | +15.5 | L −13.5 | 138.5 | U 119 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 82-75 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 151.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 16 | @ | L 50-68 | +6.5 | L −11.5 | 143.5 | U 118 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 61-78 | +24.5 | W +7.5 | 151.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 49-72 | +36.5 | W +13.5 | 147.5 | U 121 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 53-56 | +7.5 | W +4.5 | 137.5 | U 109 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 77-65 | -6.5 | W +5.5 | 134.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 5 | @ | L 56-75 | +6.5 | L −12.5 | 130.5 | O 131 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 63-69 | +8.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 74-82 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 131.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 47-93 | +19.5 | L −26.5 | 153.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 56-51 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 125.5 | U 107 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 63-77 | -2.5 | L −16.5 | 143.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 46-71 | +3.5 | L −21.5 | 136.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 79-74 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 135.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 55-79 | +1.5 | L −22.5 | 132.5 | O 134 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 52-62 | +8.5 | L −1.5 | 133.5 | U 114 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 60-63 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 130.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 92-84 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 131.5 | O 176 |
| Feb 5 | vs | L 63-65 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 133.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 73-67 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 128.5 | O 140 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 69-88 | +4.5 | L −14.5 | 141.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 63-90 | +13.5 | L −13.5 | 133.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 67-79 | -4.5 | L −16.5 | 134.5 | O 146 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 58-70 | +11.5 | L −0.5 | 138.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 69-52 | +1.5 | W +18.5 | 138.5 | U 121 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 83-88 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 135.5 | O 171 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 57-77 | +11.5 | L −8.5 | 130.5 | O 134 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
SIE
L 66-82
−2.5
7
@
GT
L 45-74
−13.5
12
vs
DART
W 82-75
+5.5
16
@
VAL
L 50-68
−11.5
19
@
VT
L 61-78
+7.5
23
@
CONN
L 49-72
+13.5
29
@
HARV
L 53-56
+4.5
2
vs
STO
W 77-65
+5.5
5
@
BRWN
L 56-75
−12.5
10
@
IONA
L 63-69
+2.5
13
vs
MRST
L 74-82
−6.5
22
@
HPU
L 47-93
−26.5
3
@
ME
W 56-51
+3.5
8
vs
UML
L 63-77
−16.5
10
@
UALB
L 46-71
−21.5
15
vs
UMBC
W 79-74
+6.5
19
@
NJIT
L 55-79
−22.5
24
vs
UVM
L 52-62
−1.5
29
@
BING
L 60-63
−5.5
31
vs
UNH
W 92-84
+6.5
5
vs
UALB
L 63-65
−3.5
7
vs
ME
W 73-67
+3.5
12
@
UML
L 69-88
−14.5
14
@
UVM
L 63-90
−13.5
19
vs
BING
L 67-79
−16.5
26
@
UMBC
L 58-70
−0.5
28
vs
NJIT
W 69-52
+18.5
3
@
UNH
L 83-88
−2.5
7
@
UVM
L 57-77
−8.5
covered 11didn’t cover 18avg −4.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
SIE
L 66-82
−0.5
7
@
GT
L 45-74
−19.5
12
vs
DART
W 82-75
+5.5
16
@
VAL
L 50-68
−25.5
19
@
VT
L 61-78
−12.5
23
@
CONN
L 49-72
−26.5
29
@
HARV
L 53-56
−28.5
2
vs
STO
W 77-65
+7.5
5
@
BRWN
L 56-75
+0.5
10
@
IONA
L 63-69
−14.5
13
vs
MRST
L 74-82
+24.5
22
@
HPU
L 47-93
−13.5
3
@
ME
W 56-51
−18.5
8
vs
UML
L 63-77
−3.5
10
@
UALB
L 46-71
−19.5
15
vs
UMBC
W 79-74
+17.5
19
@
NJIT
L 55-79
+1.5
24
vs
UVM
L 52-62
−19.5
29
@
BING
L 60-63
−7.5
31
vs
UNH
W 92-84
+44.5
5
vs
UALB
L 63-65
−5.5
7
vs
ME
W 73-67
+11.5
12
@
UML
L 69-88
+15.5
14
@
UVM
L 63-90
+19.5
19
vs
BING
L 67-79
+11.5
26
@
UMBC
L 58-70
−10.5
28
vs
NJIT
W 69-52
−17.5
3
@
UNH
L 83-88
+35.5
7
@
UVM
L 57-77
+3.5
over 13under 16avg −1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Fordham
29 games played
Straight up
14-15
48% wins
Against the spread
16-13
55% covers · avg +1.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
7-22
24% overs · avg −7.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | L 61-72 | -14.5 | L −25.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 63-61 | -12.5 | L −10.5 | 139.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 71-76 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 157.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 69-53 | -4.5 | W +11.5 | 145.5 | U 122 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 88-68 | -10.5 | W +9.5 | 143.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 62-72 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 142.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 69-70 | -10.5 | L −11.5 | 138.5 | O 139 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 75-54 | -11.5 | W +9.5 | 141.5 | U 129 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 82-53 | -8.5 | W +20.5 | 147.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 65-47 | -13.5 | W +4.5 | 127.5 | U 112 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 56-63 | +16.5 | W +9.5 | 139.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 4 | vs | L 75-83 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 142.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 58-67 | +5.5 | L −3.5 | 134.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 81-77 | +8.5 | W +12.5 | 142.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 56-78 | +17.5 | L −4.5 | 154.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 63-74 | +1.5 | L −9.5 | 145.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 63-68 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 135.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 64-58 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 136.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 79-65 | +11.5 | W +25.5 | 150.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 3 | vs | L 59-63 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 67-70 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 141.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 10 | @ | W 68-64 | +3.5 | W +7.5 | 135.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 70-66 | +4.5 | W +8.5 | 134.5 | O 136 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 62-59 | -8.5 | L −5.5 | 135.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 63-59 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 131.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 63-82 | +12.5 | L −6.5 | 144.5 | O 145 |
| Mar 4 | @ | L 84-87 | -3.5 | L −6.5 | 131.5 | O 171 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 61-49 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 136.5 | U 110 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 62-66 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 144.5 | U 128 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
NJIT
L 61-72
−25.5
11
vs
WAG
W 63-61
−10.5
14
@
IONA
L 71-76
+0.5
20
vs
LIU
W 69-53
+11.5
29
vs
UALB
W 88-68
+9.5
30
vs
COLG
L 62-72
−8.5
6
vs
HC
L 69-70
−11.5
10
vs
FDU
W 75-54
+9.5
13
vs
MAN
W 82-53
+20.5
22
vs
NHVN
W 65-47
+4.5
31
@
DAY
L 56-63
+9.5
4
vs
RICH
L 75-83
−5.5
7
vs
GMU
L 58-67
−3.5
10
@
SBU
W 81-77
+12.5
14
@
SLU
L 56-78
−4.5
17
vs
DUQ
L 63-74
−9.5
21
@
DAV
L 63-68
−0.5
28
vs
LAS
W 64-58
+0.5
31
@
GW
W 79-65
+25.5
3
vs
VCU
L 59-63
+3.5
7
vs
SBU
L 67-70
−1.5
10
@
JOES
W 68-64
+7.5
14
@
URI
W 70-66
+8.5
18
vs
LUC
W 62-59
−5.5
21
vs
DAV
W 63-59
+5.5
28
@
VCU
L 63-82
−6.5
4
@
LAS
L 84-87
−6.5
7
vs
URI
W 61-49
+10.5
12
vs
GW
L 62-66
+3.5
covered 16didn’t cover 13avg +1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
NJIT
L 61-72
−14.5
11
vs
WAG
W 63-61
−15.5
14
@
IONA
L 71-76
−10.5
20
vs
LIU
W 69-53
−23.5
29
vs
UALB
W 88-68
+12.5
30
vs
COLG
L 62-72
−8.5
6
vs
HC
L 69-70
+0.5
10
vs
FDU
W 75-54
−12.5
13
vs
MAN
W 82-53
−12.5
22
vs
NHVN
W 65-47
−15.5
31
@
DAY
L 56-63
−20.5
4
vs
RICH
L 75-83
+15.5
7
vs
GMU
L 58-67
−9.5
10
@
SBU
W 81-77
+15.5
14
@
SLU
L 56-78
−20.5
17
vs
DUQ
L 63-74
−8.5
21
@
DAV
L 63-68
−4.5
28
vs
LAS
W 64-58
−14.5
31
@
GW
W 79-65
−6.5
3
vs
VCU
L 59-63
−24.5
7
vs
SBU
L 67-70
−4.5
10
@
JOES
W 68-64
−3.5
14
@
URI
W 70-66
+1.5
18
vs
LUC
W 62-59
−14.5
21
vs
DAV
W 63-59
−9.5
28
@
VCU
L 63-82
+0.5
4
@
LAS
L 84-87
+39.5
7
vs
URI
W 61-49
−26.5
12
vs
GW
L 62-66
−16.5
over 7under 22avg −7.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Fordham has the better starters
Position by position: Bryant 1, Fordham 2, even 2
BryantBetterFordham
G T. Tabales9 pts · 2 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 20
→FORBig
G A. Lindsey TR17.9 pts · 3.3 reb · 4.9 ast
Score 79
G F. Vassalluzzo0 pts · 0.2 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G L. Patrick TR15 pts · 3.2 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 68
F A. Pasha TR10.8 pts · 5 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 39
→FORBig
F R. Schulte10.4 pts · 9.2 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 82
F K. Harvey10.9 pts · 4.8 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 64
←BRYBig
F A. Jacobs7.2 pts · 4.8 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 27
F E. Chatfield TR2.6 pts · 1 reb · 1.4 ast
Not ranked
=No call
C J. Whitbourn8.4 pts · 8.4 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 63
BryantBetterFordham
BRY offense306th of 366 · -9.5
→FORBig
FOR defense71st of 366 · +0.8
BRY defense254th of 366 · -6.6
→FORBig
FOR offense119th of 366 · -2.7
Backcourt-2.6 · 2 players
→FORBig
Backcourt+2.1 · 2 players
Frontcourt-1.8 · 3 players
→FORBig
Frontcourt+1.3 · 3 players
Bench-0.0 · 3 players
=Even
Bench+0.2 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestBRY betterFOR betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Tabales28 minF. Vassalluzzo1 minJ. Sepe1 minM. DeOrsey1 minR. WoernerNew
Forwards
A. Pasha33 min · TRK. Harvey27 minE. Chatfield13 min · TRO. Nnani1 min · TRD. ThompsonNewC. LyonsNew
Guards
A. Lindsey38 min · TRL. Patrick29 min · TRK. Odih5 min · TRJ. Laboy4 min · TRA. Crotty1 minM. Miller1 min
Forwards
R. Schulte31 minA. Jacobs29 minA. Bodija19 minR. Akhuar19 minF. Siaca BeyNew
Centers
J. Whitbourn24 minO. EssamNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63.0 #358 | Points per game | 67.5 #323 |
| 0.96 #351 | Points per possession | 1.04 #262 |
| 65.2 #338 | Pace (possessions) | 64.8 #349 |
| Shooting | ||
| 46.9 #340 | Effective FG% | 48.6 #300 |
| 30.0 #343 | 3-point % | 28.9 #356 |
| 47.9 #25 | 3-point attempt rate | 38.3 #205 |
| 29.4 #322 | Free throw rate | 26.4 #354 |
| Possessions | ||
| 20.2 #351 | Turnover rate | 17.2 #219 |
| 27.7 #276 | Offensive rebound rate | 34.1 #64 |
| 11.4 #314 | Assists per game | 13.2 #200 |
| Defense | ||
| 73.3 #138 | Points allowed | 66.3 #17 |
| 1.13 #283 | Points allowed per possession | 1.02 #47 |
| 52.7 #257 | Opponent effective FG% | 49.9 #95 |
| 36.3 #320 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.4 #149 |
| 14.6 #313 | Turnovers forced | 17.2 #138 |
| 69.0 #203 | Defensive rebound rate | 73.2 #29 |
| 5.9 #250 | Steals per game | 7.0 #126 |
| 3.9 #88 | Blocks per game | 2.2 #335 |
Bryant
7-22 in 2025-26 overall · 5-12 in conference · America East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Vermont57–77
- L@ New Hampshire83–88
- Wvs NJIT69–52
- L@ UMBC58–70
- Lvs Binghamton67–79
A week or more of rest.
Fordham
14-15 in 2025-26 overall · 8-11 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs G Washington62–66
- Wvs Rhode Island61–49
- L@ La Salle84–87
- L@ VCU63–82
- Wvs Davidson63–59
A week or more of rest.