Bob Carpenter Center · at Delaware
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | DEL | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects DEL 76–74 · win probability DEL 57%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 150.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: DEL has more of the edges
W&M 2, DEL 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: W&M 16.6%, DEL 18.3%. Forced: W&M 18.9%, DEL 14.0%
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: W&M plays 73.6 a game (14th fastest), DEL 65.3 (337th). Faster games mean more points
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: W&M 1%, DEL 46%. Transfers in: W&M 7, DEL 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Free throws
Free throw rate: W&M 44.0, DEL 30.6. Allowed: W&M 35.5, DEL 30.2
DEL offense vs W&M defense
Offense 237th of 366 against a defense 289th, on the model’s ratings
Home court
DEL at home. This season: DEL 0-0 at home, W&M 0-0 away
Even
Three-pointers
W&M hits 33.0% and allows 33.0%; DEL hits 36.8% and allows 35.1%. Threes are 42.8% and 46.2% of their shots
Even
W&M offense vs DEL defense
Offense 160th of 366 against a defense 187th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
W&M has played the 171st-hardest schedule, DEL the 195th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: W&M 26.0%, DEL 20.8%. Defensive: W&M 68.5%, DEL 68.9%
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: W&M 54.3 and allows 51.9; DEL 53.3 and allows 51.5
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | DEL -2.0 | — |
| Total | — | 150.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | W&M 74.1 · DEL 76.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | DEL -1.1 | — |
| 1H total | 70.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | W&M 34.6 · DEL 35.7 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | |
| 4-6 40% | 7-3 70% | 8-2 80% |
Next 3 games
With how the last meeting with each opponent went
No more games listed yet.
| Date | Game | Last meeting |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 15 | @ DUQ | L66–80LO |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 7 since 2021-22
W&M 0–7 DELDEL leads · 7 games since 2021-22 · DEL has won the last 7 meetings · W&M 3-4 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2024-25 | DEL 100 vs W&M 78 | W&M -3.5 | DEL W |
| Feb 8, 2024-25 | W&M 64 @ DEL 74 | DEL -1.5 | DEL W |
| Feb 10, 2023-24 | W&M 58 @ DEL 69 | DEL -12.5 | W&M W |
| Feb 1, 2023-24 | DEL 81 @ W&M 53 | W&M +4.5 | DEL W |
| Jan 19, 2022-23 | W&M 53 @ DEL 80 | DEL -5.5 | DEL W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
William & Mary
30 games played
Straight up
18-12
60% wins
Against the spread
16-14
53% covers · avg +0.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-17
43% overs · avg −2.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | W 81-78 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 158.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 86-90 | +9.5 | W +5.5 | 164.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 60-93 | +28.5 | L −4.5 | 179.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 19 | @ | W 82-74 | +8.5 | W +16.5 | 167.5 | U 156 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 74-63 | -2.5 | W +8.5 | 159.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 92-58 | +1.5 | W +35.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 88-75 | -8.5 | W +4.5 | 163.5 | U 163 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 83-79 | +5.5 | W +9.5 | 170.5 | U 162 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 86-99 | +13.5 | W +0.5 | 174.5 | O 185 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 96-83 | -8.5 | W +4.5 | 170.5 | O 179 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 84-70 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 157.5 | U 154 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 76-57 | -11.5 | W +7.5 | 159.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 5 | @ | L 79-88 | +2.5 | L −6.5 | 165.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 70-81 | -2.5 | L −13.5 | 156.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 58-64 | -3.5 | L −9.5 | 150.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 97-89 | -13.5 | L −5.5 | 162.5 | O 186 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 77-70 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 159.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 89-82 | -3.5 | W +3.5 | 157.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 76-79 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 169.5 | U 155 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 96-104 | -8.5 | L −16.5 | 168.5 | O 200 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 85-78 | +4.5 | W +11.5 | 159.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 74-77 | -5.5 | L −8.5 | 152.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 94-67 | -5.5 | W +21.5 | 167.5 | U 161 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 78-81 | -8.5 | L −11.5 | 165.5 | U 159 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 83-84 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 167.5 | U 167 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 84-77 | -11.5 | L −4.5 | 164.5 | U 161 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 91-88 | -8.5 | L −5.5 | 163.5 | O 179 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 94-85 | -11.5 | L −2.5 | 163.5 | O 179 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 72-62 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 163.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 61-92 | +2.5 | L −28.5 | 152.5 | O 153 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
NORF
W 81-78
+0.5
11
@
RICH
L 86-90
+5.5
15
@
SJU
L 60-93
−4.5
19
@
BGSU
W 82-74
+16.5
24
vs
UTEP
W 74-63
+8.5
25
vs
ACU
W 92-58
+35.5
30
vs
ODU
W 88-75
+4.5
2
@
DUQ
W 83-79
+9.5
6
@
GW
L 86-99
+0.5
18
vs
RAD
W 96-83
+4.5
29
vs
TOW
W 84-70
+12.5
31
vs
STBK
W 76-57
+7.5
5
@
COFC
L 79-88
−6.5
8
@
MONM
L 70-81
−13.5
10
@
DREX
L 58-64
−9.5
15
vs
NCAT
W 97-89
−5.5
22
vs
UNCW
W 77-70
+4.5
24
vs
HOF
W 89-82
+3.5
29
@
ELON
L 76-79
−4.5
31
vs
CAM
L 96-104
−16.5
5
@
UNCW
W 85-78
+11.5
7
@
HAMP
L 74-77
−8.5
12
@
NE
W 94-67
+21.5
14
vs
ELON
L 78-81
−11.5
19
@
CAM
L 83-84
−2.5
26
vs
NE
W 84-77
−4.5
28
@
NCAT
W 91-88
−5.5
3
vs
HAMP
W 94-85
−2.5
7
vs
ELON
W 72-62
+4.5
8
vs
HOF
L 61-92
−28.5
covered 16didn’t cover 14avg +0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
NORF
W 81-78
+0.5
11
@
RICH
L 86-90
+11.5
15
@
SJU
L 60-93
−26.5
19
@
BGSU
W 82-74
−11.5
24
vs
UTEP
W 74-63
−22.5
25
vs
ACU
W 92-58
+2.5
30
vs
ODU
W 88-75
−0.5
2
@
DUQ
W 83-79
−8.5
6
@
GW
L 86-99
+10.5
18
vs
RAD
W 96-83
+8.5
29
vs
TOW
W 84-70
−3.5
31
vs
STBK
W 76-57
−26.5
5
@
COFC
L 79-88
+1.5
8
@
MONM
L 70-81
−5.5
10
@
DREX
L 58-64
−28.5
15
vs
NCAT
W 97-89
+23.5
22
vs
UNCW
W 77-70
−12.5
24
vs
HOF
W 89-82
+13.5
29
@
ELON
L 76-79
−14.5
31
vs
CAM
L 96-104
+31.5
5
@
UNCW
W 85-78
+3.5
7
@
HAMP
L 74-77
−1.5
12
@
NE
W 94-67
−6.5
14
vs
ELON
L 78-81
−6.5
19
@
CAM
L 83-84
−0.5
26
vs
NE
W 84-77
−3.5
28
@
NCAT
W 91-88
+15.5
3
vs
HAMP
W 94-85
+15.5
7
vs
ELON
W 72-62
−29.5
8
vs
HOF
L 61-92
+0.5
over 13under 17avg −2.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Delaware
30 games played
Straight up
10-20
33% wins
Against the spread
15-15
50% covers · avg +0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-14
53% overs · avg +2.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 70-78 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 149.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 68-85 | +35.5 | W +18.5 | 164.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 81-70 | -4.5 | W +6.5 | 137.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 59-79 | +8.5 | L −11.5 | 153.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 73-60 | +1.5 | W +14.5 | 142.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 1 | vs | L 66-89 | +1.5 | L −21.5 | 149.5 | O 155 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 72-75 | -7.5 | L −10.5 | 129.5 | O 147 |
| Dec 10 | @ | W 70-58 | +21.5 | W +33.5 | 152.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 66-88 | -1.5 | L −23.5 | 144.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 65-57 | -8.5 | L −0.5 | 129.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 29 | vs | L 43-61 | +1.5 | L −16.5 | 131.5 | U 104 |
| Jan 2 | vs | L 64-67 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 126.5 | O 131 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 67-52 | +8.5 | W +23.5 | 148.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 60-72 | +11.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 68-70 | +6.5 | W +4.5 | 123.5 | O 138 |
| Jan 15 | vs | L 69-70 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 125.5 | O 139 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 68-97 | +4.5 | L −24.5 | 134.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 51-67 | +15.5 | L −0.5 | 134.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 73-64 | +13.5 | W +22.5 | 137.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 55-70 | +6.5 | L −8.5 | 128.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 69-75 | +10.5 | W +4.5 | 132.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 89-88 | +5.5 | W +6.5 | 133.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 68-66 | +8.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 76-67 | +9.5 | W +18.5 | 135.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 87-88 | +4.5 | W +3.5 | 139.5 | O 175 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 66-78 | +10.5 | L −1.5 | 137.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 70-80 | +7.5 | L −2.5 | 133.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 82-90 | +11.5 | W +3.5 | 143.5 | O 172 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 83-80 | +7.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | O 163 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 38-81 | +2.5 | L −40.5 | 132.5 | U 119 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
BUCK
L 70-78
−5.5
11
@
BYU
L 68-85
+18.5
18
vs
SPU
W 81-70
+6.5
23
vs
SIU
L 59-79
−11.5
25
vs
UNCG
W 73-60
+14.5
1
vs
IONA
L 66-89
−21.5
6
@
DSU
L 72-75
−10.5
10
@
GW
W 70-58
+33.5
13
vs
CSUN
L 66-88
−23.5
16
vs
RID
W 65-57
−0.5
29
vs
MOST
L 43-61
−16.5
2
vs
JXST
L 64-67
+1.5
4
vs
KENN
W 67-52
+23.5
8
@
SHSU
L 60-72
−0.5
10
@
LT
L 68-70
+4.5
15
vs
UTEP
L 69-70
−2.5
17
vs
NMSU
L 68-97
−24.5
24
@
LIB
L 51-67
−0.5
28
@
NMSU
W 73-64
+22.5
31
@
UTEP
L 55-70
−8.5
4
vs
LIB
L 69-75
+4.5
7
vs
MTSU
W 89-88
+6.5
12
@
FIU
W 68-66
+10.5
14
@
MOST
W 76-67
+18.5
18
vs
WKU
L 87-88
+3.5
21
@
MTSU
L 66-78
−1.5
26
@
JXST
L 70-80
−2.5
28
@
KENN
L 82-90
+3.5
5
vs
SHSU
W 83-80
+10.5
7
vs
LT
L 38-81
−40.5
covered 15didn’t cover 15avg +0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
BUCK
L 70-78
−1.5
11
@
BYU
L 68-85
−11.5
18
vs
SPU
W 81-70
+13.5
23
vs
SIU
L 59-79
−15.5
25
vs
UNCG
W 73-60
−9.5
1
vs
IONA
L 66-89
+5.5
6
@
DSU
L 72-75
+17.5
10
@
GW
W 70-58
−24.5
13
vs
CSUN
L 66-88
+9.5
16
vs
RID
W 65-57
−7.5
29
vs
MOST
L 43-61
−27.5
2
vs
JXST
L 64-67
+4.5
4
vs
KENN
W 67-52
−29.5
8
@
SHSU
L 60-72
−12.5
10
@
LT
L 68-70
+14.5
15
vs
UTEP
L 69-70
+13.5
17
vs
NMSU
L 68-97
+30.5
24
@
LIB
L 51-67
−16.5
28
@
NMSU
W 73-64
−0.5
31
@
UTEP
L 55-70
−3.5
4
vs
LIB
L 69-75
+11.5
7
vs
MTSU
W 89-88
+43.5
12
@
FIU
W 68-66
−13.5
14
@
MOST
W 76-67
+7.5
18
vs
WKU
L 87-88
+35.5
21
@
MTSU
L 66-78
+6.5
26
@
JXST
L 70-80
+16.5
28
@
KENN
L 82-90
+28.5
5
vs
SHSU
W 83-80
+15.5
7
vs
LT
L 38-81
−13.5
over 16under 14avg +2.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
William & Mary has the better starters
Position by position: William & Mary 2, Delaware 1, even 2
William & MaryBetterDelaware
G J. Baldwin TR7.7 pts · 4.2 reb · 3.2 ast
Score 63
←W&MBig
G D. Dinkins TR11.9 pts · 1.6 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 21
G J. McIntosh TR6.8 pts · 3.2 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 48
←W&MBig
G A. Kazanecki5 pts · 2 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 5
G T. Blassingame TR3.7 pts · 2.6 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 18
=No call
G J. Brown12 pts · 3 reb · 1 ast
Not ranked
G N. Daniels TR2 pts · 1.1 reb · 0.4 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G M. Ellison3.8 pts · 1.5 reb · 0.8 ast
Not ranked
F S. Sivka TR2 pts · 1.4 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 15
→DELSmall
F K. Nzeh TR11.6 pts · 4.7 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 44
William & MaryBetterDelaware
W&M offense160th of 366 · -4.8
=Even
DEL defense187th of 366 · -4.3
W&M defense289th of 366 · -7.2
=Even
DEL offense237th of 366 · -7.3
Backcourt-2.6 · 4 players
←W&MBig
Backcourt-9.1 · 4 players
Frontcourt-1.0 · 1 player
=Even
Frontcourt-0.6 · 1 player
Bench-0.4 · 3 players
←W&MSmall
Bench-2.8 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestW&M betterDEL betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Baldwin20 min · TRJ. McIntosh17 min · TRT. Blassingame17 min · TRN. Daniels10 min · TRZ. Clark9 min · TRJ. Forsythe4 min · TR
Forwards
S. Sivka11 min · TRB. CarterNewJ. RolandNew
Guards
D. Dinkins34 min · TRA. Kazanecki29 minJ. Brown23 minM. Ellison20 minC. Bailey18 min · TRD. Harris-Smith17 min · TR
Forwards
K. Nzeh29 min · TRE. Alvin20 min · TRJ. Taylor16 minF. EgbunaNew
Centers
S. Solano4 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 81.5 #38 | Points per game | 67.9 #316 |
| 1.11 #116 | Points per possession | 1.04 #269 |
| 73.6 #14 | Pace (possessions) | 65.3 #337 |
| Shooting | ||
| 54.3 #58 | Effective FG% | 53.3 #89 |
| 33.0 #233 | 3-point % | 36.8 #31 |
| 42.8 #120 | 3-point attempt rate | 46.2 #44 |
| 44.0 #9 | Free throw rate | 30.6 #291 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.6 #171 | Turnover rate | 18.3 #287 |
| 26.0 #324 | Offensive rebound rate | 20.8 #362 |
| 17.4 #17 | Assists per game | 12.2 #271 |
| Defense | ||
| 78.9 #294 | Points allowed | 74.1 #156 |
| 1.07 #126 | Points allowed per possession | 1.13 #298 |
| 51.9 #205 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.5 #185 |
| 33.0 #126 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.1 #255 |
| 18.9 #52 | Turnovers forced | 14.0 #334 |
| 68.5 #229 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.9 #206 |
| 7.9 #47 | Steals per game | 5.7 #273 |
| 3.8 #95 | Blocks per game | 3.0 #219 |
William & Mary
18-12 in 2025-26 overall · 11-9 in conference · Coastal Athletic Association
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Hofstra61–92
- Wvs Elon72–62
- Wvs Hampton94–85
- W@ NC A&T91–88
- Wvs Northeastern84–77
A week or more of rest.
Delaware
10-20 in 2025-26 overall · 6-14 in conference · Conference USA
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Louisiana Tech38–81
- Wvs Sam Houston83–80
- L@ Kennesaw St82–90
- L@ Jax State70–80
- L@ MTSU66–78
A week or more of rest.