Cassell Coliseum · at Virginia Tech
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | VT | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects VT 89–56 · win probability VT 100%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 144.6
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: VT has more of the edges
UMES 0, VT 8 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
UMES offense vs VT defense
Offense 364th of 366 against a defense 72nd, on the model’s ratings
VT offense vs UMES defense
Offense 68th of 366 against a defense 350th, on the model’s ratings
Free throws
Free throw rate: UMES 29.4, VT 34.0. Allowed: UMES 43.0, VT 28.8
Three-pointers
UMES hits 29.0% and allows 33.5%; VT hits 35.5% and allows 30.6%. Threes are 33.5% and 39.7% of their shots
Context
Schedule so far
UMES has played the 240th-hardest schedule, VT the 74th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UMES 23.7%, VT 14.9%. Forced: UMES 18.0%, VT 17.3%
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: UMES plays 65.8 a game (321st fastest), VT 69.8 (127th). Faster games mean more points
Shooting
Effective FG%: UMES 47.8 and allows 50.8; VT 52.2 and allows 50.9
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UMES 9%, VT 47%. Transfers in: UMES 1, VT 8. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Home court
VT at home. This season: VT 0-0 at home, UMES 0-0 away
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UMES 32.4%, VT 31.9%. Defensive: UMES 66.4%, VT 67.4%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | VT -32.5 | — |
| Total | — | 144.6 | — |
| Projected score | — | UMES 56.1 · VT 88.6 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | VT -19.2 | — |
| 1H total | 67.7 | — |
| 1H projected score | UMES 24.2 · VT 43.4 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-9 10% | 2-8 20% | 4-6 40% | |
| 3-7 30% | 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
UMES 0–1 VTVT leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · UMES 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2025-26 | UMES 53 @ VT 82 | VT -27.5 | VT W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
MD Eastern
30 games played
Straight up
7-23
23% wins
Against the spread
15-15
50% covers · avg +0.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-17
43% overs · avg +0.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 52-56 | +28.5 | W +24.5 | 139.5 | U 108 |
| Nov 5 | @ | L 29-94 | +33.5 | L −31.5 | 142.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 50-69 | +35.5 | W +16.5 | 146.5 | U 119 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 45-84 | +33.5 | L −5.5 | 135.5 | U 129 |
| Nov 18 | @ | W 83-82 | +17.5 | W +18.5 | 138.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 57-60 | +3.5 | W +0.5 | 128.5 | U 117 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 63-52 | +5.5 | W +16.5 | 125.5 | U 115 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 68-74 | +6.5 | W +0.5 | 124.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 56-68 | +12.5 | W +0.5 | 127.5 | U 124 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 60-78 | +10.5 | L −7.5 | 130.5 | O 138 |
| Dec 9 | @ | L 60-84 | +36.5 | W +12.5 | 134.5 | O 144 |
| Dec 12 | @ | L 79-82 | +7.5 | W +4.5 | 130.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 14 | @ | L 53-82 | +27.5 | L −1.5 | 139.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 64-78 | +4.5 | L −9.5 | 131.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 71-94 | +33.5 | W +10.5 | 138.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 66-49 | -6.5 | W +10.5 | 138.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 69-57 | +2.5 | W +14.5 | 130.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 12 | @ | W 74-70 | +5.5 | W +9.5 | 132.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 70-67 | -10.5 | L −7.5 | 133.5 | O 137 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 57-65 | -2.5 | L −10.5 | 128.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 2 | @ | L 63-65 | +2.5 | W +0.5 | 134.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 54-63 | -3.5 | L −12.5 | 133.5 | U 117 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 71-79 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 140.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 53-79 | +10.5 | L −15.5 | 132.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 16 | vs | L 66-70 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 136.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 65-71 | -3.5 | L −9.5 | 128.5 | O 136 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 69-57 | -5.5 | W +6.5 | 132.5 | U 126 |
| Mar 2 | vs | L 73-77 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 133.5 | O 150 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 56-57 | -5.5 | L −6.5 | 124.5 | U 113 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 76-83 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 131.5 | O 159 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
GT
L 52-56
+24.5
5
@
UGA
L 29-94
−31.5
11
@
NEB
L 50-69
+16.5
14
@
CREI
L 45-84
−5.5
18
@
LONG
W 83-82
+18.5
21
@
CAN
L 57-60
+0.5
22
vs
BING
W 63-52
+16.5
25
vs
HAMP
L 68-74
+0.5
2
@
ECU
L 56-68
+0.5
6
@
AMER
L 60-78
−7.5
9
@
UVA
L 60-84
+12.5
12
@
NCAT
L 79-82
+4.5
14
@
VT
L 53-82
−1.5
17
@
WAG
L 64-78
−9.5
22
@
TEX
L 71-94
+10.5
3
vs
MORG
W 66-49
+10.5
10
vs
HOW
W 69-57
+14.5
12
@
NORF
W 74-70
+9.5
17
vs
COPP
W 70-67
−7.5
31
@
DSU
L 57-65
−10.5
2
@
NCCU
L 63-65
+0.5
4
@
SCST
L 54-63
−12.5
7
@
MORG
L 71-79
−9.5
14
@
HOW
L 53-79
−15.5
16
vs
NORF
L 66-70
−2.5
21
@
COPP
L 65-71
−9.5
28
vs
SCST
W 69-57
+6.5
2
vs
NCCU
L 73-77
−6.5
5
vs
DSU
L 56-57
−6.5
12
vs
NCCU
L 76-83
−8.5
covered 15didn’t cover 15avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
GT
L 52-56
−31.5
5
@
UGA
L 29-94
−19.5
11
@
NEB
L 50-69
−27.5
14
@
CREI
L 45-84
−6.5
18
@
LONG
W 83-82
+26.5
21
@
CAN
L 57-60
−11.5
22
vs
BING
W 63-52
−10.5
25
vs
HAMP
L 68-74
+17.5
2
@
ECU
L 56-68
−3.5
6
@
AMER
L 60-78
+7.5
9
@
UVA
L 60-84
+9.5
12
@
NCAT
L 79-82
+30.5
14
@
VT
L 53-82
−4.5
17
@
WAG
L 64-78
+10.5
22
@
TEX
L 71-94
+26.5
3
vs
MORG
W 66-49
−23.5
10
vs
HOW
W 69-57
−4.5
12
@
NORF
W 74-70
+11.5
17
vs
COPP
W 70-67
+3.5
31
@
DSU
L 57-65
−6.5
2
@
NCCU
L 63-65
−6.5
4
@
SCST
L 54-63
−16.5
7
@
MORG
L 71-79
+9.5
14
@
HOW
L 53-79
−0.5
16
vs
NORF
L 66-70
−0.5
21
@
COPP
L 65-71
+7.5
28
vs
SCST
W 69-57
−6.5
2
vs
NCCU
L 73-77
+16.5
5
vs
DSU
L 56-57
−11.5
12
vs
NCCU
L 76-83
+27.5
over 13under 17avg +0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Virginia Tech
32 games played
Straight up
19-13
59% wins
Against the spread
19-13
59% covers · avg +1.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-15
53% overs · avg +3.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 98-67 | -18.5 | W +12.5 | 146.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 107-101 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 157.5 | O 208 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 94-59 | -12.5 | W +22.5 | 158.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 84-76 | -18.5 | L −10.5 | 145.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 78-61 | -24.5 | L −7.5 | 151.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 66-64 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 153.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 66-77 | +5.5 | L −5.5 | 144.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 68-86 | +2.5 | L −15.5 | 153.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 86-83 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 149.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 73-62 | -4.5 | W +6.5 | 144.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 11 | vs | W 96-74 | -20.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 82-53 | -27.5 | W +1.5 | 139.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 82-81 | -12.5 | L −11.5 | 158.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 95-85 | +5.5 | W +15.5 | 153.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 78-81 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 153.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 68-69 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 148.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 78-75 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 148.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 76-77 | +8.5 | W +7.5 | 155.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 89-76 | -6.5 | W +6.5 | 143.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 21 | @ | W 76-74 | +3.5 | W +5.5 | 152.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 71-85 | +14.5 | W +0.5 | 160.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 71-65 | -9.5 | L −3.5 | 155.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 58-72 | +13.5 | L −0.5 | 148.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 73-82 | +10.5 | W +1.5 | 154.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 76-66 | +8.5 | W +18.5 | 138.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 69-92 | -4.5 | L −27.5 | 156.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 66-67 | +8.5 | W +7.5 | 148.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 82-63 | -3.5 | W +15.5 | 150.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 82-89 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 149.5 | O 171 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 72-63 | -11.5 | L −2.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 72-76 | +11.5 | W +7.5 | 145.5 | O 148 |
| Mar 10 | vs | L 89-95 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 150.5 | O 184 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
CHSO
W 98-67
+12.5
8
vs
PROV
W 107-101
+8.5
12
vs
JOES
W 94-59
+22.5
16
vs
CLT
W 84-76
−10.5
19
vs
BRY
W 78-61
−7.5
26
vs
CSU
W 66-64
−2.5
27
vs
SMC
L 66-77
−5.5
28
vs
VCU
L 68-86
−15.5
2
@
SC
W 86-83
+5.5
6
vs
GMU
W 73-62
+6.5
11
vs
WCU
W 96-74
+1.5
14
vs
UMES
W 82-53
+1.5
20
vs
ELON
W 82-81
−11.5
31
vs
UVA
W 95-85
+15.5
3
@
WAKE
L 78-81
+2.5
7
vs
STAN
L 68-69
−4.5
10
vs
CAL
W 78-75
−2.5
14
@
SMU
L 76-77
+7.5
17
vs
ND
W 89-76
+6.5
21
@
SYR
W 76-74
+5.5
24
@
LOU
L 71-85
+0.5
27
vs
GT
W 71-65
−3.5
31
vs
DUKE
L 58-72
−0.5
7
@
NCSU
L 73-82
+1.5
11
@
CLEM
W 76-66
+18.5
14
vs
FSU
L 69-92
−27.5
17
@
MIA
L 66-67
+7.5
21
vs
WAKE
W 82-63
+15.5
28
@
UNC
L 82-89
+0.5
3
vs
BC
W 72-63
−2.5
7
@
UVA
L 72-76
+7.5
10
vs
WAKE
L 89-95
−4.5
covered 19didn’t cover 13avg +1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
CHSO
W 98-67
+18.5
8
vs
PROV
W 107-101
+50.5
12
vs
JOES
W 94-59
−5.5
16
vs
CLT
W 84-76
+14.5
19
vs
BRY
W 78-61
−12.5
26
vs
CSU
W 66-64
−23.5
27
vs
SMC
L 66-77
−1.5
28
vs
VCU
L 68-86
+0.5
2
@
SC
W 86-83
+19.5
6
vs
GMU
W 73-62
−9.5
11
vs
WCU
W 96-74
+17.5
14
vs
UMES
W 82-53
−4.5
20
vs
ELON
W 82-81
+4.5
31
vs
UVA
W 95-85
+26.5
3
@
WAKE
L 78-81
+5.5
7
vs
STAN
L 68-69
−11.5
10
vs
CAL
W 78-75
+4.5
14
@
SMU
L 76-77
−2.5
17
vs
ND
W 89-76
+21.5
21
@
SYR
W 76-74
−2.5
24
@
LOU
L 71-85
−4.5
27
vs
GT
W 71-65
−19.5
31
vs
DUKE
L 58-72
−18.5
7
@
NCSU
L 73-82
+0.5
11
@
CLEM
W 76-66
+3.5
14
vs
FSU
L 69-92
+4.5
17
@
MIA
L 66-67
−15.5
21
vs
WAKE
W 82-63
−5.5
28
@
UNC
L 82-89
+21.5
3
vs
BC
W 72-63
−7.5
7
@
UVA
L 72-76
+2.5
10
vs
WAKE
L 89-95
+33.5
over 17under 15avg +3.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Virginia Tech has the better starters
Position by position: MD Eastern 0, Virginia Tech 1, even 4
MD EasternBetterVirginia Tech
G I. Hall NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
G E. Copeland TR14.5 pts · 3.7 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 67
F L. Beckwith1.8 pts · 2.9 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 1
→VTBig
G B. Hammond13.2 pts · 2.3 reb · 3.2 ast
Score 89
F L. Gibson-Savadel TR2.3 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.1 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G I. Elohim TR12.2 pts · 4.1 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 71
F E. Berhanu NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
G T. Johnson8 pts · 4.5 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 77
F G. Tokody NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
F A. Hansberry14.3 pts · 7.4 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 92
MD EasternBetterVirginia Tech
UMES offense364th of 366 · -15.3
→VTBig
VT defense72nd of 366 · +0.8
UMES defense350th of 366 · -9.7
→VTBig
VT offense68th of 366 · +1.8
BackcourtNo numbers yet
=No call
Backcourt+4.7 · 4 players
Frontcourt-3.5 · 4 players
→VTBig
Frontcourt+3.8 · 1 player
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench+1.5 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestUMES betterVT betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
I. HallNewE. JohnsonNewI. GriffinNewS. MooreNewB. GardnerNewV. EzehNew
Forwards
L. Beckwith17 minL. Gibson-Savadel7 min · TRE. BerhanuNewG. TokodyNewA. ColeNewD. Hall-JohnsonNew
Centers
E. OgohNew
Guards
E. Copeland32 min · TRB. Hammond32 minI. Elohim29 min · TRT. Johnson26 minJ. Curry24 min · TRB. Johnson21 min · TR
Forwards
A. Hansberry31 minM. Heide19 min · TRK. Atak14 min · TRS. Jones7 min
Centers
M. Sagnia12 min · TRS. DavisNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62.4 #360 | Points per game | 78.8 #85 |
| 0.94 #358 | Points per possession | 1.13 #89 |
| 65.8 #321 | Pace (possessions) | 69.8 #127 |
| Shooting | ||
| 47.8 #319 | Effective FG% | 52.2 #134 |
| 29.0 #354 | 3-point % | 35.5 #88 |
| 33.5 #309 | 3-point attempt rate | 39.7 #179 |
| 29.4 #321 | Free throw rate | 34.0 #209 |
| Possessions | ||
| 23.7 #365 | Turnover rate | 14.9 #60 |
| 32.4 #112 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.9 #129 |
| 13.0 #213 | Assists per game | 14.4 #122 |
| Defense | ||
| 71.5 #91 | Points allowed | 74.9 #184 |
| 1.09 #207 | Points allowed per possession | 1.07 #141 |
| 50.8 #142 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.9 #147 |
| 33.5 #156 | Opponent 3-point % | 30.6 #26 |
| 18.0 #95 | Turnovers forced | 17.3 #131 |
| 66.4 #311 | Defensive rebound rate | 67.4 #284 |
| 5.7 #274 | Steals per game | 6.4 #187 |
| 2.5 #302 | Blocks per game | 3.2 #190 |
MD Eastern
7-23 in 2025-26 overall · 5-10 in conference · Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs NC Central76–83
- Lvs Delaware St56–57
- Lvs NC Central73–77
- Wvs SC State69–57
- L@ Coppin St65–71
A week or more of rest.
Virginia Tech
19-13 in 2025-26 overall · 8-11 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Wake Forest89–95
- L@ Virginia72–76
- Wvs Boston College72–63
- L@ North Carolina82–89
- Wvs Wake Forest82–63
A week or more of rest.