UPMC Cooper Fieldhouse · at Duquesne
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | DUQ | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects DUQ 80–68 · win probability DUQ 85%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 147.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: DUQ has more of the edges
DEL 2, DUQ 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: DEL 18.3%, DUQ 17.6%. Forced: DEL 14.0%, DUQ 18.4%
Three-pointers
DEL hits 36.8% and allows 35.1%; DUQ hits 33.1% and allows 36.2%. Threes are 46.2% and 44.4% of their shots
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: DEL 20.8%, DUQ 30.4%. Defensive: DEL 68.9%, DUQ 70.4%
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: DEL plays 65.3 a game (337th fastest), DUQ 70.4 (99th). Faster games mean more points
DEL offense vs DUQ defense
Offense 237th of 366 against a defense 118th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
DEL has played the 195th-hardest schedule, DUQ the 108th. A record against a soft schedule means less
DUQ offense vs DEL defense
Offense 107th of 366 against a defense 187th, on the model’s ratings
Home court
DUQ at home. This season: DUQ 0-0 at home, DEL 0-0 away
Shooting
Effective FG%: DEL 53.3 and allows 51.5; DUQ 52.3 and allows 52.5
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: DEL 30.6, DUQ 38.3. Allowed: DEL 30.2, DUQ 39.9
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: DEL 46%, DUQ 49%. Transfers in: DEL 6, DUQ 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | DUQ -11.7 | — |
| Total | — | 147.2 | — |
| Projected score | — | DEL 67.8 · DUQ 79.5 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | DUQ -6.8 | — |
| 1H total | 68.8 | — |
| 1H projected score | DEL 31 · DUQ 37.8 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 7-3 70% | 8-2 80% | |
| 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% | 3-7 30% |
Next 3 games
With how the last meeting with each opponent went
No more games listed yet.
No more games listed yet.
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
DEL 0–1 DUQDUQ leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · DEL 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2024-25 | DEL 66 @ DUQ 80 | DUQ -3.5 | DUQ W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Delaware
30 games played
Straight up
10-20
33% wins
Against the spread
15-15
50% covers · avg +0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-14
53% overs · avg +2.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 70-78 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 149.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 68-85 | +35.5 | W +18.5 | 164.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 81-70 | -4.5 | W +6.5 | 137.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 59-79 | +8.5 | L −11.5 | 153.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 73-60 | +1.5 | W +14.5 | 142.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 1 | vs | L 66-89 | +1.5 | L −21.5 | 149.5 | O 155 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 72-75 | -7.5 | L −10.5 | 129.5 | O 147 |
| Dec 10 | @ | W 70-58 | +21.5 | W +33.5 | 152.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 66-88 | -1.5 | L −23.5 | 144.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 65-57 | -8.5 | L −0.5 | 129.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 29 | vs | L 43-61 | +1.5 | L −16.5 | 131.5 | U 104 |
| Jan 2 | vs | L 64-67 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 126.5 | O 131 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 67-52 | +8.5 | W +23.5 | 148.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 60-72 | +11.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 68-70 | +6.5 | W +4.5 | 123.5 | O 138 |
| Jan 15 | vs | L 69-70 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 125.5 | O 139 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 68-97 | +4.5 | L −24.5 | 134.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 51-67 | +15.5 | L −0.5 | 134.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 73-64 | +13.5 | W +22.5 | 137.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 55-70 | +6.5 | L −8.5 | 128.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 69-75 | +10.5 | W +4.5 | 132.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 89-88 | +5.5 | W +6.5 | 133.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 68-66 | +8.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 76-67 | +9.5 | W +18.5 | 135.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 87-88 | +4.5 | W +3.5 | 139.5 | O 175 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 66-78 | +10.5 | L −1.5 | 137.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 70-80 | +7.5 | L −2.5 | 133.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 82-90 | +11.5 | W +3.5 | 143.5 | O 172 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 83-80 | +7.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | O 163 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 38-81 | +2.5 | L −40.5 | 132.5 | U 119 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
BUCK
L 70-78
−5.5
11
@
BYU
L 68-85
+18.5
18
vs
SPU
W 81-70
+6.5
23
vs
SIU
L 59-79
−11.5
25
vs
UNCG
W 73-60
+14.5
1
vs
IONA
L 66-89
−21.5
6
@
DSU
L 72-75
−10.5
10
@
GW
W 70-58
+33.5
13
vs
CSUN
L 66-88
−23.5
16
vs
RID
W 65-57
−0.5
29
vs
MOST
L 43-61
−16.5
2
vs
JXST
L 64-67
+1.5
4
vs
KENN
W 67-52
+23.5
8
@
SHSU
L 60-72
−0.5
10
@
LT
L 68-70
+4.5
15
vs
UTEP
L 69-70
−2.5
17
vs
NMSU
L 68-97
−24.5
24
@
LIB
L 51-67
−0.5
28
@
NMSU
W 73-64
+22.5
31
@
UTEP
L 55-70
−8.5
4
vs
LIB
L 69-75
+4.5
7
vs
MTSU
W 89-88
+6.5
12
@
FIU
W 68-66
+10.5
14
@
MOST
W 76-67
+18.5
18
vs
WKU
L 87-88
+3.5
21
@
MTSU
L 66-78
−1.5
26
@
JXST
L 70-80
−2.5
28
@
KENN
L 82-90
+3.5
5
vs
SHSU
W 83-80
+10.5
7
vs
LT
L 38-81
−40.5
covered 15didn’t cover 15avg +0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
BUCK
L 70-78
−1.5
11
@
BYU
L 68-85
−11.5
18
vs
SPU
W 81-70
+13.5
23
vs
SIU
L 59-79
−15.5
25
vs
UNCG
W 73-60
−9.5
1
vs
IONA
L 66-89
+5.5
6
@
DSU
L 72-75
+17.5
10
@
GW
W 70-58
−24.5
13
vs
CSUN
L 66-88
+9.5
16
vs
RID
W 65-57
−7.5
29
vs
MOST
L 43-61
−27.5
2
vs
JXST
L 64-67
+4.5
4
vs
KENN
W 67-52
−29.5
8
@
SHSU
L 60-72
−12.5
10
@
LT
L 68-70
+14.5
15
vs
UTEP
L 69-70
+13.5
17
vs
NMSU
L 68-97
+30.5
24
@
LIB
L 51-67
−16.5
28
@
NMSU
W 73-64
−0.5
31
@
UTEP
L 55-70
−3.5
4
vs
LIB
L 69-75
+11.5
7
vs
MTSU
W 89-88
+43.5
12
@
FIU
W 68-66
−13.5
14
@
MOST
W 76-67
+7.5
18
vs
WKU
L 87-88
+35.5
21
@
MTSU
L 66-78
+6.5
26
@
JXST
L 70-80
+16.5
28
@
KENN
L 82-90
+28.5
5
vs
SHSU
W 83-80
+15.5
7
vs
LT
L 38-81
−13.5
over 16under 14avg +2.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Duquesne
31 games played
Straight up
16-15
52% wins
Against the spread
14-17
45% covers · avg −0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-15
52% overs · avg +1.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 83-63 | -17.5 | W +2.5 | 139.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 92-80 | -12.5 | L −0.5 | 157.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 87-81 | -12.5 | L −6.5 | 162.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 77-87 | +10.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 92-78 | -14.5 | L −0.5 | 150.5 | O 170 |
| Nov 22 | vs | L 86-93 | -7.5 | L −14.5 | 147.5 | O 179 |
| Dec 2 | vs | L 79-83 | -5.5 | L −9.5 | 170.5 | U 162 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 84-75 | -9.5 | L −0.5 | 150.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 64-86 | +14.5 | L −7.5 | 150.5 | U 150 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 75-78 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 151.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 103-59 | -19.5 | W +24.5 | 143.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 30 | @ | W 89-83 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 150.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 80-93 | +5.5 | L −7.5 | 165.5 | O 173 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 90-97 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 149.5 | O 187 |
| Jan 13 | vs | L 65-71 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 152.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 74-63 | -1.5 | W +9.5 | 145.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 20 | vs | L 77-81 | +8.5 | W +4.5 | 165.5 | U 158 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 71-59 | -5.5 | W +6.5 | 152.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 79-87 | -3.5 | L −11.5 | 150.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 1 | vs | W 76-61 | -2.5 | W +12.5 | 146.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 71-65 | +8.5 | W +14.5 | 143.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 88-86 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 158.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 78-73 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 152.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 62-61 | -11.5 | L −10.5 | 145.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 66-78 | +6.5 | L −5.5 | 148.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 25 | vs | L 56-67 | -3.5 | L −14.5 | 142.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 76-91 | +13.5 | L −1.5 | 160.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 4 | @ | L 52-64 | +2.5 | L −9.5 | 143.5 | U 116 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 79-77 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 147.5 | O 156 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 67-61 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 138.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 66-71 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | U 137 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
NIA
W 83-63
+2.5
7
vs
SHU
W 92-80
−0.5
11
vs
QUC
W 87-81
−6.5
15
@
VILL
L 77-87
+0.5
19
vs
L-MD
W 92-78
−0.5
22
vs
NE
L 86-93
−14.5
2
vs
W&M
L 79-83
−9.5
6
vs
STBK
W 84-75
−0.5
10
@
BOIS
L 64-86
−7.5
13
@
NEV
L 75-78
+2.5
22
vs
CAN
W 103-59
+24.5
30
@
DAV
W 89-83
+8.5
3
vs
VCU
L 80-93
−7.5
7
@
JOES
L 90-97
−8.5
13
vs
DAY
L 65-71
−3.5
17
@
FOR
W 74-63
+9.5
20
vs
SLU
L 77-81
+4.5
24
@
LUC
W 71-59
+6.5
28
vs
SBU
L 79-87
−11.5
1
vs
URI
W 76-61
+12.5
4
@
GMU
W 71-65
+14.5
7
vs
GW
W 88-86
+3.5
14
@
SBU
W 78-73
+6.5
18
vs
LAS
W 62-61
−10.5
21
@
DAY
L 66-78
−5.5
25
vs
DAV
L 56-67
−14.5
28
@
SLU
L 76-91
−1.5
4
@
URI
L 52-64
−9.5
7
vs
RICH
W 79-77
−2.5
12
vs
URI
W 67-61
+4.5
13
vs
VCU
L 66-71
+1.5
covered 14didn’t cover 17avg −0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
NIA
W 83-63
+6.5
7
vs
SHU
W 92-80
+14.5
11
vs
QUC
W 87-81
+5.5
15
@
VILL
L 77-87
+12.5
19
vs
L-MD
W 92-78
+19.5
22
vs
NE
L 86-93
+31.5
2
vs
W&M
L 79-83
−8.5
6
vs
STBK
W 84-75
+8.5
10
@
BOIS
L 64-86
−0.5
13
@
NEV
L 75-78
+1.5
22
vs
CAN
W 103-59
+18.5
30
@
DAV
W 89-83
+21.5
3
vs
VCU
L 80-93
+7.5
7
@
JOES
L 90-97
+37.5
13
vs
DAY
L 65-71
−16.5
17
@
FOR
W 74-63
−8.5
20
vs
SLU
L 77-81
−7.5
24
@
LUC
W 71-59
−22.5
28
vs
SBU
L 79-87
+15.5
1
vs
URI
W 76-61
−9.5
4
@
GMU
W 71-65
−7.5
7
vs
GW
W 88-86
+15.5
14
@
SBU
W 78-73
−1.5
18
vs
LAS
W 62-61
−22.5
21
@
DAY
L 66-78
−4.5
25
vs
DAV
L 56-67
−19.5
28
@
SLU
L 76-91
+6.5
4
@
URI
L 52-64
−27.5
7
vs
RICH
W 79-77
+8.5
12
vs
URI
W 67-61
−10.5
13
vs
VCU
L 66-71
−16.5
over 16under 15avg +1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Duquesne has the better starters
Position by position: Delaware 0, Duquesne 2, even 3
DelawareBetterDuquesne
G D. Dinkins TR11.9 pts · 1.6 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 21
→DUQBig
G T. Guinyard16.9 pts · 3.2 reb · 4.7 ast
Score 93
G A. Kazanecki5 pts · 2 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 5
→DUQBig
G J. Smith TR15.9 pts · 1.9 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 63
G J. Brown12 pts · 3 reb · 1 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G B. Hall3.4 pts · 1.4 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 6
G M. Ellison3.8 pts · 1.5 reb · 0.8 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G J. DiMichele3.5 pts · 1.1 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 31
F K. Nzeh TR11.6 pts · 4.7 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 44
=Even
F Y. Berman12.3 pts · 3.9 reb · 3.6 ast
Score 49
DelawareBetterDuquesne
DEL offense237th of 366 · -7.3
→DUQSmall
DUQ defense118th of 366 · -1.8
DEL defense187th of 366 · -4.3
→DUQSmall
DUQ offense107th of 366 · -1.6
Backcourt-9.1 · 4 players
→DUQBig
Backcourt+0.1 · 4 players
Frontcourt-0.6 · 1 player
=Even
Frontcourt-0.4 · 1 player
Bench-2.8 · 5 players
→DUQSmall
Bench-0.1 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestDEL betterDUQ betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
D. Dinkins34 min · TRA. Kazanecki29 minJ. Brown23 minM. Ellison20 minC. Bailey18 min · TRD. Harris-Smith17 min · TR
Forwards
K. Nzeh29 min · TRE. Alvin20 min · TRJ. Taylor16 minF. EgbunaNew
Centers
S. Solano4 min · TR
Guards
T. Guinyard34 minJ. Smith27 min · TRB. Hall19 minJ. DiMichele14 minI. Pasha8 min · TRE. Anish2 min
Forwards
Y. Berman29 minK. Konan8 min · TRS. Olowoniyi5 min · TRF. JellumNewZ. OwinjeNewC. GalbutNew
Centers
E. Demir9 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67.9 #316 | Points per game | 76.9 #118 |
| 1.04 #269 | Points per possession | 1.09 #164 |
| 65.3 #337 | Pace (possessions) | 70.4 #99 |
| Shooting | ||
| 53.3 #89 | Effective FG% | 52.3 #131 |
| 36.8 #31 | 3-point % | 33.1 #223 |
| 46.2 #44 | 3-point attempt rate | 44.4 #81 |
| 30.6 #291 | Free throw rate | 38.3 #94 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.3 #287 | Turnover rate | 17.6 #243 |
| 20.8 #362 | Offensive rebound rate | 30.4 #184 |
| 12.2 #271 | Assists per game | 14.7 #107 |
| Defense | ||
| 74.1 #156 | Points allowed | 75.9 #214 |
| 1.13 #298 | Points allowed per possession | 1.08 #171 |
| 51.5 #185 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.5 #241 |
| 35.1 #255 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.2 #314 |
| 14.0 #334 | Turnovers forced | 18.4 #83 |
| 68.9 #206 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.4 #142 |
| 5.7 #273 | Steals per game | 7.6 #71 |
| 3.0 #219 | Blocks per game | 3.0 #214 |
Delaware
10-20 in 2025-26 overall · 6-14 in conference · Conference USA
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Louisiana Tech38–81
- Wvs Sam Houston83–80
- L@ Kennesaw St82–90
- L@ Jax State70–80
- L@ MTSU66–78
A week or more of rest.
Duquesne
16-15 in 2025-26 overall · 10-10 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs VCU66–71
- Wvs Rhode Island67–61
- Wvs Richmond79–77
- L@ Rhode Island52–64
- L@ Saint Louis76–91
A week or more of rest.