UPMC Cooper Fieldhouse · at Duquesne · Conference game
Closing line
DUQ -4.5✓ RICH covered by 2.5
Closing total147.5Over by 8.5
| This season | DUQ | |
|---|---|---|
| 14-15 | Record | 14-14 |
| 15-14 | ATS | 12-16 |
| 12-17 | O/U | 15-13 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: RICH 75–79 DUQ · ✓ DUQ (64%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RICH | 49 | 28 | 77 |
| DUQ | 28 | 51 | 79 |
1st half: RICH 49, DUQ 28 (RICH by 21). The model had DUQ by 2.4 and a total of 71.7 (actual 77).
Team stats
| RICH | DUQ | |
|---|---|---|
| 30-47 64% | Field goals | 28-64 44% |
| 12-20 60% | 3-pointers | 6-30 20% |
| 5-9 56% | Free throws | 17-18 94% |
| 22 3 off | Rebounds | 32 15 off |
| 17 | Assists | 10 |
| 5 | Steals | 10 |
| 5 | Blocks | 2 |
| 16 | Turnovers | 10 |
| 15 | Fouls | 11 |
| 26 | Points in paint | 42 |
| 11 | Fast-break points | 12 |
Players
| RICH | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AJ Lopez G | 33 | 15 | 0 | 3 | 5-9 | 2-4 |
| Collin Tanner G | 32 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 4-7 | 0-2 |
| Will Johnston G | 27 | 14 | 3 | 2 | 6-8 | 2-2 |
| Mikkel Tyne G | 25 | 14 | 2 | 2 | 5-7 | 4-6 |
| Mike Walz C | 23 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 1-3 | 1-2 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Aiden Argabright G | 24 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 4-5 | 2-3 |
| Jaylen Robinson F | 17 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| Jaden Daughtry F | 15 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 3-6 | 1-1 |
| David Thomas G | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Donovan Richardson, Will Harper III, Dylan Homenick, Bryson McGlothin, Kirby Mooney, Jonathan Beagle, Apostolos Roumoglou
| DUQ | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jimmie Williams G | 33 | 12 | 2 | 2 | 5-11 | 0-6 |
| Tarence Guinyard G | 33 | 16 | 5 | 1 | 5-18 | 1-8 |
| David Dixon F | 27 | 17 | 11 | 2 | 6-8 | 0-1 |
| Brandon Hall G | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-2 |
| Jakub Necas F | 19 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2-4 | 0-1 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Alex Williams F | 29 | 22 | 5 | 2 | 6-10 | 5-8 |
| Maximus Edwards G | 21 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 3-8 | 0-3 |
| Cam Crawford G | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-1 |
| John Hugley IV F | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Jake DiMichele G | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Dom Aekins, Frederik Jellum, Lazar Milosevic, Lucas Prolla, Stef van Bussel, Seamus McDermott, Ethan Anish, Arness Lawson
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenDUQ -5.5
1 → RICH
CloseDUQ -4.5
1 pt toward RICH
Total
Open149.5
▼ 2
Close147.5
Down 2 since the open
Moneyline
RICH +170 · DUQ -205
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened DUQ -5.5 · closed DUQ -4.5 · moved 1 toward RICHmodel DUQ -4
model DUQ -4
Opened 149.5 · closed 147.5 · moved 2 downmodel 153.5
model 153.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | DUQ -4.5 | DUQ -4.2 | RICH +0.3 | W RICH covered |
| Total | 147.5 | 153.3 | Over 5.8 | W Over |
| Projected score | — | RICH 74.6 · DUQ 78.7 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | DUQ -2.4 | RICH -21.0 |
| 1H total | 71.7 | 77 |
| 1H projected score | RICH 34.6 · DUQ 37 | RICH 49 · DUQ 28 |
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% | |
| 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% | 3-7 30% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
RICH 4–0 DUQRICH leads · 4 games since 2021-22 · RICH has won the last 4 meetings · RICH 3-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2024-25 | DUQ 68 @ RICH 73 | RICH +2.5 | RICH W |
| Jan 16, 2023-24 | RICH 63 @ DUQ 61 | DUQ -3.5 | RICH W |
| Jan 7, 2022-23 | DUQ 73 @ RICH 75 | RICH -2.5 | DUQ W |
| Feb 1, 2021-22 | RICH 74 @ DUQ 57 | DUQ +7 | RICH W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Richmond
29 games played
Straight up
14-15
48% wins
Against the spread
15-14
52% covers · avg +0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-17
41% overs · avg +0.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | vs | W 87-72 | -5.5 | W +9.5 | 143.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 90-86 | -9.5 | L −5.5 | 164.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 87-54 | -14.5 | W +18.5 | 152.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 102-67 | -19.5 | W +15.5 | 154.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 72-73 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 71-66 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 141.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 3 | @ | W 84-76 | +6.5 | W +14.5 | 156.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 86-77 | -12.5 | L −3.5 | 153.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 93-84 | -3.5 | W +5.5 | 153.5 | O 177 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 70-73 | -3.5 | L −6.5 | 161.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 80-56 | -18.5 | W +5.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 28 | vs | L 72-77 | -11.5 | L −16.5 | 159.5 | U 149 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 85-99 | +2.5 | L −11.5 | 162.5 | O 184 |
| Jan 4 | @ | W 83-75 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 142.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 89-80 | +6.5 | W +15.5 | 153.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 11 | vs | L 65-67 | -7.5 | L −9.5 | 150.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 74-53 | -8.5 | W +12.5 | 147.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 63-88 | +14.5 | L −10.5 | 162.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 21 | vs | L 68-69 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 69-85 | +10.5 | L −5.5 | 159.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 69-77 | +12.5 | W +4.5 | 155.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 54-79 | -1.5 | L −26.5 | 140.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 77-82 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 142.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 10 | vs | W 82-70 | +3.5 | W +15.5 | 139.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 67-78 | +7.5 | L −3.5 | 154.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 63-65 | +5.5 | W +3.5 | 141.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 99-94 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 147.5 | O 193 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 66-69 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 146.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 3 | vs | L 60-65 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 144.5 | U 125 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
vs
ECU
W 87-72
+9.5
11
vs
W&M
W 90-86
−5.5
19
vs
VMI
W 87-54
+18.5
22
vs
GWEB
W 102-67
+15.5
27
vs
FUR
L 72-73
−4.5
28
vs
CLT
W 71-66
−1.5
3
@
BEL
W 84-76
+14.5
6
vs
ODU
W 86-77
−3.5
13
vs
SIU
W 93-84
+5.5
17
@
ELON
L 70-73
−6.5
20
vs
CIT
W 80-56
+5.5
28
vs
CHSO
L 72-77
−16.5
31
vs
GW
L 85-99
−11.5
4
@
FOR
W 83-75
+5.5
7
@
SBU
W 89-80
+15.5
11
vs
JOES
L 65-67
−9.5
14
vs
LAS
W 74-53
+12.5
17
@
SLU
L 63-88
−10.5
21
vs
URI
L 68-69
−4.5
24
@
GW
L 69-85
−5.5
27
@
VCU
L 69-77
+4.5
31
vs
DAV
L 54-79
−26.5
7
@
URI
L 77-82
+0.5
10
vs
GMU
W 82-70
+15.5
14
vs
VCU
L 67-78
−3.5
18
@
DAV
L 63-65
+3.5
21
vs
SBU
W 99-94
+3.5
28
@
LUC
L 66-69
−5.5
3
vs
DAY
L 60-65
+0.5
covered 15didn’t cover 14avg +0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
vs
ECU
W 87-72
+15.5
11
vs
W&M
W 90-86
+11.5
19
vs
VMI
W 87-54
−11.5
22
vs
GWEB
W 102-67
+14.5
27
vs
FUR
L 72-73
−2.5
28
vs
CLT
W 71-66
−4.5
3
@
BEL
W 84-76
+3.5
6
vs
ODU
W 86-77
+9.5
13
vs
SIU
W 93-84
+23.5
17
@
ELON
L 70-73
−18.5
20
vs
CIT
W 80-56
−10.5
28
vs
CHSO
L 72-77
−10.5
31
vs
GW
L 85-99
+21.5
4
@
FOR
W 83-75
+15.5
7
@
SBU
W 89-80
+15.5
11
vs
JOES
L 65-67
−18.5
14
vs
LAS
W 74-53
−20.5
17
@
SLU
L 63-88
−11.5
21
vs
URI
L 68-69
−7.5
24
@
GW
L 69-85
−5.5
27
@
VCU
L 69-77
−9.5
31
vs
DAV
L 54-79
−7.5
7
@
URI
L 77-82
+16.5
10
vs
GMU
W 82-70
+12.5
14
vs
VCU
L 67-78
−9.5
18
@
DAV
L 63-65
−13.5
21
vs
SBU
W 99-94
+45.5
28
@
LUC
L 66-69
−11.5
3
vs
DAY
L 60-65
−19.5
over 12under 17avg +0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Duquesne
28 games played
Straight up
14-14
50% wins
Against the spread
12-16
43% covers · avg −0.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-13
54% overs · avg +2.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 83-63 | -17.5 | W +2.5 | 139.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 92-80 | -12.5 | L −0.5 | 157.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 87-81 | -12.5 | L −6.5 | 162.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 77-87 | +10.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 92-78 | -14.5 | L −0.5 | 150.5 | O 170 |
| Nov 22 | vs | L 86-93 | -7.5 | L −14.5 | 147.5 | O 179 |
| Dec 2 | vs | L 79-83 | -5.5 | L −9.5 | 170.5 | U 162 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 84-75 | -9.5 | L −0.5 | 150.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 64-86 | +14.5 | L −7.5 | 150.5 | U 150 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 75-78 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 151.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 103-59 | -19.5 | W +24.5 | 143.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 30 | @ | W 89-83 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 150.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 80-93 | +5.5 | L −7.5 | 165.5 | O 173 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 90-97 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 149.5 | O 187 |
| Jan 13 | vs | L 65-71 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 152.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 74-63 | -1.5 | W +9.5 | 145.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 20 | vs | L 77-81 | +8.5 | W +4.5 | 165.5 | U 158 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 71-59 | -5.5 | W +6.5 | 152.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 79-87 | -3.5 | L −11.5 | 150.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 1 | vs | W 76-61 | -2.5 | W +12.5 | 146.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 71-65 | +8.5 | W +14.5 | 143.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 88-86 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 158.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 78-73 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 152.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 62-61 | -11.5 | L −10.5 | 145.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 66-78 | +6.5 | L −5.5 | 148.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 25 | vs | L 56-67 | -3.5 | L −14.5 | 142.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 76-91 | +13.5 | L −1.5 | 160.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 4 | @ | L 52-64 | +2.5 | L −9.5 | 143.5 | U 116 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
NIA
W 83-63
+2.5
7
vs
SHU
W 92-80
−0.5
11
vs
QUC
W 87-81
−6.5
15
@
VILL
L 77-87
+0.5
19
vs
L-MD
W 92-78
−0.5
22
vs
NE
L 86-93
−14.5
2
vs
W&M
L 79-83
−9.5
6
vs
STBK
W 84-75
−0.5
10
@
BOIS
L 64-86
−7.5
13
@
NEV
L 75-78
+2.5
22
vs
CAN
W 103-59
+24.5
30
@
DAV
W 89-83
+8.5
3
vs
VCU
L 80-93
−7.5
7
@
JOES
L 90-97
−8.5
13
vs
DAY
L 65-71
−3.5
17
@
FOR
W 74-63
+9.5
20
vs
SLU
L 77-81
+4.5
24
@
LUC
W 71-59
+6.5
28
vs
SBU
L 79-87
−11.5
1
vs
URI
W 76-61
+12.5
4
@
GMU
W 71-65
+14.5
7
vs
GW
W 88-86
+3.5
14
@
SBU
W 78-73
+6.5
18
vs
LAS
W 62-61
−10.5
21
@
DAY
L 66-78
−5.5
25
vs
DAV
L 56-67
−14.5
28
@
SLU
L 76-91
−1.5
4
@
URI
L 52-64
−9.5
covered 12didn’t cover 16avg −0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
NIA
W 83-63
+6.5
7
vs
SHU
W 92-80
+14.5
11
vs
QUC
W 87-81
+5.5
15
@
VILL
L 77-87
+12.5
19
vs
L-MD
W 92-78
+19.5
22
vs
NE
L 86-93
+31.5
2
vs
W&M
L 79-83
−8.5
6
vs
STBK
W 84-75
+8.5
10
@
BOIS
L 64-86
−0.5
13
@
NEV
L 75-78
+1.5
22
vs
CAN
W 103-59
+18.5
30
@
DAV
W 89-83
+21.5
3
vs
VCU
L 80-93
+7.5
7
@
JOES
L 90-97
+37.5
13
vs
DAY
L 65-71
−16.5
17
@
FOR
W 74-63
−8.5
20
vs
SLU
L 77-81
−7.5
24
@
LUC
W 71-59
−22.5
28
vs
SBU
L 79-87
+15.5
1
vs
URI
W 76-61
−9.5
4
@
GMU
W 71-65
−7.5
7
vs
GW
W 88-86
+15.5
14
@
SBU
W 78-73
−1.5
18
vs
LAS
W 62-61
−22.5
21
@
DAY
L 66-78
−4.5
25
vs
DAV
L 56-67
−19.5
28
@
SLU
L 76-91
+6.5
4
@
URI
L 52-64
−27.5
over 15under 13avg +2.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Richmond
14-15 overall · 5-12 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Dayton60–65
- L@ Loyola Chicago66–69
- Wvs St Bonaventure99–94
- L@ Davidson63–65
- Lvs VCU67–78
4 days since their last game.
Duquesne
14-14 overall · 8-9 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Rhode Island52–64
- L@ Saint Louis76–91
- Lvs Davidson56–67
- L@ Dayton66–78
- Wvs La Salle62–61
3 days since their last game.