Day in numbers

Tap a number to filter the games below

Games9292 final · 0 to play
Lines moved511+ pt since the open · 92 with a line
Totals moved741+ pt since the open
Favorites ATS45-4749% covered
Upsets30outright
Over / Under51-4155% over
Model Favorite68-2474% won
GameSpread, open → closeMovedTotalMoved
ARK @ MIZARK -3.5 → MIZ -2.56 → MIZ162.5 → 163.5▲ 1
MORE vs TNSTTNST -3.5 → TNST -5.52 → TNST152.5 → 143.5▼ 9
TTU @ BYUTTU -1.5 → BYU -2.54 → BYU160.5 → 159.5▼ 1
ARIZ @ COLOARIZ -17.5 → ARIZ -13.54 → COLO155.5 → 156.5▲ 1
KSU @ KUKU -16.5 → KU -17.51 → KU150.5 → 157.5▲ 7
UNCA vs HPUHPU -11.5 → HPU -14.53 → HPU149.5 → 147.5▼ 2
ASU @ ISUISU -13.5 → ISU -16.53 → ISU146.5 → 148.5▲ 2
LOU @ MIALOU -1.5 → MIA -1.53 → MIA156.5 → 155.5▼ 1
JXST @ UTEPUTEP -1.5 → JXST -1.53 → JXST139.5 → 139.5no move
FLA @ UKFLA -7.5 → FLA -5.52 → UK156.5 → 162.5▲ 6
Line movedCoveredCover rate
1+ pts5579-5698-549%
2+ pts2172-2236-249%
3+ pts880-90849%
5+ pts139-14948%
Sort by

Sort

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
FinalConference
25-5 · #2 AP #7
82
18-12 · #45
75
Spread
HOU -13.5
✓ OKST W ATS
Total
151.5 ▲1
▲ Over 157
Projected
82–70
✓ HOU won
Model: OKST by 1.8 ✓ Model: Over 0.9 ✓
FinalConference
19-11 · #68
72
26-4 · #20 AP #13
76
Spread
UVA -11.5
✓ VT W ATS
Total
145.5 ▲4
▲ Over 148
Projected
70–80
✓ UVA won
Model: VT by 1.6 ✓ Model: Over 4.4 ✓
FinalConference
22-8 · #18 AP #20
88
20-10 · #54
84
Spread
MIZ -2.5
✓ ARK W ATS
Total
163.5 ▲1
▲ Over 172
Projected
84–81
✓ ARK won
Model: ARK by 6.1 ✓ Model: Over 1.1 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
12-17 · #243
96
15-14 · #191
89
Spread
CAM -2.5
✓ CAM W ATS
Total
148.5 ▲1
▲ Over 185
Projected
76–73
✓ CAM won
Model: CAM by 0.6 ✓ Model: Over 0.9 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
8-21 · #339
76
ETSU
19-10 · #173
83
Spread
ETSU -14.5
✓ CIT W ATS
Total
139.5
▲ Over 159
Projected
64–79
✓ ETSU won
Model: CIT by 0.3 ✓ Model: Over 3.4 ✓
FinalConference · Conference tournament
10-20 · #349
51
14-16 · #331
56
Spread
MERC -4.5
✓ MERC W ATS
Total
134.5 ▲5
▼ Under 107
Projected
63–69
✓ MERC won
Model: MERC by 1.3 ✓ Model: Under 2.1 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
12-16 · #271
71
25-4 · #90
75
Spread
HPU -14.5
✓ UNCA W ATS
Total
147.5 ▼2
▼ Under 146
Projected
71–83
✓ HPU won
Model: UNCA by 2.3 ✓ Model: Over 5.8 ✗
FinalConference
16-12 · #115
68
14-15 · #142
63
Spread
SBU -4.5
✓ DAV W ATS
Total
141.5 ▼1
▼ Under 131
Projected
71–73
✗ SBU lost
Model: DAV by 2.8 ✓ Model: Over 2.0 ✗
FinalConference
15-15 · #72
81
16-14 · #66
71
Spread
DEP -4.5
✓ BTLR W ATS
Total
142.5 ▲1
▲ Over 152
Projected
73–74
✗ DEP lost
Model: BTLR by 3.1 ✓ Model: Over 4.8 ✓
FinalConference
14-16 · #49
78
23-7 · #32
91
Spread
VILL -11.5
✓ VILL W ATS
Total
153.5
▲ Over 169
Projected
72–82
✓ VILL won
Model: XAV by 1.6 ✗ Model: Over 0.9 ✓
FinalConference
13-17 · #71
69
10-20 · #95
77
Spread
ND -1.5
✓ BC W ATS
Total
141.5 ▲1
▲ Over 146
Projected
72–70
✗ ND lost
Model: ND by 0.2 ✗ Model: Over 0.8 ✓
FinalConference
11-19 · #94
76
21-9 · #35
79
Spread
CLEM -15.5
✓ GT W ATS
Total
145.5 ▲1
▲ Over 155
Projected
64–79
✓ CLEM won
Model: CLEM by 0.1 ✗ Model: Under 2.6 ✗
FinalConference
14-13 · #244
81
10-19 · #206
38
Spread
LT -2.5
✓ LT W ATS
Total
132.5 ▼1
▼ Under 119
Projected
68–66
✓ LT won
Model: DEL by 0.5 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✗
FinalConference
27-3 · #6 AP #4
62
11-19 · #42
68
Spread
CONN -9.5
✓ MARQ W ATS
Total
143.5
▼ Under 130
Projected
77–68
✗ CONN lost
Model: CONN by 0.3 ✗ Model: Over 1.4 ✗
FinalConference · Conference tournament
8-20 · #301
76
11-17 · #307
81
Spread
UML -2.5
✓ UML W ATS
Total
146.5 ▼4
▲ Over 157
Projected
73–76
✓ UML won
Model: UML by 0.4 ✓ Model: Over 1.9 ✓
FinalConference · Conference tournament
7-20 · #286
69
UMBC
19-8 · #264
84
Spread
UMBC -12.5
✓ UMBC W ATS
Total
142.5 ▲5
▲ Over 153
Projected
66–79
✓ UMBC won
Model: UMBC by 0.3 ✓ Model: Over 2.8 ✓
FinalConference
8-21 · #124
76
18-10 · #114
88
Spread
JOES -11.5
✓ JOES W ATS
Total
142.5 ▲2
▲ Over 164
Projected
66–74
✓ JOES won
Model: LAS by 3.5 ✗ Model: Under 3.2 ✗
FinalConference
12-18 · #79
64
12-18 · #46
61
Spread
MISS -7.5
✓ SC W ATS
Total
147.5
▼ Under 125
Projected
71–77
✗ MISS lost
Model: SC by 2.3 ✓ Model: Over 0.3 ✗
FinalConference
16-14 · #60
65
24-6 · #13 AP #6
86
Spread
ISU -16.5
✓ ISU W ATS
Total
148.5 ▲2
▲ Over 151
Projected
68–82
✓ ISU won
Model: ASU by 2.0 ✗ Model: Over 1.2 ✓
FinalConference
12-18 · #83
85
21-9 · #16 AP #14
104
Spread
KU -17.5
✓ KU W ATS
Total
157.5 ▲7
▲ Over 189
Projected
70–84
✓ KU won
Model: KSU by 4.2 ✗ Model: Under 3.7 ✗
FinalConference
21-9 · #14
92
24-6 · #25 AP #22
89
Spread
MIA -1.5
✓ LOU W ATS
Total
155.5 ▼1
▲ Over 181
Projected
80–78
✓ LOU won
Model: LOU by 4.0 ✓ Model: Over 2.0 ✓
FinalConference
23-7 · #22 AP #24
86
21-9 · #7 AP #23
82
Spread
TENN -2.5
✓ VAN W ATS
Total
146.5 ▼1
▲ Over 168
Projected
74–78
✗ TENN lost
Model: TENN by 0.9 ✗ Model: Over 5.4 ✓
FinalConference · Conference tournament
11-16 · #354
56
22-10 · #324
64
Spread
LIU -6.5
✓ LIU W ATS
Total
138.5 ▼2
▼ Under 120
Projected
67–76
✓ LIU won
Model: LIU by 2.2 ✓ Model: Over 3.8 ✗
FinalConference · Conference tournament
7-21 · #290
57
18-11 · #186
77
Spread
UVM -11.5
✓ UVM W ATS
Total
130.5 ▼4
▲ Over 134
Projected
63–74
✓ UVM won
Model: BRY by 0.5 ✗ Model: Over 7.3 ✓
FinalConference
12-12 · #179
111
9-15 · #251
90
Spread
COR -4.5
✓ COR W ATS
Total
166.5 ▲1
▲ Over 201
Projected
86–83
✓ COR won
Model: DART by 1.7 ✗ Model: Over 2.1 ✓
FinalConference
16-13 · #101
62
7-23 · #113
68
Spread
GW -9.5
✓ LUC W ATS
Total
148.5 ▼4
▼ Under 130
Projected
82–71
✗ GW lost
Model: GW by 1.2 ✗ Model: Over 4.5 ✗
FinalConference
16-14 · #105
49
13-14 · #100
61
Spread
FOR -1.5
✓ FOR W ATS
Total
136.5 ▲3
▼ Under 110
Projected
67–67
✓ FOR won
Model: URI by 1.4 ✗ Model: Under 2.1 ✓
FinalConference
14-15 · #104
77
14-14 · #107
79
Spread
DUQ -4.5
✓ RICH W ATS
Total
147.5 ▼2
▲ Over 156
Projected
75–79
✓ DUQ won
Model: RICH by 0.3 ✓ Model: Over 5.8 ✓
FinalConference
17-13 · #30
63
TCU
20-10 · #40
73
Spread
TCU -2.5
✓ TCU W ATS
Total
140.5
▼ Under 136
Projected
69–71
✓ TCU won
Model: CIN by 0.9 ✗ Model: Under 0.6 ✓
FinalConference
SMU
19-11 · #55
78
16-14 · #81
91
Spread
FSU -1.5
✓ FSU W ATS
Total
158.5 ▼3
▲ Over 169
Projected
83–81
✗ SMU lost
Model: SMU by 3.3 ✗ Model: Over 6.1 ✓
FinalConference
8-19 · #135
53
Yale
20-5 · #126
78
Spread
YALE -14.5
✓ YALE W ATS
Total
137.5 ▼1
▼ Under 131
Projected
65–78
✓ YALE won
Model: PRIN by 0.6 ✗ Model: Over 5.3 ✗
FinalConference
16-12 · #129
67
FIU
11-16 · #178
92
Spread
WKU -1.5
✓ FIU W ATS
Total
160.5
▼ Under 159
Projected
80–79
✗ WKU lost
Model: FIU by 0.5 ✓ Model: Under 0.9 ✓
FinalConference
18-9 · #189
72
21-6 · #160
79
Spread
LIB -4.5
✓ LIB W ATS
Total
152.5 ▼4
▼ Under 151
Projected
75–78
✓ LIB won
Model: SHSU by 1.3 ✗ Model: Over 0.8 ✗
FinalConference
19-11 · #85
85
19-11 · #48
84
Spread
NCSU -9.5
✓ STAN W ATS
Total
152.5 ▼2
▲ Over 169
Projected
73–81
✗ NCSU lost
Model: STAN by 1.5 ✓ Model: Over 2.1 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
7-23 · #229
77
15-15 · #262
84
Spread
DREX -4.5
✓ DREX W ATS
Total
138.5 ▼2
▲ Over 161
Projected
70–73
✓ DREX won
Model: NE by 2.1 ✗ Model: Over 4.8 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
12-18 · #284
75
17-12 · #248
72
Spread
WOF -4.5
✓ UNCG W ATS
Total
155.5 ▼1
▼ Under 147
Projected
78–81
✗ WOF lost
Model: UNCG by 0.9 ✓ Model: Over 3.1 ✗
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
12-17 · #183
71
19-10 · #205
73
Spread
WIN -7.5
✓ PRES W ATS
Total
145.5 ▼1
▼ Under 144
Projected
72–78
✓ WIN won
Model: PRES by 1.3 ✓ Model: Over 4.5 ✗
FinalConference
MTSU
13-14 · #154
75
11-16 · #250
63
Spread
MOST -2.5
✓ MTSU W ATS
Total
145.5 ▲1
▼ Under 138
Projected
74–73
✓ MTSU won
Model: MTSU by 2.8 ✓ Model: Over 1.4 ✗
FinalConference
11-16 · #198
64
UTEP
8-19 · #190
61
Spread
JXST -1.5
✓ JXST W ATS
Total
139.5
▼ Under 125
Projected
68–67
✓ JXST won
Model: UTEP by 1.0 ✗ Model: Under 4.6 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
12-19 · #144
51
UIC
16-14 · #110
72
Spread
UIC -4.5
✓ UIC W ATS
Total
144.5
▼ Under 123
Projected
72–75
✓ UIC won
Model: DRKE by 1.0 ✗ Model: Over 2.5 ✗
FinalConference
21-9 · #34
102
13-17 · #53
96
Spread
UGA -5.5
✓ UGA W ATS
Total
167.5 ▲2
▲ Over 198
Projected
88–81
✓ UGA won
Model: UGA by 1.4 ✓ Model: Over 1.7 ✓
FinalConference
24-6 · #1 AP #5
84
19-11 · #19
77
Spread
FLA -5.5
✓ FLA W ATS
Total
162.5 ▲6
▼ Under 161
Projected
83–76
✓ FLA won
Model: FLA by 2.1 ✓ Model: Under 3.9 ✓
FinalConference
21-9 · #41
97
23-7 · #23 AP #15
93
Spread
PUR -9.5
✓ WIS W ATS
Total
154.5 ▼3
▲ Over 190
Projected
74–83
✗ PUR lost
Model: WIS by 0.3 ✓ Model: Over 2.9 ✓
FinalConference
26-3 · #69 AP #25
57
21-8 · #93
86
Spread
SLU -7.5
✓ GMU W ATS
Total
146.5 ▲1
▼ Under 143
Projected
77–72
✗ SLU lost
Model: GMU by 2.3 ✓ Model: Over 2.1 ✗
FinalConference · Conference tournament
7-23 · #323
58
NJIT
14-16 · #316
60
Spread
NJIT -3.5
✓ ME W ATS
Total
134.5 ▲3
▼ Under 118
Projected
64–68
✓ NJIT won
Model: NJIT by 0.2 ✗ Model: Under 2.7 ✓
FinalConference
21-8 · #82
90
23-6 · #58
94
Spread
USU -7.5
✓ UNM W ATS
Total
155.5
▲ Over 184
Projected
75–81
✓ USU won
Model: UNM by 1.2 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✓
FinalConference
FAU
15-13 · #109
70
19-10 · #77
88
Spread
WICH -8.5
✓ WICH W ATS
Total
150.5 ▲4
▲ Over 158
Projected
74–79
✓ WICH won
Model: FAU by 3.2 ✗ Model: Over 2.9 ✓
FinalConference
18-10 · #86
78
19-10 · #87
67
Spread
CSU -1.5
✓ BOIS W ATS
Total
143.5 ▲1
▲ Over 145
Projected
73–72
✓ BOIS won
Model: BOIS by 2.6 ✓ Model: Over 1.7 ✓
FinalConference
20-9 · #92
73
15-15 · #89
80
Spread
WAKE -5.5
✓ WAKE W ATS
Total
154.5 ▲3
▼ Under 153
Projected
75–79
✓ WAKE won
Model: CAL by 1.0 ✗ Model: Under 0.9 ✓
FinalConference
15-12 · #148
76
11-15 · #133
79
Spread
NMSU -1.5
✓ NMSU W ATS
Total
157.5 ▲2
▼ Under 155
Projected
79–80
✓ NMSU won
Model: NMSU by 0.1 ✓ Model: Over 1.3 ✗
FinalConference
Pitt
11-19 · #74
71
15-15 · #63
69
Spread
SYR -5.5
✓ PITT W ATS
Total
141.5
▼ Under 140
Projected
70–74
✗ SYR lost
Model: PITT by 1.5 ✓ Model: Over 3.3 ✗
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
FGCU
14-17 · #266
63
19-11 · #240
73
Spread
CARK -4.5
✓ CARK W ATS
Total
144.5 ▼1
▼ Under 136
Projected
75–77
✓ CARK won
Model: FGCU by 1.7 ✗ Model: Over 7.3 ✗
FinalConference
16-13 · #122
88
7-22 · #143
78
Spread
WYO -6.5
✓ WYO W ATS
Total
148.5 ▼1
▲ Over 166
Projected
76–71
✓ WYO won
Model: SJSU by 0.9 ✗ Model: Under 1.3 ✗
FinalConference
Utah
10-20 · #73
75
14-15 · #29
101
Spread
BAY -13.5
✓ BAY W ATS
Total
148.5 ▼3
▲ Over 176
Projected
73–84
✓ BAY won
Model: UTAH by 2.9 ✗ Model: Over 8.5 ✓
FinalConference
18-12 · #38
78
19-11 · #33
91
Spread
OSU -3.5
✓ OSU W ATS
Total
148.5 ▲1
▲ Over 169
Projected
76–79
✓ OSU won
Model: IU by 0.1 ✗ Model: Over 6.6 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
11-18 · #159
68
15-14 · #165
74
Spread
TOW -7.5
✓ HAMP W ATS
Total
132.5 ▲1
▲ Over 142
Projected
63–69
✓ TOW won
Model: HAMP by 1.5 ✓ Model: Under 1.0 ✗
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
16-12 · #152
86
16-13 · #184
81
Spread
SAM -1.5
✓ FUR W ATS
Total
147.5 ▲1
▲ Over 167
Projected
75–74
✓ FUR won
Model: FUR by 1.9 ✓ Model: Over 1.3 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
20-12 · #131
73
20-11 · #167
69
Spread
UNI -4.5
✓ BRAD W ATS
Total
127.5 ▼1
▲ Over 142
Projected
69–67
✓ UNI won
Model: BRAD by 1.8 ✓ Model: Over 8.6 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
17-11 · #236
77
18-12 · #241
75
Spread
QUIN -1.5
✓ MRST W ATS
Total
135.5 ▲5
▲ Over 152
Projected
70–69
✓ MRST won
Model: MRST by 2.1 ✓ Model: Over 3.2 ✓
FinalConference
20-10 · #28
94
LSU
15-15 · #51
91
Spread
TA&M -2.5
✓ TA&M W ATS
Total
161.5 ▲1
▲ Over 185
Projected
83–83
✓ TA&M won
Model: LSU by 1.7 ✗ Model: Over 4.4 ✓
FinalConference
24-6 · #44 AP #17
61
Duke
28-2 · #3 AP #1
76
Spread
DUKE -18.5
✓ UNC W ATS
Total
147.5 ▲3
▼ Under 137
Projected
66–80
✓ DUKE won
Model: UNC by 4.8 ✓ Model: Under 0.9 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
16-15 · #224
86
17-12 · #259
73
Spread
APP -4.5
✓ USM W ATS
Total
137.5 ▲2
▲ Over 159
Projected
67–70
✗ APP lost
Model: USM by 2.0 ✓ Model: Under 0.4 ✗
FinalConference
6-23 · #329
76
11-18 · #164
108
Spread
CP -8.5
✓ CP W ATS
Total
174.5 ▲2
▲ Over 184
Projected
81–89
✓ CP won
Model: CSUB by 0.3 ✗ Model: Under 5.3 ✗
FinalConference
14-13 · #257
64
10-17 · #253
57
Spread
ACU -1.5
✓ UTA W ATS
Total
131.5 ▼2
▼ Under 121
Projected
67–67
✓ UTA won
Model: UTA by 1.5 ✓ Model: Over 1.8 ✗
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
7-21 · #321
65
9-19 · #344
73
Spread
IDST -4.5
✓ IDST W ATS
Total
142.5 ▼1
▼ Under 138
Projected
69–73
✓ IDST won
Model: NAU by 0.6 ✗ Model: Over 0.2 ✗
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
18-13 · #175
90
20-8 · #210
83
Spread
APSU -2.5
✓ QUC W ATS
Total
161.5 ▼1
▲ Over 173
Projected
81–82
✗ APSU lost
Model: QUC by 2.0 ✓ Model: Over 1.4 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
12-16 · #279
50
22-7 · #213
74
Spread
NDSU -8.5
✓ NDSU W ATS
Total
146.5
▼ Under 124
Projected
72–79
✓ NDSU won
Model: OMA by 1.5 ✗ Model: Over 4.0 ✗
FinalConference
12-17 · #174
60
19-11 · #80
85
Spread
GCU -12.5
✓ GCU W ATS
Total
149.5 ▲5
▼ Under 145
Projected
67–77
✓ GCU won
Model: FRES by 1.8 ✗ Model: Under 5.7 ✓
FinalConference
14-15 · #312
90
17-12 · #194
77
Spread
CSUN -5.5
✓ CSUF W ATS
Total
170.5 ▲1
▼ Under 167
Projected
82–87
✗ CSUN lost
Model: CSUF by 0.1 ✓ Model: Under 1.7 ✓
FinalConference
14-16 · #52
79
13-17 · #64
80
Spread
GTWN -1.5
✓ PROV W ATS
Total
158.5
▲ Over 159
Projected
83–83
✓ GTWN won
Model: PROV by 1.1 ✓ Model: Over 7.4 ✓
FinalConference
16-12 · #182
69
19-10 · #149
79
Spread
UCI -7.5
✓ UCI W ATS
Total
144.5 ▲1
▲ Over 148
Projected
67–75
✓ UCI won
Model: UCD by 0.3 ✗ Model: Under 2.7 ✗
FinalConference
16-14 · #21
84
22-8 · #15 AP #16
96
Spread
ALA -5.5
✓ ALA W ATS
Total
175.5 ▼1
▲ Over 180
Projected
86–92
✓ ALA won
Model: ALA by 0.4 ✓ Model: Over 2.2 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
Elon
12-17 · #232
62
17-11 · #217
72
Spread
W&M -5.5
✓ W&M W ATS
Total
163.5 ▼1
▼ Under 134
Projected
81–86
✓ W&M won
Model: ELON by 0.4 ✗ Model: Over 2.8 ✗
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
12-15 · #215
77
16-12 · #242
73
Spread
MER -1.5
✓ WCU W ATS
Total
154.5 ▼3
▼ Under 150
Projected
78–81
✗ MER lost
Model: MER by 1.1 ✗ Model: Over 4.7 ✗
FinalConference
16-14 · #31
88
17-12 · #11
85
Spread
TEX -6.5
✓ OU W ATS
Total
154.5 ▼3
▲ Over 173
Projected
77–83
✗ TEX lost
Model: OU by 0.1 ✓ Model: Over 5.5 ✓
FinalConference
22-8 · #203
82
7-20 · #267
75
Spread
CBU -6.5
✓ CBU W ATS
Total
148.5 ▲3
▲ Over 157
Projected
77–71
✓ CBU won
Model: SUU by 0.3 ✗ Model: Under 1.3 ✗
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
14-16 · #278
58
20-11 · #260
63
Spread
SIE -2.5
✓ SIE W ATS
Total
135.5 ▲4
▼ Under 121
Projected
67–72
✓ SIE won
Model: SIE by 2.7 ✓ Model: Over 2.9 ✗
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
13-18 · #169
65
15-15 · #161
82
Spread
SF -6.5
✓ SF W ATS
Total
146.5 ▲2
▲ Over 147
Projected
72–77
✓ SF won
Model: PORT by 0.8 ✗ Model: Over 2.6 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
17-12 · #350
67
19-9 · #245
93
Spread
TNST -5.5
✓ TNST W ATS
Total
143.5 ▼9
▲ Over 160
Projected
74–79
✓ TNST won
Model: MORE by 0.4 ✗ Model: Over 10.1 ✓
FinalConference
UCLA
20-10 · #26
89
USC
17-12 · #36
68
Spread
UCLA -4.5
✓ UCLA W ATS
Total
151.5
▲ Over 157
Projected
79–76
✓ UCLA won
Model: USC by 1.0 ✗ Model: Over 3.1 ✓
FinalConference
13-17 · #59
66
14-16 · #70
67
Spread
MINN -4.5
✓ NU W ATS
Total
133.5
▼ Under 133
Projected
67–69
✓ MINN won
Model: NU by 2.8 ✓ Model: Over 2.1 ✗
FinalConference
19-10 · #123
64
16-12 · #134
63
Spread
UCSB -2.5
✓ UCSD W ATS
Total
141.5 ▲1
▼ Under 127
Projected
71–72
✗ UCSB lost
Model: UCSD by 2.0 ✓ Model: Over 1.8 ✗
FinalConference
20-7 · #150
104
15-13 · #268
101
Spread
UVU -8.5
✓ UTU W ATS
Total
147.5
▲ Over 205
Projected
79–72
✓ UVU won
Model: UTU by 1.2 ✓ Model: Over 3.3 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
17-15 · #296
96
18-12 · #283
72
Spread
CCU -1.5
✓ GASO W ATS
Total
151.5
▲ Over 168
Projected
78–78
✓ GASO won
Model: GASO by 1.7 ✓ Model: Over 3.9 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
7-20 · #196
45
14-14 · #247
68
Spread
IDHO -6.5
✓ IDHO W ATS
Total
158.5
▼ Under 113
Projected
77–82
✓ IDHO won
Model: SAC by 1.5 ✗
FinalConference
3-27 · #220
59
19-11 · #96
74
Spread
NEV -24.5
✓ AF W ATS
Total
144.5 ▲2
▼ Under 133
Projected
59–81
✓ NEV won
Model: AF by 1.8 ✓ Model: Under 4.9 ✓
FinalConference
22-8 · #12 AP #10
76
BYU
20-10 · #24
82
Spread
BYU -2.5
✓ BYU W ATS
Total
159.5 ▼1
▼ Under 158
Projected
79–81
✓ BYU won
Model: TTU by 0.8 ✗ Model: Over 1.0 ✗
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
14-16 · #336
67
21-8 · #212
66
Spread
STMN -11.5
✓ UND W ATS
Total
153.5 ▼3
▼ Under 133
Projected
74–83
✗ STMN lost
Model: UND by 1.8 ✓ Model: Over 3.5 ✗
FinalConference
28-2 · #5 AP #2
89
17-13 · #65
79
Spread
ARIZ -13.5
✓ COLO W ATS
Total
156.5 ▲1
▲ Over 168
Projected
87–73
✓ ARIZ won
Model: ARIZ by 1.2 ✗ Model: Over 3.1 ✓
FinalConference
15-15 · #56
79
11-19 · #57
85
Spread
WASH -1.5
✓ ORE W ATS
Total
145.5 ▲5
▲ Over 164
Projected
74–72
✗ WASH lost
Model: WASH by 0.3 ✗ Model: Over 0.3 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
18-12 · #119
58
15-14 · #163
61
Spread
PAC -1.5
✓ PAC W ATS
Total
129.5
▼ Under 119
Projected
66–66
✗ SEA lost
Model: SEA by 2.3 ✗ Model: Over 2.3 ✗
FinalConference
7-22 · #297
84
20-7 · #140
75
Spread
HAW -14.5
✓ LBSU W ATS
Total
150.5 ▲2
▲ Over 159
Projected
69–81
✗ HAW lost
Model: LBSU by 1.8 ✓ Model: Under 0.7 ✗
StatusMatchupSpreadTotalModel lineSpread edgeModel totalTotal edgeWin probModel
Final
25-5 · #2
82
18-12 · #45
75
HOU -13.5 151.5 HOU -11.7 OKST +1.8 152.4 Over 0.9 85% HOU W W ›
Final
19-11 · #68
72
26-4 · #20
76
UVA -11.5 145.5 UVA -9.9 VT +1.6 149.9 Over 4.4 81% UVA W W ›
Final
22-8 · #18
88
20-10 · #54
84
MIZ -2.5 163.5 ARK -3.6 ARK +6.1 164.6 Over 1.1 62% ARK W W ›
Final
12-17 · #243
96
15-14 · #191
89
CAM -2.5 148.5 CAM -3.1 CAM +0.6 149.4 Over 0.9 61% CAM W W ›
Final
8-21 · #339
76
19-10 · #173
83
ETSU -14.5 139.5 ETSU -14.2 CIT +0.3 142.9 Over 3.4 89% ETSU W W ›
Final
10-20 · #349
51
14-16 · #331
56
MERC -4.5 134.5 MERC -5.8 MERC +1.3 132.4 Under 2.1 69% MERC W W ›
Final
12-16 · #271
71
25-4 · #90
75
HPU -14.5 147.5 HPU -12.2 UNCA +2.3 153.3 Over 5.8 86% HPU W L ›
Final
16-12 · #115
68
14-15 · #142
63
SBU -4.5 141.5 SBU -1.7 DAV +2.8 143.5 Over 2.0 56% SBU W L ›
Final
15-15 · #72
81
16-14 · #66
71
DEP -4.5 142.5 DEP -1.4 BTLR +3.1 147.3 Over 4.8 55% DEP W W ›
Final
14-16 · #49
78
23-7 · #32
91
VILL -11.5 153.5 VILL -9.9 XAV +1.6 154.4 Over 0.9 81% VILL L W ›
Final
13-17 · #71
69
10-20 · #95
77
ND -1.5 141.5 ND -1.7 ND +0.2 142.3 Over 0.8 56% ND L W ›
Final
11-19 · #94
76
21-9 · #35
79
CLEM -15.5 145.5 CLEM -15.6 CLEM +0.1 142.9 Under 2.6 91% CLEM L L ›
Final
14-13 · #244
81
10-19 · #206
38
LT -2.5 132.5 LT -2.0 DEL +0.5 133.0 Over 0.5 57% LT L L ›
Final
27-3 · #6
62
11-19 · #42
68
CONN -9.5 143.5 CONN -9.8 CONN +0.3 144.9 Over 1.4 80% CONN L L ›
Final
8-20 · #301
76
11-17 · #307
81
UML -2.5 146.5 UML -2.9 UML +0.4 148.4 Over 1.9 60% UML W W ›
Final
7-20 · #286
69
19-8 · #264
84
UMBC -12.5 142.5 UMBC -12.8 UMBC +0.3 145.3 Over 2.8 87% UMBC W W ›
Final
8-21 · #124
76
18-10 · #114
88
JOES -11.5 142.5 JOES -8.0 LAS +3.5 139.3 Under 3.2 76% JOES L L ›
Final
12-18 · #79
64
12-18 · #46
61
MISS -7.5 147.5 MISS -5.2 SC +2.3 147.8 Over 0.3 67% MISS W L ›
Final
16-14 · #60
65
24-6 · #13
86
ISU -16.5 148.5 ISU -14.5 ASU +2.0 149.7 Over 1.2 90% ISU L W ›
Final
12-18 · #83
85
21-9 · #16
104
KU -17.5 157.5 KU -13.3 KSU +4.2 153.8 Under 3.7 88% KU L L ›
Final
21-9 · #14
92
24-6 · #25
89
MIA -1.5 155.5 LOU -2.5 LOU +4.0 157.5 Over 2.0 59% LOU W W ›
Final
23-7 · #22
86
21-9 · #7
82
TENN -2.5 146.5 TENN -3.4 TENN +0.9 151.9 Over 5.4 62% TENN L W ›
Final
11-16 · #354
56
22-10 · #324
64
LIU -6.5 138.5 LIU -8.7 LIU +2.2 142.3 Over 3.8 78% LIU W L ›
Final
7-21 · #290
57
18-11 · #186
77
UVM -11.5 130.5 UVM -11.0 BRY +0.5 137.8 Over 7.3 83% UVM L W ›
Final
12-12 · #179
111
9-15 · #251
90
COR -4.5 166.5 COR -2.8 DART +1.7 168.6 Over 2.1 60% COR L W ›
Final
16-13 · #101
62
7-23 · #113
68
GW -9.5 148.5 GW -10.7 GW +1.2 153.0 Over 4.5 83% GW L L ›
Final
16-14 · #105
49
13-14 · #100
61
FOR -1.5 136.5 FOR -0.1 URI +1.4 134.4 Under 2.1 51% FOR L W ›
Final
14-15 · #104
77
14-14 · #107
79
DUQ -4.5 147.5 DUQ -4.2 RICH +0.3 153.3 Over 5.8 64% DUQ W W ›
Final
17-13 · #30
63
20-10 · #40
73
TCU -2.5 140.5 TCU -1.6 CIN +0.9 139.9 Under 0.6 55% TCU L W ›
Final
19-11 · #55
78
16-14 · #81
91
FSU -1.5 158.5 SMU -1.8 SMU +3.3 164.6 Over 6.1 56% SMU L W ›
Final
8-19 · #135
53
20-5 · #126
78
YALE -14.5 137.5 YALE -13.9 PRIN +0.6 142.8 Over 5.3 89% YALE L L ›
Final
16-12 · #129
67
11-16 · #178
92
WKU -1.5 160.5 WKU -1.0 FIU +0.5 159.6 Under 0.9 54% WKU W W ›
Final
18-9 · #189
72
21-6 · #160
79
LIB -4.5 152.5 LIB -3.2 SHSU +1.3 153.3 Over 0.8 61% LIB L L ›
Final
19-11 · #85
85
19-11 · #48
84
NCSU -9.5 152.5 NCSU -8.0 STAN +1.5 154.6 Over 2.1 76% NCSU W W ›
Final
7-23 · #229
77
15-15 · #262
84
DREX -4.5 138.5 DREX -2.4 NE +2.1 143.3 Over 4.8 58% DREX L W ›
Final
12-18 · #284
75
17-12 · #248
72
WOF -4.5 155.5 WOF -3.6 UNCG +0.9 158.6 Over 3.1 62% WOF W L ›
Final
12-17 · #183
71
19-10 · #205
73
WIN -7.5 145.5 WIN -6.2 PRES +1.3 150.0 Over 4.5 71% WIN W L ›
Final
13-14 · #154
75
11-16 · #250
63
MOST -2.5 145.5 MTSU -0.3 MTSU +2.8 146.9 Over 1.4 51% MTSU W L ›
Final
11-16 · #198
64
8-19 · #190
61
JXST -1.5 139.5 JXST -0.5 UTEP +1.0 134.9 Under 4.6 52% JXST L W ›
Final
12-19 · #144
51
16-14 · #110
72
UIC -4.5 144.5 UIC -3.5 DRKE +1.0 147.0 Over 2.5 62% UIC L L ›
Final
21-9 · #34
102
13-17 · #53
96
UGA -5.5 167.5 UGA -6.9 UGA +1.4 169.2 Over 1.7 73% UGA W W ›
Final
24-6 · #1
84
19-11 · #19
77
FLA -5.5 162.5 FLA -7.6 FLA +2.1 158.6 Under 3.9 75% FLA W W ›
Final
21-9 · #41
97
23-7 · #23
93
PUR -9.5 154.5 PUR -9.3 WIS +0.3 157.4 Over 2.9 79% PUR W W ›
Final
26-3 · #69
57
21-8 · #93
86
SLU -7.5 146.5 SLU -5.2 GMU +2.3 148.6 Over 2.1 68% SLU W L ›
Final
7-23 · #323
58
14-16 · #316
60
NJIT -3.5 134.5 NJIT -3.7 NJIT +0.2 131.8 Under 2.7 63% NJIT L W ›
Final
21-8 · #82
90
23-6 · #58
94
USU -7.5 155.5 USU -6.3 UNM +1.2 156.0 Over 0.5 71% USU W W ›
Final
15-13 · #109
70
19-10 · #77
88
WICH -8.5 150.5 WICH -5.3 FAU +3.2 153.4 Over 2.9 68% WICH L W ›
Final
18-10 · #86
78
19-10 · #87
67
CSU -1.5 143.5 BOIS -1.1 BOIS +2.6 145.2 Over 1.7 54% BOIS W W ›
Final
20-9 · #92
73
15-15 · #89
80
WAKE -5.5 154.5 WAKE -4.5 CAL +1.0 153.6 Under 0.9 65% WAKE L W ›
Final
15-12 · #148
76
11-15 · #133
79
NMSU -1.5 157.5 NMSU -1.6 NMSU +0.1 158.8 Over 1.3 55% NMSU W L ›
Final
11-19 · #74
71
15-15 · #63
69
SYR -5.5 141.5 SYR -4.0 PITT +1.5 144.8 Over 3.3 64% SYR W L ›
Final
14-17 · #266
63
19-11 · #240
73
CARK -4.5 144.5 CARK -2.8 FGCU +1.7 151.8 Over 7.3 60% CARK L L ›
Final
16-13 · #122
88
7-22 · #143
78
WYO -6.5 148.5 WYO -5.6 SJSU +0.9 147.2 Under 1.3 69% WYO L L ›
Final
10-20 · #73
75
14-15 · #29
101
BAY -13.5 148.5 BAY -10.6 UTAH +2.9 157.0 Over 8.5 82% BAY L W ›
Final
18-12 · #38
78
19-11 · #33
91
OSU -3.5 148.5 OSU -3.4 IU +0.1 155.1 Over 6.6 62% OSU L W ›
Final
11-18 · #159
68
15-14 · #165
74
TOW -7.5 132.5 TOW -6.0 HAMP +1.5 131.5 Under 1.0 70% TOW W L ›
Final
16-12 · #152
86
16-13 · #184
81
SAM -1.5 147.5 FUR -0.4 FUR +1.9 148.8 Over 1.3 51% FUR W W ›
Final
20-12 · #131
73
20-11 · #167
69
UNI -4.5 127.5 UNI -2.7 BRAD +1.8 136.1 Over 8.6 59% UNI W W ›
Final
17-11 · #236
77
18-12 · #241
75
QUIN -1.5 135.5 MRST -0.6 MRST +2.1 138.7 Over 3.2 52% MRST W W ›
Final
20-10 · #28
94
15-15 · #51
91
TA&M -2.5 161.5 TA&M -0.8 LSU +1.7 165.9 Over 4.4 53% TA&M L W ›
Final
24-6 · #44
61
28-2 · #3
76
DUKE -18.5 147.5 DUKE -13.7 UNC +4.8 146.6 Under 0.9 89% DUKE W W ›
Final
16-15 · #224
86
17-12 · #259
73
APP -4.5 137.5 APP -2.5 USM +2.0 137.1 Under 0.4 59% APP W L ›
Final
6-23 · #329
76
11-18 · #164
108
CP -8.5 174.5 CP -8.2 CSUB +0.3 169.2 Under 5.3 76% CP L L ›
Final
14-13 · #257
64
10-17 · #253
57
ACU -1.5 131.5 UTA -0.0 UTA +1.5 133.3 Over 1.8 50% ACU W L ›
Final
7-21 · #321
65
9-19 · #344
73
IDST -4.5 142.5 IDST -3.9 NAU +0.6 142.7 Over 0.2 63% IDST L L ›
Final
20-8 · #210
83
APSU -2.5 161.5 APSU -0.5 QUC +2.0 162.9 Over 1.4 52% APSU W W ›
Final
12-16 · #279
50
22-7 · #213
74
NDSU -8.5 146.5 NDSU -7.0 OMA +1.5 150.5 Over 4.0 73% NDSU L L ›
Final
12-17 · #174
60
19-11 · #80
85
GCU -12.5 149.5 GCU -10.8 FRES +1.8 143.8 Under 5.7 83% GCU L W ›
Final
14-15 · #312
90
17-12 · #194
77
CSUN -5.5 170.5 CSUN -5.4 CSUF +0.1 168.8 Under 1.7 68% CSUN W W ›
Final
14-16 · #52
79
13-17 · #64
80
GTWN -1.5 158.5 GTWN -0.5 PROV +1.1 165.9 Over 7.4 52% GTWN W W ›
Final
16-12 · #182
69
19-10 · #149
79
UCI -7.5 144.5 UCI -7.2 UCD +0.3 141.8 Under 2.7 74% UCI L L ›
Final
16-14 · #21
84
22-8 · #15
96
ALA -5.5 175.5 ALA -5.9 ALA +0.4 177.7 Over 2.2 70% ALA W W ›
Final
12-17 · #232
62
17-11 · #217
72
W&M -5.5 163.5 W&M -5.1 ELON +0.4 166.3 Over 2.8 67% W&M L L ›
Final
12-15 · #215
77
16-12 · #242
73
MER -1.5 154.5 MER -2.6 MER +1.1 159.2 Over 4.7 59% MER L L ›
Final
16-14 · #31
88
17-12 · #11
85
TEX -6.5 154.5 TEX -6.4 OU +0.1 160.0 Over 5.5 71% TEX W W ›
Final
22-8 · #203
82
7-20 · #267
75
CBU -6.5 148.5 CBU -6.2 SUU +0.3 147.2 Under 1.3 70% CBU L L ›
Final
14-16 · #278
58
20-11 · #260
63
SIE -2.5 135.5 SIE -5.2 SIE +2.7 138.4 Over 2.9 68% SIE W L ›
Final
13-18 · #169
65
15-15 · #161
82
SF -6.5 146.5 SF -5.8 PORT +0.8 149.1 Over 2.6 69% SF L W ›
Final
17-12 · #350
67
19-9 · #245
93
TNST -5.5 143.5 TNST -5.1 MORE +0.4 153.6 Over 10.1 67% TNST L W ›
Final
20-10 · #26
89
17-12 · #36
68
UCLA -4.5 151.5 UCLA -3.5 USC +1.0 154.6 Over 3.1 62% UCLA L W ›
Final
13-17 · #59
66
14-16 · #70
67
MINN -4.5 133.5 MINN -1.7 NU +2.8 135.6 Over 2.1 56% MINN W L ›
Final
19-10 · #123
64
16-12 · #134
63
UCSB -2.5 141.5 UCSB -0.5 UCSD +2.0 143.3 Over 1.8 52% UCSB W L ›
Final
20-7 · #150
104
15-13 · #268
101
UVU -8.5 147.5 UVU -7.3 UTU +1.2 150.8 Over 3.3 74% UVU W W ›
Final
17-15 · #296
96
18-12 · #283
72
CCU -1.5 151.5 GASO -0.2 GASO +1.7 155.4 Over 3.9 51% GASO W W ›
Final
7-20 · #196
45
14-14 · #247
68
IDHO -6.5 158.5 IDHO -5.0 SAC +1.5 158.5 — 67% IDHO L ›
Final
3-27 · #220
59
19-11 · #96
74
NEV -24.5 144.5 NEV -22.7 AF +1.8 139.6 Under 4.9 98% NEV W W ›
Final
22-8 · #12
76
20-10 · #24
82
BYU -2.5 159.5 BYU -1.7 TTU +0.8 160.5 Over 1.0 56% BYU L L ›
Final
14-16 · #336
67
21-8 · #212
66
STMN -11.5 153.5 STMN -9.7 UND +1.8 157.0 Over 3.5 80% STMN W L ›
Final
28-2 · #5
89
17-13 · #65
79
ARIZ -13.5 156.5 ARIZ -14.7 ARIZ +1.2 159.6 Over 3.1 90% ARIZ L W ›
Final
15-15 · #56
79
11-19 · #57
85
WASH -1.5 145.5 WASH -1.8 WASH +0.3 145.8 Over 0.3 56% WASH L W ›
Final
18-12 · #119
58
15-14 · #163
61
PAC -1.5 129.5 SEA -0.8 SEA +2.3 131.8 Over 2.3 53% SEA L L ›
Final
7-22 · #297
84
20-7 · #140
75
HAW -14.5 150.5 HAW -12.7 LBSU +1.8 149.8 Under 0.7 87% HAW W L ›
The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record