UPMC Cooper Fieldhouse · at Duquesne · Conference game
Closing line
DUQ -4.5✓ RICH covered by 2.5
Closing total147.5Over by 8.5
| This season | DUQ | |
|---|---|---|
| 14-15 | Record | 14-14 |
| 15-14 | ATS | 12-16 |
| 12-17 | O/U | 15-13 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: RICH 75–79 DUQ · ✓ DUQ (64%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RICH | 49 | 28 | 77 |
| DUQ | 28 | 51 | 79 |
1st half: RICH 49, DUQ 28 (RICH by 21). The model had DUQ by 2.4 and a total of 71.7 (actual 77).
Team stats
| RICH | DUQ | |
|---|---|---|
| 30-47 64% | Field goals | 28-64 44% |
| 12-20 60% | 3-pointers | 6-30 20% |
| 5-9 56% | Free throws | 17-18 94% |
| 22 3 off | Rebounds | 32 15 off |
| 17 | Assists | 10 |
| 5 | Steals | 10 |
| 5 | Blocks | 2 |
| 16 | Turnovers | 10 |
| 15 | Fouls | 11 |
| 26 | Points in paint | 42 |
| 11 | Fast-break points | 12 |
Players
| RICH | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AJ Lopez G | 33 | 15 | 0 | 3 | 5-9 | 2-4 |
| Collin Tanner G | 32 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 4-7 | 0-2 |
| Will Johnston G | 27 | 14 | 3 | 2 | 6-8 | 2-2 |
| Mikkel Tyne G | 25 | 14 | 2 | 2 | 5-7 | 4-6 |
| Mike Walz C | 23 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 1-3 | 1-2 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Aiden Argabright G | 24 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 4-5 | 2-3 |
| Jaylen Robinson F | 17 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| Jaden Daughtry F | 15 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 3-6 | 1-1 |
| David Thomas G | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Donovan Richardson, Will Harper III, Dylan Homenick, Bryson McGlothin, Kirby Mooney, Jonathan Beagle, Apostolos Roumoglou
| DUQ | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jimmie Williams G | 33 | 12 | 2 | 2 | 5-11 | 0-6 |
| Tarence Guinyard G | 33 | 16 | 5 | 1 | 5-18 | 1-8 |
| David Dixon F | 27 | 17 | 11 | 2 | 6-8 | 0-1 |
| Brandon Hall G | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-2 |
| Jakub Necas F | 19 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2-4 | 0-1 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Alex Williams F | 29 | 22 | 5 | 2 | 6-10 | 5-8 |
| Maximus Edwards G | 21 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 3-8 | 0-3 |
| Cam Crawford G | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-1 |
| John Hugley IV F | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Jake DiMichele G | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Dom Aekins, Frederik Jellum, Lazar Milosevic, Lucas Prolla, Stef van Bussel, Seamus McDermott, Ethan Anish, Arness Lawson
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketDUQ -4.5
ModelDUQ -4.2
Model edgeRICH +0.3
W RICH covered
Total
Market147.5
Model153.3
Model edgeOver 5.8
W Over
Projected score
RICH 74.6 · DUQ 78.7
RICH 77 · DUQ 79
Win probability
DUQ 64%
1st half
Spread
DUQ -2.4
RICH -21.0
Total
71.7
77 points
Projected score
RICH 34.6 · DUQ 37
RICH 49 · DUQ 28
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenDUQ -5.5
1 → RICH
CloseDUQ -4.5
1 pt toward RICH
Total
Open149.5
▼ 2
Close147.5
Down 2 since the open
Moneyline
RICH +170 · DUQ -205
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened DUQ -5.5 · closed DUQ -4.5 · moved 1 toward RICHmodel DUQ -4
model DUQ -4
Opened 149.5 · closed 147.5 · moved 2 downmodel 153.5
model 153.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% | |
| 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% | 3-7 30% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
RICH 4–0 DUQRICH leads · 4 games since 2021-22 · RICH has won the last 4 meetings · RICH 3-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2024-25 | DUQ 68 @ RICH 73 | RICH +2.5 | RICH W |
| Jan 16, 2023-24 | RICH 63 @ DUQ 61 | DUQ -3.5 | RICH W |
| Jan 7, 2022-23 | DUQ 73 @ RICH 75 | RICH -2.5 | DUQ W |
| Feb 1, 2021-22 | RICH 74 @ DUQ 57 | DUQ +7 | RICH W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Richmond
29 games played
Straight up
14-15
48% wins
Against the spread
15-14
52% covers · avg +0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-17
41% overs · avg +0.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | vs | W 87-72 | -5.5 | W +9.5 | 143.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 90-86 | -9.5 | L −5.5 | 164.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 87-54 | -14.5 | W +18.5 | 152.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 102-67 | -19.5 | W +15.5 | 154.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 72-73 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 71-66 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 141.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 3 | @ | W 84-76 | +6.5 | W +14.5 | 156.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 86-77 | -12.5 | L −3.5 | 153.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 93-84 | -3.5 | W +5.5 | 153.5 | O 177 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 70-73 | -3.5 | L −6.5 | 161.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 80-56 | -18.5 | W +5.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 28 | vs | L 72-77 | -11.5 | L −16.5 | 159.5 | U 149 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 85-99 | +2.5 | L −11.5 | 162.5 | O 184 |
| Jan 4 | @ | W 83-75 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 142.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 89-80 | +6.5 | W +15.5 | 153.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 11 | vs | L 65-67 | -7.5 | L −9.5 | 150.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 74-53 | -8.5 | W +12.5 | 147.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 63-88 | +14.5 | L −10.5 | 162.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 21 | vs | L 68-69 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 69-85 | +10.5 | L −5.5 | 159.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 69-77 | +12.5 | W +4.5 | 155.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 54-79 | -1.5 | L −26.5 | 140.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 77-82 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 142.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 10 | vs | W 82-70 | +3.5 | W +15.5 | 139.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 67-78 | +7.5 | L −3.5 | 154.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 63-65 | +5.5 | W +3.5 | 141.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 99-94 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 147.5 | O 193 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 66-69 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 146.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 3 | vs | L 60-65 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 144.5 | U 125 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
vs
ECU
W 87-72
+9.5
11
vs
W&M
W 90-86
−5.5
19
vs
VMI
W 87-54
+18.5
22
vs
GWEB
W 102-67
+15.5
27
vs
FUR
L 72-73
−4.5
28
vs
CLT
W 71-66
−1.5
3
@
BEL
W 84-76
+14.5
6
vs
ODU
W 86-77
−3.5
13
vs
SIU
W 93-84
+5.5
17
@
ELON
L 70-73
−6.5
20
vs
CIT
W 80-56
+5.5
28
vs
CHSO
L 72-77
−16.5
31
vs
GW
L 85-99
−11.5
4
@
FOR
W 83-75
+5.5
7
@
SBU
W 89-80
+15.5
11
vs
JOES
L 65-67
−9.5
14
vs
LAS
W 74-53
+12.5
17
@
SLU
L 63-88
−10.5
21
vs
URI
L 68-69
−4.5
24
@
GW
L 69-85
−5.5
27
@
VCU
L 69-77
+4.5
31
vs
DAV
L 54-79
−26.5
7
@
URI
L 77-82
+0.5
10
vs
GMU
W 82-70
+15.5
14
vs
VCU
L 67-78
−3.5
18
@
DAV
L 63-65
+3.5
21
vs
SBU
W 99-94
+3.5
28
@
LUC
L 66-69
−5.5
3
vs
DAY
L 60-65
+0.5
covered 15didn’t cover 14avg +0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
vs
ECU
W 87-72
+15.5
11
vs
W&M
W 90-86
+11.5
19
vs
VMI
W 87-54
−11.5
22
vs
GWEB
W 102-67
+14.5
27
vs
FUR
L 72-73
−2.5
28
vs
CLT
W 71-66
−4.5
3
@
BEL
W 84-76
+3.5
6
vs
ODU
W 86-77
+9.5
13
vs
SIU
W 93-84
+23.5
17
@
ELON
L 70-73
−18.5
20
vs
CIT
W 80-56
−10.5
28
vs
CHSO
L 72-77
−10.5
31
vs
GW
L 85-99
+21.5
4
@
FOR
W 83-75
+15.5
7
@
SBU
W 89-80
+15.5
11
vs
JOES
L 65-67
−18.5
14
vs
LAS
W 74-53
−20.5
17
@
SLU
L 63-88
−11.5
21
vs
URI
L 68-69
−7.5
24
@
GW
L 69-85
−5.5
27
@
VCU
L 69-77
−9.5
31
vs
DAV
L 54-79
−7.5
7
@
URI
L 77-82
+16.5
10
vs
GMU
W 82-70
+12.5
14
vs
VCU
L 67-78
−9.5
18
@
DAV
L 63-65
−13.5
21
vs
SBU
W 99-94
+45.5
28
@
LUC
L 66-69
−11.5
3
vs
DAY
L 60-65
−19.5
over 12under 17avg +0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Duquesne
28 games played
Straight up
14-14
50% wins
Against the spread
12-16
43% covers · avg −0.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-13
54% overs · avg +2.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 83-63 | -17.5 | W +2.5 | 139.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 92-80 | -12.5 | L −0.5 | 157.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 87-81 | -12.5 | L −6.5 | 162.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 77-87 | +10.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 92-78 | -14.5 | L −0.5 | 150.5 | O 170 |
| Nov 22 | vs | L 86-93 | -7.5 | L −14.5 | 147.5 | O 179 |
| Dec 2 | vs | L 79-83 | -5.5 | L −9.5 | 170.5 | U 162 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 84-75 | -9.5 | L −0.5 | 150.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 64-86 | +14.5 | L −7.5 | 150.5 | U 150 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 75-78 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 151.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 103-59 | -19.5 | W +24.5 | 143.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 30 | @ | W 89-83 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 150.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 80-93 | +5.5 | L −7.5 | 165.5 | O 173 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 90-97 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 149.5 | O 187 |
| Jan 13 | vs | L 65-71 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 152.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 74-63 | -1.5 | W +9.5 | 145.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 20 | vs | L 77-81 | +8.5 | W +4.5 | 165.5 | U 158 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 71-59 | -5.5 | W +6.5 | 152.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 79-87 | -3.5 | L −11.5 | 150.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 1 | vs | W 76-61 | -2.5 | W +12.5 | 146.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 71-65 | +8.5 | W +14.5 | 143.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 88-86 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 158.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 78-73 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 152.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 62-61 | -11.5 | L −10.5 | 145.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 66-78 | +6.5 | L −5.5 | 148.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 25 | vs | L 56-67 | -3.5 | L −14.5 | 142.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 76-91 | +13.5 | L −1.5 | 160.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 4 | @ | L 52-64 | +2.5 | L −9.5 | 143.5 | U 116 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
NIA
W 83-63
+2.5
7
vs
SHU
W 92-80
−0.5
11
vs
QUC
W 87-81
−6.5
15
@
VILL
L 77-87
+0.5
19
vs
L-MD
W 92-78
−0.5
22
vs
NE
L 86-93
−14.5
2
vs
W&M
L 79-83
−9.5
6
vs
STBK
W 84-75
−0.5
10
@
BOIS
L 64-86
−7.5
13
@
NEV
L 75-78
+2.5
22
vs
CAN
W 103-59
+24.5
30
@
DAV
W 89-83
+8.5
3
vs
VCU
L 80-93
−7.5
7
@
JOES
L 90-97
−8.5
13
vs
DAY
L 65-71
−3.5
17
@
FOR
W 74-63
+9.5
20
vs
SLU
L 77-81
+4.5
24
@
LUC
W 71-59
+6.5
28
vs
SBU
L 79-87
−11.5
1
vs
URI
W 76-61
+12.5
4
@
GMU
W 71-65
+14.5
7
vs
GW
W 88-86
+3.5
14
@
SBU
W 78-73
+6.5
18
vs
LAS
W 62-61
−10.5
21
@
DAY
L 66-78
−5.5
25
vs
DAV
L 56-67
−14.5
28
@
SLU
L 76-91
−1.5
4
@
URI
L 52-64
−9.5
covered 12didn’t cover 16avg −0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
NIA
W 83-63
+6.5
7
vs
SHU
W 92-80
+14.5
11
vs
QUC
W 87-81
+5.5
15
@
VILL
L 77-87
+12.5
19
vs
L-MD
W 92-78
+19.5
22
vs
NE
L 86-93
+31.5
2
vs
W&M
L 79-83
−8.5
6
vs
STBK
W 84-75
+8.5
10
@
BOIS
L 64-86
−0.5
13
@
NEV
L 75-78
+1.5
22
vs
CAN
W 103-59
+18.5
30
@
DAV
W 89-83
+21.5
3
vs
VCU
L 80-93
+7.5
7
@
JOES
L 90-97
+37.5
13
vs
DAY
L 65-71
−16.5
17
@
FOR
W 74-63
−8.5
20
vs
SLU
L 77-81
−7.5
24
@
LUC
W 71-59
−22.5
28
vs
SBU
L 79-87
+15.5
1
vs
URI
W 76-61
−9.5
4
@
GMU
W 71-65
−7.5
7
vs
GW
W 88-86
+15.5
14
@
SBU
W 78-73
−1.5
18
vs
LAS
W 62-61
−22.5
21
@
DAY
L 66-78
−4.5
25
vs
DAV
L 56-67
−19.5
28
@
SLU
L 76-91
+6.5
4
@
URI
L 52-64
−27.5
over 15under 13avg +2.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Richmond
14-15 overall · 5-12 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Dayton60–65
- L@ Loyola Chicago66–69
- Wvs St Bonaventure99–94
- L@ Davidson63–65
- Lvs VCU67–78
4 days since their last game.
Duquesne
14-14 overall · 8-9 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Rhode Island52–64
- L@ Saint Louis76–91
- Lvs Davidson56–67
- L@ Dayton66–78
- Wvs La Salle62–61
3 days since their last game.