Day in numbers44 finalFavorites 20-24 ATS13 upsetsO/U 22-22Model Favorite 27-17Open
| Game | Spread, open → close | Moved | Total | Moved |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UNLV vs USU | USU -6.5 → USU -8.5 | 2 → USU | 164.5 → 156.5 | ▼ 8 |
| NU vs PUR | PUR -10.5 → PUR -13.5 | 3 → PUR | 147.5 → 139.5 | ▼ 8 |
| LUC vs DAV | DAV -9.5 → DAV -5.5 | 4 → LUC | 130.5 → 132.5 | ▲ 2 |
| CLEM vs UNC | UNC -1.5 → CLEM -2.5 | 4 → CLEM | 140.5 → 140.5 | no move |
| IOWA vs OSU | OSU -1.5 → IOWA -1.5 | 3 → IOWA | 139.5 → 140.5 | ▲ 1 |
| ISU vs TTU | ISU -4.5 → ISU -7.5 | 3 → ISU | 143.5 → 143.5 | no move |
| XAV vs CONN | CONN -14.5 → CONN -17.5 | 3 → CONN | 152.5 → 150.5 | ▼ 2 |
| UMES vs NCCU | NCCU -1.5 → UMES -1.5 | 3 → UMES | 133.5 → 131.5 | ▼ 2 |
| FAU vs UNT | FAU -1.5 → UNT -1.5 | 3 → UNT | 137.5 → 136.5 | ▼ 1 |
| UCD vs CSUF | UCD -1.5 → CSUF -1.5 | 3 → CSUF | 159.5 → 155.5 | ▼ 4 |
| Line moved | Covered | Cover rate |
|---|---|---|
| 1+ pts | 5579-5698-5 | 49% |
| 2+ pts | 2172-2236-2 | 49% |
| 3+ pts | 880-908 | 49% |
| 5+ pts | 139-149 | 48% |
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
Spread
M-OH -6.5
✓ MASS W ATS
Total
161.5 ▼5
▲ Over 170
Projected
81–87
✗ M-OH lost
Model: M-OH by 0.1 ✗ Model: Over 6.2 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
Spread
GW -7.5
✓ FOR W ATS
Total
144.5 ▲3
▼ Under 128
Projected
77–70
✓ GW won
Model: FOR by 0.8 ✓ Model: Over 2.3 ✗
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
Spread
UVA -6.5
✓ UVA W ATS
Total
153.5 ▲2
▲ Over 155
Projected
77–79
✓ UVA won
Model: NCSU by 4.2 ✗ Model: Over 1.9 ✓
FinalConference · Conference tournament
Spread
SJU -11.5
✓ SJU W ATS
Total
158.5 ▼2
▼ Under 157
Projected
77–91
✓ SJU won
Model: SJU by 2.1 ✓ Model: Over 9.2 ✗
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
Spread
IOWA -1.5
✓ OSU W ATS
Total
140.5 ▲1
▲ Over 141
Projected
74–74
✗ IOWA lost
Model: OSU by 0.8 ✓ Model: Over 7.5 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
Spread
ISU -7.5
✓ ISU W ATS
Total
143.5
▼ Under 128
Projected
75–71
✓ ISU won
Model: TTU by 3.6 ✗ Model: Over 2.9 ✗
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
Spread
UK -2.5
✓ UK W ATS
Total
148.5 ▼2
▲ Over 150
Projected
79–74
✓ UK won
Model: UK by 2.1 ✓ Model: Over 4.9 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
Spread
TOL -1.5
✓ BGSU W ATS
Total
150.5 ▼3
▲ Over 153
Projected
76–77
✓ TOL won
Model: BGSU by 0.9 ✓ Model: Over 2.2 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
Spread
AAMU -1.5
✓ AAMU W ATS
Total
142.5 ▼1
▲ Over 159
Projected
74–74
✗ TXSO lost
Model: TXSO by 1.6 ✗ Model: Over 6.3 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
Spread
GMU -2.5
✓ SBU W ATS
Total
143.5
▼ Under 120
Projected
70–74
✗ GMU lost
Model: GMU by 1.8 ✗ Model: Over 0.9 ✗
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
Spread
WIS -6.5
✓ WASH W ATS
Total
157.5 ▲1
▲ Over 167
Projected
77–81
✓ WIS won
Model: WASH by 2.5 ✓ Model: Over 0.6 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
Spread
LOU -1.5
✓ MIA W ATS
Total
153.5 ▼5
▼ Under 151
Projected
81–76
✗ LOU lost
Model: LOU by 3.3 ✗ Model: Over 3.8 ✗
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
Spread
HALL -2.5
✓ HALL W ATS
Total
136.5 ▲1
▼ Under 133
Projected
68–69
✓ HALL won
Model: CREI by 1.5 ✗ Model: Over 0.8 ✗
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
Spread
ARIZ -15.5
✓ ARIZ W ATS
Total
159.5 ▼2
▼ Under 140
Projected
74–89
✓ ARIZ won
Model: UCF by 0.3 ✗ Model: Over 3.8 ✗
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
Spread
USU -8.5
✓ USU W ATS
Total
156.5 ▼8
▼ Under 140
Projected
76–86
✓ USU won
Model: USU by 0.7 ✓ Model: Over 5.4 ✗
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
Spread
TENN -5.5
✓ TENN W ATS
Total
144.5 ▼5
▼ Under 134
Projected
75–77
✓ TENN won
Model: AUB by 2.9 ✗ Model: Over 7.4 ✗
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
Spread
AKR -12.5
✓ BUF W ATS
Total
158.5 ▼4
▼ Under 143
Projected
75–88
✓ AKR won
Model: AKR by 0.2 ✗ Model: Over 4.0 ✗
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
Spread
DUQ -1.5
✓ DUQ W ATS
Total
138.5 ▼1
▼ Under 128
Projected
73–73
✓ DUQ won
Model: URI by 1.4 ✗ Model: Over 7.5 ✗
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
Spread
GCU -3.5
✓ NEV W ATS
Total
137.5 ▼2
▲ Over 164
Projected
70–72
✗ GCU lost
Model: NEV by 1.8 ✓ Model: Over 5.1 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
Spread
NORF -7.5
✓ SCST W ATS
Total
144.5 ▼1
▲ Over 170
Projected
70–77
✗ NORF lost
Model: SCST by 0.6 ✓ Model: Over 2.6 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
Spread
PUR -13.5
✓ NU W ATS
Total
139.5 ▼8
▲ Over 149
Projected
67–79
✓ PUR won
Model: NU by 1.8 ✓ Model: Over 6.8 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
Spread
KENT -3.5
✓ KENT W ATS
Total
161.5 ▲1
▼ Under 161
Projected
81–84
✓ KENT won
Model: OHIO by 1.2 ✗ Model: Over 3.2 ✗
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
Spread
MTSU -1.5
✓ LT W ATS
Total
134.5 ▲4
▲ Over 149
Projected
70–68
✗ MTSU lost
Model: MTSU by 0.1 ✗ Model: Over 3.0 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
Spread
DUKE -16.5
✓ FSU W ATS
Total
150.5 ▼2
▲ Over 159
Projected
67–85
✓ DUKE won
Model: DUKE by 1.3 ✗ Model: Over 0.8 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
Spread
HOU -9.5
✓ BYU W ATS
Total
146.5 ▼2
▼ Under 139
Projected
72–77
✓ HOU won
Model: BYU by 4.6 ✓ Model: Over 2.5 ✗
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
Spread
CONN -17.5
✓ CONN W ATS
Total
150.5 ▼2
▲ Over 161
Projected
70–83
✓ CONN won
Model: XAV by 3.5 ✗ Model: Over 2.4 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
Spread
UGA -5.5
✓ MISS W ATS
Total
156.5 ▼3
▼ Under 148
Projected
78–85
✗ UGA lost
Model: UGA by 1.4 ✗ Model: Over 5.5 ✗
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
Spread
CLT -1.5
✓ CLT W ATS
Total
144.5
▼ Under 134
Projected
73–73
✓ CLT won
Model: TULN by 1.2 ✗ Model: Over 2.1 ✗
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
Spread
DAV -5.5
✓ LUC W ATS
Total
132.5 ▲2
▼ Under 123
Projected
65–72
✓ DAV won
Model: DAV by 1.5 ✗ Model: Over 3.7 ✗
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
Spread
SOU -4.5
✓ UAPB W ATS
Total
151.5 ▼2
▲ Over 165
Projected
77–83
✓ SOU won
Model: SOU by 1.4 ✗ Model: Over 8.3 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
Spread
UTA -4.5
✓ UTA W ATS
Total
141.5 ▲1
▼ Under 132
Projected
70–75
✓ UTA won
Model: UTA by 0.3 ✓ Model: Over 3.5 ✗
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
Spread
SDSU -6.5
✓ SDSU W ATS
Total
142.5 ▼1
▼ Under 133
Projected
69–75
✓ SDSU won
Model: CSU by 1.4 ✗ Model: Over 1.4 ✗
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
Spread
WKU -1.5
✓ KENN W ATS
Total
159.5
▲ Over 183
Projected
81–81
✗ WKU lost
Model: KENN by 1.1 ✓ Model: Over 2.0 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
Spread
UCSD -1.5
✓ CSUN W ATS
Total
153.5 ▲1
▼ Under 150
Projected
79–75
✗ UCSD lost
Model: UCSD by 2.2 ✗ Model: Over 1.1 ✗
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
Spread
UCLA -10.5
✓ UCLA W ATS
Total
141.5 ▼3
▼ Under 131
Projected
68–79
✓ UCLA won
Model: UCLA by 0.2 ✓ Model: Over 5.4 ✗
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
Spread
UMES -1.5
✓ NCCU W ATS
Total
131.5 ▼2
▲ Over 159
Projected
68–68
✗ UMES lost
Model: NCCU by 1.2 ✓ Model: Over 4.0 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
Spread
CLEM -2.5
✓ UNC W ATS
Total
140.5
▲ Over 159
Projected
70–72
✗ UNC lost
Model: UNC by 4.4 ✓ Model: Over 1.3 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
Spread
VILL -7.5
✓ GTWN W ATS
Total
140.5 ▼2
▲ Over 142
Projected
69–76
✗ VILL lost
Model: GTWN by 1.0 ✓ Model: Over 4.8 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
Spread
UNT -1.5
✓ UNT W ATS
Total
136.5 ▼1
▲ Over 144
Projected
71–70
✗ FAU lost
Model: FAU by 2.4 ✗ Model: Over 4.3 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
Spread
KU -4.5
✓ KU W ATS
Total
146.5 ▲5
▲ Over 151
Projected
71–75
✓ KU won
Model: TCU by 0.4 ✗ Model: Under 0.8 ✗
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
Spread
TA&M -2.5
✓ OU W ATS
Total
162.5
▼ Under 146
Projected
82–85
✗ TA&M lost
Model: TA&M by 0.5 ✗ Model: Over 4.4 ✗
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
Spread
UTU -1.5
✓ UTU W ATS
Total
142.5 ▲1
▲ Over 154
Projected
72–73
✓ UTU won
Model: ACU by 1.2 ✗ Model: Over 2.6 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
Spread
CSUF -1.5
✓ CSUF W ATS
Total
155.5 ▼4
▼ Under 152
Projected
80–78
✗ UCD lost
Model: UCD by 3.6 ✗ Model: Over 2.6 ✗
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
Spread
UNM -16.5
✓ SJSU W ATS
Total
154.5 ▲1
▲ Over 170
Projected
70–83
✓ UNM won
Model: SJSU by 3.5 ✓ Model: Under 1.3 ✗
| Status | Matchup | Spread | Total | Model line | Spread edge | Model total | Total edge | Win prob | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Final | 15-15 · #209 28-0 · #125 |
M-OH -6.5 | 161.5 | M-OH -6.6 | M-OH +0.1 | 167.7 | Over 6.2 | 72% M-OH | L W | › |
| Final | 16-14 · #101 14-14 · #100 |
GW -7.5 | 144.5 | GW -6.7 | FOR +0.8 | 146.8 | Over 2.3 | 72% GW | W L | › |
| Final | 20-12 · #48 27-4 · #20 |
UVA -6.5 | 153.5 | UVA -2.4 | NCSU +4.2 | 155.4 | Over 1.9 | 58% UVA | L W | › |
| Final | 15-17 · #52 25-6 · #9 |
SJU -11.5 | 158.5 | SJU -13.6 | SJU +2.1 | 167.7 | Over 9.2 | 88% SJU | W L | › |
| Final | 21-11 · #43 20-11 · #33 |
IOWA -1.5 | 140.5 | IOWA -0.7 | OSU +0.8 | 148.0 | Over 7.5 | 52% IOWA | W W | › |
| Final | 26-6 · #13 22-9 · #12 |
ISU -7.5 | 143.5 | ISU -3.9 | TTU +3.6 | 146.4 | Over 2.9 | 63% ISU | L L | › |
| Final | 20-12 · #19 20-11 · #54 |
UK -2.5 | 148.5 | UK -4.6 | UK +2.1 | 153.4 | Over 4.9 | 66% UK | W W | › |
| Final | 15-13 · #200 15-14 · #157 |
TOL -1.5 | 150.5 | TOL -0.6 | BGSU +0.9 | 152.7 | Over 2.2 | 52% TOL | W W | › |
| Final | 14-14 · #328 10-17 · #322 |
AAMU -1.5 | 142.5 | TXSO -0.1 | TXSO +1.6 | 148.8 | Over 6.3 | 50% TXSO | L W | › |
| Final | 15-16 · #142 22-8 · #93 |
GMU -2.5 | 143.5 | GMU -4.3 | GMU +1.8 | 144.4 | Over 0.9 | 65% GMU | L L | › |
| Final | 16-16 · #56 22-9 · #41 |
WIS -6.5 | 157.5 | WIS -4.0 | WASH +2.5 | 158.1 | Over 0.6 | 64% WIS | W W | › |
| Final | 23-9 · #14 24-7 · #25 |
LOU -1.5 | 153.5 | LOU -4.8 | LOU +3.3 | 157.3 | Over 3.8 | 66% LOU | L L | › |
| Final | 15-16 · #37 20-11 · #67 |
HALL -2.5 | 136.5 | HALL -1.0 | CREI +1.5 | 137.3 | Over 0.8 | 54% HALL | L L | › |
| Final | 21-10 · #39 29-2 · #5 |
ARIZ -15.5 | 159.5 | ARIZ -15.2 | UCF +0.3 | 163.3 | Over 3.8 | 91% ARIZ | L L | › |
| Final | 16-15 · #98 24-6 · #58 |
USU -8.5 | 156.5 | USU -9.2 | USU +0.7 | 161.9 | Over 5.4 | 79% USU | W L | › |
| Final | 17-15 · #21 21-10 · #7 |
TENN -5.5 | 144.5 | TENN -2.6 | AUB +2.9 | 151.9 | Over 7.4 | 59% TENN | L L | › |
| Final | 15-14 · #237 24-5 · #118 |
AKR -12.5 | 158.5 | AKR -12.7 | AKR +0.2 | 162.5 | Over 4.0 | 87% AKR | L L | › |
| Final | 16-15 · #105 15-14 · #107 |
DUQ -1.5 | 138.5 | DUQ -0.1 | URI +1.4 | 146.0 | Over 7.5 | 50% DUQ | L L | › |
| Final | 21-11 · #96 20-11 · #80 |
GCU -3.5 | 137.5 | GCU -1.7 | NEV +1.8 | 142.6 | Over 5.1 | 56% GCU | W W | › |
| Final | 7-21 · #353 11-16 · #319 |
NORF -7.5 | 144.5 | NORF -6.9 | SCST +0.6 | 147.1 | Over 2.6 | 73% NORF | W W | › |
| Final | 15-18 · #59 23-8 · #23 |
PUR -13.5 | 139.5 | PUR -11.7 | NU +1.8 | 146.3 | Over 6.8 | 85% PUR | W W | › |
| Final | 13-16 · #128 21-8 · #151 |
KENT -3.5 | 161.5 | KENT -2.3 | OHIO +1.2 | 164.7 | Over 3.2 | 58% KENT | L L | › |
| Final | 14-14 · #154 15-13 · #244 |
MTSU -1.5 | 134.5 | MTSU -1.6 | MTSU +0.1 | 137.5 | Over 3.0 | 56% MTSU | L W | › |
| Final | 18-14 · #81 29-2 · #3 |
DUKE -16.5 | 150.5 | DUKE -17.8 | DUKE +1.3 | 151.3 | Over 0.8 | 94% DUKE | L W | › |
| Final | 23-10 · #24 26-5 · #2 |
HOU -9.5 | 146.5 | HOU -4.9 | BYU +4.6 | 149.0 | Over 2.5 | 67% HOU | W L | › |
| Final | 15-17 · #49 27-4 · #6 |
CONN -17.5 | 150.5 | CONN -14.0 | XAV +3.5 | 152.9 | Over 2.4 | 89% CONN | L W | › |
| Final | 13-19 · #46 22-9 · #34 |
UGA -5.5 | 156.5 | UGA -6.9 | UGA +1.4 | 162.0 | Over 5.5 | 73% UGA | L L | › |
| Final | 17-14 · #130 14-16 · #141 |
CLT -1.5 | 144.5 | CLT -0.3 | TULN +1.2 | 146.6 | Over 2.1 | 51% CLT | L L | › |
| Final | 9-23 · #113 17-12 · #115 |
DAV -5.5 | 132.5 | DAV -7.0 | DAV +1.5 | 136.2 | Over 3.7 | 73% DAV | L L | › |
| Final | 11-18 · #363 12-16 · #309 |
SOU -4.5 | 151.5 | SOU -5.9 | SOU +1.4 | 159.8 | Over 8.3 | 70% SOU | L W | › |
| Final | 7-21 · #267 15-13 · #257 |
UTA -4.5 | 141.5 | UTA -4.8 | UTA +0.3 | 145.0 | Over 3.5 | 66% UTA | W L | › |
| Final | 20-11 · #87 19-10 · #75 |
SDSU -6.5 | 142.5 | SDSU -5.1 | CSU +1.4 | 143.9 | Over 1.4 | 67% SDSU | L L | › |
| Final | 15-13 · #148 16-13 · #129 |
WKU -1.5 | 159.5 | WKU -0.5 | KENN +1.1 | 161.5 | Over 2.0 | 52% WKU | W W | › |
| Final | 21-10 · #123 17-13 · #194 |
UCSD -1.5 | 153.5 | UCSD -3.7 | UCSD +2.2 | 154.6 | Over 1.1 | 63% UCSD | L L | › |
| Final | 14-18 · #62 21-10 · #26 |
UCLA -10.5 | 141.5 | UCLA -10.7 | UCLA +0.2 | 146.9 | Over 5.4 | 82% UCLA | W L | › |
| Final | 7-22 · #364 8-17 · #357 |
UMES -1.5 | 131.5 | UMES -0.3 | NCCU +1.2 | 135.5 | Over 4.0 | 51% UMES | W W | › |
| Final | 23-9 · #35 24-7 · #44 |
CLEM -2.5 | 140.5 | UNC -1.9 | UNC +4.4 | 141.8 | Over 1.3 | 57% UNC | W W | › |
| Final | 15-17 · #64 24-7 · #32 |
VILL -7.5 | 140.5 | VILL -6.5 | GTWN +1.0 | 145.3 | Over 4.8 | 71% VILL | W W | › |
| Final | 16-14 · #109 16-13 · #112 |
UNT -1.5 | 136.5 | FAU -0.8 | FAU +2.4 | 140.8 | Over 4.3 | 53% FAU | L W | › |
| Final | 22-10 · #40 22-9 · #16 |
KU -4.5 | 146.5 | KU -4.1 | TCU +0.4 | 145.7 | Under 0.8 | 64% KU | L L | › |
| Final | 18-14 · #31 21-10 · #28 |
TA&M -2.5 | 162.5 | TA&M -3.0 | TA&M +0.5 | 166.9 | Over 4.4 | 60% TA&M | L L | › |
| Final | 11-18 · #253 15-14 · #268 |
UTU -1.5 | 142.5 | UTU -0.3 | ACU +1.2 | 145.1 | Over 2.6 | 51% UTU | L W | › |
| Final | 17-13 · #182 15-15 · #312 |
CSUF -1.5 | 155.5 | UCD -2.1 | UCD +3.6 | 158.1 | Over 2.6 | 57% UCD | L L | › |
| Final | 8-23 · #143 21-9 · #82 |
UNM -16.5 | 154.5 | UNM -13.0 | SJSU +3.5 | 153.2 | Under 1.3 | 87% UNM | W L | › |
The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record