Day in numbers

Tap a number to filter the games below

Games3838 final · 0 to play
Lines moved301+ pt since the open · 38 with a line
Totals moved341+ pt since the open
Favorites ATS18-2047% covered
Upsets14outright
Over / Under18-2047% over
Model Favorite24-1463% won
GameSpread, open → closeMovedTotalMoved
NU vs IUIU -2.5 → IU -6.54 → IU144.5 → 142.5▼ 2
OKST vs TCUTCU -3.5 → TCU -7.54 → TCU156.5 → 158.5▲ 2
TAR vs ACUTAR -1.5 → ACU -1.53 → ACU139.5 → 134.5▼ 5
JKST vs FAMUFAMU -4.5 → FAMU -6.52 → FAMU147.5 → 141.5▼ 6
GTWN vs DEPDEP -1.5 → GTWN -1.53 → GTWN137.5 → 136.5▼ 1
TEM vs FAUFAU -1.5 → TEM -1.53 → TEM148.5 → 144.5▼ 4
WYO vs UNLVUNLV -2.5 → UNLV -2.5no move159.5 → 153.5▼ 6
SBU vs LASSBU -5.5 → SBU -7.52 → SBU145.5 → 146.5▲ 1
MD vs IOWAIOWA -10.5 → IOWA -11.51 → IOWA137.5 → 133.5▼ 4
ASU vs ISUISU -11.5 → ISU -13.52 → ISU146.5 → 148.5▲ 2
Line movedCoveredCover rate
1+ pts5579-5698-549%
2+ pts2172-2236-249%
3+ pts880-90849%
5+ pts139-14948%
Sort by

Sort

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
14-16 · #142
99
8-22 · #124
80
Spread
SBU -7.5
✓ SBU W ATS
Total
146.5 ▲1
▲ Over 179
Projected
75–71
✓ SBU won
Model: LAS by 3.8 ✗ Model: Under 0.7 ✗
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
12-20 · #50
64
Iowa
20-11 · #43
75
Spread
IOWA -11.5
✓ MD W ATS
Total
133.5 ▼4
▲ Over 139
Projected
65–75
✓ IOWA won
Model: MD by 1.0 ✓ Model: Over 6.4 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
Pitt
13-19 · #74
88
19-12 · #48
98
Spread
NCSU -8.5
✓ NCSU W ATS
Total
144.5 ▼2
▲ Over 186
Projected
71–78
✓ NCSU won
Model: PITT by 2.1 ✗ Model: Over 4.2 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
17-15 · #60
42
25-6 · #13 AP #7
91
Spread
ISU -13.5
✓ ISU W ATS
Total
148.5 ▲2
▼ Under 133
Projected
69–81
✓ ISU won
Model: ASU by 1.4 ✗ Model: Over 1.2 ✗
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
LSU
15-16 · #51
82
19-12 · #19
87
Spread
UK -8.5
✓ LSU W ATS
Total
151.5 ▼2
▲ Over 169
Projected
76–82
✓ UK won
Model: LSU by 2.5 ✓ Model: Over 6.5 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
11-17 · #343
71
16-14 · #202
67
Spread
BCU -5.5
✓ PV W ATS
Total
147.5 ▼4
▼ Under 138
Projected
76–81
✗ BCU lost
Model: PV by 0.3 ✓ Model: Over 9.4 ✗
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
8-23 · #113
75
14-16 · #104
67
Spread
RICH -4.5
✓ LUC W ATS
Total
141.5 ▼2
▲ Over 142
Projected
70–76
✗ RICH lost
Model: RICH by 1.1 ✗ Model: Over 3.9 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
USC
17-13 · #36
79
15-16 · #56
83
Spread
WASH -3.5
✓ WASH W ATS
Total
154.5 ▲3
▲ Over 162
Projected
77–80
✓ WASH won
Model: WASH by 0.2 ✓ Model: Over 2.6 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
SMU
20-12 · #55
58
22-9 · #14 AP #24
62
Spread
LOU -7.5
✓ SMU W ATS
Total
164.5 ▼1
▼ Under 120
Projected
80–86
✓ LOU won
Model: SMU by 1.4 ✓ Model: Over 0.6 ✗
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
17-13 · #122
70
UNLV
15-15 · #98
73
Spread
UNLV -2.5
✓ UNLV W ATS
Total
153.5 ▼6
▼ Under 143
Projected
78–78
✗ WYO lost
Model: WYO by 2.5 ✗ Model: Over 3.3 ✗
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
13-18 · #53
61
16-15 · #21
79
Spread
AUB -8.5
✓ AUB W ATS
Total
160.5
▼ Under 140
Projected
78–87
✓ AUB won
Model: AUB by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 3.5 ✗
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
18-14 · #30
65
UCF
20-10 · #39
66
Spread
CIN -3.5
✓ UCF W ATS
Total
149.5 ▲2
▼ Under 131
Projected
77–74
✗ CIN lost
Model: UCF by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 1.7 ✗
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
14-17 · #52
91
16-15 · #72
81
Spread
PROV -1.5
✓ PROV W ATS
Total
162.5 ▼4
▲ Over 172
Projected
87–86
✓ PROV won
Model: BTLR by 0.9 ✗ Model: Over 10.5 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
25-5 · #127
76
26-4 · #193
59
Spread
MCN -3.5
✓ MCN W ATS
Total
134.5 ▼3
▲ Over 135
Projected
74–69
✓ MCN won
Model: MCN by 1.3 ✓ Model: Over 7.7 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
3-28 · #220
45
20-11 · #96
80
Spread
NEV -19.5
✓ NEV W ATS
Total
140.5 ▼1
▼ Under 125
Projected
60–80
✓ NEV won
Model: NEV by 0.2 ✓ Model: Under 1.2 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
4-21 · #351
75
11-15 · #345
70
Spread
MORG -3.5
✓ DSU W ATS
Total
142.5 ▼1
▲ Over 145
Projected
72–73
✗ MORG lost
Model: DSU by 2.1 ✓ Model: Over 1.9 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
12-17 · #250
77
22-6 · #160
69
Spread
LIB -4.5
✓ MOST W ATS
Total
142.5 ▼2
▲ Over 146
Projected
70–75
✗ LIB lost
Model: LIB by 0.7 ✗ Model: Over 1.9 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
14-18 · #59
74
18-13 · #38
61
Spread
IU -6.5
✓ NU W ATS
Total
142.5 ▼2
▼ Under 135
Projected
72–76
✗ IU lost
Model: NU by 2.5 ✓ Model: Over 4.6 ✗
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
14-17 · #49
89
12-19 · #42
87
Spread
MARQ -4.5
✓ XAV W ATS
Total
157.5 ▲3
▲ Over 176
Projected
78–80
✗ MARQ lost
Model: XAV by 2.3 ✓ Model: Over 0.9 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
12-19 · #46
76
17-13 · #11
66
Spread
TEX -5.5
✓ MISS W ATS
Total
147.5 ▼3
▼ Under 142
Projected
74–80
✗ TEX lost
Model: TEX by 0.4 ✗ Model: Over 6.4 ✗
FinalConference · Conference tournament
16-16 · #261
60
15-16 · #216
74
Spread
BU -2.5
✓ LEH W ATS
Total
138.5 ▼3
▼ Under 134
Projected
74–74
✗ BU lost
Model: LEH by 2.4 ✓ Model: Over 10.0 ✗
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
BYU
22-10 · #24
68
18-13 · #47
48
Spread
BYU -3.5
✓ BYU W ATS
Total
141.5
▼ Under 116
Projected
76–70
✓ BYU won
Model: BYU by 3.2 ✓ Model: Over 4.5 ✗
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
16-14 · #130
81
13-18 · #76
69
Spread
MEM -4.5
✓ TULN W ATS
Total
151.5
▼ Under 150
Projected
73–78
✗ MEM lost
Model: MEM by 0.9 ✗ Model: Under 0.1 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
20-10 · #92
89
17-14 · #81
95
Spread
FSU -1.5
✓ FSU W ATS
Total
154.5 ▲1
▲ Over 184
Projected
77–79
✓ FSU won
Model: FSU by 0.4 ✓ Model: Over 1.4 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
10-17 · #185
78
10-18 · #253
84
Spread
ACU -1.5
✓ ACU W ATS
Total
134.5 ▼5
▲ Over 162
Projected
71–69
✗ TAR lost
Model: TAR by 2.6 ✗ Model: Over 5.4 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
12-20 · #280
60
12-15 · #327
70
Spread
FAMU -6.5
✓ FAMU W ATS
Total
141.5 ▼6
▼ Under 130
Projected
74–76
✓ FAMU won
Model: JKST by 4.1 ✗ Model: Over 8.4 ✗
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
12-18 · #174
63
19-11 · #87
67
Spread
CSU -7.5
✓ FRES W ATS
Total
146.5
▼ Under 130
Projected
69–75
✓ CSU won
Model: FRES by 1.9 ✓ Model: Under 2.9 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
13-15 · #133
61
18-10 · #189
69
Spread
SHSU -4.5
✓ SHSU W ATS
Total
154.5 ▼2
▼ Under 130
Projected
77–79
✓ SHSU won
Model: NMSU by 2.2 ✗ Model: Over 1.8 ✗
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
12-18 · #164
69
20-10 · #123
72
Spread
UCSD -4.5
✓ CP W ATS
Total
162.5 ▲4
▼ Under 141
Projected
77–84
✓ UCSD won
Model: UCSD by 1.8 ✗ Model: Under 1.6 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
13-18 · #62
72
15-16 · #70
67
Spread
MINN -6.5
✓ RUTG W ATS
Total
135.5 ▼1
▲ Over 139
Projected
67–72
✗ MINN lost
Model: RUTG by 1.7 ✓ Model: Over 3.1 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
14-17 · #64
63
16-15 · #66
56
Spread
GTWN -1.5
✓ GTWN W ATS
Total
136.5 ▼1
▼ Under 119
Projected
70–70
✓ GTWN won
Model: DEP by 1.2 ✗ Model: Over 3.6 ✗
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
17-15 · #89
62
22-9 · #35
71
Spread
CLEM -5.5
✓ CLEM W ATS
Total
143.5 ▲2
▼ Under 133
Projected
71–75
✓ CLEM won
Model: WAKE by 1.4 ✗ Model: Over 2.0 ✗
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
13-18 · #79
74
17-14 · #31
86
Spread
OU -7.5
✓ OU W ATS
Total
149.5 ▲1
▲ Over 160
Projected
74–79
✓ OU won
Model: SC by 2.6 ✗ Model: Over 3.5 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
15-15 · #111
59
FAU
15-14 · #109
63
Spread
TEM -1.5
✓ FAU W ATS
Total
144.5 ▼4
▼ Under 122
Projected
75–77
✓ FAU won
Model: FAU by 3.7 ✓ Model: Over 7.6 ✗
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
19-13 · #45
88
TCU
21-10 · #40
95
Spread
TCU -7.5
✓ OKST W ATS
Total
158.5 ▲2
▲ Over 183
Projected
79–82
✓ TCU won
Model: OKST by 4.3 ✓ Model: Over 2.3 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
7-23 · #143
84
19-10 · #86
74
Spread
BOIS -14.5
✓ SJSU W ATS
Total
146.5 ▼4
▲ Over 158
Projected
68–82
✗ BOIS lost
Model: SJSU by 0.6 ✓ Model: Over 2.5 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
16-13 · #134
73
16-13 · #182
79
Spread
UCSB -4.5
✓ UCD W ATS
Total
139.5 ▼3
▲ Over 152
Projected
74–73
✗ UCSB lost
Model: UCD by 3.0 ✓ Model: Over 7.6 ✓
FinalConference · Neutral site · Conference tournament
17-14 · #247
77
15-14 · #273
66
Spread
IDHO -3.5
✓ IDHO W ATS
Total
147.5 ▲2
▼ Under 143
Projected
76–73
✓ IDHO won
Model: MONT by 0.6 ✗ Model: Over 1.7 ✗
StatusMatchupSpreadTotalModel lineSpread edgeModel totalTotal edgeWin probModel
Final
14-16 · #142
99
8-22 · #124
80
SBU -7.5 146.5 SBU -3.7 LAS +3.8 145.8 Under 0.7 63% SBU L L ›
Final
12-20 · #50
64
20-11 · #43
75
IOWA -11.5 133.5 IOWA -10.5 MD +1.0 139.9 Over 6.4 82% IOWA W W ›
Final
13-19 · #74
88
19-12 · #48
98
NCSU -8.5 144.5 NCSU -6.4 PITT +2.1 148.7 Over 4.2 71% NCSU L W ›
Final
17-15 · #60
42
25-6 · #13
91
ISU -13.5 148.5 ISU -12.1 ASU +1.4 149.7 Over 1.2 86% ISU L L ›
Final
15-16 · #51
82
19-12 · #19
87
UK -8.5 151.5 UK -6.0 LSU +2.5 158.0 Over 6.5 70% UK W W ›
Final
11-17 · #343
71
16-14 · #202
67
BCU -5.5 147.5 BCU -5.2 PV +0.3 156.9 Over 9.4 67% BCU W L ›
Final
8-23 · #113
75
14-16 · #104
67
RICH -4.5 141.5 RICH -5.6 RICH +1.1 145.4 Over 3.9 69% RICH L W ›
Final
17-13 · #36
79
15-16 · #56
83
WASH -3.5 154.5 WASH -3.7 WASH +0.2 157.1 Over 2.6 63% WASH W W ›
Final
20-12 · #55
58
22-9 · #14
62
LOU -7.5 164.5 LOU -6.1 SMU +1.4 165.1 Over 0.6 70% LOU W L ›
Final
17-13 · #122
70
15-15 · #98
73
UNLV -2.5 153.5 UNLV -0.1 WYO +2.5 156.8 Over 3.3 50% UNLV L L ›
Final
13-18 · #53
61
16-15 · #21
79
AUB -8.5 160.5 AUB -9.0 AUB +0.5 164.0 Over 3.5 78% AUB W L ›
Final
18-14 · #30
65
20-10 · #39
66
CIN -3.5 149.5 CIN -3.0 UCF +0.5 151.2 Over 1.7 61% CIN W L ›
Final
14-17 · #52
91
16-15 · #72
81
PROV -1.5 162.5 PROV -0.6 BTLR +0.9 173.0 Over 10.5 52% PROV L W ›
Final
25-5 · #127
76
26-4 · #193
59
MCN -3.5 134.5 MCN -4.8 MCN +1.3 142.2 Over 7.7 66% MCN W W ›
Final
3-28 · #220
45
20-11 · #96
80
NEV -19.5 140.5 NEV -19.7 NEV +0.2 139.3 Under 1.2 96% NEV W W ›
Final
4-21 · #351
75
11-15 · #345
70
MORG -3.5 142.5 MORG -1.4 DSU +2.1 144.4 Over 1.9 55% MORG W W ›
Final
12-17 · #250
77
22-6 · #160
69
LIB -4.5 142.5 LIB -5.2 LIB +0.7 144.4 Over 1.9 68% LIB L W ›
Final
14-18 · #59
74
18-13 · #38
61
IU -6.5 142.5 IU -4.0 NU +2.5 147.1 Over 4.6 64% IU W L ›
Final
14-17 · #49
89
12-19 · #42
87
MARQ -4.5 157.5 MARQ -2.3 XAV +2.3 158.4 Over 0.9 58% MARQ W W ›
Final
12-19 · #46
76
17-13 · #11
66
TEX -5.5 147.5 TEX -5.9 TEX +0.4 153.9 Over 6.4 70% TEX L L ›
Final
16-16 · #261
60
15-16 · #216
74
BU -2.5 138.5 BU -0.1 LEH +2.4 148.5 Over 10.0 50% LEH W L ›
Final
22-10 · #24
68
18-13 · #47
48
BYU -3.5 141.5 BYU -6.7 BYU +3.2 146.0 Over 4.5 72% BYU W L ›
Final
16-14 · #130
81
13-18 · #76
69
MEM -4.5 151.5 MEM -5.4 MEM +0.9 151.4 Under 0.1 68% MEM L W ›
Final
20-10 · #92
89
17-14 · #81
95
FSU -1.5 154.5 FSU -1.9 FSU +0.4 155.9 Over 1.4 56% FSU W W ›
Final
10-17 · #185
78
10-18 · #253
84
ACU -1.5 134.5 TAR -1.1 TAR +2.6 139.9 Over 5.4 54% TAR L W ›
Final
12-20 · #280
60
12-15 · #327
70
FAMU -6.5 141.5 FAMU -2.4 JKST +4.1 149.9 Over 8.4 58% FAMU L L ›
Final
12-18 · #174
63
19-11 · #87
67
CSU -7.5 146.5 CSU -5.6 FRES +1.9 143.6 Under 2.9 69% CSU W W ›
Final
13-15 · #133
61
18-10 · #189
69
SHSU -4.5 154.5 SHSU -2.3 NMSU +2.2 156.3 Over 1.8 58% SHSU L L ›
Final
12-18 · #164
69
20-10 · #123
72
UCSD -4.5 162.5 UCSD -6.3 UCSD +1.8 160.9 Under 1.6 71% UCSD L W ›
Final
13-18 · #62
72
15-16 · #70
67
MINN -6.5 135.5 MINN -4.8 RUTG +1.7 138.6 Over 3.1 66% MINN W W ›
Final
14-17 · #64
63
16-15 · #66
56
GTWN -1.5 136.5 GTWN -0.3 DEP +1.2 140.1 Over 3.6 51% GTWN L L ›
Final
17-15 · #89
62
22-9 · #35
71
CLEM -5.5 143.5 CLEM -4.1 WAKE +1.4 145.5 Over 2.0 64% CLEM L L ›
Final
13-18 · #79
74
17-14 · #31
86
OU -7.5 149.5 OU -4.9 SC +2.6 153.0 Over 3.5 67% OU L W ›
Final
15-15 · #111
59
15-14 · #109
63
TEM -1.5 144.5 FAU -2.2 FAU +3.7 152.1 Over 7.6 58% FAU W L ›
Final
19-13 · #45
88
21-10 · #40
95
TCU -7.5 158.5 TCU -3.2 OKST +4.3 160.8 Over 2.3 61% TCU W W ›
Final
7-23 · #143
84
19-10 · #86
74
BOIS -14.5 146.5 BOIS -13.9 SJSU +0.6 149.0 Over 2.5 89% BOIS W W ›
Final
16-13 · #134
73
16-13 · #182
79
UCSB -4.5 139.5 UCSB -1.5 UCD +3.0 147.1 Over 7.6 55% UCSB W W ›
Final
17-14 · #247
77
15-14 · #273
66
IDHO -3.5 147.5 IDHO -2.9 MONT +0.6 149.2 Over 1.7 60% IDHO L L ›
The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record