Legacy Arena at BJCC · Neutral site · Conference game · Conference tournament
Closing line
MEM -4.5✓ TULN covered by 16.5
Closing total151.5Under by 1.5
| This season | MEM | |
|---|---|---|
| 16-14 | Record | 13-18 |
| 14-16 | ATS | 14-17 |
| 13-17 | O/U | 16-15 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: TULN 73–78 MEM · ✗ MEM (68%) lost
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| TULN | 39 | 42 | 81 |
| MEM | 31 | 38 | 69 |
1st half: TULN 39, MEM 31 (TULN by 8). The model had MEM by 3.1 and a total of 70.8 (actual 70).
Team stats
| TULN | MEM | |
|---|---|---|
| 22-62 35% | Field goals | 22-61 36% |
| 14-34 41% | 3-pointers | 5-22 23% |
| 23-28 82% | Free throws | 20-29 69% |
| 40 15 off | Rebounds | 45 16 off |
| 13 | Assists | 7 |
| 6 | Steals | 5 |
| 1 | Blocks | 7 |
| 10 | Turnovers | 12 |
| 23 | Fouls | 19 |
| 16 | Points in paint | 30 |
| 19 | Fast-break points | 12 |
Players
| TULN | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Curtis Williams Jr. G | 37 | 11 | 7 | 1 | 3-10 | 3-8 |
| Rowan Brumbaugh G | 37 | 35 | 8 | 2 | 10-15 | 5-8 |
| Asher Woods G | 29 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 2-10 | 0-3 |
| Tyler Ringgold F | 28 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 1-6 | 1-2 |
| Percy Daniels C | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Scotty Middleton F | 24 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 3-11 | 3-9 |
| KJ Greene G | 23 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 1-5 | 1-2 |
| Luke Rasmussen G | 14 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2-4 | 1-2 |
| Josiah Moore G | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Vasilije Kuridza, Robert Moore, Joseph Teich, Luke Cronin, Jake Shapiro, Davion Bradford
| MEM | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dug McDaniel G | 40 | 11 | 6 | 2 | 4-14 | 2-8 |
| Zach Davis G | 33 | 12 | 8 | 1 | 4-11 | 1-3 |
| Curtis Givens III G | 29 | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4-9 | 1-5 |
| Quante Berry G | 25 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 3-7 | 1-3 |
| Thierno Sylla C | 21 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Aaron Bradshaw F | 22 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 1-5 | 0-1 |
| Sincere Parker G | 15 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0-7 | 0-2 |
| Julius Thedford G | 15 | 13 | 4 | 1 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Ashton Hardaway, Simon Majok, Mason Matthews, William Whorton, Hasan Abdul Hakim, Arop Arop, Tariq Ingraham
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketMEM -4.5
ModelMEM -5.4
Model edgeMEM +0.9
L TULN covered
Total
Market151.5
Model151.4
Model edgeUnder 0.1
W Under
Projected score
TULN 73 · MEM 78.4
TULN 81 · MEM 69
Win probability
MEM 68%
1st half
Spread
MEM -3.1
TULN -8.0
Total
70.8
70 points
Projected score
TULN 33.9 · MEM 37
TULN 39 · MEM 31
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenMEM -4.5
no move
CloseMEM -4.5
No change since the open
Total
Open151.5
no move
Close151.5
No change since the open
Moneyline
TULN +164 · MEM -198
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened MEM -4.5 · unchangedmodel MEM -5.5
model MEM -5.5
Opened 151.5 · unchangedmodel 151.5 matches the line
model 151.5 = line ✓
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | |
| 3-7 30% | 3-7 30% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 11 since 2021-22
TULN 5–6 MEMMEM leads · 11 games since 2021-22 · TULN 7-4 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2025-26 | MEM 96 @ TULN 95 | TULN +2.5 | TULN W |
| Feb 1, 2025-26 | TULN 78 @ MEM 76 | MEM -8.5 | TULN W |
| Mar 15, 2024-25 | TULN 77 vs MEM 78 | MEM -8.5 | TULN W |
| Jan 30, 2024-25 | MEM 68 @ TULN 56 | TULN +5.5 | MEM W |
| Feb 11, 2023-24 | TULN 78 @ MEM 90 | MEM -8.5 | MEM W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Tulane
30 games played
Straight up
16-14
53% wins
Against the spread
14-16
47% covers · avg −3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-17
43% overs · avg −0.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 85-72 | -7.5 | W +5.5 | 154.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 79-71 | -12.5 | L −4.5 | 146.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 11 | @ | W 66-62 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 135.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 14 | vs | L 63-85 | -11.5 | L −33.5 | 153.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 75-96 | +8.5 | L −12.5 | 151.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 93-90 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 140.5 | O 183 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 82-72 | -8.5 | W +1.5 | 148.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 65-63 | -11.5 | L −9.5 | 148.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 71-88 | +6.5 | L −10.5 | 162.5 | U 159 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 67-93 | +5.5 | L −20.5 | 149.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 61-53 | -4.5 | W +3.5 | 140.5 | U 114 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 63-61 | -2.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | U 124 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 79-70 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 145.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 69-66 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 158.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 85-52 | -7.5 | W +25.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 69-82 | +1.5 | L −11.5 | 153.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 18 | vs | L 63-71 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 137.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 74-79 | +10.5 | W +5.5 | 155.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 23 | @ | L 70-73 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 143.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 83-97 | +8.5 | L −5.5 | 158.5 | O 180 |
| Feb 1 | @ | W 78-76 | +8.5 | W +10.5 | 151.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 8 | vs | L 61-75 | +5.5 | L −8.5 | 148.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 77-66 | -1.5 | W +9.5 | 144.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 15 | @ | W 55-54 | +6.5 | W +7.5 | 152.5 | U 109 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 77-71 | +6.5 | W +12.5 | 137.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 22 | vs | W 81-75 | -4.5 | W +1.5 | 147.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 25 | vs | L 56-90 | +5.5 | L −28.5 | 156.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 1 | @ | L 62-90 | +15.5 | L −12.5 | 155.5 | U 152 |
| Mar 5 | @ | L 60-89 | +4.5 | L −24.5 | 144.5 | O 149 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 95-96 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 154.5 | O 191 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
SAM
W 85-72
+5.5
8
vs
TXST
W 79-71
−4.5
11
@
UL
W 66-62
−1.5
14
vs
NOLA
L 63-85
−33.5
21
vs
USU
L 75-96
−12.5
23
vs
BC
W 93-90
+5.5
28
vs
NICH
W 82-72
+1.5
2
vs
GRAM
W 65-63
−9.5
6
vs
AKR
L 71-88
−10.5
13
vs
UCSD
L 67-93
−20.5
17
vs
LT
W 61-53
+3.5
20
vs
PRST
W 63-61
−0.5
31
@
ECU
W 79-70
+7.5
4
vs
FAU
W 69-66
+6.5
10
@
UTSA
W 85-52
+25.5
14
vs
UAB
L 69-82
−11.5
18
vs
UNT
L 63-71
−9.5
21
@
FAU
L 74-79
+5.5
23
@
CLT
L 70-73
−0.5
28
vs
USF
L 83-97
−5.5
1
@
MEM
W 78-76
+10.5
8
vs
WICH
L 61-75
−8.5
11
vs
TEM
W 77-66
+9.5
15
@
UAB
W 55-54
+7.5
19
@
UNT
W 77-71
+12.5
22
vs
RICE
W 81-75
+1.5
25
vs
TLSA
L 56-90
−28.5
1
@
USF
L 62-90
−12.5
5
@
TEM
L 60-89
−24.5
8
vs
MEM
L 95-96
+1.5
covered 14didn’t cover 16avg −3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
SAM
W 85-72
+2.5
8
vs
TXST
W 79-71
+3.5
11
@
UL
W 66-62
−7.5
14
vs
NOLA
L 63-85
−5.5
21
vs
USU
L 75-96
+19.5
23
vs
BC
W 93-90
+42.5
28
vs
NICH
W 82-72
+5.5
2
vs
GRAM
W 65-63
−20.5
6
vs
AKR
L 71-88
−3.5
13
vs
UCSD
L 67-93
+10.5
17
vs
LT
W 61-53
−26.5
20
vs
PRST
W 63-61
−21.5
31
@
ECU
W 79-70
+3.5
4
vs
FAU
W 69-66
−23.5
10
@
UTSA
W 85-52
−10.5
14
vs
UAB
L 69-82
−2.5
18
vs
UNT
L 63-71
−3.5
21
@
FAU
L 74-79
−2.5
23
@
CLT
L 70-73
−0.5
28
vs
USF
L 83-97
+21.5
1
@
MEM
W 78-76
+2.5
8
vs
WICH
L 61-75
−12.5
11
vs
TEM
W 77-66
−1.5
15
@
UAB
W 55-54
−43.5
19
@
UNT
W 77-71
+10.5
22
vs
RICE
W 81-75
+8.5
25
vs
TLSA
L 56-90
−10.5
1
@
USF
L 62-90
−3.5
5
@
TEM
L 60-89
+4.5
8
vs
MEM
L 95-96
+36.5
over 13under 17avg −0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Memphis
31 games played
Straight up
13-18
42% wins
Against the spread
14-17
45% covers · avg −2.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-15
52% overs · avg −1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | vs | W 76-70 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 157.5 | U 146 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 77-83 | +9.5 | W +3.5 | 152.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 16 | vs | L 78-92 | -9.5 | L −23.5 | 163.5 | O 170 |
| Nov 20 | vs | L 71-80 | +14.5 | W +5.5 | 156.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 68-69 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 160.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 74-58 | -10.5 | W +5.5 | 156.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 86-70 | -14.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 78-71 | +3.5 | W +10.5 | 158.5 | U 149 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 73-99 | +16.5 | L −9.5 | 162.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 17 | vs | L 70-77 | +9.5 | W +2.5 | 159.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 66-71 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 88-67 | -20.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | O 155 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 57-48 | -9.5 | L −0.5 | 137.5 | U 105 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 76-70 | -7.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 11 | @ | L 78-89 | +1.5 | L −9.5 | 152.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 55-53 | -7.5 | L −5.5 | 143.5 | U 108 |
| Jan 18 | vs | W 95-69 | -20.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 66-83 | +6.5 | L −10.5 | 153.5 | U 149 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 59-74 | +3.5 | L −11.5 | 145.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 92-65 | -3.5 | W +23.5 | 152.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 1 | vs | L 76-78 | -8.5 | L −10.5 | 151.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 90-80 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 155.5 | O 170 |
| Feb 8 | vs | W 77-54 | -10.5 | W +12.5 | 144.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 69-76 | -2.5 | L −9.5 | 138.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 75-99 | +13.5 | L −10.5 | 155.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 66-87 | +9.5 | L −11.5 | 163.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 22 | vs | L 67-78 | -5.5 | L −16.5 | 152.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 26 | vs | L 82-88 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 149.5 | O 170 |
| Mar 1 | @ | L 68-84 | -4.5 | L −20.5 | 152.5 | U 152 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 89-96 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 163.5 | O 185 |
| Mar 8 | @ | W 96-95 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 154.5 | O 191 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
vs
SF
W 76-70
+3.5
11
@
MISS
L 77-83
+3.5
16
vs
UNLV
L 78-92
−23.5
20
vs
PUR
L 71-80
+5.5
21
vs
WAKE
L 68-69
+1.5
26
vs
SIU
W 74-58
+5.5
3
vs
NOLA
W 86-70
+1.5
6
vs
BAY
W 78-71
+10.5
13
@
LOU
L 73-99
−9.5
17
vs
VAN
L 70-77
+2.5
20
@
MSST
L 66-71
−1.5
22
vs
ALST
W 88-67
+0.5
31
vs
UNT
W 57-48
−0.5
3
@
RICE
W 76-70
−1.5
11
@
FAU
L 78-89
−9.5
14
vs
TEM
W 55-53
−5.5
18
vs
UTSA
W 95-69
+5.5
21
@
TLSA
L 66-83
−10.5
24
@
WICH
L 59-74
−11.5
29
vs
FAU
W 92-65
+23.5
1
vs
TULN
L 76-78
−10.5
5
@
UAB
W 90-80
+11.5
8
vs
CLT
W 77-54
+12.5
12
@
UNT
L 69-76
−9.5
14
@
USU
L 75-99
−10.5
19
@
USF
L 66-87
−11.5
22
vs
UAB
L 67-78
−16.5
26
vs
WICH
L 82-88
−7.5
1
@
ECU
L 68-84
−20.5
5
vs
USF
L 89-96
+0.5
8
@
TULN
W 96-95
−1.5
covered 14didn’t cover 17avg −2.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
vs
SF
W 76-70
−11.5
11
@
MISS
L 77-83
+7.5
16
vs
UNLV
L 78-92
+6.5
20
vs
PUR
L 71-80
−5.5
21
vs
WAKE
L 68-69
−23.5
26
vs
SIU
W 74-58
−24.5
3
vs
NOLA
W 86-70
+6.5
6
vs
BAY
W 78-71
−9.5
13
@
LOU
L 73-99
+9.5
17
vs
VAN
L 70-77
−12.5
20
@
MSST
L 66-71
−16.5
22
vs
ALST
W 88-67
+3.5
31
vs
UNT
W 57-48
−32.5
3
@
RICE
W 76-70
+1.5
11
@
FAU
L 78-89
+14.5
14
vs
TEM
W 55-53
−35.5
18
vs
UTSA
W 95-69
+16.5
21
@
TLSA
L 66-83
−4.5
24
@
WICH
L 59-74
−12.5
29
vs
FAU
W 92-65
+4.5
1
vs
TULN
L 76-78
+2.5
5
@
UAB
W 90-80
+14.5
8
vs
CLT
W 77-54
−13.5
12
@
UNT
L 69-76
+6.5
14
@
USU
L 75-99
+18.5
19
@
USF
L 66-87
−10.5
22
vs
UAB
L 67-78
−7.5
26
vs
WICH
L 82-88
+20.5
1
@
ECU
L 68-84
−0.5
5
vs
USF
L 89-96
+21.5
8
@
TULN
W 96-95
+36.5
over 16under 15avg −1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Tulane
16-14 overall · 8-10 in conference · American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Memphis95–96
- L@ Temple60–89
- L@ South Florida62–90
- Lvs Tulsa56–90
- Wvs Rice81–75
3 days since their last game.
Memphis
13-18 overall · 8-10 in conference · American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- W@ Tulane96–95
- Lvs South Florida89–96
- L@ East Carolina68–84
- Lvs Wichita St82–88
- Lvs UAB67–78
3 days since their last game.