Avron B. Fogelman Arena in the Devlin Fieldhouse · at Tulane · Conference game
Closing line
MEM -2.5✓ TULN covered by 1.5
Closing total154.5Over by 36.5
| This season | TULN | |
|---|---|---|
| 12-18 | Record | 16-13 |
| 14-16 | ATS | 13-16 |
| 15-15 | O/U | 12-17 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: MEM 76–73 TULN · ✓ MEM (60%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | OT | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEM | 31 | 50 | 15 | 96 |
| TULN | 40 | 41 | 14 | 95 |
1st half: MEM 31, TULN 40 (TULN by 9). The model had MEM by 1.9 and a total of 69.7 (actual 71).
Team stats
| MEM | TULN | |
|---|---|---|
| 32-62 52% | Field goals | 36-73 49% |
| 7-19 37% | 3-pointers | 9-26 35% |
| 25-36 69% | Free throws | 14-18 78% |
| 41 15 off | Rebounds | 32 12 off |
| 15 | Assists | 14 |
| 6 | Steals | 12 |
| 6 | Blocks | 2 |
| 13 | Turnovers | 8 |
| 18 | Fouls | 25 |
| 42 | Points in paint | 44 |
| 17 | Fast-break points | 8 |
Players
| MEM | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dug McDaniel G | 45 | 20 | 7 | 6 | 8-15 | 2-4 |
| Quante Berry G | 38 | 22 | 3 | 3 | 6-12 | 2-4 |
| Zach Davis G | 34 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 5-8 | 1-2 |
| Aaron Bradshaw F | 19 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 4-8 | 0-1 |
| Julius Thedford G | 13 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-1 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Curtis Givens III G | 38 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 2-7 | 2-6 |
| Thierno Sylla C | 30 | 17 | 4 | 0 | 5-6 | 0-0 |
| Sincere Parker G | 8 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1-4 | 0-1 |
Did not play: Simon Majok, Mason Matthews, William Whorton, Hasan Abdul Hakim, Arop Arop, Tariq Ingraham, Ashton Hardaway
| TULN | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asher Woods G | 43 | 21 | 2 | 3 | 6-16 | 2-6 |
| Rowan Brumbaugh G | 43 | 31 | 5 | 2 | 12-22 | 4-9 |
| Curtis Williams Jr. G | 39 | 11 | 10 | 3 | 5-13 | 1-6 |
| Percy Daniels C | 34 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| Tyler Ringgold F | 23 | 16 | 2 | 1 | 7-11 | 2-2 |
| Bench | ||||||
| KJ Greene G | 21 | 10 | 1 | 3 | 4-5 | 0-1 |
| Scotty Middleton F | 20 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-2 |
| Josiah Moore G | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Luke Rasmussen G | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Robert Moore, Davion Bradford, Joseph Teich, Vasilije Kuridza, Luke Cronin, Jake Shapiro
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenMEM -1.5
1 → MEM
CloseMEM -2.5
1 pt toward MEM
Total
Open150.5
▲ 4
Close154.5
Up 4 since the open
Moneyline
MEM -148 · TULN +124
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened MEM -1.5 · closed MEM -2.5 · moved 1 toward MEMmodel MEM -3
model MEM -3
Opened 150.5 · closed 154.5 · moved 4 upmodel 149
model 149
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | MEM -2.5 | MEM -3.0 | MEM +0.5 | L TULN covered |
| Total | 154.5 | 148.9 | Under 5.6 | L Over |
| Projected score | — | MEM 76 · TULN 72.9 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | MEM -1.9 | TULN -9.0 |
| 1H total | 69.7 | 71 |
| 1H projected score | MEM 35.8 · TULN 33.9 | MEM 31 · TULN 40 |
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 3-7 30% | 6-4 60% | |
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 10 since 2021-22
MEM 5–5 TULNSeries tied · 10 games since 2021-22 · MEM 4-6 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2025-26 | TULN 78 @ MEM 76 | MEM -8.5 | TULN W |
| Mar 15, 2024-25 | TULN 77 vs MEM 78 | MEM -8.5 | TULN W |
| Jan 30, 2024-25 | MEM 68 @ TULN 56 | TULN +5.5 | MEM W |
| Feb 11, 2023-24 | TULN 78 @ MEM 90 | MEM -8.5 | MEM W |
| Jan 21, 2023-24 | MEM 79 @ TULN 81 | TULN +3.5 | TULN W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Memphis
30 games played
Straight up
12-18
40% wins
Against the spread
14-16
47% covers · avg −2.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-15
50% overs · avg −2.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | vs | W 76-70 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 157.5 | U 146 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 77-83 | +9.5 | W +3.5 | 152.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 16 | vs | L 78-92 | -9.5 | L −23.5 | 163.5 | O 170 |
| Nov 20 | vs | L 71-80 | +14.5 | W +5.5 | 156.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 68-69 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 160.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 74-58 | -10.5 | W +5.5 | 156.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 86-70 | -14.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 78-71 | +3.5 | W +10.5 | 158.5 | U 149 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 73-99 | +16.5 | L −9.5 | 162.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 17 | vs | L 70-77 | +9.5 | W +2.5 | 159.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 66-71 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 88-67 | -20.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | O 155 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 57-48 | -9.5 | L −0.5 | 137.5 | U 105 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 76-70 | -7.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 11 | @ | L 78-89 | +1.5 | L −9.5 | 152.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 55-53 | -7.5 | L −5.5 | 143.5 | U 108 |
| Jan 18 | vs | W 95-69 | -20.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 66-83 | +6.5 | L −10.5 | 153.5 | U 149 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 59-74 | +3.5 | L −11.5 | 145.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 92-65 | -3.5 | W +23.5 | 152.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 1 | vs | L 76-78 | -8.5 | L −10.5 | 151.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 90-80 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 155.5 | O 170 |
| Feb 8 | vs | W 77-54 | -10.5 | W +12.5 | 144.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 69-76 | -2.5 | L −9.5 | 138.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 75-99 | +13.5 | L −10.5 | 155.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 66-87 | +9.5 | L −11.5 | 163.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 22 | vs | L 67-78 | -5.5 | L −16.5 | 152.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 26 | vs | L 82-88 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 149.5 | O 170 |
| Mar 1 | @ | L 68-84 | -4.5 | L −20.5 | 152.5 | U 152 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 89-96 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 163.5 | O 185 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
vs
SF
W 76-70
+3.5
11
@
MISS
L 77-83
+3.5
16
vs
UNLV
L 78-92
−23.5
20
vs
PUR
L 71-80
+5.5
21
vs
WAKE
L 68-69
+1.5
26
vs
SIU
W 74-58
+5.5
3
vs
NOLA
W 86-70
+1.5
6
vs
BAY
W 78-71
+10.5
13
@
LOU
L 73-99
−9.5
17
vs
VAN
L 70-77
+2.5
20
@
MSST
L 66-71
−1.5
22
vs
ALST
W 88-67
+0.5
31
vs
UNT
W 57-48
−0.5
3
@
RICE
W 76-70
−1.5
11
@
FAU
L 78-89
−9.5
14
vs
TEM
W 55-53
−5.5
18
vs
UTSA
W 95-69
+5.5
21
@
TLSA
L 66-83
−10.5
24
@
WICH
L 59-74
−11.5
29
vs
FAU
W 92-65
+23.5
1
vs
TULN
L 76-78
−10.5
5
@
UAB
W 90-80
+11.5
8
vs
CLT
W 77-54
+12.5
12
@
UNT
L 69-76
−9.5
14
@
USU
L 75-99
−10.5
19
@
USF
L 66-87
−11.5
22
vs
UAB
L 67-78
−16.5
26
vs
WICH
L 82-88
−7.5
1
@
ECU
L 68-84
−20.5
5
vs
USF
L 89-96
+0.5
covered 14didn’t cover 16avg −2.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
vs
SF
W 76-70
−11.5
11
@
MISS
L 77-83
+7.5
16
vs
UNLV
L 78-92
+6.5
20
vs
PUR
L 71-80
−5.5
21
vs
WAKE
L 68-69
−23.5
26
vs
SIU
W 74-58
−24.5
3
vs
NOLA
W 86-70
+6.5
6
vs
BAY
W 78-71
−9.5
13
@
LOU
L 73-99
+9.5
17
vs
VAN
L 70-77
−12.5
20
@
MSST
L 66-71
−16.5
22
vs
ALST
W 88-67
+3.5
31
vs
UNT
W 57-48
−32.5
3
@
RICE
W 76-70
+1.5
11
@
FAU
L 78-89
+14.5
14
vs
TEM
W 55-53
−35.5
18
vs
UTSA
W 95-69
+16.5
21
@
TLSA
L 66-83
−4.5
24
@
WICH
L 59-74
−12.5
29
vs
FAU
W 92-65
+4.5
1
vs
TULN
L 76-78
+2.5
5
@
UAB
W 90-80
+14.5
8
vs
CLT
W 77-54
−13.5
12
@
UNT
L 69-76
+6.5
14
@
USU
L 75-99
+18.5
19
@
USF
L 66-87
−10.5
22
vs
UAB
L 67-78
−7.5
26
vs
WICH
L 82-88
+20.5
1
@
ECU
L 68-84
−0.5
5
vs
USF
L 89-96
+21.5
over 15under 15avg −2.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Tulane
29 games played
Straight up
16-13
55% wins
Against the spread
13-16
45% covers · avg −3.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-17
41% overs · avg −2.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 85-72 | -7.5 | W +5.5 | 154.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 79-71 | -12.5 | L −4.5 | 146.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 11 | @ | W 66-62 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 135.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 14 | vs | L 63-85 | -11.5 | L −33.5 | 153.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 75-96 | +8.5 | L −12.5 | 151.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 93-90 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 140.5 | O 183 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 82-72 | -8.5 | W +1.5 | 148.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 65-63 | -11.5 | L −9.5 | 148.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 71-88 | +6.5 | L −10.5 | 162.5 | U 159 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 67-93 | +5.5 | L −20.5 | 149.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 61-53 | -4.5 | W +3.5 | 140.5 | U 114 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 63-61 | -2.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | U 124 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 79-70 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 145.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 69-66 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 158.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 85-52 | -7.5 | W +25.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 69-82 | +1.5 | L −11.5 | 153.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 18 | vs | L 63-71 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 137.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 74-79 | +10.5 | W +5.5 | 155.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 23 | @ | L 70-73 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 143.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 83-97 | +8.5 | L −5.5 | 158.5 | O 180 |
| Feb 1 | @ | W 78-76 | +8.5 | W +10.5 | 151.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 8 | vs | L 61-75 | +5.5 | L −8.5 | 148.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 77-66 | -1.5 | W +9.5 | 144.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 15 | @ | W 55-54 | +6.5 | W +7.5 | 152.5 | U 109 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 77-71 | +6.5 | W +12.5 | 137.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 22 | vs | W 81-75 | -4.5 | W +1.5 | 147.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 25 | vs | L 56-90 | +5.5 | L −28.5 | 156.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 1 | @ | L 62-90 | +15.5 | L −12.5 | 155.5 | U 152 |
| Mar 5 | @ | L 60-89 | +4.5 | L −24.5 | 144.5 | O 149 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
SAM
W 85-72
+5.5
8
vs
TXST
W 79-71
−4.5
11
@
UL
W 66-62
−1.5
14
vs
NOLA
L 63-85
−33.5
21
vs
USU
L 75-96
−12.5
23
vs
BC
W 93-90
+5.5
28
vs
NICH
W 82-72
+1.5
2
vs
GRAM
W 65-63
−9.5
6
vs
AKR
L 71-88
−10.5
13
vs
UCSD
L 67-93
−20.5
17
vs
LT
W 61-53
+3.5
20
vs
PRST
W 63-61
−0.5
31
@
ECU
W 79-70
+7.5
4
vs
FAU
W 69-66
+6.5
10
@
UTSA
W 85-52
+25.5
14
vs
UAB
L 69-82
−11.5
18
vs
UNT
L 63-71
−9.5
21
@
FAU
L 74-79
+5.5
23
@
CLT
L 70-73
−0.5
28
vs
USF
L 83-97
−5.5
1
@
MEM
W 78-76
+10.5
8
vs
WICH
L 61-75
−8.5
11
vs
TEM
W 77-66
+9.5
15
@
UAB
W 55-54
+7.5
19
@
UNT
W 77-71
+12.5
22
vs
RICE
W 81-75
+1.5
25
vs
TLSA
L 56-90
−28.5
1
@
USF
L 62-90
−12.5
5
@
TEM
L 60-89
−24.5
covered 13didn’t cover 16avg −3.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
SAM
W 85-72
+2.5
8
vs
TXST
W 79-71
+3.5
11
@
UL
W 66-62
−7.5
14
vs
NOLA
L 63-85
−5.5
21
vs
USU
L 75-96
+19.5
23
vs
BC
W 93-90
+42.5
28
vs
NICH
W 82-72
+5.5
2
vs
GRAM
W 65-63
−20.5
6
vs
AKR
L 71-88
−3.5
13
vs
UCSD
L 67-93
+10.5
17
vs
LT
W 61-53
−26.5
20
vs
PRST
W 63-61
−21.5
31
@
ECU
W 79-70
+3.5
4
vs
FAU
W 69-66
−23.5
10
@
UTSA
W 85-52
−10.5
14
vs
UAB
L 69-82
−2.5
18
vs
UNT
L 63-71
−3.5
21
@
FAU
L 74-79
−2.5
23
@
CLT
L 70-73
−0.5
28
vs
USF
L 83-97
+21.5
1
@
MEM
W 78-76
+2.5
8
vs
WICH
L 61-75
−12.5
11
vs
TEM
W 77-66
−1.5
15
@
UAB
W 55-54
−43.5
19
@
UNT
W 77-71
+10.5
22
vs
RICE
W 81-75
+8.5
25
vs
TLSA
L 56-90
−10.5
1
@
USF
L 62-90
−3.5
5
@
TEM
L 60-89
+4.5
over 12under 17avg −2.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Memphis
12-18 overall · 7-10 in conference · American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs South Florida89–96
- L@ East Carolina68–84
- Lvs Wichita St82–88
- Lvs UAB67–78
- L@ South Florida66–87
3 days since their last game.
Tulane
16-13 overall · 8-9 in conference · American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Temple60–89
- L@ South Florida62–90
- Lvs Tulsa56–90
- Wvs Rice81–75
- W@ North Texas77–71
3 days since their last game.