Madison Square Garden · Neutral site · Conference game · Conference tournament
Closing line
GTWN -1.5✓ GTWN covered by 5.5
Closing total136.5Under by 17.5
| This season | DEP | |
|---|---|---|
| 14-17 | Record | 16-15 |
| 12-19 | ATS | 20-11 |
| 17-14 | O/U | 11-20 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: GTWN 70–70 DEP · ✓ GTWN (51%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GTWN | 21 | 42 | 63 |
| DEP | 24 | 32 | 56 |
1st half: GTWN 21, DEP 24 (DEP by 3). The model had GTWN by 0.3 and a total of 65.6 (actual 45).
Team stats
| GTWN | DEP | |
|---|---|---|
| 22-56 39% | Field goals | 20-58 34% |
| 3-14 21% | 3-pointers | 9-21 43% |
| 16-18 89% | Free throws | 7-11 64% |
| 42 12 off | Rebounds | 30 9 off |
| 11 | Assists | 11 |
| 5 | Steals | 6 |
| 4 | Blocks | 5 |
| 10 | Turnovers | 9 |
| 13 | Fouls | 16 |
| 36 | Points in paint | 20 |
| 2 | Fast-break points | 3 |
Players
| GTWN | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Malik Mack G | 34 | 16 | 6 | 4 | 6-12 | 0-3 |
| Caleb Williams F | 30 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 1-5 | 0-2 |
| Jeremiah Williams G | 26 | 17 | 1 | 2 | 6-13 | 1-3 |
| Isaiah Abraham F | 22 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0-3 | 0-2 |
| Julius Halaifonua C | 17 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Kayvaun Mulready G | 30 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1-7 | 0-2 |
| Vince Iwuchukwu C | 23 | 17 | 14 | 0 | 4-9 | 2-2 |
| Jayden Fort F | 11 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| Langston Love G | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Seal Diouf, Michael Van Raaphorst, Gabriel Landeira, Mason Moses, Hashem Asadallah, KJ Lewis, DeShawn Harris-Smith, Austin Montgomery
| DEP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NJ Benson F | 33 | 12 | 7 | 1 | 6-11 | 0-0 |
| Brandon Maclin G | 30 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 1-6 | 0-0 |
| RJ Smith G | 26 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2-4 | 1-2 |
| Kruz McClure G | 25 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 2-5 | 2-4 |
| Theo Pierre-Justin F | 14 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1-4 | 1-3 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Layden Blocker G | 34 | 16 | 3 | 7 | 5-14 | 4-6 |
| CJ Gunn G | 27 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 3-13 | 1-5 |
| Kaleb Banks F | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Fabian Flores C | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Isaiah Medina, Jonas Johnson, Nate Kasher, Amsal Delalic, Ilija Milijasevic, Jeremy Lorenz, Khaman Maker
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketGTWN -1.5
ModelGTWN -0.3
Model edgeDEP +1.2
L GTWN covered
Total
Market136.5
Model140.1
Model edgeOver 3.6
L Under
Projected score
GTWN 70.2 · DEP 69.9
GTWN 63 · DEP 56
Win probability
GTWN 51%
1st half
Spread
GTWN -0.3
DEP -3.0
Total
65.6
45 points
Projected score
GTWN 33 · DEP 32.7
GTWN 21 · DEP 24
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenDEP -1.5
3 → GTWN
CloseGTWN -1.5
3 pts toward GTWN
Total
Open137.5
▼ 1
Close136.5
Down 1 since the open
Moneyline
GTWN -115 · DEP -105
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened DEP -1.5 · closed GTWN -1.5 · moved 3 toward GTWNmodel GTWN -0.5
model GTWN -0.5
Opened 137.5 · closed 136.5 · moved 1 downmodel 140
model 140
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | |
| 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 11 since 2021-22
GTWN 4–7 DEPDEP leads · 11 games since 2021-22 · GTWN 2-9 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2025-26 | DEP 61 @ GTWN 70 | GTWN -3.5 | GTWN W |
| Jan 6, 2025-26 | GTWN 50 @ DEP 56 | DEP -2.5 | DEP W |
| Mar 12, 2024-25 | DEP 71 vs GTWN 67 | GTWN -4.5 | DEP W |
| Mar 8, 2024-25 | GTWN 77 @ DEP 83 | DEP -1.5 | DEP W |
| Jan 17, 2024-25 | DEP 73 @ GTWN 68 | GTWN -5.5 | DEP W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Georgetown
31 games played
Straight up
14-17
45% wins
Against the spread
12-19
39% covers · avg −0.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-14
55% overs · avg +1.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 87-70 | -27.5 | L −10.5 | 154.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 7 | @ | W 70-60 | +4.5 | W +14.5 | 144.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 83-70 | -27.5 | L −14.5 | 141.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 79-74 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 142.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 92-75 | -25.5 | L −8.5 | 140.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 79-84 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 145.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 65-78 | +5.5 | L −7.5 | 151.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 90-81 | -19.5 | L −10.5 | 149.5 | O 171 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 61-81 | +10.5 | L −9.5 | 149.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 76-68 | -20.5 | L −12.5 | 140.5 | O 144 |
| Dec 17 | @ | W 78-69 | +6.5 | W +15.5 | 149.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 77-80 | -4.5 | L −7.5 | 149.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 97-67 | -33.5 | L −3.5 | 150.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 83-95 | +8.5 | L −3.5 | 152.5 | O 178 |
| Jan 6 | @ | L 50-56 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 144.5 | U 106 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 67-76 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 137.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 83-86 | +8.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 62-64 | +11.5 | W +9.5 | 141.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 51-66 | +8.5 | L −6.5 | 142.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 81-78 | +5.5 | W +8.5 | 159.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 70-61 | -3.5 | W +5.5 | 139.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 77-64 | +5.5 | W +18.5 | 149.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 76-68 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 146.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 73-80 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 140.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 75-79 | +16.5 | W +12.5 | 138.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 89-93 | -6.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | O 182 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 47-51 | +6.5 | W +2.5 | 136.5 | U 98 |
| Feb 24 | vs | L 60-76 | -2.5 | L −18.5 | 150.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 84-91 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 155.5 | O 175 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 69-72 | +15.5 | W +12.5 | 148.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 80-79 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 158.5 | O 159 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
MORG
W 87-70
−10.5
7
@
MD
W 70-60
+14.5
12
vs
BING
W 83-70
−14.5
15
vs
CLEM
W 79-74
+6.5
22
vs
WAG
W 92-75
−8.5
27
vs
DAY
L 79-84
−3.5
28
vs
MIA
L 65-78
−7.5
3
vs
UMBC
W 90-81
−10.5
7
@
UNC
L 61-81
−9.5
13
vs
SPU
W 76-68
−12.5
17
@
MARQ
W 78-69
+15.5
20
vs
XAV
L 77-80
−7.5
22
vs
COPP
W 97-67
−3.5
31
vs
SJU
L 83-95
−3.5
6
@
DEP
L 50-56
−3.5
10
vs
HALL
L 67-76
−7.5
13
@
CREI
L 83-86
+5.5
17
vs
CONN
L 62-64
+9.5
21
@
VILL
L 51-66
−6.5
24
@
PROV
W 81-78
+8.5
28
vs
DEP
W 70-61
+5.5
31
@
BTLR
W 77-64
+18.5
4
vs
CREI
W 76-68
+6.5
7
vs
VILL
L 73-80
−4.5
14
@
CONN
L 75-79
+12.5
18
vs
BTLR
L 89-93
−10.5
21
@
HALL
L 47-51
+2.5
24
vs
MARQ
L 60-76
−18.5
28
@
XAV
L 84-91
−2.5
3
@
SJU
L 69-72
+12.5
7
vs
PROV
W 80-79
−0.5
covered 12didn’t cover 19avg −0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
MORG
W 87-70
+2.5
7
@
MD
W 70-60
−14.5
12
vs
BING
W 83-70
+11.5
15
vs
CLEM
W 79-74
+10.5
22
vs
WAG
W 92-75
+26.5
27
vs
DAY
L 79-84
+17.5
28
vs
MIA
L 65-78
−8.5
3
vs
UMBC
W 90-81
+21.5
7
@
UNC
L 61-81
−7.5
13
vs
SPU
W 76-68
+3.5
17
@
MARQ
W 78-69
−2.5
20
vs
XAV
L 77-80
+7.5
22
vs
COPP
W 97-67
+13.5
31
vs
SJU
L 83-95
+25.5
6
@
DEP
L 50-56
−38.5
10
vs
HALL
L 67-76
+5.5
13
@
CREI
L 83-86
+21.5
17
vs
CONN
L 62-64
−15.5
21
@
VILL
L 51-66
−25.5
24
@
PROV
W 81-78
−0.5
28
vs
DEP
W 70-61
−8.5
31
@
BTLR
W 77-64
−8.5
4
vs
CREI
W 76-68
−2.5
7
vs
VILL
L 73-80
+12.5
14
@
CONN
L 75-79
+15.5
18
vs
BTLR
L 89-93
+34.5
21
@
HALL
L 47-51
−38.5
24
vs
MARQ
L 60-76
−14.5
28
@
XAV
L 84-91
+19.5
3
@
SJU
L 69-72
−7.5
7
vs
PROV
W 80-79
+0.5
over 17under 14avg +1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
DePaul
31 games played
Straight up
16-15
52% wins
Against the spread
20-11
65% covers · avg −0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
11-20
35% overs · avg −4.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 92-62 | -24.5 | W +5.5 | 143.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 72-64 | -22.5 | L −14.5 | 147.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 11 | vs | L 53-66 | -18.5 | L −31.5 | 153.5 | U 119 |
| Nov 14 | vs | L 79-81 | +5.5 | W +3.5 | 145.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 93-62 | -21.5 | W +9.5 | 155.5 | U 155 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 95-75 | -19.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | O 170 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 75-61 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 147.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 63-96 | +5.5 | L −27.5 | 152.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 76-72 | -23.5 | L −19.5 | 156.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 92-49 | -21.5 | W +21.5 | 150.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 61-58 | +7.5 | W +10.5 | 145.5 | U 119 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 66-79 | +19.5 | W +6.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 21 | vs | L 54-72 | +12.5 | L −5.5 | 133.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 66-71 | +12.5 | W +7.5 | 139.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 86-77 | -2.5 | W +6.5 | 149.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 56-50 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 144.5 | U 106 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 60-72 | +19.5 | W +7.5 | 137.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 16 | vs | W 80-75 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 20 | @ | L 80-87 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 67-60 | +2.5 | W +9.5 | 135.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 61-70 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 139.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 66-68 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 150.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 3 | vs | L 56-68 | +9.5 | L −2.5 | 145.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 72-90 | +4.5 | L −13.5 | 153.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 72-71 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 141.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 69-57 | +7.5 | W +19.5 | 129.5 | U 126 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 68-71 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 152.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 72-71 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 142.5 | O 143 |
| Mar 1 | @ | W 62-51 | +4.5 | W +15.5 | 139.5 | U 113 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 57-76 | +1.5 | L −17.5 | 135.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 71-81 | -4.5 | L −14.5 | 142.5 | O 152 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
CHST
W 92-62
+5.5
7
vs
STO
W 72-64
−14.5
11
vs
BUF
L 53-66
−31.5
14
vs
NU
L 79-81
+3.5
18
vs
GWEB
W 93-62
+9.5
23
vs
DETM
W 95-75
+0.5
28
vs
GT
W 75-61
+12.5
29
vs
LSU
L 63-96
−27.5
6
vs
UAPB
W 76-72
−19.5
9
vs
MORG
W 92-49
+21.5
13
@
WICH
W 61-58
+10.5
16
@
SJU
L 66-79
+6.5
21
vs
CONN
L 54-72
−5.5
31
@
VILL
L 66-71
+7.5
3
vs
XAV
W 86-77
+6.5
6
vs
GTWN
W 56-50
+3.5
10
@
CONN
L 60-72
+7.5
16
vs
MARQ
W 80-75
+2.5
20
@
BTLR
L 80-87
+0.5
24
vs
HALL
W 67-60
+9.5
28
@
GTWN
L 61-70
−5.5
31
@
XAV
L 66-68
+2.5
3
vs
SJU
L 56-68
−2.5
7
@
PROV
L 72-90
−13.5
11
vs
CREI
W 72-71
+2.5
18
@
HALL
W 69-57
+19.5
21
vs
PROV
L 68-71
−5.5
25
@
CREI
W 72-71
+4.5
1
@
MARQ
W 62-51
+15.5
4
vs
VILL
L 57-76
−17.5
7
vs
BTLR
L 71-81
−14.5
covered 20didn’t cover 11avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
CHST
W 92-62
+10.5
7
vs
STO
W 72-64
−11.5
11
vs
BUF
L 53-66
−34.5
14
vs
NU
L 79-81
+14.5
18
vs
GWEB
W 93-62
−0.5
23
vs
DETM
W 95-75
+18.5
28
vs
GT
W 75-61
−11.5
29
vs
LSU
L 63-96
+6.5
6
vs
UAPB
W 76-72
−8.5
9
vs
MORG
W 92-49
−9.5
13
@
WICH
W 61-58
−26.5
16
@
SJU
L 66-79
−2.5
21
vs
CONN
L 54-72
−7.5
31
@
VILL
L 66-71
−2.5
3
vs
XAV
W 86-77
+13.5
6
vs
GTWN
W 56-50
−38.5
10
@
CONN
L 60-72
−5.5
16
vs
MARQ
W 80-75
+9.5
20
@
BTLR
L 80-87
+19.5
24
vs
HALL
W 67-60
−8.5
28
@
GTWN
L 61-70
−8.5
31
@
XAV
L 66-68
−16.5
3
vs
SJU
L 56-68
−21.5
7
@
PROV
L 72-90
+8.5
11
vs
CREI
W 72-71
+1.5
18
@
HALL
W 69-57
−3.5
21
vs
PROV
L 68-71
−13.5
25
@
CREI
W 72-71
+0.5
1
@
MARQ
W 62-51
−26.5
4
vs
VILL
L 57-76
−2.5
7
vs
BTLR
L 71-81
+9.5
over 11under 20avg −4.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Georgetown
14-17 overall · 6-14 in conference · Big East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Providence80–79
- L@ St John's69–72
- L@ Xavier84–91
- Lvs Marquette60–76
- L@ Seton Hall47–51
4 days since their last game.
DePaul
16-15 overall · 8-12 in conference · Big East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Butler71–81
- Lvs Villanova57–76
- W@ Marquette62–51
- W@ Creighton72–71
- Lvs Providence68–71
4 days since their last game.