Spectrum Center · Neutral site · Conference game · Conference tournament
Closing line
CLEM -5.5✓ CLEM covered by 3.5
CLEM -5.5✓ CLEM covered by 3.5Closing total143.5Under by 10.5
 WAKE | This season | CLEM |
|---|---|---|
| 17-15 | Record | 22-9 |
| 15-17 | ATS | 16-15 |
| 18-14 | O/U | 13-18 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: WAKE 71–75 CLEM · ✓ CLEM (64%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| WAKE | 23 | 39 | 62 |
| CLEM | 41 | 30 | 71 |
1st half: WAKE 23, CLEM 41 (CLEM by 18). The model had CLEM by 2.3 and a total of 68.1 (actual 64).
Team stats
| WAKE | CLEM | |
|---|---|---|
| 22-50 44% | Field goals | 26-64 41% |
| 10-22 45% | 3-pointers | 10-31 32% |
| 8-13 62% | Free throws | 9-15 60% |
| 33 7 off | Rebounds | 40 17 off |
| 12 | Assists | 11 |
| 2 | Steals | 7 |
| 2 | Blocks | 5 |
| 12 | Turnovers | 4 |
| 14 | Fouls | 10 |
| 18 | Points in paint | 22 |
| 9 | Fast-break points | 8 |
Players
| WAKE | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juke Harris G | 40 | 22 | 2 | 4 | 7-12 | 3-7 |
| Tre'Von Spillers F | 32 | 15 | 12 | 3 | 6-9 | 3-4 |
| Omaha Biliew F | 26 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 1-2 | 1-1 |
| Myles Colvin G | 22 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| Sebastian Akins G | 15 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1-5 | 0-2 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Nate Calmese G | 25 | 20 | 0 | 1 | 7-14 | 3-5 |
| Mekhi Mason G | 20 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-2 |
| Cooper Schwieger F | 20 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0-4 | 0-1 |
Did not play: Will Underwood, Vincent Ricchiuti, Jaylen Cross, Marqus Marion, Isaac Carr, Owen Kmety, Anson Beard Jr., Dimitrije Kovacevic
| CLEM | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dillon Hunter G | 28 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 2-8 | 0-3 |
| RJ Godfrey F | 25 | 11 | 8 | 1 | 4-10 | 0-0 |
| Butta Johnson G | 24 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 2-6 | 2-5 |
| Jestin Porter G | 22 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2-9 | 1-6 |
| Carter Welling F | 12 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 2-4 | 1-2 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Nick Davidson F | 22 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 4-8 | 0-3 |
| Ace Buckner G | 22 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 3-7 | 2-5 |
| Chase Thompson F | 19 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 4-7 | 1-3 |
| Jake Wahlin F | 16 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1-2 | 1-2 |
| Dallas Thomas F | 10 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 2-3 | 2-2 |
Did not play: Trent Steinour, Zac Foster, Blake Davidson
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenCLEM -5.5
no move
CloseCLEM -5.5
No change since the open
Total
Open141.5
▲ 2
Close143.5
Up 2 since the open
Moneyline
WAKE +205 · CLEM -250
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened CLEM -5.5 · unchangedmodel CLEM -4
model CLEM -4
Opened 141.5 · closed 143.5 · moved 2 upmodel 145.5
model 145.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | CLEM -5.5 | CLEM -4.1 | WAKE +1.4 | L CLEM covered |
| Total | 143.5 | 145.5 | Over 2.0 | L Under |
| Projected score | — | WAKE 70.7 · CLEM 74.8 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | CLEM -2.3 | CLEM -18.0 |
| 1H total | 68.1 | 64 |
| 1H projected score | WAKE 32.9 · CLEM 35.2 | WAKE 23 · CLEM 41 |
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| WAKE | 6-4 60% | 8-2 80% | 4-6 40% |
| CLEM | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 6 since 2021-22
WAKE 3–3 CLEMSeries tied · 6 games since 2021-22 · WAKE 3-3 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2025-26 | CLEM 77 @ WAKE 85 | WAKE +4.5 | WAKE W |
| Dec 21, 2024-25 | WAKE 62 @ CLEM 73 | CLEM -8.5 | CLEM W |
| Mar 9, 2023-24 | CLEM 76 @ WAKE 81 | WAKE -3.5 | WAKE W |
| Jan 17, 2022-23 | CLEM 77 @ WAKE 87 | WAKE -3.5 | WAKE W |
| Dec 2, 2022-23 | WAKE 57 @ CLEM 77 | CLEM -3.5 | CLEM W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Wake Forest
32 games played
Straight up
17-15
53% wins
Against the spread
15-17
47% covers · avg −0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-14
56% overs · avg +0.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs AMER | W 88-74 | -19.5 | L −5.5 | 139.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 7 | vs MORE | W 81-65 | -22.5 | L −6.5 | 152.5 | U 146 |
| Nov 11 | vs MICH | L 84-85 | +15.5 | W +14.5 | 168.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 16 | vs UML | W 109-75 | -30.5 | W +3.5 | 165.5 | O 184 |
| Nov 20 | vs TTU | L 83-84 | +9.5 | W +8.5 | 160.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 21 | vs MEM | W 69-68 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 160.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 25 | vs CAM | W 99-51 | -17.5 | W +30.5 | 159.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 28 | vs NE | W 86-73 | -17.5 | L −4.5 | 154.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 2 | vs OU | L 68-86 | -4.5 | L −22.5 | 159.5 | U 154 |
| Dec 6 | vs WVU | W 75-66 | +2.5 | W +11.5 | 143.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 14 | vs QUC | W 111-73 | -18.5 | W +19.5 | 165.5 | O 184 |
| Dec 17 | vs LONG | W 71-68 | -24.5 | L −21.5 | 163.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 21 | vs VAN | L 67-98 | +5.5 | L −25.5 | 164.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 31 | @ NCSU | L 57-70 | +10.5 | L −2.5 | 159.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 3 | vs VT | W 81-78 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 153.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 7 | vs MIA | L 77-81 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 157.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 10 | @ UNC | L 84-87 | +10.5 | W +7.5 | 154.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 17 | @ FSU | W 69-68 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 168.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 20 | vs SMU | L 79-91 | -1.5 | L −13.5 | 157.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 24 | @ DUKE | L 69-90 | +19.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 27 | @ PITT | L 76-80 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 150.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 31 | vsNCSU | L 78-96 | +5.5 | L −12.5 | 156.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 7 | vs LOU | L 80-88 | +9.5 | W +1.5 | 162.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 11 | @ GT | W 83-67 | -3.5 | W +12.5 | 158.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 14 | vs STAN | W 68-63 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 150.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 18 | vsCLEM | W 85-77 | +4.5 | W +12.5 | 140.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 21 | @VT | L 63-82 | +3.5 | L −15.5 | 150.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 25 | @ BC | L 67-68 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 28 | vs SYR | W 88-83 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | O 171 |
| Mar 3 | @ UVA | L 70-75 | +14.5 | W +9.5 | 150.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 7 | vs CAL | W 80-73 | -5.5 | W +1.5 | 154.5 | U 153 |
| Mar 10 | vsVT | W 95-89 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 150.5 | O 184 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vsAMER
AMERW 88-74
−5.5
7
vsMORE
MOREW 81-65
−6.5
11
vsMICH
MICHL 84-85
+14.5
16
vsUML
UMLW 109-75
+3.5
20
vsTTU
TTUL 83-84
+8.5
21
vsMEM
MEMW 69-68
−1.5
25
vsCAM
CAMW 99-51
+30.5
28
vsNE
NEW 86-73
−4.5
2
vsOU
OUL 68-86
−22.5
6
vsWVU
WVUW 75-66
+11.5
14
vsQUC
QUCW 111-73
+19.5
17
vsLONG
LONGW 71-68
−21.5
21
vsVAN
VANL 67-98
−25.5
31
@NCSU
NCSUL 57-70
−2.5
3
vsVT
VTW 81-78
−2.5
7
vsMIA
MIAL 77-81
−5.5
10
@UNC
UNCL 84-87
+7.5
17
@FSU
FSUW 69-68
−0.5
20
vsSMU
SMUL 79-91
−13.5
24
@DUKE
DUKEL 69-90
−1.5
27
@PITT
PITTL 76-80
−2.5
31
vsNCSU
NCSUL 78-96
−12.5
7
vsLOU
LOUL 80-88
+1.5
11
@GT
GTW 83-67
+12.5
14
vsSTAN
STANW 68-63
+0.5
18
vsCLEM
CLEMW 85-77
+12.5
21
@VT
VTL 63-82
−15.5
25
@BC
BCL 67-68
−4.5
28
vsSYR
SYRW 88-83
+1.5
3
@UVA
UVAL 70-75
+9.5
7
vsCAL
CALW 80-73
+1.5
10
vsVT
VTW 95-89
+4.5
covered 15didn’t cover 17avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vsAMER
AMERW 88-74
+22.5
7
vsMORE
MOREW 81-65
−6.5
11
vsMICH
MICHL 84-85
+0.5
16
vsUML
UMLW 109-75
+18.5
20
vsTTU
TTUL 83-84
+6.5
21
vsMEM
MEMW 69-68
−23.5
25
vsCAM
CAMW 99-51
−9.5
28
vsNE
NEW 86-73
+4.5
2
vsOU
OUL 68-86
−5.5
6
vsWVU
WVUW 75-66
−2.5
14
vsQUC
QUCW 111-73
+18.5
17
vsLONG
LONGW 71-68
−24.5
21
vsVAN
VANL 67-98
+0.5
31
@NCSU
NCSUL 57-70
−32.5
3
vsVT
VTW 81-78
+5.5
7
vsMIA
MIAL 77-81
+0.5
10
@UNC
UNCL 84-87
+16.5
17
@FSU
FSUW 69-68
−31.5
20
vsSMU
SMUL 79-91
+12.5
24
@DUKE
DUKEL 69-90
+5.5
27
@PITT
PITTL 76-80
+5.5
31
vsNCSU
NCSUL 78-96
+17.5
7
vsLOU
LOUL 80-88
+5.5
11
@GT
GTW 83-67
−8.5
14
vsSTAN
STANW 68-63
−19.5
18
vsCLEM
CLEMW 85-77
+21.5
21
@VT
VTL 63-82
−5.5
25
@BC
BCL 67-68
−10.5
28
vsSYR
SYRW 88-83
+18.5
3
@UVA
UVAL 70-75
−5.5
7
vsCAL
CALW 80-73
−1.5
10
vsVT
VTW 95-89
+33.5
over 18under 14avg +0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Clemson
31 games played
Straight up
22-9
71% wins
Against the spread
16-15
52% covers · avg −0 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-18
42% overs · avg −2.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs UNH | W 88-38 | -29.5 | W +20.5 | 146.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 7 | vs GWEB | W 97-59 | -29.5 | W +8.5 | 145.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 11 | vsMORE | W 83-56 | -29.5 | L −2.5 | 151.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 15 | @ GTWN | L 74-79 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 142.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 17 | vs UNA | W 81-61 | -25.5 | L −5.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 21 | vsWVU | W 70-67 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 132.5 | O 137 |
| Nov 23 | vs UGA | W 97-94 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | O 191 |
| Nov 28 | vs AAMU | W 92-56 | -27.5 | W +8.5 | 141.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 3 | @ ALA | L 84-90 | +8.5 | W +2.5 | 165.5 | O 174 |
| Dec 9 | vs BYU | L 64-67 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 13 | vs MER | W 70-63 | -22.5 | L −15.5 | 152.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 16 | vs SC | W 68-61 | -12.5 | L −5.5 | 142.5 | U 129 |
| Dec 21 | vs CIN | W 68-65 | -3.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 31 | @SYR | W 64-61 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 140.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 3 | @PITT | W 73-68 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 135.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 7 | vsSMU | W 74-70 | -3.5 | W +0.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 10 | @ ND | W 76-61 | -3.5 | W +11.5 | 133.5 | O 137 |
| Jan 13 | vsBC | W 74-50 | -15.5 | W +8.5 | 136.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 17 | vsMIA | W 69-59 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 143.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 20 | vsNCSU | L 76-80 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 142.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 24 | @GT | W 77-63 | -8.5 | W +5.5 | 142.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 31 | vsPITT | W 63-52 | -10.5 | W +0.5 | 135.5 | U 115 |
| Feb 4 | @STAN | W 66-64 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 138.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 7 | @CAL | W 77-55 | -4.5 | W +17.5 | 139.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 11 | vsVT | L 66-76 | -8.5 | L −18.5 | 138.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 14 | @DUKE | L 54-67 | +12.5 | L −0.5 | 134.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 18 | @WAKE | L 77-85 | -4.5 | L −12.5 | 140.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 21 | vsFSU | L 65-70 | -8.5 | L −13.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 28 | vsLOU | W 80-75 | +2.5 | W +7.5 | 146.5 | O 155 |
| Mar 3 | @UNC | L 63-67 | +2.5 | L −1.5 | 141.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 7 | vsGT | W 79-76 | -15.5 | L −12.5 | 145.5 | O 155 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vsUNH
UNHW 88-38
+20.5
7
vsGWEB
GWEBW 97-59
+8.5
11
vsMORE
MOREW 83-56
−2.5
15
@GTWN
GTWNL 74-79
−6.5
17
vsUNA
UNAW 81-61
−5.5
21
vsWVU
WVUW 70-67
−1.5
23
vsUGA
UGAW 97-94
+1.5
28
vsAAMU
AAMUW 92-56
+8.5
3
@ALA
ALAL 84-90
+2.5
9
vsBYU
BYUL 64-67
+1.5
13
vsMER
MERW 70-63
−15.5
16
vsSC
SCW 68-61
−5.5
21
vsCIN
CINW 68-65
−0.5
31
@SYR
SYRW 64-61
+1.5
3
@PITT
PITTW 73-68
+1.5
7
vsSMU
SMUW 74-70
+0.5
10
@ND
NDW 76-61
+11.5
13
vsBC
BCW 74-50
+8.5
17
vsMIA
MIAW 69-59
+5.5
20
vsNCSU
NCSUL 76-80
−6.5
24
@GT
GTW 77-63
+5.5
31
vsPITT
PITTW 63-52
+0.5
4
@STAN
STANW 66-64
−1.5
7
@CAL
CALW 77-55
+17.5
11
vsVT
VTL 66-76
−18.5
14
@DUKE
DUKEL 54-67
−0.5
18
@WAKE
WAKEL 77-85
−12.5
21
vsFSU
FSUL 65-70
−13.5
28
vsLOU
LOUW 80-75
+7.5
3
@UNC
UNCL 63-67
−1.5
7
vsGT
GTW 79-76
−12.5
covered 16didn’t cover 15avg −0 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vsUNH
UNHW 88-38
−20.5
7
vsGWEB
GWEBW 97-59
+10.5
11
vsMORE
MOREW 83-56
−12.5
15
@GTWN
GTWNL 74-79
+10.5
17
vsUNA
UNAW 81-61
−2.5
21
vsWVU
WVUW 70-67
+4.5
23
vsUGA
UGAW 97-94
+38.5
28
vsAAMU
AAMUW 92-56
+6.5
3
@ALA
ALAL 84-90
+8.5
9
vsBYU
BYUL 64-67
−21.5
13
vsMER
MERW 70-63
−19.5
16
vsSC
SCW 68-61
−13.5
21
vsCIN
CINW 68-65
−7.5
31
@SYR
SYRW 64-61
−15.5
3
@PITT
PITTW 73-68
+5.5
7
vsSMU
SMUW 74-70
−5.5
10
@ND
NDW 76-61
+3.5
13
vsBC
BCW 74-50
−12.5
17
vsMIA
MIAW 69-59
−15.5
20
vsNCSU
NCSUL 76-80
+13.5
24
@GT
GTW 77-63
−2.5
31
vsPITT
PITTW 63-52
−20.5
4
@STAN
STANW 66-64
−8.5
7
@CAL
CALW 77-55
−7.5
11
vsVT
VTL 66-76
+3.5
14
@DUKE
DUKEL 54-67
−13.5
18
@WAKE
WAKEL 77-85
+21.5
21
vsFSU
FSUL 65-70
−10.5
28
vsLOU
LOUW 80-75
+8.5
3
@UNC
UNCL 63-67
−11.5
7
vsGT
GTW 79-76
+9.5
over 13under 18avg −2.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Wake Forest
17-15 overall · 8-11 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Virginia Tech95–89
- Wvs California80–73
- L@ Virginia70–75
- Wvs Syracuse88–83
- L@ Boston College67–68
1 day since their last game.
Clemson
22-9 overall · 12-6 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Georgia Tech79–76
- L@ North Carolina63–67
- Wvs Louisville80–75
- Lvs Florida St65–70
- L@ Wake Forest77–85
4 days since their last game.