Maples Pavilion · at Stanford · Conference game
Closing line
CLEM -3.5✓ STAN covered by 1.5
Closing total138.5Under by 8.5
| This season | STAN | |
|---|---|---|
| 18-4 | Record | 14-8 |
| 14-8 | ATS | 11-11 |
| 9-13 | O/U | 9-13 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: CLEM 73–68 STAN · ✓ CLEM (68%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CLEM | 30 | 36 | 66 |
| STAN | 32 | 32 | 64 |
1st half: CLEM 30, STAN 32 (STAN by 2). The model had CLEM by 3.3 and a total of 66.2 (actual 62).
Team stats
| CLEM | STAN | |
|---|---|---|
| 21-46 46% | Field goals | 24-60 40% |
| 7-17 41% | 3-pointers | 9-28 32% |
| 17-22 77% | Free throws | 7-9 78% |
| 34 6 off | Rebounds | 30 10 off |
| 8 | Assists | 12 |
| 3 | Steals | 10 |
| 1 | Blocks | 3 |
| 12 | Turnovers | 7 |
| 14 | Fouls | 20 |
| 28 | Points in paint | 22 |
| 11 | Fast-break points | 6 |
Players
| CLEM | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jestin Porter G | 35 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 2-10 | 2-5 |
| Dillon Hunter G | 27 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 1-4 | 0-1 |
| Carter Welling F | 19 | 4 | 8 | 1 | 2-5 | 0-1 |
| Jake Wahlin F | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-2 |
| RJ Godfrey F | 12 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Nick Davidson F | 30 | 16 | 7 | 0 | 5-6 | 2-2 |
| Butta Johnson G | 21 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-2 |
| Ace Buckner G | 21 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 3-6 | 1-2 |
| Chase Thompson F | 18 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 4-5 | 1-1 |
| Dallas Thomas F | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 1-1 |
Did not play: Trent Steinour, Zac Foster, Blake Davidson
| STAN | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ebuka Okorie G | 37 | 18 | 1 | 3 | 6-11 | 2-3 |
| Benny Gealer G | 25 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 2-8 | 2-7 |
| Ryan Agarwal G | 21 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 2-8 | 2-6 |
| AJ Rohosy F | 17 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| Donavin Young F | 8 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Aidan Cammann F | 32 | 19 | 5 | 2 | 7-12 | 2-5 |
| Jeremy Dent-Smith G | 27 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 2-10 | 1-4 |
| Oskar Giltay C | 23 | 8 | 11 | 0 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| Jaylen Thompson F | 10 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-1 |
Did not play: Anthony Batson Jr., Cameron Grant, Evan Stinson, Ethan Kitch, Chisom Okpara, Myles Jones, Kristers Skrinda, Tallis Toure
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketCLEM -3.5
ModelCLEM -5.3
Model edgeCLEM +1.8
L STAN covered
Total
Market138.5
Model141.3
Model edgeOver 2.8
L Under
Projected score
CLEM 73.3 · STAN 68
CLEM 66 · STAN 64
Win probability
CLEM 68%
1st half
Spread
CLEM -3.3
STAN -2.0
Total
66.2
62 points
Projected score
CLEM 34.7 · STAN 31.4
CLEM 30 · STAN 32
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenCLEM -4.5
1 → STAN
CloseCLEM -3.5
1 pt toward STAN
Total
Open136.5
▲ 2
Close138.5
Up 2 since the open
Moneyline
CLEM -180 · STAN +150
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened CLEM -4.5 · closed CLEM -3.5 · moved 1 toward STANmodel CLEM -5.5
model CLEM -5.5
Opened 136.5 · closed 138.5 · moved 2 upmodel 141.5
model 141.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9-1 90% | 8-2 80% | 3-7 30% | |
| 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
CLEM 1–0 STANCLEM leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · CLEM 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 1, 2024-25 | STAN 71 @ CLEM 85 | CLEM -10.5 | CLEM W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Clemson
22 games played
Straight up
18-4
82% wins
Against the spread
14-8
64% covers · avg +1.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
9-13
41% overs · avg −3.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 88-38 | -29.5 | W +20.5 | 146.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 97-59 | -29.5 | W +8.5 | 145.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 83-56 | -29.5 | L −2.5 | 151.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 74-79 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 142.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 81-61 | -25.5 | L −5.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 70-67 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 132.5 | O 137 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 97-94 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | O 191 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 92-56 | -27.5 | W +8.5 | 141.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 84-90 | +8.5 | W +2.5 | 165.5 | O 174 |
| Dec 9 | vs | L 64-67 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 70-63 | -22.5 | L −15.5 | 152.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 68-61 | -12.5 | L −5.5 | 142.5 | U 129 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 68-65 | -3.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 64-61 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 140.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 73-68 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 135.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 74-70 | -3.5 | W +0.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 76-61 | -3.5 | W +11.5 | 133.5 | O 137 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 74-50 | -15.5 | W +8.5 | 136.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 69-59 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 143.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 20 | vs | L 76-80 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 142.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 77-63 | -8.5 | W +5.5 | 142.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 63-52 | -10.5 | W +0.5 | 135.5 | U 115 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
UNH
W 88-38
+20.5
7
vs
GWEB
W 97-59
+8.5
11
vs
MORE
W 83-56
−2.5
15
@
GTWN
L 74-79
−6.5
17
vs
UNA
W 81-61
−5.5
21
vs
WVU
W 70-67
−1.5
23
vs
UGA
W 97-94
+1.5
28
vs
AAMU
W 92-56
+8.5
3
@
ALA
L 84-90
+2.5
9
vs
BYU
L 64-67
+1.5
13
vs
MER
W 70-63
−15.5
16
vs
SC
W 68-61
−5.5
21
vs
CIN
W 68-65
−0.5
31
@
SYR
W 64-61
+1.5
3
@
PITT
W 73-68
+1.5
7
vs
SMU
W 74-70
+0.5
10
@
ND
W 76-61
+11.5
13
vs
BC
W 74-50
+8.5
17
vs
MIA
W 69-59
+5.5
20
vs
NCSU
L 76-80
−6.5
24
@
GT
W 77-63
+5.5
31
vs
PITT
W 63-52
+0.5
covered 14didn’t cover 8avg +1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
UNH
W 88-38
−20.5
7
vs
GWEB
W 97-59
+10.5
11
vs
MORE
W 83-56
−12.5
15
@
GTWN
L 74-79
+10.5
17
vs
UNA
W 81-61
−2.5
21
vs
WVU
W 70-67
+4.5
23
vs
UGA
W 97-94
+38.5
28
vs
AAMU
W 92-56
+6.5
3
@
ALA
L 84-90
+8.5
9
vs
BYU
L 64-67
−21.5
13
vs
MER
W 70-63
−19.5
16
vs
SC
W 68-61
−13.5
21
vs
CIN
W 68-65
−7.5
31
@
SYR
W 64-61
−15.5
3
@
PITT
W 73-68
+5.5
7
vs
SMU
W 74-70
−5.5
10
@
ND
W 76-61
+3.5
13
vs
BC
W 74-50
−12.5
17
vs
MIA
W 69-59
−15.5
20
vs
NCSU
L 76-80
+13.5
24
@
GT
W 77-63
−2.5
31
vs
PITT
W 63-52
−20.5
over 9under 13avg −3.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Stanford
22 games played
Straight up
14-8
64% wins
Against the spread
11-11
50% covers · avg −1.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
9-13
41% overs · avg −0.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 89-79 | -11.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 91-68 | -12.5 | W +10.5 | 150.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 77-68 | -14.5 | L −5.5 | 148.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 93-66 | -20.5 | W +6.5 | 139.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 69-77 | -10.5 | L −18.5 | 152.5 | U 146 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 72-68 | -2.5 | W +1.5 | 142.5 | U 140 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 78-77 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 160.5 | U 155 |
| Dec 1 | vs | W 94-72 | -19.5 | W +2.5 | 156.5 | O 166 |
| Dec 7 | vs | L 74-75 | -9.5 | L −10.5 | 164.5 | U 149 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 86-82 | -8.5 | L −4.5 | 145.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 76-60 | -10.5 | W +5.5 | 139.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 77-68 | +2.5 | W +11.5 | 154.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 27 | vs | W 88-80 | -15.5 | L −7.5 | 160.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 30 | vs | L 40-47 | -6.5 | L −13.5 | 143.5 | U 87 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 80-76 | +7.5 | W +11.5 | 157.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 69-68 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 148.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 55-70 | +12.5 | L −2.5 | 143.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 95-90 | +4.5 | W +9.5 | 147.5 | O 185 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 50-80 | +11.5 | L −18.5 | 148.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 66-78 | -4.5 | L −16.5 | 146.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 70-79 | +9.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 80-88 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 152.5 | O 168 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
PRST
W 89-79
−1.5
8
vs
MONT
W 91-68
+10.5
12
vs
MTST
W 77-68
−5.5
18
vs
UL
W 93-66
+6.5
21
vs
SEA
L 69-77
−18.5
27
vs
MINN
W 72-68
+1.5
28
vs
SLU
W 78-77
+2.5
1
vs
PORT
W 94-72
+2.5
7
vs
UNLV
L 74-75
−10.5
13
@
SJSU
W 86-82
−4.5
17
vs
UTA
W 76-60
+5.5
20
vs
COLO
W 77-68
+11.5
27
vs
CSUN
W 88-80
−7.5
30
vs
ND
L 40-47
−13.5
2
vs
LOU
W 80-76
+11.5
7
@
VT
W 69-68
+4.5
10
@
UVA
L 55-70
−2.5
14
vs
UNC
W 95-90
+9.5
17
vs
DUKE
L 50-80
−18.5
24
vs
CAL
L 66-78
−16.5
28
@
MIA
L 70-79
+0.5
31
@
FSU
L 80-88
−4.5
covered 11didn’t cover 11avg −1.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
PRST
W 89-79
+23.5
8
vs
MONT
W 91-68
+8.5
12
vs
MTST
W 77-68
−3.5
18
vs
UL
W 93-66
+19.5
21
vs
SEA
L 69-77
−6.5
27
vs
MINN
W 72-68
−2.5
28
vs
SLU
W 78-77
−5.5
1
vs
PORT
W 94-72
+9.5
7
vs
UNLV
L 74-75
−15.5
13
@
SJSU
W 86-82
+22.5
17
vs
UTA
W 76-60
−3.5
20
vs
COLO
W 77-68
−9.5
27
vs
CSUN
W 88-80
+7.5
30
vs
ND
L 40-47
−56.5
2
vs
LOU
W 80-76
−1.5
7
@
VT
W 69-68
−11.5
10
@
UVA
L 55-70
−18.5
14
vs
UNC
W 95-90
+37.5
17
vs
DUKE
L 50-80
−18.5
24
vs
CAL
L 66-78
−2.5
28
@
MIA
L 70-79
+1.5
31
@
FSU
L 80-88
+15.5
over 9under 13avg −0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Clemson
18-4 overall · 8-1 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Pitt63–52
- W@ Georgia Tech77–63
- Lvs NC State76–80
- Wvs Miami69–59
- Wvs Boston College74–50
4 days since their last game.
Stanford
14-8 overall · 3-6 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Florida St80–88
- L@ Miami70–79
- Lvs California66–78
- Lvs Duke50–80
- Wvs North Carolina95–90
4 days since their last game.