Conte Forum · at Boston College · Conference game
Closing line
WAKE -3.5✓ BC covered by 4.5
WAKE -3.5✓ BC covered by 4.5Closing total145.5Under by 10.5
| WAKE | This season | BC |
|---|---|---|
| 14-13 | Record | 9-18 |
| 11-16 | ATS | 12-15 |
| 16-11 | O/U | 11-16 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: WAKE 76–71 BC · ✗ WAKE (68%) lost
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| WAKE | 29 | 38 | 67 |
| BC | 22 | 46 | 68 |
1st half: WAKE 29, BC 22 (WAKE by 7). The model had WAKE by 3.2 and a total of 68.7 (actual 51).
Team stats
| WAKE | BC | |
|---|---|---|
| 22-62 35% | Field goals | 25-58 43% |
| 10-30 33% | 3-pointers | 7-28 25% |
| 13-17 76% | Free throws | 11-13 85% |
| 39 13 off | Rebounds | 38 9 off |
| 12 | Assists | 12 |
| 8 | Steals | 3 |
| 1 | Blocks | 1 |
| 7 | Turnovers | 8 |
| 18 | Fouls | 15 |
| 18 | Points in paint | 28 |
| 7 | Fast-break points | 4 |
Players
| WAKE | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juke Harris G | 39 | 38 | 6 | 1 | 12-19 | 6-12 |
| Tre'Von Spillers F | 34 | 4 | 11 | 3 | 2-9 | 0-2 |
| Omaha Biliew F | 28 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 2-8 | 2-5 |
| Isaac Carr G | 26 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 3-7 | 1-3 |
| Myles Colvin G | 18 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0-9 | 0-4 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Mekhi Mason G | 26 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1-4 | 0-2 |
| Cooper Schwieger F | 10 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Sebastian Akins G | 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-3 | 0-1 |
| Nate Calmese G | 6 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2-2 | 1-1 |
| Marqus Marion F | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Anson Beard Jr., Dimitrije Kovacevic, Jaylen Cross, Will Underwood, Vincent Ricchiuti, Owen Kmety
| BC | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fred Payne G | 36 | 23 | 3 | 1 | 8-20 | 3-11 |
| Boden Kapke F | 34 | 13 | 10 | 1 | 4-6 | 1-1 |
| Chase Forte G | 32 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2-6 | 0-2 |
| Luka Toews G | 31 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 2-7 | 0-2 |
| Jayden Hastings F | 16 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Aidan Shaw F | 30 | 11 | 7 | 0 | 4-4 | 1-1 |
| Caleb Steger G | 12 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1-5 | 1-5 |
| Donald Hand Jr. G | 9 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2-8 | 1-6 |
Did not play: Marko Radunovic, Jason Asemota, Will Eggemeier, Nick Petronio, Akbar Waheed III, Jack DiDonna, Jack Bailey, Kany Musungay
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenWAKE -3.5
no move
CloseWAKE -3.5
No change since the open
Total
Open140.5
▲ 5
Close145.5
Up 5 since the open
Moneyline
WAKE -185 · BC +154
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened WAKE -3.5 · unchangedmodel WAKE -5
model WAKE -5
Opened 140.5 · closed 145.5 · moved 5 upmodel 146.5
model 146.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | WAKE -3.5 | WAKE -5.2 | WAKE +1.7 | L BC covered |
| Total | 145.5 | 146.7 | Over 1.2 | L Under |
| Projected score | — | WAKE 76 · BC 70.8 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | WAKE -3.2 | WAKE -7.0 |
| 1H total | 68.7 | 51 |
| 1H projected score | WAKE 35.9 · BC 32.7 | WAKE 29 · BC 22 |
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| WAKE | 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% |
| BC | 2-8 20% | 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 6 since 2021-22
WAKE 4–2 BCWAKE leads · 6 games since 2021-22 · WAKE has won the last 2 meetings · WAKE 3-3 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2024-25 | BC 66 @ WAKE 72 | WAKE -10.5 | BC W |
| Jan 2, 2023-24 | WAKE 84 @ BC 78 | BC +1.5 | WAKE W |
| Feb 28, 2022-23 | BC 71 @ WAKE 69 | WAKE -7.5 | BC W |
| Jan 14, 2022-23 | WAKE 85 @ BC 63 | BC +2.5 | WAKE W |
| Mar 9, 2021-22 | BC 82 vs WAKE 77 | WAKE -9.5 | BC W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Wake Forest
27 games played
Straight up
14-13
52% wins
Against the spread
11-16
41% covers · avg −0.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-11
59% overs · avg −0.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs AMER | W 88-74 | -19.5 | L −5.5 | 139.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 7 | vs MORE | W 81-65 | -22.5 | L −6.5 | 152.5 | U 146 |
| Nov 11 | vs MICH | L 84-85 | +15.5 | W +14.5 | 168.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 16 | vs UML | W 109-75 | -30.5 | W +3.5 | 165.5 | O 184 |
| Nov 20 | vs TTU | L 83-84 | +9.5 | W +8.5 | 160.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 21 | vs MEM | W 69-68 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 160.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 25 | vs CAM | W 99-51 | -17.5 | W +30.5 | 159.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 28 | vs NE | W 86-73 | -17.5 | L −4.5 | 154.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 2 | vs OU | L 68-86 | -4.5 | L −22.5 | 159.5 | U 154 |
| Dec 6 | vs WVU | W 75-66 | +2.5 | W +11.5 | 143.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 14 | vs QUC | W 111-73 | -18.5 | W +19.5 | 165.5 | O 184 |
| Dec 17 | vs LONG | W 71-68 | -24.5 | L −21.5 | 163.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 21 | vs VAN | L 67-98 | +5.5 | L −25.5 | 164.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 31 | @ NCSU | L 57-70 | +10.5 | L −2.5 | 159.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 3 | vs VT | W 81-78 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 153.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 7 | vs MIA | L 77-81 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 157.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 10 | @ UNC | L 84-87 | +10.5 | W +7.5 | 154.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 17 | @ FSU | W 69-68 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 168.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 20 | vs SMU | L 79-91 | -1.5 | L −13.5 | 157.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 24 | @ DUKE | L 69-90 | +19.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 27 | @ PITT | L 76-80 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 150.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 31 | vsNCSU | L 78-96 | +5.5 | L −12.5 | 156.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 7 | vs LOU | L 80-88 | +9.5 | W +1.5 | 162.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 11 | @ GT | W 83-67 | -3.5 | W +12.5 | 158.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 14 | vs STAN | W 68-63 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 150.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 18 | vs CLEM | W 85-77 | +4.5 | W +12.5 | 140.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 21 | @VT | L 63-82 | +3.5 | L −15.5 | 150.5 | U 145 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vsAMER
AMERW 88-74
−5.5
7
vsMORE
MOREW 81-65
−6.5
11
vsMICH
MICHL 84-85
+14.5
16
vsUML
UMLW 109-75
+3.5
20
vsTTU
TTUL 83-84
+8.5
21
vsMEM
MEMW 69-68
−1.5
25
vsCAM
CAMW 99-51
+30.5
28
vsNE
NEW 86-73
−4.5
2
vsOU
OUL 68-86
−22.5
6
vsWVU
WVUW 75-66
+11.5
14
vsQUC
QUCW 111-73
+19.5
17
vsLONG
LONGW 71-68
−21.5
21
vsVAN
VANL 67-98
−25.5
31
@NCSU
NCSUL 57-70
−2.5
3
vsVT
VTW 81-78
−2.5
7
vsMIA
MIAL 77-81
−5.5
10
@UNC
UNCL 84-87
+7.5
17
@FSU
FSUW 69-68
−0.5
20
vsSMU
SMUL 79-91
−13.5
24
@DUKE
DUKEL 69-90
−1.5
27
@PITT
PITTL 76-80
−2.5
31
vsNCSU
NCSUL 78-96
−12.5
7
vsLOU
LOUL 80-88
+1.5
11
@GT
GTW 83-67
+12.5
14
vsSTAN
STANW 68-63
+0.5
18
vsCLEM
CLEMW 85-77
+12.5
21
@VT
VTL 63-82
−15.5
covered 11didn’t cover 16avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vsAMER
AMERW 88-74
+22.5
7
vsMORE
MOREW 81-65
−6.5
11
vsMICH
MICHL 84-85
+0.5
16
vsUML
UMLW 109-75
+18.5
20
vsTTU
TTUL 83-84
+6.5
21
vsMEM
MEMW 69-68
−23.5
25
vsCAM
CAMW 99-51
−9.5
28
vsNE
NEW 86-73
+4.5
2
vsOU
OUL 68-86
−5.5
6
vsWVU
WVUW 75-66
−2.5
14
vsQUC
QUCW 111-73
+18.5
17
vsLONG
LONGW 71-68
−24.5
21
vsVAN
VANL 67-98
+0.5
31
@NCSU
NCSUL 57-70
−32.5
3
vsVT
VTW 81-78
+5.5
7
vsMIA
MIAL 77-81
+0.5
10
@UNC
UNCL 84-87
+16.5
17
@FSU
FSUW 69-68
−31.5
20
vsSMU
SMUL 79-91
+12.5
24
@DUKE
DUKEL 69-90
+5.5
27
@PITT
PITTL 76-80
+5.5
31
vsNCSU
NCSUL 78-96
+17.5
7
vsLOU
LOUL 80-88
+5.5
11
@GT
GTW 83-67
−8.5
14
vsSTAN
STANW 68-63
−19.5
18
vsCLEM
CLEMW 85-77
+21.5
21
@VT
VTL 63-82
−5.5
over 16under 11avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Boston College
27 games played
Straight up
9-18
33% wins
Against the spread
12-15
44% covers · avg −0.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
11-16
41% overs · avg −3.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ FAU | L 78-83 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 148.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 6 | vs CIT | W 76-47 | -15.5 | W +13.5 | 144.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 11 | vs CCSU | L 59-60 | -17.5 | L −18.5 | 136.5 | U 119 |
| Nov 15 | @ TEM | W 76-71 | +3.5 | W +8.5 | 142.5 | O 147 |
| Nov 18 | vs HAMP | W 63-52 | -12.5 | L −1.5 | 135.5 | U 115 |
| Nov 21 | vs DAV | L 49-59 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 140.5 | U 108 |
| Nov 23 | vs TULN | L 90-93 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 140.5 | O 183 |
| Nov 26 | vs HARV | W 73-60 | -7.5 | W +5.5 | 138.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 3 | vs LSU | L 69-78 | +7.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 6 | vs NHVN | W 67-63 | -17.5 | L −13.5 | 126.5 | O 130 |
| Dec 10 | vs MASS | L 74-76 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 143.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 22 | vs FDU | W 72-61 | -16.5 | L −5.5 | 141.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 28 | vs LEM | W 72-64 | -12.5 | L −4.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 3 | @GT | L 53-65 | +6.5 | L −5.5 | 145.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 6 | vsNCSU | L 71-79 | +11.5 | W +3.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 10 | @LOU | L 62-75 | +21.5 | W +8.5 | 150.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 13 | @CLEM | L 50-74 | +15.5 | L −8.5 | 136.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 17 | vs SYR | W 81-73 | +5.5 | W +13.5 | 141.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 21 | vsPITT | W 65-62 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 137.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 24 | @ ND | L 64-68 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 137.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 31 | vs UVA | L 66-73 | +13.5 | W +6.5 | 141.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 3 | @DUKE | L 49-67 | +26.5 | W +8.5 | 141.5 | U 116 |
| Feb 7 | vsMIA | L 68-74 | +8.5 | W +2.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 11 | vsSTAN | L 64-70 | +3.5 | L −2.5 | 139.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 14 | vs CAL | L 75-86 | +3.5 | L −7.5 | 144.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 17 | @FSU | L 72-80 | +11.5 | W +3.5 | 148.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 21 | @SMU | L 70-94 | +15.5 | L −8.5 | 150.5 | O 164 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@FAU
FAUL 78-83
−3.5
6
vsCIT
CITW 76-47
+13.5
11
vsCCSU
CCSUL 59-60
−18.5
15
@TEM
TEMW 76-71
+8.5
18
vsHAMP
HAMPW 63-52
−1.5
21
vsDAV
DAVL 49-59
−11.5
23
vsTULN
TULNL 90-93
−5.5
26
vsHARV
HARVW 73-60
+5.5
3
vsLSU
LSUL 69-78
−1.5
6
vsNHVN
NHVNW 67-63
−13.5
10
vsMASS
MASSL 74-76
−3.5
22
vsFDU
FDUW 72-61
−5.5
28
vsLEM
LEMW 72-64
−4.5
3
@GT
GTL 53-65
−5.5
6
vsNCSU
NCSUL 71-79
+3.5
10
@LOU
LOUL 62-75
+8.5
13
@CLEM
CLEML 50-74
−8.5
17
vsSYR
SYRW 81-73
+13.5
21
vsPITT
PITTW 65-62
+5.5
24
@ND
NDL 64-68
+3.5
31
vsUVA
UVAL 66-73
+6.5
3
@DUKE
DUKEL 49-67
+8.5
7
vsMIA
MIAL 68-74
+2.5
11
vsSTAN
STANL 64-70
−2.5
14
vsCAL
CALL 75-86
−7.5
17
@FSU
FSUL 72-80
+3.5
21
@SMU
SMUL 70-94
−8.5
covered 12didn’t cover 15avg −0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@FAU
FAUL 78-83
+12.5
6
vsCIT
CITW 76-47
−21.5
11
vsCCSU
CCSUL 59-60
−17.5
15
@TEM
TEMW 76-71
+4.5
18
vsHAMP
HAMPW 63-52
−20.5
21
vsDAV
DAVL 49-59
−32.5
23
vsTULN
TULNL 90-93
+42.5
26
vsHARV
HARVW 73-60
−5.5
3
vsLSU
LSUL 69-78
−2.5
6
vsNHVN
NHVNW 67-63
+3.5
10
vsMASS
MASSL 74-76
+6.5
22
vsFDU
FDUW 72-61
−8.5
28
vsLEM
LEMW 72-64
−10.5
3
@GT
GTL 53-65
−27.5
6
vsNCSU
NCSUL 71-79
+8.5
10
@LOU
LOUL 62-75
−13.5
13
@CLEM
CLEML 50-74
−12.5
17
vsSYR
SYRW 81-73
+12.5
21
vsPITT
PITTW 65-62
−10.5
24
@ND
NDL 64-68
−5.5
31
vsUVA
UVAL 66-73
−2.5
3
@DUKE
DUKEL 49-67
−25.5
7
vsMIA
MIAL 68-74
+0.5
11
vsSTAN
STANL 64-70
−5.5
14
vsCAL
CALL 75-86
+16.5
17
@FSU
FSUL 72-80
+3.5
21
@SMU
SMUL 70-94
+13.5
over 11under 16avg −3.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Wake Forest
14-13 overall · 5-9 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Virginia Tech63–82
- Wvs Clemson85–77
- Wvs Stanford68–63
- W@ Georgia Tech83–67
- Lvs Louisville80–88
4 days since their last game.
Boston College
9-18 overall · 2-12 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ SMU70–94
- L@ Florida St72–80
- Lvs California75–86
- Lvs Stanford64–70
- Lvs Miami68–74
4 days since their last game.