Fiserv Forum · at Marquette · Conference game
Closing line
MARQ -4.5✓ DEP covered by 15.5
Closing total139.5Under by 26.5
| This season | MARQ | |
|---|---|---|
| 15-13 | Record | 10-18 |
| 19-9 | ATS | 11-17 |
| 10-18 | O/U | 14-14 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: DEP 70–74 MARQ · ✗ MARQ (62%) lost
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| DEP | 32 | 30 | 62 |
| MARQ | 14 | 37 | 51 |
1st half: DEP 32, MARQ 14 (DEP by 18). The model had MARQ by 2.0 and a total of 67.2 (actual 46).
Team stats
| DEP | MARQ | |
|---|---|---|
| 20-52 38% | Field goals | 18-47 38% |
| 7-23 30% | 3-pointers | 4-22 18% |
| 15-19 79% | Free throws | 11-22 50% |
| 41 12 off | Rebounds | 28 7 off |
| 11 | Assists | 9 |
| 7 | Steals | 11 |
| 1 | Blocks | 6 |
| 14 | Turnovers | 13 |
| 20 | Fouls | 19 |
| 26 | Points in paint | 28 |
| 14 | Fast-break points | 18 |
Players
| DEP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brandon Maclin G | 36 | 18 | 5 | 3 | 6-15 | 2-6 |
| NJ Benson F | 29 | 10 | 16 | 1 | 4-8 | 0-0 |
| RJ Smith G | 28 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 1-4 | 0-2 |
| Theo Pierre-Justin F | 23 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 3-4 | 2-3 |
| Layden Blocker G | 21 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1-7 | 0-3 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Kruz McClure G | 30 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 2-5 | 2-5 |
| CJ Gunn G | 18 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 2-7 | 1-4 |
| Fabian Flores C | 8 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Kaleb Banks F | 7 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Isaiah Medina, Jeremy Lorenz, Jonas Johnson, Nate Kasher, Amsal Delalic, Ilija Milijasevic, Khaman Maker
| MARQ | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nigel James Jr. G | 34 | 14 | 7 | 3 | 4-11 | 0-5 |
| Chase Ross G | 34 | 12 | 4 | 2 | 5-12 | 2-4 |
| Royce Parham F | 32 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2-4 | 1-2 |
| Adrien Stevens G | 31 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1-4 | 0-3 |
| Ben Gold F | 27 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 3-7 | 1-4 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Damarius Owens SF | 22 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3-7 | 0-3 |
| Michael Phillips II SF | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Tre Norman G | 8 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Caedin Hamilton F | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Nash Walker, Sheek Pearson, Braeden Brenn, Ian Miletic, Joshua Clark, Casey O'Malley, Jonah Lucas, Sean Jones
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketMARQ -4.5
ModelMARQ -3.5
Model edgeDEP +1.0
W DEP covered
Total
Market139.5
Model143.6
Model edgeOver 4.1
L Under
Projected score
DEP 70 · MARQ 73.6
DEP 62 · MARQ 51
Win probability
MARQ 62%
1st half
Spread
MARQ -2.0
DEP -18.0
Total
67.2
46 points
Projected score
DEP 32.6 · MARQ 34.6
DEP 32 · MARQ 14
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenMARQ -3.5
1 → MARQ
CloseMARQ -4.5
1 pt toward MARQ
Total
Open142.5
▼ 3
Close139.5
Down 3 since the open
Moneyline
DEP +180 · MARQ -218
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened MARQ -3.5 · closed MARQ -4.5 · moved 1 toward MARQmodel MARQ -3.5
model MARQ -3.5
Opened 142.5 · closed 139.5 · moved 3 downmodel 143.5
model 143.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | |
| 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 9 since 2021-22
DEP 2–7 MARQMARQ leads · 9 games since 2021-22 · DEP 6-3 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2025-26 | MARQ 75 @ DEP 80 | DEP -2.5 | DEP W |
| Feb 11, 2024-25 | DEP 58 @ MARQ 68 | MARQ -16.5 | DEP W |
| Jan 14, 2024-25 | MARQ 85 @ DEP 83 | DEP +12.5 | DEP W |
| Feb 21, 2023-24 | DEP 71 @ MARQ 105 | MARQ -27.5 | MARQ W |
| Jan 24, 2023-24 | MARQ 86 @ DEP 73 | DEP +18.5 | DEP W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
DePaul
28 games played
Straight up
15-13
54% wins
Against the spread
19-9
68% covers · avg +0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
10-18
36% overs · avg −4.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 92-62 | -24.5 | W +5.5 | 143.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 72-64 | -22.5 | L −14.5 | 147.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 11 | vs | L 53-66 | -18.5 | L −31.5 | 153.5 | U 119 |
| Nov 14 | vs | L 79-81 | +5.5 | W +3.5 | 145.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 93-62 | -21.5 | W +9.5 | 155.5 | U 155 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 95-75 | -19.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | O 170 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 75-61 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 147.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 63-96 | +5.5 | L −27.5 | 152.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 76-72 | -23.5 | L −19.5 | 156.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 92-49 | -21.5 | W +21.5 | 150.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 61-58 | +7.5 | W +10.5 | 145.5 | U 119 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 66-79 | +19.5 | W +6.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 21 | vs | L 54-72 | +12.5 | L −5.5 | 133.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 66-71 | +12.5 | W +7.5 | 139.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 86-77 | -2.5 | W +6.5 | 149.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 56-50 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 144.5 | U 106 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 60-72 | +19.5 | W +7.5 | 137.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 16 | vs | W 80-75 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 20 | @ | L 80-87 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 67-60 | +2.5 | W +9.5 | 135.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 61-70 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 139.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 66-68 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 150.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 3 | vs | L 56-68 | +9.5 | L −2.5 | 145.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 72-90 | +4.5 | L −13.5 | 153.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 72-71 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 141.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 69-57 | +7.5 | W +19.5 | 129.5 | U 126 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 68-71 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 152.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 72-71 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 142.5 | O 143 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
CHST
W 92-62
+5.5
7
vs
STO
W 72-64
−14.5
11
vs
BUF
L 53-66
−31.5
14
vs
NU
L 79-81
+3.5
18
vs
GWEB
W 93-62
+9.5
23
vs
DETM
W 95-75
+0.5
28
vs
GT
W 75-61
+12.5
29
vs
LSU
L 63-96
−27.5
6
vs
UAPB
W 76-72
−19.5
9
vs
MORG
W 92-49
+21.5
13
@
WICH
W 61-58
+10.5
16
@
SJU
L 66-79
+6.5
21
vs
CONN
L 54-72
−5.5
31
@
VILL
L 66-71
+7.5
3
vs
XAV
W 86-77
+6.5
6
vs
GTWN
W 56-50
+3.5
10
@
CONN
L 60-72
+7.5
16
vs
MARQ
W 80-75
+2.5
20
@
BTLR
L 80-87
+0.5
24
vs
HALL
W 67-60
+9.5
28
@
GTWN
L 61-70
−5.5
31
@
XAV
L 66-68
+2.5
3
vs
SJU
L 56-68
−2.5
7
@
PROV
L 72-90
−13.5
11
vs
CREI
W 72-71
+2.5
18
@
HALL
W 69-57
+19.5
21
vs
PROV
L 68-71
−5.5
25
@
CREI
W 72-71
+4.5
covered 19didn’t cover 9avg +0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
CHST
W 92-62
+10.5
7
vs
STO
W 72-64
−11.5
11
vs
BUF
L 53-66
−34.5
14
vs
NU
L 79-81
+14.5
18
vs
GWEB
W 93-62
−0.5
23
vs
DETM
W 95-75
+18.5
28
vs
GT
W 75-61
−11.5
29
vs
LSU
L 63-96
+6.5
6
vs
UAPB
W 76-72
−8.5
9
vs
MORG
W 92-49
−9.5
13
@
WICH
W 61-58
−26.5
16
@
SJU
L 66-79
−2.5
21
vs
CONN
L 54-72
−7.5
31
@
VILL
L 66-71
−2.5
3
vs
XAV
W 86-77
+13.5
6
vs
GTWN
W 56-50
−38.5
10
@
CONN
L 60-72
−5.5
16
vs
MARQ
W 80-75
+9.5
20
@
BTLR
L 80-87
+19.5
24
vs
HALL
W 67-60
−8.5
28
@
GTWN
L 61-70
−8.5
31
@
XAV
L 66-68
−16.5
3
vs
SJU
L 56-68
−21.5
7
@
PROV
L 72-90
+8.5
11
vs
CREI
W 72-71
+1.5
18
@
HALL
W 69-57
−3.5
21
vs
PROV
L 68-71
−13.5
25
@
CREI
W 72-71
+0.5
over 10under 18avg −4.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Marquette
28 games played
Straight up
10-18
36% wins
Against the spread
11-17
39% covers · avg −2.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-14
50% overs · avg −0.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 80-53 | -24.5 | W +2.5 | 149.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 5 | vs | W 100-82 | -24.5 | L −6.5 | 155.5 | O 182 |
| Nov 9 | vs | L 77-100 | +3.5 | L −19.5 | 156.5 | O 177 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 89-49 | -21.5 | W +18.5 | 155.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 82-89 | -8.5 | L −15.5 | 146.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 19 | vs | L 71-77 | -6.5 | L −12.5 | 151.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 85-71 | -25.5 | L −11.5 | 152.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 74-75 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 162.5 | U 149 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 75-72 | -17.5 | L −14.5 | 146.5 | O 147 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 76-96 | +11.5 | L −8.5 | 160.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 59-79 | +16.5 | L −3.5 | 154.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 17 | vs | L 69-78 | -6.5 | L −15.5 | 149.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 63-84 | +6.5 | L −14.5 | 151.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 30 | vs | L 73-79 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 57-73 | +17.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 66-65 | -5.5 | L −4.5 | 157.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 73-76 | +3.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 68-92 | +15.5 | L −8.5 | 155.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 16 | @ | L 75-80 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 145.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 105-104 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 167.5 | O 209 |
| Jan 23 | @ | L 76-87 | +5.5 | L −5.5 | 161.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 86-62 | +1.5 | W +25.5 | 154.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 64-69 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 143.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 70-55 | -3.5 | W +11.5 | 155.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 10 | @ | L 74-77 | +9.5 | W +6.5 | 144.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 88-96 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 157.5 | O 184 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 70-76 | +8.5 | W +2.5 | 157.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 24 | @ | W 76-60 | +2.5 | W +18.5 | 150.5 | U 136 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
UALB
W 80-53
+2.5
5
vs
SOU
W 100-82
−6.5
9
vs
IU
L 77-100
−19.5
12
vs
LR
W 89-49
+18.5
15
vs
MD
L 82-89
−15.5
19
vs
DAY
L 71-77
−12.5
22
vs
CMU
W 85-71
−11.5
28
vs
OU
L 74-75
+0.5
2
vs
VAL
W 75-72
−14.5
6
@
WIS
L 76-96
−8.5
13
@
PUR
L 59-79
−3.5
17
vs
GTWN
L 69-78
−15.5
20
@
CREI
L 63-84
−14.5
30
vs
HALL
L 73-79
−7.5
4
@
CONN
L 57-73
+1.5
7
vs
XAV
W 66-65
−4.5
10
vs
VILL
L 73-76
+0.5
13
@
SJU
L 68-92
−8.5
16
@
DEP
L 75-80
−2.5
19
vs
PROV
W 105-104
−1.5
23
@
BTLR
L 76-87
−5.5
27
vs
CREI
W 86-62
+25.5
31
@
HALL
L 64-69
+1.5
7
vs
BTLR
W 70-55
+11.5
10
@
VILL
L 74-77
+6.5
14
@
XAV
L 88-96
−6.5
18
vs
SJU
L 70-76
+2.5
24
@
GTWN
W 76-60
+18.5
covered 11didn’t cover 17avg −2.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
UALB
W 80-53
−16.5
5
vs
SOU
W 100-82
+26.5
9
vs
IU
L 77-100
+20.5
12
vs
LR
W 89-49
−17.5
15
vs
MD
L 82-89
+24.5
19
vs
DAY
L 71-77
−3.5
22
vs
CMU
W 85-71
+3.5
28
vs
OU
L 74-75
−13.5
2
vs
VAL
W 75-72
+0.5
6
@
WIS
L 76-96
+11.5
13
@
PUR
L 59-79
−16.5
17
vs
GTWN
L 69-78
−2.5
20
@
CREI
L 63-84
−4.5
30
vs
HALL
L 73-79
+6.5
4
@
CONN
L 57-73
−14.5
7
vs
XAV
W 66-65
−26.5
10
vs
VILL
L 73-76
+2.5
13
@
SJU
L 68-92
+4.5
16
@
DEP
L 75-80
+9.5
19
vs
PROV
W 105-104
+41.5
23
@
BTLR
L 76-87
+1.5
27
vs
CREI
W 86-62
−6.5
31
@
HALL
L 64-69
−10.5
7
vs
BTLR
W 70-55
−30.5
10
@
VILL
L 74-77
+6.5
14
@
XAV
L 88-96
+26.5
18
vs
SJU
L 70-76
−11.5
24
@
GTWN
W 76-60
−14.5
over 14under 14avg −0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
DePaul
15-13 overall · 7-10 in conference · Big East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- W@ Creighton72–71
- Lvs Providence68–71
- W@ Seton Hall69–57
- Wvs Creighton72–71
- L@ Providence72–90
4 days since their last game.
Marquette
10-18 overall · 5-12 in conference · Big East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- W@ Georgetown76–60
- Lvs St John's70–76
- L@ Xavier88–96
- L@ Villanova74–77
- Wvs Butler70–55
5 days since their last game.