No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.2
Projected
29–33
✓ DAV won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.3
Projected
33–41
✓ USF won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.0
Projected
32–35
✓ UAB won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.3
Projected
33–36
✗ MD lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.2
Projected
36–34
✗ UIC lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.2
Projected
35–30
✗ QUIN lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.4
Projected
38–34
✗ PUR lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.8
Projected
37–38
✓ BRAD won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.6
Projected
32–36
✓ TEM won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.0
Projected
37–33
✗ MEM lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.8
Projected
33–38
✗ FAU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.5
Projected
28–37
✗ SIE lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.2
Projected
33–36
✗ FAIR lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 60.5
Projected
33–28
✓ MRMK won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 61.3
Projected
29–32
✓ MRST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.5
Projected
38–36
✓ IONA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.8
Projected
33–30
✓ UNI won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.5
Projected
35–33
✓ MSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.0
Projected
35–31
✓ SIU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.2
Projected
33–35
✗ MARQ lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.7
Projected
35–36
✗ ILST lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.4
Projected
33–36
✓ UNCW won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.6
Projected
40–31
✓ WICH won
| Status | Matchup | Spread | Total | Model line | Spread edge | Model total | Total edge | Win prob | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Half final |  7-20 · #124  15-11 · #115 |
— | — | DAV -4.5 | — | 62.2 | — | 69% DAV | › | |
| Half final |  16-11 · #130  19-8 · #84 |
— | — | USF -8.6 | — | 74.3 | — | 82% USF | › | |
| Half final |  14-13 · #112  17-10 · #102 |
— | — | UAB -2.8 | — | 67.0 | — | 62% UAB | › | |
| Half final |  11-17 · #62  11-17 · #50 |
— | — | MD -2.6 | — | 68.3 | — | 61% MD | › | |
| Half final |  15-13 · #110  8-20 · #207 |
— | — | UIC -2.2 | — | 70.2 | — | 59% UIC | › | |
| Half final |  17-12 · #241  9-20 · #359 |
— | — | QUIN -5.4 | — | 65.2 | — | 72% QUIN | › | |
| Half final |  22-6 · #23  17-11 · #33 |
— | — | PUR -3.9 | — | 72.4 | — | 67% PUR | › | |
| Half final |  20-10 · #132  18-11 · #167 |
— | — | BRAD -1.1 | — | 75.8 | — | 55% BRAD | › | |
| Half final |  9-17 · #177  14-13 · #111 |
— | — | TEM -4.0 | — | 68.6 | — | 67% TEM | › | |
| Half final |  12-16 · #76  9-18 · #145 |
— | — | MEM -3.4 | — | 70.0 | — | 65% MEM | › | |
| Half final |  14-13 · #141  14-13 · #109 |
— | — | FAU -4.4 | — | 70.8 | — | 68% FAU | › | |
| Half final |  3-24 · #347  19-11 · #260 |
— | — | SIE -8.4 | — | 64.5 | — | 82% SIE | › | |
| Half final |  13-16 · #278  18-11 · #239 |
— | — | FAIR -2.8 | — | 68.2 | — | 62% FAIR | › | |
| Half final |  20-10 · #225  7-21 · #346 |
— | — | MRMK -4.8 | — | 60.5 | — | 70% MRMK | › | |
| Half final |  15-11 · #269  17-10 · #236 |
— | — | MRST -3.0 | — | 61.3 | — | 63% MRST | › | |
| Half final |  17-13 · #233  11-18 · #330 |
— | — | IONA -1.4 | — | 73.5 | — | 56% IONA | › | |
| Half final |  17-12 · #131  10-18 · #144 |
— | — | UNI -2.1 | — | 62.8 | — | 59% UNI | › | |
| Half final |  23-5 · #10  17-11 · #38 |
— | — | MSU -2.1 | — | 68.5 | — | 59% MSU | › | |
| Half final |  14-15 · #195  5-23 · #255 |
— | — | SIU -4.7 | — | 66.0 | — | 70% SIU | › | |
| Half final |  15-13 · #66  10-18 · #42 |
— | — | MARQ -2.0 | — | 67.2 | — | 59% MARQ | › | |
| Half final |  25-4 · #138  18-11 · #116 |
— | — | ILST -0.2 | — | 70.7 | — | 51% ILST | › | |
| Half final |  19-10 · #117  23-4 · #120 |
— | — | UNCW -2.7 | — | 68.4 | — | 62% UNCW | › | |
| Half final |  18-10 · #77  3-23 · #192 |
— | — | WICH -8.6 | — | 70.6 | — | 82% WICH | › |
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record